Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Friday, January 31, 2014

Nationals’ Matt Williams: Instant Replay Will Be Interesting

This is not going to start well.

When Matt Williams was recently asked about MLB’s use of instant replay for the 2014 season, a smile immediately flashed across his face.

As a first-time manager for the Washington Nationals, Williams will at least be on even ground when it comes to that new component of the game.

“I’m not the rookie, anymore,” Williams said, referring to how all managers will be dealing with the new rule for the first time. “Everybody is now in my boat. So, it’s going to be interesting to understand at what point do we want to do it, how it impacts our team and our game at that point. It’s going to be interesting.”

...Williams said teams had to be careful with how they request a replay because of the restrictions. He offered at least one scenario in which he would take advantage of the new rule.

“It could be a [Stephen] Strasburg-[Clay] Kershaw matchup where there may be very few [runs] scored,” Williams said. “And, we have a scoring opportunity with a man on third base and a have a ground ball to the infield, which we think [the runner] potentially beat to score us a run. That’s a scenario. But there’s a million of those.”

Williams said another issue would be if managers tried to stall while other team officials monitored the play to determine whether the play was worthy of instant replay. The rules say a manager must react in a timely manner, meaning before the pitcher and catcher are set to face the next batter, if he wants to officially review a call.

“There’s some cagey managers in this game,” Williams said with a sheepish grin.

Repoz Posted: January 31, 2014 at 11:19 AM | 11 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: nats

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Robert in Manhattan Beach Posted: January 31, 2014 at 12:35 PM (#4649260)
Williams said another issue would be if managers tried to stall while other team officials monitored the play to determine whether the play was worthy of instant replay.

How would we be able to tell? Baseball is one big stall these days.
   2. boteman is not here 'til October Posted: January 31, 2014 at 02:11 PM (#4649331)
The headline omitted the scare quotes around "interesting".
   3. Misirlou's been working for the drug squad Posted: January 31, 2014 at 02:17 PM (#4649339)
He offered at least one scenario in which he would take advantage of the new rule.

“It could be a [Stephen] Strasburg-[Clay] Kershaw matchup where there may be very few [runs] scored,” Williams said. “And, we have a scoring opportunity with a man on third base and a have a ground ball to the infield, which we think [the runner] potentially beat to score us a run. That’s a scenario.


The man's a genius. I never would have thought that would be a time to use IR.
   4. Bourbon Samurai in Asia Posted: January 31, 2014 at 02:49 PM (#4649370)
I feel sad we never got to see Tony Larussa piss people off with this
   5. Random Transaction Generator Posted: January 31, 2014 at 04:11 PM (#4649453)
I feel sad we never got to see Tony Larussa piss people off with this

Tony: Is our reliever ready yet?
Bullpen coach: Nope. He needs a few more tosses.
Tony: Thanks.

[LaRussa throws the challenge flag on a routine ground ball where the runner is out by 5 feet.]
   6. cardsfanboy Posted: January 31, 2014 at 04:19 PM (#4649457)
I feel sad we never got to see Tony Larussa piss people off with this


He helped design the damn system...he's doing his part to piss people off. I wasn't in the room, but I'm pretty confident that TLR was the voice asking for managers challenge when every sane person was saying "what type of idiot would want that?"
   7. BDC Posted: January 31, 2014 at 05:19 PM (#4649521)
I think if the challenge is unsuccessful, the manager should have to remove his pants.
   8. Misirlou's been working for the drug squad Posted: January 31, 2014 at 05:25 PM (#4649528)
[LaRussa throws the challenge flag on a routine ground ball where the runner is out by 5 feet.]


I think the first time a manager pulls a stunt like that, he should be tossed. Second time, suspended.
   9. God Posted: February 01, 2014 at 12:45 AM (#4649709)
I feel sad we never got to see Tony Larussa piss people off with this


He wouldn't have been able to check with anyone about whether to challenge, because he never would've gotten the phone to work.
   10. SoSH U at work Posted: February 01, 2014 at 01:14 AM (#4649714)
The stall scenario is an interesting, and potentially objectionable, aspect to the whole thing. Now, it shouldn't be much of an issue if the play being considered for a challenge happens between batters. But if a guy is thrown out trying to steal/is ruled safe stealing, or there's a pickoff play, it will be interesting to see how the umpires move things along if one side or the other is trying to delay to consider whether a challenge is necessary.

I wonder if they'll need to create a rule that any intentional timeout (manager goes to the mound, batter goes down to review the signs with the third base coach) will preclude a team from challenging the previous play. And umps may have to just start calling automatic balls/strikes when one side is clearly not interested in proceeding.

   11. JE (Jason) Posted: February 01, 2014 at 09:43 AM (#4649744)
[LaRussa throws the challenge flag on a routine ground ball where the runner is out by 5 feet.]

I think the first time a manager pulls a stunt like that, he should be tossed. Second time, suspended.

Or perhaps given the Verlander "unwritten rules" treatment: a fastball high and inside?

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
BarrysLazyBoy
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogFraley: Millions in lost revenue from ticket sales will impact Rangers payroll | Dallas Morning News
(58 - 7:27am, Sep 16)
Last: jacksone (AKA It's OK...)

NewsblogOT: Politics, September, 2014: ESPN honors Daily Worker sports editor Lester Rodney
(2510 - 7:16am, Sep 16)
Last: Misirlou's been working for the drug squad

NewsblogNed Yost Is The Worst Manager, Except For All The Other Managers
(1 - 7:15am, Sep 16)
Last: Bug Selig

NewsblogA’s lose Triple-A Sacramento affiliate
(20 - 7:13am, Sep 16)
Last: Boileryard

NewsblogBowman: A year’s worth of struggles leads reason to wonder what changes are in store for the Braves
(17 - 6:26am, Sep 16)
Last: Dr. Vaux

NewsblogDave Kreiger: New Baseball Hall of Fame voting rules
(36 - 3:16am, Sep 16)
Last: MelOtt4

NewsblogSteven Matz, other top minor league Mets to be honored at Citi Field on Monday
(5 - 2:28am, Sep 16)
Last: Win Big Stein's Money

NewsblogPapelbon blows lead, gets ejected for crotch-grabbing at fans
(61 - 1:32am, Sep 16)
Last: Dog on the sidewalk

NewsblogOT: NBC.news: Valve isn’t making one gaming console, but multiple ‘Steam machines’
(813 - 12:15am, Sep 16)
Last: Win Big Stein's Money

NewsblogOMNICHATTER 9-15-2014
(78 - 11:46pm, Sep 15)
Last: RollingWave

NewsblogHeyman: Mariners have decided not to retain the ice-cream buying scout
(4 - 11:45pm, Sep 15)
Last: SoSHially Unacceptable

NewsblogSports Bog: Fans Switch From Skins to Nats
(62 - 11:41pm, Sep 15)
Last: boteman is not here 'til October

NewsblogCalcaterra: Derek Jeter got a bucket of crabs and a captain’s hat from the Orioles
(12 - 11:41pm, Sep 15)
Last: Jolly Old St. Nick Is A Jolly Old St. Crip

NewsblogOT: The Soccer Thread, September 2014
(219 - 10:43pm, Sep 15)
Last: frannyzoo

NewsblogOT August 2014:  Wrassle Mania I
(161 - 10:11pm, Sep 15)
Last: NJ in DC (Now with temporary employment!)

Page rendered in 0.2603 seconds
52 querie(s) executed