User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.1887 seconds
54 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Tim Stauffer, Trot Nixon's Coming (Dan Lee) Posted: February 01, 2010 at 11:47 PM (#3452117)Go!
Does anyone know if other teams are as generous to rain-out attendees who aren't locals?
Also, I think the piece is written a bit badly. Craig says:
and then:
Technically, these aren't contradictory, but they do leave the wrong impression. I believe that there are creditors involved who, indeed, Hicks had to borrow from in order to make ends meet. Monarch, though, isn't one of them. If I understand correctly, they bought that debt on the secondary market for less than face value. So, Hicks not only didn't borrow from them, but they could, depending upon how much they paid for the debt, make a tidy profit even if they have to take less than Hicks borrowed.
There's no reason that should affect the priority of the creditors though. Hicks should get the leftovers, not the creditors.
Its a trap!
Is it just me or are there a lot of clubs for sale? Is it the economy? The impending CBA? Or a bit of both?
If they do have a right to prepayment in full from the sale proceeds, then they can cause a default and put the team in bankruptcy absent some other arrangement assuming $390mm isn't enough to both retire all outstanding debt and pay for other assets acquired (i.e. Hicks-owned property).
Exactly. If the real estate is not collateral for the loan, the creditors can go pound sand, for all the good it's going to do them in bankruptcy court.
I guess they could argue some sort of tied-sale is being used to defraud them (i.e. the buyers are paying over fair value for the land and under for the club to try and cheat them).
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main