Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Tuesday, July 01, 2014

New Hearing for Barry Bonds

I thought this was dead and buried but the full 9th Circuit has decided to hear the case again.

BBTF lawyers—report for duty.

Walt Davis Posted: July 01, 2014 at 09:24 PM | 16 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: barry bonds, truth, justice and the american way

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Mark S. is bored Posted: July 02, 2014 at 12:13 PM (#4741900)
Bonds already has served his sentence of 30 days' house arrest and paid a $4,100 fine. He also was sentenced to two years of probation and 250 hours of community service in youth-related activities.


If he wins, does he get his $4,100 back?
   2. dlf Posted: July 02, 2014 at 12:19 PM (#4741904)
yes ... and he can't go home for 30 days.
   3. Batman Posted: July 02, 2014 at 12:19 PM (#4741905)
If he wins, does he get his $4,100 back?
No, but Sid Bream is out.
   4. Mark S. is bored Posted: July 02, 2014 at 12:26 PM (#4741911)
yes ... and he can't go home for 30 days.


And he will have youth service him for 250 hours.
   5. Ron J2 Posted: July 02, 2014 at 12:31 PM (#4741916)
Too bad we don't have primeys any more. #2 made me laugh out loud.
   6. The Yankee Clapper Posted: July 02, 2014 at 01:22 PM (#4741964)
. . . but the full 9th Circuit has decided to hear the case again.

That's not quite correct. In every other federal circuit, en banc review includes all the active judges of the circuit, but the 9th Circuit is so large (29 judges) that it has determined that to be too unwieldy, so it uses a special of panel of 11 judges (always including the Chief Judge) for en banc review. The 9th Circuit is far larger than any of the other circuits were when they were split into two circuits (e,g, 11th Circuit carved out of the old 5th Circuit), so from a judicial administration perspective, either every other circuit is the wrong size, or the 9th Circuit is too big. That so much of the size disparity is due to one state, California, has complicated efforts to address the issue, as has the partisan motivations arising from the 9th Circuit being somewhat ideologically out of step for the last couple of decades.
   7. Dan Lee is some pumkins Posted: July 02, 2014 at 01:31 PM (#4741973)
And he will have youth service him for 250 hours.
Your ideas are intriguing to Chad Curtis and he would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
   8. Gonfalon Bubble Posted: July 02, 2014 at 01:41 PM (#4741979)
And don't worry, that newsletter is shipped to you in a plain brown wrapper with the words "NOT PENIS CREAM" stamped all over it in big red letters.
   9. Tulo's Fishy Mullet (mrams) Posted: July 02, 2014 at 03:50 PM (#4742098)
While clerking I was specifically told, by a federal magistrate judge and a federal district court judge (in the same district, far away from the 9th cir.) to never bring to them, cases from the 9th circuit when preparing bench memos, or other research. These weren't exactly the most right wing judges either.
   10. Howling John Shade Posted: July 02, 2014 at 03:54 PM (#4742104)
That's not quite correct. In every other federal circuit, en banc review includes all the active judges of the circuit, but the 9th Circuit is so large (29 judges) that it has determined that to be too unwieldy, so it uses a special of panel of 11 judges (always including the Chief Judge) for en banc review.
Yep. And, as the article notes, the judges on the circuit vote on whether to rehear a case en banc (once there's a petition to rehear it). So this indicates that a significant number of them think that the original panel got the case wrong. I worked for one of the Ninth Circuit judges in law school, and seeing the emails sent around prior to en banc votes was always pretty entertaining. Most judges have pretty high opinions of themselves and they really don't like a bunch of their equally arrogant colleagues telling them that they got it wrong. Also, when I was there they all used Lotus Notes, which was hilarious in itself and infuriated Kozinski.
   11. Walt Davis Posted: July 02, 2014 at 06:07 PM (#4742237)
250 hours of community service in youth-related activities.

Lecturing them on the dangers of wandering off-topic I hope.

And apologies, I didn't realize I needed a scorecard to track the 9th circuit.

My memory of the original ruling is that it basically said that what Bonds did was pretty immaterial (he answered the question directly later) but that the obstruction statute was written so broadly that obstructing justice for a minute still counted.
   12. Arbitol Dijaler Posted: July 02, 2014 at 09:53 PM (#4742366)
So the whole court (29 judges) votes on the en banc petition -- is the 11-judge panel then random apart from the chief (or 7 randoms plus chief plus original panel)? If so, that's pretty wacky. You could end up with mostly judges who voted against rehearing the case.
   13. Cooper Nielson Posted: July 02, 2014 at 10:05 PM (#4742376)
Too bad we don't have primeys any more. #2 made me laugh out loud.

Me too. But I had to read it twice.
   14. Howling John Shade Posted: July 02, 2014 at 10:22 PM (#4742380)
So the whole court (29 judges) votes on the en banc petition -- is the 11-judge panel then random apart from the chief (or 7 randoms plus chief plus original panel)? If so, that's pretty wacky. You could end up with mostly judges who voted against rehearing the case.
The other 10 judges are drawn by lot, so yeah the composition of the panel can have a dramatic effect on the result.
   15. Ziggy Posted: July 02, 2014 at 10:56 PM (#4742401)
The line about Sid Bream was good too. Good work everyone.
   16. David Nieporent (now, with children) Posted: July 04, 2014 at 04:48 PM (#4743457)
Has Kevin's head exploded?

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Dock Ellis on Acid
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogThe 2015 HOF Ballot Collecting Gizmo!
(160 - 10:17am, Dec 21)
Last: toratoratora

NewsblogThe Jeff Jacobs HOF Ballot: Keep The Voting Serious And Fair
(26 - 10:14am, Dec 21)
Last: JJ1986

NewsblogMarty Noble's HOF Ballot
(8 - 10:12am, Dec 21)
Last: BDC

NewsblogRuben Amaro Jr. says it would be best if Phillies move on from Ryan Howard
(37 - 10:07am, Dec 21)
Last: BDC

NewsblogThe Yankees’ plan in case A-Rod can’t play at all
(13 - 10:05am, Dec 21)
Last: NattyBoh

NewsblogGetting ready to gamble on Jung-Ho Kang | FOX Sports
(1 - 10:04am, Dec 21)
Last: What's the realistic upside, RMc?

NewsblogOT: Politics - December 2014: Baseball & Politics Collide in New Thriller
(5146 - 10:01am, Dec 21)
Last: Mefisto

NewsblogOT: Soccer December 2014
(320 - 9:34am, Dec 21)
Last: Juilin Sandar to Conkling Speedwell (Arjun)

NewsblogDodgers biggest spenders in payroll
(8 - 9:16am, Dec 21)
Last: cercopithecus aethiops

NewsblogOT: NFL/NHL thread
(9190 - 8:37am, Dec 21)
Last: PASTE Thinks This Trout Kid Might Be OK (Zeth)

NewsblogGiants acquire McGehee to fill third-base spot
(5 - 8:33am, Dec 21)
Last: Greg K

NewsblogAP sources: Umpires, MLB reach 5-year agreement
(3 - 5:48am, Dec 21)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogAngels, Red Sox discontinue pension plans for non-uniformed personnel - LA Times
(23 - 4:00am, Dec 21)
Last: The TVerik of Lordly Might

NewsblogOT: Monthly NBA Thread - December 2014
(762 - 3:19am, Dec 21)
Last: Win Big Stein's Money

NewsblogThe right — and wrong — way for Mets to get Tulowitzki | New York Post
(12 - 1:09am, Dec 21)
Last: Cargo Cultist

Page rendered in 0.2266 seconds
50 querie(s) executed