Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Sunday, November 20, 2005

Newsday: Heyman - Ichiro-Hargrove feud may benefit Yanks

Yankees/Mets notes from Jon Heyman…

“Whatever it takes” is basically [the Yankees’] standing offer for Ichiro in hopes that his feud with manager Mike Hargrove could be impetus to a trade… Newsday has learned that Hargrove and Bavasi recently proposed trading Ichiro and that Ichiro suggested Hargrove’s firing, which should make for an uncomfortable spring reunion.

The Yankees also inquired about bringing back Alfonso Soriano to play center but were unwilling to trade Cano and/or Wang (Texas could have had Cano as the throw-in in the A-Rod trade). The Marlins requested the same two players for Juan Pierre, whom Yankees reports suggest regressed last season, anyway… Cashman is said to be “dead set against” the volatile Milton Bradley.
...
With Kenji Jojima showing no interest in coming to New York, either, the Mets’ main catching choices come down to Bengie Molina and Ramon Hernandez. But to some Mets scouts, there’s only one choice: Hernandez. While Molina looked good in the playoffs, the Mets have surprisingly negative scouting reports on his defense.

ALSO:
NY Daily News: Yanks’ center still cloudy
NY Daily News: Mets looking to hold a Grudz

NTNgod Posted: November 20, 2005 at 10:47 AM | 88 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: mariners, mets, miami, rangers, yankees

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Paul The Paranoid Android Posted: November 20, 2005 at 12:34 PM (#1739367)
Cashman is said to be “dead set against” the volatile Milton Bradley.

There goes that idea. The Yanks can't acquire someone for pennies on the dollar; they gotta acquire someone for dollars on the penny.
   2. Ivan Grushenko of Hong Kong Posted: November 20, 2005 at 12:44 PM (#1739369)
I'm surprised that either Ichiro or Hargrove would get angry enough to feud with anyone, let alone each other.
   3. Vaux, A.B.D. Posted: November 20, 2005 at 12:44 PM (#1739370)
At least they won't give up Cano or Wang for Pierre or Soriano. You know Steinbrenner himself would in a second.
   4. TVerik Posted: November 20, 2005 at 01:29 PM (#1739383)
Ichiro! is famous and fast and a damned good outfielder. He wears #51 and plays CF. And he prefers to bat leadoff.

He might be old, and he is probably overpriced.

Therefore, the perfect Yankee.

A Matsui/Ichiro!/anyone OF would be big news in the Pacific Rim.
   5. Maury Brown Posted: November 20, 2005 at 02:47 PM (#1739412)
Would be the dumbest move yet by the Mariners. One more reason to fire Bavasi for even talking such nonsense.
   6. I Love LA (OFF) Posted: November 20, 2005 at 03:20 PM (#1739421)
Oh thank God!

Please, Omar. Don't sign Bengie.
   7. TVerik Posted: November 20, 2005 at 03:50 PM (#1739426)
Maury, Ichiro for Wang and Cano seems to me to be a fair-to-good deal from the M's perspective. They get younger, cheaper, and pitching help.

With revenue sharing, Japanese marketing can take a flying leap for all I care.
   8. Norcan Posted: November 20, 2005 at 04:01 PM (#1739427)
If the Yankees are going to make a glitzy deal I hope on hope that they deal Philip Hughes. The guy looks he's going to be great and I don't want the Red Sox to have to face him many times a season for many years. I'd rather do without that prospect. It also hurts me a little when a supposed Red Sox fan growing up like Hughes has said in interviews pitches well against them, so if the Yankees would kindly oblige I would greatly appreciate it. If he goes to a national league club, then that'll be all the better.
   9. TVerik Posted: November 20, 2005 at 04:08 PM (#1739430)
I'm just not sure that Ichiro! will be a part of the next playoff Mariners team.
   10. OlePerfesser Posted: November 20, 2005 at 04:46 PM (#1739458)
Well, if you have to do something to make Mike Hargrove secure and happy, you just do it and don't ask any questions. The guy's your cornerstone. [/end sarcasm]

If Ichiro! plays CF, he becomes significantly more valuable to whoever pays him. One of the (many) curiosities of Bavasi's reign is why he didn't make that switch as soon as he lost Cameron.
   11. bookbook Posted: November 20, 2005 at 06:01 PM (#1739520)
If the M's trade Ichiro, they'll do it for a potential star. Cano & Wang don't have anywhere near that kind of potential.

While I understand that there's nothing more important to Seattle's future than Hargrove's happiness, I don't think Ichiro's going anywhere.
   12. CraigK Posted: November 20, 2005 at 06:11 PM (#1739533)
And where is that "Yankees sign everyone in baseball" article again?

Seriously, I will hunt down and taser in the balls the first writer to even use "Albert Pujols" and "Yankees should trade for" in the same sentence.
   13. CraigK Posted: November 20, 2005 at 06:11 PM (#1739534)
MARINERS ENTIRE 40-MAN ROSTER FOR BUBBA CROSBY
   14. Bobby Bonilla's Annuity (Matt) Posted: November 20, 2005 at 06:27 PM (#1739561)
Ramon Hernandez and Mark Grudzielanek?

YES!
   15. TVerik Posted: November 20, 2005 at 06:31 PM (#1739570)
Are any two Yankee players plus salary considerations worth Pujols? I don't think so. Any three?
   16. CraigK Posted: November 20, 2005 at 06:32 PM (#1739571)
Maybe, and I mean, maybe Rodriguez, Matsui, Mussina, and Rivera.

But that's it.
   17. I Love LA (OFF) Posted: November 20, 2005 at 06:37 PM (#1739576)
If salary wasn't an issue, who would you rather have A-Rod or Pujols? Alex has the edge in defense and baserunning. Pujols has the edge in hitting, coming up big in the clutch, and "age."
   18. Шĥy Posted: November 20, 2005 at 06:43 PM (#1739582)
Alex has the edge in defense

I don't think this is right.
   19. TVerik Posted: November 20, 2005 at 06:45 PM (#1739585)
I might be overvaluing my team, but absent salary, I think the Cards would do very well to get A-Rod and Rivera in a Pujols swap.

Just speculatin'. No need for violence or anything.
   20. Шĥy Posted: November 20, 2005 at 06:46 PM (#1739586)
This is interesting. From the Palm Beach Post:

Florida and the Mets have had extensive talks over the past two weeks about Marlins second baseman Luis Castillo.
   21. Шĥy Posted: November 20, 2005 at 06:51 PM (#1739594)
Looks like Jim Bowden did the Mets a favor. From the NYPost:

The Mets offered him a substantial increase on his 2005 salary of $575,000, somewhere in the $800,000-$1 million range.
   22. Шĥy Posted: November 20, 2005 at 06:51 PM (#1739597)
That previous post was referring to Marlon Anderson.
   23. I Love LA (OFF) Posted: November 20, 2005 at 06:53 PM (#1739600)
Alex has the edge in defense

I don't think this is right.


Are you kidding? A-Rod can play shortstop competently. Even if you are going just by UZRs, A-Rod has the edge. Remember, you have to use some sort of positional adjustment factor. I don't know if this has changed, but Tango used to add seven "runs" for shortstops (+1 for 3b- I wonder why this this low..) and subtract nine "runs" for first-basemen. But forget about defensive metrics. Lets think about this. Who do you think is more valuable? A shortstop/thirdbaseman who hits like A-Rod or a first-baseman who hits like Pujols?
   24. I Love LA (OFF) Posted: November 20, 2005 at 06:55 PM (#1739603)
Looks like Jim Bowden did the Mets a favor. From the NYPost:

The Mets offered him a substantial increase on his 2005 salary of $575,000, somewhere in the $800,000-$1 million range


Eh...the Mets offered Sweeney, not Anderson that much. Marlon said the Mets offered him a lot less than what the Nats did, and only for one year.
   25. Optimus_Primate Posted: November 20, 2005 at 07:10 PM (#1739623)
There goes that idea. The Yanks can't acquire someone for pennies on the dollar; they gotta acquire someone for dollars on the penny.

I think even pennies are too high a price to pay for some psycho wife beater.
   26. Women's Lib is Ms.Guided Posted: November 20, 2005 at 07:16 PM (#1739629)
ARod is younger than Pujols if the results of this inquiry are accurate.
   27. CraigK Posted: November 20, 2005 at 07:39 PM (#1739641)
ARod is younger than Pujols if the results of this inquiry are accurate

Oh, come off it; there's probably an inquiry out on the internet somewhere saying Abe Vigoda is younger than Pujols.
   28. Famous Original Joe C Posted: November 20, 2005 at 07:40 PM (#1739642)
Craig, if you read it, you'd have seen it was a parody, not a serious inquiry.
   29. CraigK Posted: November 20, 2005 at 07:50 PM (#1739653)
Sorry; I get a little defensive when people say he's older than he claims.

I say he's whatever age he says he is until proven otherwise.
   30. MM1f Posted: November 20, 2005 at 09:15 PM (#1739706)
I think 26 proved it otherwise pretty conclusivly : )
   31. Halofan Posted: November 20, 2005 at 09:19 PM (#1739707)
He's older than he claims.

(I am talkin' about Abe Vigoda here)

Mariners - Ichiro = A's, Angels & Rangers all having much better shots at the Wild Card.
   32. cardsfanboy Posted: November 20, 2005 at 09:24 PM (#1739709)
as far as defensively, I'm not sure arod could return to shortstop, but if he can the obviously his value is better. but as third basemen, I'm pretty sure Pujols is better defensively.

the Marlins asked for cano and wang for juan pierre???? heck I thought it was a pretty interesting rumor when it was edmonds for cano and wang, and even being a huge edmonds fan I was thinking it was pretty close to even. Juan pierre for a even one of those guys would be a rip off of the yankees.
   33. DCW3 Posted: November 20, 2005 at 09:33 PM (#1739715)
The Marlins requested the same two players for Juan Pierre, whom Yankees reports suggest regressed last season, anyway…

"Yankees reports also suggested that Barry Bonds may have been on the disabled list for a significant portion of last season."
   34. DCW3 Posted: November 20, 2005 at 09:36 PM (#1739717)
I might be overvaluing my team, but absent salary, I think the Cards would do very well to get A-Rod and Rivera in a Pujols swap.

Just speculatin'. No need for violence or anything.


You ####! That would be a terrible trade!

*gouges out Erik's eyes with barbed wire*
   35. DCW3 Posted: November 20, 2005 at 09:37 PM (#1739719)
Oh, wait, you said *no* need for violence. My apologies.
   36. nycfan Posted: November 20, 2005 at 10:12 PM (#1739740)
WARP rates A-Rod higher for 2005, and for 2001 & 2002. I think that if A-Rod is a SS then he is better, but if he's at third they have about equal value (disregarding age and salary). As a Yankee fan, i would take Ichiro in a second, but i'm not sure he would be worth what it would take. He's getting older. and once he loses some of that speed that gets him so many IF hits, he is gonna be done.
   37. DCW3 Posted: November 20, 2005 at 10:42 PM (#1739761)
WARP rates A-Rod higher for 2005, and for 2001 & 2002.

Pujols had to have a major advantage in '03 and '04, though.
   38. Vaux, A.B.D. Posted: November 20, 2005 at 10:51 PM (#1739765)
Sorry, but A-Rod and Rivera for Pujols would be a pretty decent trade. Rodriguez isn't old, is signed for a while, and plays two much tougher positions to fill. The problem is that Rivera isn't signed long-term. Now, for marketing reasons, I might not make it, but I'd have to seriously consider it.
   39. sardonic Posted: November 20, 2005 at 10:55 PM (#1739768)
I would much rather have A-Rod than Pujols at this point, salary considerations aside. I don't see any reason why A-Rod wouldn't be able to play shortstop as well as he has in the past, and I'd much rather have a franchise shortstop who hits like A-Rod than a franchise 1B who hits like Pujols.
   40. Bitter Calculus Instructor Posted: November 20, 2005 at 11:28 PM (#1739782)
A-Rod and Pujols are both historically great players. I would give the slight edge to A-Rod, since he can play short stop.

Ichiro would be an alright addition to the Yankees; he can handle center field. However, if it costs Cano, then it would be a poor trade for the Yankees. If it costs Wang, then the trade would be atrociously bad. If it costs both, then Cashman is the only GM who would make that trade.
   41. Big Train Posted: November 20, 2005 at 11:53 PM (#1739808)
I am higher on Wang than I am on Cano. I love Robby, but if you look at Kevin Brown, he had a sub 5 k/9 when he was young, and he turned it around. Wang also improved his K/9 after he came back from injury. Obviously, it would be improbable for Wang to follow Kevin Brown's career path, but a few all star appearances is not out of the realm of possibility.

Sure, Ichiro! would be a great addition to the Yankees, but they are going to have to give up ML ready talent AND a prospect or two.

I don't think the Yankees have the players to do that. (what about Sheffield, Womack, Wright and 1 billion dollars?)
   42. MM1f Posted: November 21, 2005 at 12:27 AM (#1739839)
"Ichiro would be an alright addition to the Yankees; he can handle center field. However, if it costs Cano, then it would be a poor trade for the Yankees. If it costs Wang, then the trade would be atrociously bad. If it costs both, then Cashman is the only GM who would make that trade. "

Wait..what?
No #### Ichiro would be a nice addition to a team....FOR FREE and it sounds like thats the only condition you would pick him up on. If you think giving up Cano and/or Wang (and neither of these guys are anything close to future superstars) would be bad who WOULD you give up and why would the Mariners deal him to NY if they aren't getting any one decent back? The Yankees are pretty devoid of trading chips...Duncan has been looking bad, some reports say hes an all or nothing swinger w bad D at first...Hughes has upside but big injury issue. after that you are down to mediocre prospects who all have their pluses but aren't anything near the level to get Ichiro with (cabrera, vechionacci, kevin thompson, battle,henn) Tabata has upside but is still like 18 and was in the GCL this year so hes waaaay the heck off. Bruce and Jackson (or any 05 picks) can't be dealt yet
   43. Golfing Great Mitch Cumstein Posted: November 21, 2005 at 12:44 AM (#1739871)
What is the source of the Hargrove-Ichiro! dispute?
   44. nycfan Posted: November 21, 2005 at 12:44 AM (#1739872)
I think it would take Wang or Cano and Hughes to get the deal done (if the mariners would actually trade him, which i doubt they would). Cano probably won't be anything special, but Wang could definitely turn into a very good pitcher. He has a fantastic G/F at around 3, and he has pretty good control. His K/9 was pretty poor this year, but it was better after he came back from injury and was solid in the minors (7.09). He throws in the mid-90's with tons of movement, so i don't see any reason why he can't bring his K/9 up to at least 6. Combined with his solid control and great G/F, he definitely has potential.
   45. Vaux, A.B.D. Posted: November 21, 2005 at 12:44 AM (#1739874)
Ichiro! is not a very far above-average player, if that. An average 2b and an average starter is not worth a pretty-much average rf.
   46. Rich Posted: November 21, 2005 at 01:03 AM (#1739886)
Heyman should be drug tested.
   47. Big Train Posted: November 21, 2005 at 01:08 AM (#1739896)
Ichiro! is not a very far above-average player, if that. An average 2b and an average starter is not worth a pretty-much average rf.

Well, Ichiro! would be a lot more valuable in CF, where the Yankees would play him. He would be, what, at worst the 3rd or 4th best CF in the AL?

Duncan has been looking bad

Not an AFL fan, are you?
   48. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: November 21, 2005 at 01:56 AM (#1739961)
Seriously, I will hunt down and taser in the balls the first writer to even use "Albert Pujols" and "Yankees should trade for" in the same sentence.

Technically, aren't you now obligated to zap yourself?
   49. Robert S. Posted: November 21, 2005 at 02:46 AM (#1740030)
Anything less than $40 million, King Felix and Ichiro! would be an insult to the Yankees.
   50. Big Train Posted: November 21, 2005 at 02:56 AM (#1740040)
It says 49 comments, but I only see 48. Why is that?
   51. Шĥy Posted: November 21, 2005 at 03:04 AM (#1740048)
It says 49 comments, but I only see 48. Why is that?

Yankee fans are inherently delusional.
   52. Big Train Posted: November 21, 2005 at 03:08 AM (#1740052)
Yankee fans are inherently delusional.

I didn't want to do this, but you have forced my hand.

Count them. Count the rings.
   53. Tom Cervo, backup catcher Posted: November 21, 2005 at 04:44 AM (#1740141)
Cano probably won't be anything special, but Wang could definitely turn into a very good pitcher.

Cano was already an average hitter without adjusting for position and was only 1 run below average on defense, which will improve as he stops making stupid rookie errors. I doubt he's ever an elite hitter, but I think he'll be very valuable, at least for the next couple years while he's cheap.
   54. SMK Posted: November 21, 2005 at 05:34 AM (#1740219)
This is one of the nuttier threads I've read in awhile. It's obvious the off-season is in full effect.

Hargrove would have to be insane to ask to have Ichiro traded. The M's would have to have a death wish to even consider trading him. For an organization as PR-conscious as the Mariners are, to trade away the most popular player is...is...well, insane, especially in light of the two atrociously bad season the M's just had.

And for whatever it's worth, I think the "Ichiro-Hargrove feud" is overblown.
   55. RB in NYC (Now with New iPhone!) Posted: November 21, 2005 at 05:39 AM (#1740226)
FWIW, SMK, I think almost everyone here agrees with you that Ichiro isn't going anywhere. But it is fun--at least for the Yankees fans, I guess--to speculate on what it might take to fetch him, assuming the M's just lose their mind
   56. IronChef Chris Wok Posted: November 21, 2005 at 05:46 AM (#1740230)
Obviously, it would be improbable for Wang to follow Kevin Brown's career path, but a few all star appearances is not out of the realm of possibility.


Dude, you sound like the village idiots here in Taiwan.

A decent league average starter? Sure

An allstar pitcher that doesn't K people? C'mon.
   57. Vaux, A.B.D. Posted: November 21, 2005 at 05:48 AM (#1740233)
Jeter for Ichiro! would help both clubs, and it wouldn't be a public-relations nightmare for Seattle, I don't think. It would also really help the Yankees, and their fans might accept it in time, given Ichiro!'s popularity. It would be like the Ted Williams-Joe DiMaggio trade that never happened.
   58. Vaux, A.B.D. Posted: November 21, 2005 at 05:49 AM (#1740236)
They think Wang's K-rate will increase because of his "stuff." Of course, there are more Jason Davises out there than Kevin Browns...
   59. Big Train Posted: November 21, 2005 at 05:51 AM (#1740238)
An allstar pitcher that doesn't K people? C'mon.

There was a time, when Kevin Brown was younger, when Kevin Brown did not K people. That was the point of the comparison.It is not out of the realm of possibility that his K rate increases, given his current pitching style.
   60. Big Train Posted: November 21, 2005 at 05:52 AM (#1740239)
Well, he does have a lot of movement and currently has no interest in throwing to the corners. That may change with a pitching coach that doesn't encourage such nonsense.
   61. nycfan Posted: November 21, 2005 at 05:56 AM (#1740241)
Tim Hudson was an all-star pitcher in 2002 and 2003 while only striking out 5.5/9. Extreme groundball pitchers don't need as many K's to be successful, and there is no reason to think that Wang's K rate won't improve to somewhere around 6/9. Wang had the third best G/F ratio in the majors this year, and it was only his first season. His opp. slg had him 14th in the majors. Extreme groundball pitchers can get a lot of double plays and allow very few extra-base hits to offset the extra hits they allow. Wang was well above league average in his rookie year, so i don't see why he can't go on to become a very good pitcher.
   62. SMK Posted: November 21, 2005 at 05:57 AM (#1740244)
Jeter for Ichiro! would help both clubs, and it wouldn't be a public-relations nightmare for Seattle, I don't think. It would also really help the Yankees, and their fans might accept it in time, given Ichiro!'s popularity. It would be like the Ted Williams-Joe DiMaggio trade that never happened.

Jeter strikes me as being the kind of guy who would be miserable playing outside of NY.

Would the Yankees fans ever get over it?
   63. Шĥy Posted: November 21, 2005 at 06:15 AM (#1740257)
There was a time, when Kevin Brown was younger, when Kevin Brown did not K people. That was the point of the comparison.It is not out of the realm of possibility that his K rate increases, given his current pitching style.

The Yankees drafted Karl Amonite in the 13th round. Albert Pujols was drafted in the 13th round. Clearly, Karl Amonite will follow the career path of Albert Pujols.
   64. Cowboy Popup Posted: November 21, 2005 at 06:24 AM (#1740260)
"The Yankees drafted Karl Amonite in the 13th round. Albert Pujols was drafted in the 13th round. Clearly, Karl Amonite will follow the career path of Albert Pujols."

You just love being obtuse don't you? Brown threw a heavy fastball at around 95 and was an extreme ground ball pitcher. Wang throws a heavy fastball at around 95 and is an extreme ground ball pitcher. Both K'ed guys in the minors at a good rate and neither struck alot of guys out in their initial Major League exposure. I'm sure this is the first time you've seen that comparision posted on this board though, it's not like it's been posted about 100 times since the middle of the season.
   65. robinred Posted: November 21, 2005 at 06:33 AM (#1740266)
I find it very hard to picture the Mariners trading Suzuki at all and even harder to picture them trading him to the Yankees.

I do think he will age very well based on several factors, so I wouldn't worry much about that angle if I were in the market for him.
   66. Bitter Calculus Instructor Posted: November 21, 2005 at 06:39 AM (#1740271)
Brown started his career as a very mediocre pitcher. He then became bigger and threw harder. Then, he had major injury problems.

Steroids make people bigger. Steroids allow people to throw harder. Steroids create future injury problems.

I am not going to make any conclusions here to try to connect the two sets of data, but they do seem to connect somehow.

Proof is right here that one can be strike out basically nobody and still have a hall of fame career.
   67. Bitter Calculus Instructor Posted: November 21, 2005 at 06:43 AM (#1740272)
Wang was well above league average in his rookie year, so i don't see why he can't go on to become a very good pitcher.

Here is a good counter example, though I do think Wang will be a very good pitcher. And, I certainly think he will give the Yankees more than Brown did.
   68. Big Train Posted: November 21, 2005 at 07:13 AM (#1740290)
I am not going to make any conclusions here to try to connect the two sets of data, but they do seem to connect somehow.

Yes, you were very subtle there. Well played sir, a 4 year old boy or a dolphin might have read that and thought you were not accusing Brown of juicing.

Are you accusing Brown of using steroids because he broke down at age 37? A pitcher, with more than 3000 career innings, with arm trouble? If that is all it takes to set off your roid meter, well, you must never get any sleep, because that thing is going off all the time.

Proof is right here that one can be strike out basically nobody and still have a hall of fame career.

If you have to go back that far to prove your point, you aren't making your point.
   69. The Hop-Clop Goes On (psa1) Posted: November 21, 2005 at 07:18 AM (#1740296)
Jeter strikes me as being the kind of guy who would be miserable playing outside of NY.

Would the Yankees fans ever get over it?


I would seriously consider becoming a Yankees fan if they traded Jeter. So they'd only be down about 499,999 fans.
   70. Vaux, A.B.D. Posted: November 21, 2005 at 07:29 AM (#1740301)
Wow, that's nothing to the Yankees, especially after adding all of Japan.

Gagne 55, just go away.
   71. The Hop-Clop Goes On (psa1) Posted: November 21, 2005 at 07:40 AM (#1740305)
Wow, that's nothing to the Yankees

Hmm. It felt like a big number. Maybe I miscounted me by an order of magnitude.
   72. The Underground Man Posted: November 21, 2005 at 08:37 AM (#1740336)
You just love being obtuse don't you? Brown threw a heavy fastball at around 95 and was an extreme ground ball pitcher. Wang throws a heavy fastball at around 95 and is an extreme ground ball pitcher. Both K'ed guys in the minors at a good rate and neither struck alot of guys out in their initial Major League exposure. I'm sure this is the first time you've seen that comparision posted on this board though, it's not like it's been posted about 100 times since the middle of the season.


Are you not seeing the wishcasting there? Every pitcher whose best pitch is a sinker and throws in the low to mid nineties is compared to Kevin Brown. Wang is compared to Kevin Brown, Derek Lowe was compared to Kevin Brown, Jon Garland is compared to Kevin Brown, Jake Westbrook is compared to Kevin Brown. Kevin Brown is 90th percentile projection for the starting pitcher with a hard sinker. I believe the post comparing Albert Pujols to the average 13th round draft pick was using hyperbole to point out how unlikely your scenario with Wang is. You appear to be the one being obtuse.
   73. Eraser-X is emphatically dominating teh site!!! Posted: November 21, 2005 at 09:05 AM (#1740346)
Actually, if Wang has any seasons that compare to the best season of any of the guys you named, he'll be doing real good.

Garland: 7.5 WARP3
Westbrook: 7.9
Brown: 11.2
Lowe: 11.6

If he has a season like any of those in the next few years, him for Ichiro would be a good trade straight up.
   74. Russ Posted: November 21, 2005 at 01:21 PM (#1740387)
Actually, if Wang has any seasons that compare to the best season of any of the guys you named, he'll be doing real good.

Those are the *best* seasons of those players, so that's a little misleading, but I did think to myself as well when he listed those pitchers: "Damn, those are all guys I wouldn't necessarily have minded having on my staff."
   75. Cowboy Popup Posted: November 21, 2005 at 01:23 PM (#1740388)
"You appear to be the one being obtuse."

I don't see how. If you want to argue the merits of the comparision, which is not something I came up with, like you did, that's fine. I don't think Kevin Brown is a reasonable projection for Wang, it's just a counter arguement to the "Wang didn't K enough batters in his first 120 or whatever major league innings" arguement that is thrown around so often on this board. Comments like #63, which was intentionally thick headed to give someone a hard time are pretty much the definition of being obtuse.
   76. IronChef Chris Wok Posted: November 21, 2005 at 01:29 PM (#1740391)
Wang throws a heavy fastball at around 95 and is an extreme ground ball pitcher.

I rarely see him throw above 94.

Plus, he seriously has no outpitch. That curveball or slider or splitter or whatever it is is pretty dan lame.
   77. MM1f Posted: November 21, 2005 at 05:31 PM (#1740645)
"Duncan has been looking bad

Not an AFL fan, are you? "


I just think it should be taken in context. It is more like a postseason spring training, where how a guy looks is more important than the stat line he puts up esp. for hitters given the weak, tired pitching and hitters parks...Duncan has always had good power, it doesnt surprise me the least bit to see him pounding weak shtt into the cheap seats. His problem was thateven as he was mashing mistakes he was looking bad doing it, scouts felt he hadn't changed his approach at all. And Lord knows his bad regular season is more impt than his brief AFL stint (though in his defense he was rushed to AA)

Plus the track record of guys who either weren't good prospects period and/or guys coming off a bad year and having big AFL years isn't all that convincing (Richard Lewis and Ken Harvey are who i'm thinkin of).
   78. Cowboy Popup Posted: November 21, 2005 at 05:49 PM (#1740676)
"I rarely see him throw above 94."

Towards the end of the season he was regurlarly around 94-95 according to the YES gun, and I'm fairly certain that if checking the old game chatters was an option (at least, I can't figure out how to do it) I could prove that. Supposedly he threw 97 before he was injured, so there's reason to think he should be able to continue throwing at that velocity.
   79. BWC Posted: November 21, 2005 at 06:16 PM (#1740736)
Well, Wang still has a chance to follow the Kevin Brown career path, which is impressive.

But it's still serious wishcasting. Let's worry about projecting him to be a reliable 3rd starter before we start imagining him running off a 6-7 year stretch of ace-caliber seasons.
   80. RB in NYC (Now with New iPhone!) Posted: November 21, 2005 at 06:39 PM (#1740791)
# And, I certainly think he will give the Yankees more than Brown did.

Hell, he arguable already has. Its just unfortunate that its all apropos of nothing. David Justice gave the Yankees more than Wee Willie Keeler did, but I don't think that tells us much about them as ballplayers
   81. TVerik Posted: November 21, 2005 at 06:42 PM (#1740797)
Jeter strikes me as being the kind of guy who would be miserable playing outside of NY.

Would the Yankees fans ever get over it?


From this moment forward, just on the field, I think I'd rather have Jeter. But I admit it's close.
   82. Best Regards, Larry M. Posted: November 21, 2005 at 10:12 PM (#1741185)
I find it very hard to picture the Mariners trading Suzuki at all and even harder to picture them trading him to the Yankees.

I think the M's are more likely to fire Hargrove than trade Ichiro, but if they do trade him, I don't see any reason why they wouldn't trade him to the Yankees. New York is one of the few teams that would give up somebody and take the entire contract.
   83. Шĥy Posted: November 21, 2005 at 10:44 PM (#1741260)
Since this also seems to be the Mets thread,

mlbtraderumors.com is reporting that Wagner will accept a 4/40 deal from the Mets. This site was also the first to break the Nady-Cameron trade, getting the scoop a few days before any newspaper reported it. Still, I hope it isn't true. That is definately too much money and too many years.
   84. Best Regards, Larry M. Posted: November 21, 2005 at 11:03 PM (#1741299)
This site was also the first to break the Nady-Cameron trade, getting the scoop a few days before any newspaper reported it.

Entirely irrelevant. Calling one trade correctly isn't nearly enough to establish a reputation for reliability.
   85. Шĥy Posted: November 21, 2005 at 11:08 PM (#1741312)

Entirely irrelevant. Calling one trade correctly isn't nearly enough to establish a reputation for reliability.


I just wanted to say that it has some credibility, to separate it from the rumors one finds on the ESPN or MLB.com boards.
   86. RB in NYC (Now with New iPhone!) Posted: November 22, 2005 at 12:55 AM (#1741485)
Seems like it might be the Pedro Contract Part II
   87. Big Train Posted: November 22, 2005 at 01:34 AM (#1741523)
Sox fans can call Dustin Pedroia the next Alomar and Biggio calls no one calls them on it, but Yankee fans can't point out that Kevin Brown didn't strike anyone out without the thread blowing up?

All I said was that Wang could make a few all star games. I hate it when you people make me do this....

Count 'em. All 26. Count 'em all.
   88. Шĥy Posted: November 22, 2005 at 01:52 AM (#1741562)
I'm glad that Gotham Baseabll has no credibility because I certainly don't like this from them.

Another player on the Mets' fans wish list is Brian Giles, who the Yankees are reportedly still interested in signing. Well, you can cross him off as well, as he has let the Mets know through intermediaries that he has no interest in playing at Shea Stadium. That might explain to many of the Met-o-philes why there's been no contact between Minaya and Giles' representatives.

Nor do I like this:

The Mets' pursuit of Billy Wagner may have paid off, as several sources are saying a deal could be announced as soon as tomorrow.

Mets GM Omar Minaya has apparently offered a four-year, $40 million contract to Wagner, a deal that the Phillies are not expected to match.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Backlasher
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogHP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind
(7 - 8:09am, May 25)
Last: boteman

NewsblogBoston.com: Curt Schilling’s 38 Studios lays off all staff
(45 - 8:04am, May 25)
Last: Golfing Great Mitch Cumstein

NewsblogNeyer: New Yankee Stadium: A Review
(75 - 8:01am, May 25)
Last: Harveys Wallbangers

NewsblogFS Midwest: Streaker halts Cardinals-Phillies game
(2 - 7:57am, May 25)
Last: Justin 'The Cespedobear' T

NewsblogGreenberg: Cubs' Ricketts decries proposal
(750 - 7:54am, May 25)
Last: Jolly Old St. Neck Wound, Moral Idiot

NewsblogMatinale: WADJ: Wins Above Derek Jeter
(1 - 7:01am, May 25)
Last: bjhanke

NewsblogRoy Halladay bobblehead with glove on wrong hand selling on MLB.com
(12 - 6:46am, May 25)
Last: Doris from Rego Park

NewsblogSullivan: Dan Haren Makes Mariners Look Like Mariners
(1 - 6:40am, May 25)
Last: The cushions are crowded for Edmundo

Newsblog12 Baseball Feats That Only Happened Once
(25 - 6:25am, May 25)
Last: Greg (U)K

NewsblogShawn Green to play for Israel in World Baseball Classic
(12 - 5:50am, May 25)
Last: shoewizard

NewsblogOT: NBA Monthly Thread, May 2012
(1772 - 5:44am, May 25)
Last: baudib

NewsblogPrimer Dugout (and link of the day) 5-25-2012
(1 - 5:33am, May 25)
Last: Tim Stauffer, Trot Nixon's Coming (Dan Lee)

NewsblogWins Above Replacement: Distribution and Rarity of Talent 2011 - Beyond the Box Score
(9 - 4:18am, May 25)
Last: bobm

NewsblogDodgers want to host NHL's Winter Classic
(15 - 3:07am, May 25)
Last: Greg (U)K

NewsblogOT: NHL Playoff Thread
(1731 - 1:45am, May 25)
Last: baudib

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 0.4907 seconds
54 querie(s) executed