Instead of asking the umpires to make any of those judgments, MLB could simply treat every foul ball turned into a fair ball and caught ball turned into a trapped ball like an automatic double. After all, there’s really no good reason for automatic doubles to be automatic doubles. In a just world, if you’ve got a fast runner on first base and there are two outs and a long fly ball bounces over the fence, the fast runner would score every time. But he doesn’t. He’s stuck on third base, which has cost teams uncounted runs over the years.
They could just say that a reversed call in the infield is an automatic single, the runners moving up one base, and a reversed call in the outfield is worth two bases, just like an automatic double.
I’m not saying that’s what I would do. I like ambiguity and arguments, and I want to see the umpires making more judgments rather than fewer, assuming the judgments lead to more justice rather than less. But that does seem like a solution that all the stakeholders might get behind.
bobm
Posted: June 10, 2012 at 10:02 AM |
17 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags:
replay,
umpires
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Ivan Grushenko of Hong Kong Posted: June 10, 2012 at 11:26 AM (#4152894)As for the ideas, they're less stupid than the rhetorical structure within which they are couched.
Wow. This is just profoundly stupid. So stupid, in fact, that it could only be intentional stupidity. There are certainly ways that MLB could codify what happens on a reversed call instead of leaving it up to the umpires, but one-size-fits-all would just create more controversies than more replay would resolve.
EDIT: and I guess maybe it was intentional, based on what follows, but I still think it would make things worse rather than better.
Of course (as someone mentioned in an earlier thread) there is one aspect of the tennis system that would never fly in baseball -- playing a let.
With the way fields are crowned, a manager can't see the foul line on the other side of the field.
Exactly catomi01 - they will gladly trade some loss of autonomy for a few jobs.
I hate this idea so much. Challenge flags have no place in baseball. The umpires themselves need to call for reviews. I've been putting forth the plan in #8 in every one of these threads, and most people agree that it's the best possible solution.
You need a plan that, as much as possible, feels like the hand of God coming down to just unobtrusively correct errors. Simplicity simplicity simplicity.
The union will never agree to
lightningtasers fromheaventhe upper deck, aimed byangelsrobots, strikinghereticsAngel Hernandez every time he blows a call, but that'sfree willcollective bargaining agreements for you...Umpires? Or managers?
Umpires? Or managers?
Fans.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main