|
|
|
|
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: Numbers For Dodgers Do Not Add Up As Baseball Takes More Of Team's TV Money (12 - 2:15am, Jun 18)Last: drdrNewsblog: OMNICHATTER for 6/17/2013 (117 - 1:47am, Jun 18)Last:  DanNewsblog: OT: NHL is finally back thread (1005 - 1:39am, Jun 18)Last:  zackNewsblog: Gackle: A's pitcher Bartolo Colon becoming Bud Selig's worst nightmare (41 - 12:59am, Jun 18)Last: Walt DavisNewsblog: LATimes: Microsoft unveils new Xbox One console (176 - 12:54am, Jun 18)Last:  Jack Carter, calling Beleaguered CastleNewsblog: Berg: Rumored trivia legend Nick Swisher bats .429 in pub trivia (24 - 12:54am, Jun 18)Last: Cooper NielsonNewsblog: Calcaterra - You can thank Major League Baseball for the sewage mess in the Oakland Coliseum (5 - 12:51am, Jun 18)Last: Jack Carter, calling Beleaguered CastleNewsblog: Mark Appel signs under slot deal with Astros (97 - 11:59pm, Jun 17)Last: Jack Carter, calling Beleaguered CastleNewsblog: Keidel: Bob Costas Blurs Line Between Illuminating And Illuminati (44 - 11:39pm, Jun 17)Last: Jolly Old St. Nick Done Jumped The ShipNewsblog: WSJ: Well That Was an Unlikely Mets Comeback (65 - 11:36pm, Jun 17)Last: Jack Carter, calling Beleaguered CastleNewsblog: Wil Myers promoted by the Tampa Bay Rays (44 - 11:17pm, Jun 17)Last: catomi01Newsblog: With defensive shifts on the rise in baseball, Orioles among leading proponents (10 - 11:00pm, Jun 17)Last: ellsbury my heart at wounded kneeNewsblog: WaPo - Sheinin | For Angels' Mike Trout, no ceiling applies (1 - 10:59pm, Jun 17)Last: Walt DavisNewsblog: OT: NBA Finals and June thread (632 - 10:42pm, Jun 17)Last:  RollingWaveNewsblog: OT: The Soccer Thread June, 2013 (543 - 10:09pm, Jun 17)Last:  Weekly Journalist_
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. cardsfanboyWith 7 games left against good teams (one of which does have a personal interest in not seeing the Cardinals in the playoffs) it's probably too late for anyone else to mount a comeback, the Nats aren't trying to win, and the Reds might try to win if there is any chance of the Cardinals being eliminated, but it's not a likely event.
The Nats had better be trying to win. They haven't clinched the division.
In 2006 the Cardinals went into the last week or two of the season not caring about the fact that they haven't clinched yet and absolutely showed that they didn't care if they won or not, yes miracles happened and the Astros made it interesting, but realistically they weren't going to win the division, and the Nats aren't going to lose the division.
True question: when did the "pennant race" become the "pennant chase"? Was the former phrasing too "racist"???
"Race" implies a competition, with a winner and a loser; that is so harsh. "Chase" is like a child's game, where maybe one person (or team) gets caught by the other, but in the end, you all hug and fall down, giggling.
Would it be so unbelievable for the Braves to go 6-2, while the Nationals go 2-6? That would force a one game playoff to see who doesn't have to play in the other one game playoff.
wasted a lot of good seasons. that's what makes 2012 so incredibly disappointing. milwaukee had a lot of things go 'right' this year and the team will barely finish over .500 because management waited six weeks before doing anything about the bullpen.
based on what is floating around the team melvin was waiting on roenicke and ron being mr. loyalty finally decided something had to be done. doug has seen this before. so i don't give him a pass even though he's working to let his manager manage.
that and randy wolf. that was just ridiculous. wolf was awful, everybody knew he was awful, and ron kept running him out there thinking it would change.
Obviously, I hope the Braves catch them and while I find it to be very unlikely, I don't think it's wildly outside the realm of possibility. Still, 6-2 and 2-6, with no head to head, just to force a tie?
Line up Medlen to pitch the playoff game and if the Nats fold, cool.
This is pretty much wrong. And underestimates Davey's ego.
There is a difference between trying to win, and trying not to lose. I'm not saying they are going to be putting scrubs in the lineup everyday, but just that the intensity to win is not going to be there.
They didn't, and I would know, because I was there at the game the night they clinched the wild card. The fans were going crazy, but the team "celebration" was indistinguishable from that of any ordinary win.
The Nats are 2-3 since clinching. But they have a positive run differential in those 5 games. Really, they are trying to win and 5 games does not mean much. I'm still wary of the Braves. 4 games is too close.
Watching them closely this year and the last few nights (you're not the only fanboy!), this isn't the case. This is a quietly intense team. They're wearing down a bit, but they're still playing hard and with just as much intensity.
And that's the thing. Davey sets the tone. They're not stresed. They're relaxed and confident. They know they take care of business, the division comes. So they'll just plug away as they have all season.
I think there was more pressure on them about a month ago when Davey and Rizzo had that shouting match.
Cool. I'd only read about that game and it sounded like they jumped around (which, I believe, the Braves did). For all the two cent analysis, the Braves may well relax at this point.
I'm just pointing out that it's possible that the Nationals versus the Cardinals series, the Nationals might not be that interested in winning as hard as they can. It's not a controversial position. It happens all the time in sports.
So does TLR and yet the Cardinals in the past with a massive lead but not having won the division, just played out the string. That is my point. It may not happen to this team, but all the reasons given, doesn't mean that the team won't just position themselves for the post season. The Nats are going to win the division, they know this, and that could affect the way they perform the rest of the season.
Joey's just pissy because the Natinals lost last night and haven't wrapped up the division with a week left to play. It's sort of cute, and a bugeyed freak sort of way.
Sure. And it's possible the Cardinals fold down the stretch with a rookie manager who can't handle the pressure, letting Milwaukee -- aided by a Yaz in '67 stretch by eventual MVP winner Ryan Braun -- sneak into the playoffs on the last day of the season too.
Why not? Anything's possible.
Did the bad man hurt you in your no-touch place, Joey?
It's possible, never said it wasn't, said it's not likely though. Just like it's not likely that the Braves are going to catch the Nats.
My entire point was to look for a positive from a Cardinal point of view going into the last week of the season needing to win a couple of games against the two best teams in the NL. Neither team is probably going to need to win many games remaining, the Reds will be jockeying for rotation (But they hate the Cardinals so they might still be intense) and the Nats have the race more or less locked up so they might not be overly concerned with winning games at all costs.
I get stroked all the time, but admittedly, your mom was busy this week.
in the bathroom at Swinging Richards.
Having said that I still think the Nationals will wind up winning by 3 or 4.
Not tonight brother, not tonight! Tonight, the magic number goes down to 4.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main