User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.2610 seconds
56 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: February 27, 2008 at 02:16 PM (#2700879)There are no winners here. Both the Republicans and the Democrats are invested in the war on (some people who use some classes of) drugs, regardless of the obvious evidence of its failure to meet its stated goals and its awful effects on real people. The attempt to add more drugs to that formulary is an extension of the "war" - though surely by orders of magnitude less harmful than the typical policies, just because of the social location and biological facts of HGH use, production, and distribution.
Laws aren't like some jeopardy game, where the goal is to push the button and have the answer the fastest. Once the law is passed, it is on the books, and unmaking it becomes very difficult. It occurs to me that if someone wants a few days to read the bill and consult with medical professionals outside the realm of public comment (and grand-standing)about whether the bill is properly crafted and is appropriate in scope, then maybe that isn't a bad thing.
Just because we can exchange ideas immediately on the internet doesn't mean that everything has to be decided and done immediately. Waiting the 6 day period causes no harm, and actually may lead to some thought and further input.
I hear you, but the bill was introduced a year ago and the senators blocking it are remaining anonymous, which seems fishy to me. I hate to sound cynical, but this screams of a couple of senators taking care of their financial backers to me. I'd say the same if it were two Dems anonymously blocking the bill.
Shotty? I thought we were buds?
None yet, kevin. But if they make it a controlled substance, and states with 3 strikes law start prosecuting people, you're going to see people get longer sentences than 5 to 10.
It would be a better place if only this were true and if only the Democrats joined them.
This makes it seem like they are going to make it controlled, implying that it currently isn't. Is it just a matter of degree? From moving HGH from controlled to double secret controlled?
From The Hill:
I could see Coburn doing it.
That's not what "Controlled Substance" means.
"HGH is tightly regulated by the FDA, but HGH is not a controlled substance on the federal level in the United States. It is a controlled substance in some states, though. As of this writing, HGH is a controlled substance in Idaho, Oregon, Rhode Island and West Virginia. In addition, Colorado has "defined" HGH as an anabolic steroid, effectively making it a controlled substance in that state. Other states place some additional restrictions on it as well."
Holds are generally used to keep bills from floor action. Yet, it appears that this bill is still stuck in Committee, not having yet been referred to the floor for action.
If that's the case, then the hold doesn't really matter a damn bit, and they could (and should) just pass the bill out of Committee, even on a party-line vote, to force a bit more action.
It's also entirely possible, that the sponsors of the bill are trying to ram it through quickly, waiving some of the typical legislative and review hearings of the bill. If that's the case, that's likely to cheese off a number of committee members, who'd want a crack at the bill, if only to ensure that their name is attached to what comes out.
Much of the blame/credit for this goes to privatization. Prison construction and prison management is now a growth industry with all the lobbyists and influence peddlers that accompany wuch status.
In Calif., it's still primarily public. The Correctional Officers union might be the most influential in the state. But yeah, in general there's a lot of money to be made off prisons and it's completely warping the criminal justice system. We, as a country, I think need to take a deep breath, step back a bit, and define again what it is we want our prisons to accomplish. Because right now they've become a form of hyper-welfare and a kind of advanced MBA program for criminals. Of course, every time an election comes up all anybody wants to hear is that we're going to put more and more and more people behind bars as if that will solve everything.
On that topic, it was funny in a kind of oh-God-can-we-please-get-the-hell-over-it sense when I read about the AG-of-the-month, Michael Mukasey, whining about sentence normalization for crack cocaine and the attendant, pending release of a number of inmates imprisoned on those grounds.
stop being reasonable.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main