User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
For wholesale prices on baseball gifts and equipment, check these stores out! |
Page rendered in 0.1857 seconds
50 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. JJ1986 Posted: June 17, 2012 at 06:24 PM (#4159356)I think many aces could probably be a team's best reliever if they were so deployed.
Kimbrel probably is the only reliever who I can think of who couldn't start, but is also as good as possible as a reliever.
Either there are only 2-3 "aces" in baseball, or they're all from Lake Wobegon...
Compared to the rest of the relief pitching field, any ace starter would instantly be better.
Which kind of side-steps the fact that Swift was the Giants opening day starter in 1992 and led the league in ERA...
He did spend September '92 in the bullpen, why?
I don't know if that's always true. The two roles seem to emphasize different talents (even though it's contrary to the way my brain insists it ought to be). Some players are particularly suited to starting, others to relieving.
Freddy Garcia as a reliever in 2012
13 innings, 1.38 ERA, 7K/3BB 1.0 WHIP .547 OPS against.
he's actually doing great as a reliever, he was knocked around at the start of the season when he started 4 games where he managed to cough up 19(!!) runs in just 13.2 IP. he's been basically lights out since he was moved.
meanwhile, Soriano's been much better than last year result wise but his 1.48 WHIP still makes for a lot of scary outtings (and is actually worse than last year but a good margin)
I guess I remember a few of those guys being Giants, but it's not like you think "Bud Black! He used to be a Giant!" unless you're a San Francisco diehard.
Thanks; I didn't realize that. It makes my point even better.
And that also helps make my point about the loss of Rivera: save opportunities are mostly converted into saves even with scary outings.
Righetti's jump to the Giants was a big deal at the time, and he's been the pitching coach there for over a decade, so he's pretty much as memorable as a Giant as he was as a Yankee. Black went to the Giants when he was still good. Though maybe it's just that as a Braves fan at the time I was acutely aware of all of those guys. It was a cobbled-together staff that pitched really well and almost made it through the full season throwing as well as anyone outside of Atlanta.
The '93 Giants also show the impact of the jump in hitting levels that was going on at the time. In 1992, they finished 9th in the league in pitching, with an ERA+ of 93 and an ERA of 3.61. In 1993 they were 5th a with an ERA+ of 108 and an ERA of... 3.61.
Yeah, that was when pitching contracts just went crazy. Didn't Matt Young sign with Boston around then, after going 8-18 with the M's?
To be fair, he had a 3.51 ERA (112 ERA+) over 225 innings with that 8-18 record.
Of course, the idea of putting a lefty with control issues in Fenway probably wasn't a good one.
And some starters, like Tom Glavine, suck in their first inning.
Ugh.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main