User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
For wholesale prices on baseball gifts and equipment, check these stores out! |
Page rendered in 0.5282 seconds
51 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Of course even if he can, I am sure that he would gladly do so in exchange for the fine. Only solution I can really think of is allowing refs to check instant replays for flops in the last couple minutes of the game.
IIRC, he was the first famous person I'd ever heard of who was dyslexic.
But like you said, this was one case where even if a player knew he was going to be fined, it would still likely be worth it for him to take one for the team (hell, I wouldn't even be surprised if team management paid the fine for him). There's at least a 50/50 chance the Clips wouldn't have won without it.
Small consolation, but yeah, I hope the league at least calls him out on this.
He also attempted the Reggie Miller/Dwyane Wade leg kick thing. That's two offenses that both should be fined.
And a ref 3 feet away missed them both.
I would have been fascinated to see him play regular minutes for a month or so to see how it would have gone.
I'm sure Stern's going to love that...
---
Since Rose was brought up yesterday, there actually was an update on him finally (but it came from Joe Cowley, ugh):
CSN reported he was running "sprints" yesterday, while they were showing him jogging about 20 feet.
Poor Mo Williams. First Chauncey takes his job, and now this. He should make sure to never let him meet his wife.
Based solely on appearance, I don't think Mo Williams should have to worry too much about losing his lady to the likes of Chauncey Billups...
(Wow, I originally accidentally typed Mo Vaughn rather than Mo Williams before I caught myself. What kind of hilarious trainwreck of a season would a team have with Mo Vaughn as it's point guard?)
I think someone with the nickname Mr. Big Shot might have an appeal that goes beyond mere appearance...
Tim Duncan playing paintball with Aziz Ansari! What a scoop!
Couldn't be any worse than Jacques Vaughn.
Haven't heard whether the cats will become the hornets or not.
Have they said why? Especially to a name so much worse than their current one?
But seriously, that sounds like a folded ABA franchise or something.
With the NHL lockout, maybe NC could rent New Orleans the unused "Hurricanes" name instead? ;-)
How good is Texas?
Starting the replay now. Looks like you got Shved'd.
Homeland called it. NBAtv actually claimed it's the 3rd straight win for the Wiz over the Heat, which is completely unbelievable. I'm not sure which loss is worse - this one or OKC @ Charlotte last season. I lean towards this one, since Wall wasn't playing.
---
Bulls lose a tough, ugly UGLY one with the Pacers. The teams combined to shoot 37%. Paul George was the ####### man though - that's the guy I keep thinking he's going to be. 34pts (14/25 shooting), 9reb, 2ast, 3blk, 2stl and only 2TO (take out George's line and the Pacers only made 15 other buckets and shot 23%); he won the game for them. Bulls offense is somehow even worse without Rip. Tough no-call ended the game too; I like the no-call when the defender jumps straight up (in this case, Hibbert on Deng), but Hibbert didn't get his arms up and they came down on Deng (Deng initiated contact) - it's an automatic call 99.5% of the time so it hurts a little.
---
Harden 3 of 19 but Rockets win anyway. He's had some real stinkers shooting this year, probably learning to be the main guy I'd guess.
Or maybe they are just an old team which loses its legs towards the end.
That might be the best way I can describe Zach Randolph. He's not a HOF level player but every so often he has nights where you think "That guy is one of the best basketball players I've ever seen." If he did it all the time, he would be a HOFer.
Part of me also wonders if he had played for Lionel Hollins or Greg Popovich(that bastard) or somebody like that his entire career if things would have turned out a little differently the first 10 years of his career. Of all the seemingly unlikely things that had to happen for this Grizzlies team to work at all, Hollins getting Z-Bo to buy-in and fill the role that he does is one of the most impressive.
Philly has shot lots of long, contested twos and failed to take care of the ball in this game. The wolves finally had a good shooting night, but it had a lot to do with having time to set with nobody challenging the shots.
No word on who got Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.
Yeah, fair enough.
But wouldn't that make the Charlotte team the Pelicans?
I was not super fond of the pick (I would have rather they traded down), but I thought he would be better than this.
On the court I'm a pretty big fan of his game, but I did see people saying here that his effort wasn't 100% last year and I would defer to most of you on that.
Proud home, IIRC, to Doug Moe, Larry Brown (playing, not coaching; he was one of the league's best point guards) & Steve Jones, among others.
(Like, Wikipedia reminds me, the great James Jones -- guy was a helluva player, really, out of Grambling -- & Dallas Cowboys punter Ron Widby.)
Hornets is a specific reference to a revolutionary war unit.
Where unit is a code word for ...
EDIT: And who knew it was revolutionary. :)
Pfft. If that's their plan, New Orleans can suck it! ;-)
Nah, they can have the name if they give up the Unibrow.
Perhaps this plays into the perception.
Close, but Utah is the Beehive State not the Hornethive State.
Deal!
Cracked me up for how stupid it was.
Interesting take. Short version- If pro sports are really just about which team is better, then there is no reason for them to have so much cultural importance. Pure entertainment has to enter into the equation pretty heavily. It is probably the best reason for Stern's side that I have heard so far. Stephen Fatsis made a pretty similar argument on Hang Up and Listen podcast too.
if only anderson were getting to the line like love. regardless, kinds of a shame that the pelicants' best two dudes are pfs.
I'm a huge fan Ryan Anderson and I think he will be a very good starter for years, BUT... Jamison was guarding him and he shot 5/8 on threes. Nobody is really as good as they look on their best day.
I'm not being defensive about Love; he isn't even playing very well since coming back from his hand injury too early. Just want to put his accomplishments in context.
re anderson: i prefer the dirk lite comp some have put forth.
He was averaging 18 and 8 with like a 60TS% before this game.
Gary Neal and Splitter had really good games.
Yeah, all the stuff in post 67 seems like why the qualification lite was added in 61. If he did what he did tonight every night he wouldn't be Kevin Love Lite, he'd be Kevin Love.
And I think he can keep that up, just not go for 31 on such sharp shooting except in unique situations.
So...wouldn't that kind of sort of make him something like a Kevin Love-lite?
Fair enough.
Not until he does what Love did in post 17...
Chauncey Billups given a flopping warning for Monday's game.
If so that is almost unbelievable. He was basically as good or better than he'd ever been in '10-'11 and then boom, toast.
I notice Kris Humphries has also taken a step backwards...
Damn Kardashians.
Wilt Chamberlain
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
KARL MALONE!!!!!!
Michael Jordan
Kobe Bryant
(subtle, subliminal homerism added for effect)
Has Kobe ever appeared in a movie? Wilt was legendary in Conan, Kareem had Airplane, Malone had an embarrassing cameo in the gawdawful Soulplane, and MJ of course is of Space Jam fame (infamy?).
Too bad Shaq didn't reach 30,000. He'd have been the most "accomplished" film "actor" of them all.
I'd say there's a bit of a difference between Milwaukee's starters in December and say the Thunder or Lakers (uh) starters in May and June.
EDIT: Upon re-reading, this comes across as more sarcastic than I intended.
Kareem is obviously the best based solely on his work in Airplane, Game of Death, and Baseketball.
What Moses said. Big difference between Milwaukee and a top 4 or 8 team.
LINK
OTOH, I don't see the West looking anything like the current** version. I'd bet on 3 of the 8 right now not making it.
*For posterity, today it's NY/MIA/ATL/CHI/BKN/PHI/BOS/IND.
**MEM/OKC/SAS/LAC/GS/HOU/UTA/LAL
Yes. Absolutely. There is no debate about that.
Hoping the Wolves can sneak in. They are keeping their collective head above water with all of these injuries. Getting Love back at about 80% has helped, but without Rubio, AK, and Budinger (not bothering to count Roy), they are still scuffling. I am hoping they can get in a better rhythm in about a month when Rubio and AK are back and getting used to everyone.
So, seems like that even though Love is a great rebounder, this means that you might want a guy who is good on the OGlass out there with him.
Yeah, that's a good point. He obviously draws the defender out with him, and strictly looking at OREB% does not account for the value of taking the other big away from the rim. Strictly from a rebounding perspective, though, Love is always better than whoever is guarding him, so that's a net loss on the boards.
My general feeling is that men's college basketball has embraced the notion that the 15-20' jumper is a really poor shot -- probably because most players can't reliably hit a long 2. So possessions are more oriented around getting a good look at the rim, or an open 3. And when those aren't available, you get 35 seconds of teams trying to do that, and ending up with a bad 3, or a crappy off-the-dribble chuck at the rim.
Yeah...its nowhere near capable of doing so. I think the question is more of "How do the rules help or hinder the creation of a quality product." For me, long shot clocks enabling long bad possessions, foul limits and charge rules come immediately to mind as reasons I don't find college basketball as enjoyable as I could.
The three point line is far too close, IMO. Despite the fact that the players are smaller and less athletic than NBA players, the court seems smaller and more congested. Forcing shooters out deeper would probably help a good bit.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main