User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
For wholesale prices on baseball gifts and equipment, check these stores out! |
Page rendered in 0.4824 seconds
51 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Yes.
Joe Flacco is an average QB.
No. Turnovers automatically trigger a review.
I wish I could remember the wonderful phrase SBB came up with when he was cherry picking periods from Jack Morris record to make him look better... I always want to use it as snark when I see things like this.
Joe Flacco is an average QB.
Mercurial is more like it, but he's still outplayed those three Greek Gods in his last three playoff games, and he seems to rise to the challenge. Beyond that, this isn't the crippled Ravens team that we saw a month ago against the Broncos in Baltimore, as the Broncos discovered yesterday.
The problem with that comparison is that nobody's saying that Flacco is a HoF QB or even that he's a great one. All I wrote is that to see the Flacco we've seen in his last three playoff games, with a healthy team behind him, against a QB who's been great for all of half a year, would be a terrific matchup. This isn't about the HoF or even permanent labels of "greatness" for either of them.
It's still the same thing. The guy has 80 regular season games, and 9 playoff games on his resume. And you want to pretend that 3 of those games are more informative than his whole resume. Wake up and take a hit from the objective pipe.
You're smarter than this.
FPH's Jack Morris comparison is fair. And let's not forget that on one of the drives in OT he threw an INT that the defender stepped out of bounds on and another INT that the defender dropped. Clutch.
Maybe so, but he isn't afraid to throw the ball deep, and Harbaugh lets him, and that helps everyone.
It's sad to say given the risk-averse state of some of the coaches/qb's, but I think half or two-thirds of the QBs in the league don't make that throw that Flacco made at the end of regulation that inexplicably busted the Broncos' defense.
WTF are you talking about? I'm not comparing Flacco to Brady or Manning or Brees or Joe Montana or Dan Marino or any other HOF level QB overall. I'm just pointing out that he's performed very well in his recent playoff matchups, and that the Ravens vs the Niners or Seahawks would make for a great Super Bowl. If I want to see a Hall of Merit All-Star game instead of a matchup like that, I'll let you know.
Now just chill for a few hours and let's all hope that the Falcons go home for the winter.
I hate to say it, but I'm agreeing with you. (smile) Although I blame it more on the coaches than on the QBs.
Niner fans are split on being legitimatly afraid of the Seahawks-- even in SF and wanting revenge.
I had to look up the last Niners/Falcons game... It was 2010 Singletary led Niners blew a 14-0 1st quarter lead after a blocked punt and lost 16-14.
Cherry-picking aside, I fail to see why Flacco in the SB would be more compelling than Schaub. And both are far less compelling than Brady.
The only thing i take away from this, is that you are a Ravens fan, who wants to see them in the SB.
Do you realize that their is more to success in today NFL than throwing deep? At least 60% of your posts berate or praise teams for their deep passing attack.
For someone who is a casual fan, you are amazingly opinionated. I guess that's a trait consistent with know-it-alls's regardless of topic.
It is funnily timed.
stat d'jour
Seahawks trailing 34-0 the past two weeks in the first half while facing 2-legged QBs...
This Niner fan is amazed by how different Seattle looks today than it did in that blowout in week 16. The Seahawks dominated the line of scrimmage on both sides.
Yeah I don't want to be a troll here; going up 20-0 is impressive, no matter what.
There was nothing impressive about marching down the field methodically to put it back to a 20 point lead. It was sort of boring. Just time chewing, third down converting, TD scoring boring.
Why? "Matty Ice" is the opposing quarterback.
That was me, but then I kind of took it back. Do I still get credit? In fairness, they're almost certainly going to hold on, and I'm sure they'll take the win, no matter how impressive or unimpressive it might end up being.
Clearly a Lynch TD on replay.
EDIT: Also, for the record, it clearly broke the plane.
Holy Roller rule.
I'm glad I'm a Dolphins fan right now (dont say that often), but I feel badly for my Falcon fan friends and my city.
My favorite inexplicable rule (well, "football move" takes the cake here, so second favorite), is the goal line extending into infinity. Because...?
If it's fumbled and recovered by an offensive player, it can't end up ahead of where it was fumbled.
I mean that's not really at all what happened, but sure, it's definitely still funny.
Great game. I no longer feel badly for my Falcon friends.
Aikman: And that win, this win, right here, legitimizes the Seattle Seahawks as the #1 seed, and makes them the team to beat.
(cut to sideline reporter)
Aikman: And that win, this win, right here, legitimizes the Seattle Seahawks as the #1 seed, and makes them the team to beat.
Billick and Brennaman called the game.
Well done, instant Nostradamus!
I think it's fair to say that NFL head coaches collectively lose their senses inside of 2 minutes.
It's tough to gauge how far one can throw downfield with only 6 seconds left. Probably should have tried a 15-yard sideline route, I guess? Or maybe they thought the Hail Mary on play #2 was their best option?
As a side, I've never been a huge Tony Gonzalez fan, but the level he's still playing at is pretty amazing.
There is a world of difference between not kicking deep to the deep man and a horrible onside attempt.
I was wondering the same thing. Makes me think Smith called the TO right away thinking they might run another play and then decided to just kick the FG.
A lot of NFL coaching decisions seem to be made that way these days [Heck, Mary Levy pulled this one off with the Scott Norwood kick in Super Bowl XXV vs Giants, when Norwood had never kicked a FG that far - 47 yards - on that surface. There were still 8 secs left. To this day, everyone seems to think that it's Norwood who was the goat. Well played, Marv!].
And yes, it looked to me like Bryant already heard the whistle, then booted it anyway, knowing it didn't matter.
Yeah. I'd have liked to see that kick attempted with 4 seconds, or make Carroll take the TO to stop it earlier.
"Pain."
And that is why I married her, boys.
I wondered that, but if the snap was bad then you could abort the play and kick it again. Run the clock down and that's not an option. Also:
The Falcons didn't have a timeout left. How were they going to "abort" the play? I think the idea that they were thinking about running another play but changed their minds as someone suggested.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main