User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
For wholesale prices on baseball gifts and equipment, check these stores out! |
Page rendered in 0.6082 seconds
54 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
No, a bland one does. An innovative coach gets blood from a stone.
They have the draft and free agency coming up.
They will fire Trestman and Emery and start again. Realistically, who would you prefer the Bears to hire?
What would have happened to Smith if instead of getting to the Super Bowl in year three he got them to 9-7 instead?
This should be Trestman's #1 priority.
I think the defense is getting old and their schemes are getting a bit dated. I think they definitely can improve on defense.
As to why fire Smith? Because I don't think he is a good head coach.
Football Outsiders has them as the #1 defense. #1 total, #1 pass, #1 run. Advanced NFL Stats has them #1 as well.
I dunno, but I doubt he gets fired then.
Was that really an era, or was it just the few super-successful coaches who did that?
Wiki lists 71 college football coaches with 200 or more wins. Of those, 27 stayed (or have stayed) at their original school. Of those, the only easily recognizable names are Eddie Robinson, Joe Paterno, Tom Osborne, Jake Gaither, and Vince Dooley, and only three of them coached at big time Division I schools. Knute Rockne could be added even though he didn't coach long enough to get 200 wins, but the overwhelming majority of these coaches are either still coaching or retired only in the past 10 or 15 years.
And by leaps and bounds. The difference between them and SF in #2, is about the same as the gap from #2 to #13. You aren't getting any better on defense. The best you can hope for is to not get worse.
Yup, by default they will be worse next year. Maybe only a little, but they'll almost certainly regress. Which makes improving the offense even more important.
Now, in fairness, not having Mike Tice as OC automatically improves the offense.
I'd bet something that way more people know who Lavell Edwards (200+ wins, all at one school) is than Jake Gaither. I can't imagine that name having any meaning to someone south of 50 years old, unless they have some association with FAMU.
On a side note there will be a separate service for his eyebrows.
Manti Te’o’s Dead Girlfriend, The Most Heartbreaking And Inspirational Story Of The College Football Season, Is A Hoax
I see the Ravens as a tough opponent, but I think they're kind of a binary team: either they will be very tough or very easy.
Too bad we have to suffer through another week of the Ray Lewis Admiration Society.
I don't really have a strong opinion on the NFC game. I'm interested to see how Kaepernick plays.
The former of these is somewhat mitigated (at least compared to the last meeting) because of the addition of Talib. Talib and Dennard in coverage with McCourty back at Safety isn't going to win any awards, but it's significantly better than the McCourty at CB situation from week 3.
If that's the conventional wisdom, I agree with it. I think the Patriots certainly deserve to be favored, but I see it as more of a 1 score game and wouldn't be schocked if the Raven won. Something like 31-24 Patriots seems about right to me.
Not a strong opinion on the NFC game, but if forced to put money on it, I'd probably go with SF in a close game.
Apropos of nothing: Ronaiah Tuiasosopo, the guy who's apparently behind the hoax, is a cousin of former Mariners infielder Matt Tuiasosopo, who played for the Mets' AAA affiliate last year and signed a minor league deal with the Tigers for 2013.
Roniah is the son of Titus, who played football for USC, and Matt is the son of Manu, who played football in the NFL. Titus and Manu are cousins.
Not sure I follow the logic. Aren't you more likely to be conned by someone who knows you at least a little than a complete stranger?
A catholic institution is spinning like mad to avoid negative PR? Me so confused.
If he is in on it, it's equally puzzling. Mostly that no one at all slipped all this time.
He claims he met her, in the stories from before this came out. What exactly is he claming was the hoax? And why would the university blindly try to help deflect for him?
He's in on it. No idea why the family played this, but they're all in on it.
The same Te'o family that runs his Facebook fan page and blacklisted a Hawaii newspaper for showing a picture of Te'o getting bowled over in the BCS title game...I have no idea what role they played in this hype machine...
http://www.faniq.com/blog/Manti-Teo-and-his-father-blacklist-Honolulu-newspaper-after-negative-coverage-Blog-60568
I suppose (and note, I'm not claiming this is what I believe) that Tuiasosopo had a girl in on it as well, who actually did meet Te'o, and act the part.
That seems really, really unlikely though. It means Tuiasosopo was planning this for years, and then got lucky that Te'o turned into such a star.
EDIT: Sounds like the Te'o family is claiming essentially that (source Notre Dame, via Deadspin):
A different girl from the one in the pictures?
Who knows? Perhaps the "Reba" girl was the one in on it, and now decided to come clean for whatever reason (money, conscience, etc.).
Though that seems farfetched.
a) Teo was in on it for publicity
b) Teo is naive enough to think a girl he met on Twitter (that is, never) was his ’gf', or
c) Teo was in on it for cover (assumes he's gay)
Edit: and (b) still stretches believability. Maybe a combo of b and c, covering for the fact that he'd never had a gf?
Instead, we got this. From a November 13, 2012 ESPN story:
Did ESPN fabricate the quote?
Or this. October 25, 2012. Did SI fabricate this quote?
This is rich, from the SI article:
More:
And then, there was - oh - the videotaped interview with Te'o himself talking about the loss of his girlfriend, on Charlie Rose's show.
Etc etc etc etc. He was not the victim of the hoax. He helped perpetuate it.
But I like this from Notre Dame:
Did this person also conspire with others to lead Te'o to believe that he had a girlfriend and that he talked to her on the phone every night?
Then this "Reba" would have to be lying -- had to have actively scammed him, pretended she was his girlfriend and that she was dying -- but how does that even work when there was supposedly a hospital involved and a funeral, etc.? He never interacted at all with her friends or family? And she was his "girlfriend"?
This is going to be the bigger story in this, IMO.
And/or:
d) It started as a joke that got completely out of hand and then they just continued.
e) It was part of a Heismann campaign (if this makes sense; I don't even know who won).
f) They saw how easy it is to manipulate the media with this stuff and they took advantage.
g) They are all simply effed up, which they would have to be to use the real dead girl's parents' as pawns in the hoax.
Right, but my point is that he never said "Whoa, let's put on the brakes here, this story is not true." Instead, he participates.
Not sure it passes the smell test. Ok I am sure; it doesn't.
There is no real dead girl, is there? I thought the girl whose pictures were used is still alive.
Her "death" happened between the third and fourth games of the season. I don't think there was any real expectation he could become a Heisman candidate at that point.
No, apparently there is a real girl who did die, Bridget, as I quoted above, who Te'o sent a letter of sympathy too - though oddly it seems to have disappeared from the deadspin story:
So basically for Te'o to be telling the truth, this Reba has to be lying.
And Te'o has to have an odd understanding of the term "girlfriend," I guess. Among a thousand other things.
Ok.
Dude. You said you had a girlfriend. Who was passing away from cancer. And you never visited her?
Once summer practice hits, college football players aren't going too far from campus. And she was supposedly improving over the summer.
I'm not saying this means anything makes any more sense.
I mean, he's not saying his Twitter account was hacked, as he couldn't since he was interviewed numerous times on this topic. I imagine he's said enough things in the past few months on the record -- between Twitter and the various print/tv interviews -- to sink his battleship several times over.
And you can believe that if this Reba is telling the truth, she is already giving Deadspin enough information to prove it -- i.e., phone records, emails, etc. Although I suppose if Te'o's story is that he never actually met the girl in person, then Reba can be telling the truth which means that there is some OTHER girl involved, who used Reba's picture and then pretended to be her over the phone. I think. There are a lot of layers to this now, and especially now that Te'o has gone on the record with a formal defense.
But I imagine a simple review of Teo's phone records would confirm, if he is telling the truth, that he made several calls to Imposter X over the months and the authorities will quickly be able to tell who Imposter X is from the phone records.
One wonders why, if Te'o is telling the truth, he and the school didn't go immediately to the police on December 26th. The authorities should have this wrapped up already, or at least be ready with a formal statement that they have been investigating.
We'll have confirmation soon enough. My guess is that Te'o will be issuing an apology for producing a fake cover story and an admission of guilt within 48 hours.
"On the bright side, M. Te'o, it will be difficult for Dead Spin to acquire the imaginary photos of your member from her pretend cell phone."
Not sure how that affects anything.
And report what crime, exactly?
-Te'o's motives for engaging in the hoax
-Whether - or to what degree - his father/family was in on it.
His 'I'm super embarrassed' cover story is also quite obviously his only out. To say he got taken in by someone he met online will also serve to explain why he won't want to talk about it, take interviews, or press the matter further - 'hopefully others will learn from my mistakes, and be more cautious in future' straight to the combine and then the draft.
Re the ESPN angle - also seems clear to me that the tipping point in Deadspin running the story was their ability to track the photos down to 'Reba' and thereby confirm that 'Lennay Kekua' was in fact fully fictional.
It seems they did, according to the university's press release:
But I imagine a simple review of Teo's phone records would confirm, if he is telling the truth, that he made several calls to Imposter X over the months and the authorities will quickly be able to tell who Imposter X is from the phone records.
Yeah, I imagine phone records will provide a definitive answer to this.
The SBT story claims they met in 2009. So, I have a really hard time he thought he was friends/gf/whatever with this person for 3 years and had no idea it was a hoax.
T'eo and his family were in on this charade. (Why is anyone's guess.)
T'eo is covering his ass as best he can, which is not well at all.
Notre Dame is running with the T'eo spin because they're Notre Dame, and they have an image to protect at all cost. For the university, T'eo was a victim of a Twitter hoax exactly as much as that girl that killed herself was totally *not* raped.
She never even alleged she was raped, so that's an odd stance.
He's saying that Te'o got a call on 12/26 from his "gf" telling him she wasn't dead. Swarbrick is saying he's know of this since then.
Forget it. He's rolling.
Uh huh.
I realize the only damning fact you need is the university involved but it might behoove you to read a news article before throwing out wild conclusions.
BTW, that was the first thing he mentioned when asked what proof they had Te'o wasn't involved.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
I do my best to read an article now and then.
You'd have thought Paterno-Sandusky would have taught you people not to hold these golden calves so very high...
That story strains credibility.
I'm not sure which option is best. Or least worst.
Who was going to investigate it? The school? HA! The networks that rely on golden helmed football to drive their ratings? DOUBLE HA!
Or did learn.
I do have strong opinions about the NFC. I think the niners will win, but i wouldnt touch the -5 point home dog line with a 10 foot pole.
I think that the NFCC is likely to be a shootout. I actually think of the Falcons as the Packers lite.
Atl has better OL, worse pass rush, worse Qb than the packers.
What atl does have is health, and thats huge.
Unless i have totally mis judged the atl defense (possible) the niners will put up points. I think they can stop the run (including option) OR the pass, but not both. Atl defense wins big if they can stuff the run and confuse kaepernick with solid zone defense. Seattle, stl, mia did a good job of stopping the post alex smith niners.
What i dont see is a lot of qb runs for sf. I think they will try to do to atl what seattle did in the 4th Q.
Possibly weird but i think the niner defense is the key to this game.
Will you get the one that stuffed ne for 3 quarters or the one since.
If atl can generate successes on the ground when sf is in nickel it will be a very close game.
I don't think that's what happened here, though.
Well, then that's their problem, isn't it?
Paterno wasn't a child rapist. He just abided and abetted one for 25 years. He was king of his own little sycophantic fiefdom at Penn State, the way Brian Kelly is at Notre Dame, the way Nick Saban is at Alabama, etc, et al. The problem is that all major athletic departments are sick little feudal wastelands and cults of power/"leadership" from the Great Head Coach. And lest it be said I am jumping on Notre Dame here for some personal distaste for that little self-righteous cult*, I guarantee you that there's been a sexual assault and rape by a member of the football team at 75% of all D-1 programs this season. And they all get covered up, because football comes first at all costs.
*which is not to say that I don't harbor a special vendetta against the cult in South Bend, because, seriously, I do enjoy their comeuppance more than I would most. About the only thing that would equal it would be something at Duke basketball.
What Seattle had that SF lacks are corners who can shut down Roddy White and Julio Jones. If they double those guys, Gonzalez is open in the middle. I expect Atlanta to pass a lot more effectively against SF.
Gold star for haggard.
eta: the Deadspin article implied that they'd actually first "met" in 2011, not 2009.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main