User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
For wholesale prices on baseball gifts and equipment, check these stores out! |
Page rendered in 0.5627 seconds
53 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
He brings up the fatigue factor for Spurs. Now that the euphoria has died down, the fitness of the team is the one thing this season that worries me. They've had trouble finishing strong all season and it's only the first of October.
I am moving to NYC in a week or two, but my place is basically in Inwood so I'm not sure if the space shuttle program will be reactivated in time to get me down there.
Look for the GIANT Irish flag on the west side of 3rd avenue.
God dammit. I'd come to believe that Cox wasn't going to analyze Saturday's game for some reason, so I shamelessly aped his style in writing up a tactics-y blog post last night for the same site that carried my NYRB-THFC match report. Then I wake up this morning to discover that, not only has he written something about it for the Guardian, but he's got a full analysis up on ZM.
On the one hand, it's nice to have a ZM breakdown on a game Spurs actually won (first time that's happened in at least two years). On the other hand, I'm going to look like a mug when my post gets published tomorrow.
I'd say they finished pretty strong against Reading and QPR. Yes, they were totally gassed with 15-20 minutes left to play on Saturday, but I think there were a couple reasonable explanations for that.
One, they pressed very aggressively in the opening half hour and broke forward quickly as a unit when they won possession. All that running will take its toll; there aren't too many teams around that can maintain that ultra-high tempo for even an hour, let alone the whole game.
Two, United were just flat out fantastic in the second half. Spurs never had the ball for more than about ten seconds. They just couldn't keep it long enough to give themselves even a short breather. I don't know whether that was a cause of the fatigue or a symptom, probably a bit of both. With United pummeling them, Spurs were so deep and just didn't have the legs to be dangerous on the break or get up and support Defoe. There were about three or four counter-attacking opportunities where a fresher Bale, Vertonghen, or Demebele would have caused major problems for United, but the key pass went astray or a touch was too heavy and United was able to recover and win the ball back.
The other charitable interpretation is that it probably takes more than a few months to build up the sort of fitness levels required to sustain AVB's high tempo style over longer periods.
QPR staggering down the road towards two points from eight games. And we all know what that means...
QPR staggering down the road towards two points from eight games. And we all know what that means...
It's going to happen, isn't it?
Depending on what is closer, take the 1 to 96th or the A to 125th and then the C to 96th and then take the 96th street bus cross town.
In your heart, you know it would be hilarious.
EDIT: Mark Hughes not looking long for the job, since they have to travel to West Brom and Arsenal for two of their next three. Five points through nine games is exactly the kind of thing that gets 'Arry 'ired. I hope Tony Fernandes is ready to open the checkbook. I wonder how long it will take him to get Crouch...
In your heart, you know it would be hilarious.
Hilarious, of course, but I think he could do a job for them. He could even get Parker and Dawson from Spurs in January, probably. Those two love Harry and they'd be automatic first 11 again.
Harry would have to pull Crouch out of Tony Pulis' cold dead hands, I think. And yes, that's as close to onanistic imagery as I care to get in a public forum.
QPR host Everton between those two away days, as well. I don't know if even five points from nine games is a real good bet at this rate.
It would, of course, be a 'triffic irony if Harry got hired at that point, because six points from nine games (from the 5-2 loss at the Emirates through the 0-1 loss to, who else, QPR at the Lane) is, as much as anything else, what got Harry the other kind of 'ired this summer.
A pretty cool idea, if you ask me.
They'll have to buy out Sven's contract in Thailand.
Also, the last 20 minutes of Celtic-Spartak should be fun. Spartak down to 10, should get both sides pretty open.
Well, well. Look at Nostradamus here.
Spartak don't really have an oligarch.
Yeah, let's not talk crap about Spartak, the greatest club in Russia.
Aren't these two statements contradictory?
I'm currently watching BATE-Bayern because of the shocking scoreline. Frankly, BATE have had the better chances in the second half so far.
3-1 the final.
Early reports are that the Puyol injury is "only" a dislocated elbow, which would be incredibly lucky.
Early reports are that FPH was dancing naked in the street.
Thanks. I wasn't watching that game so those statements next to each other seemed weird to me.
Indeed. That was right up there with Rooney's leg for most gruesome injury of the season so far. Hopefully there won't be any more contenders.
And I just got this. Surprisingly juvenile from the bear, but funny.
Sounds like he needs to hire The Bobs from Office Space.
"So, Peter. What would you say...you do here?"
I thought Michael Parkhurst looked very good for most of the game. He shut down Victor Moses and while I'm not sure how much he had to do with keeping Ashley Cole in check, you didn't see Cole in the Chelsea attack much. When Cole did make runs, Parkhurst kept him in check. On the offensive end, Parkhurst wasn't afraid to go forward and did a very nice job of making runs and distributing the ball once it was fed to him. He had two very good crosses that could have converted into goals for Nordsjælland. I was impressed with the distribution, more so because I would think the natural tendency would be to stay at home against an opponent like Chelsea.
That said, he committed the foul on Torres in 80th after getting muscled off and that freekick ended up being a David Luiz goal that made it 2-0. I somewhat excuse Parkhurst for that, he was trying to defend Torres after the defender that was marking Torres failed, so Parkhurst was put in a difficult position. I blame the other defender much more for getting beat by Torres in the first place than I do Parkhurst for having to foul him.
And the other big negative was that he probably was at fault on the Ramires goal in minute 89 that made it 4-0. I'm probably sounding like a Parkhurst apologist but I also think it's hard to blame him too much for this. He was sort of in no man's land. He was responsible for tracking Hazzard on the wing and Oscar ended up making a very good run and Parkhurst ended up being a bit too far away to switch to Oscar. He was being asked to mark two players. The central mid should have been tracking Oscar's run. I think that goal was probably more a result of a Nordsjælland team that had sort of given up being down 3-0 after really pushing it to Chelsea for a good portion of the 2nd half and looking like it would tie the game.
It's kind of hard to walk away impressed with a fullback's performance when he is responsible for giving up two goals but I somehow pulled that off. He was really good for 89 minutes and I think the two he conceded were as much the fault of his teammates than Parkhurst. If Klinsmann were to have watched the game, I think he would have liked what he saw. Especially since Cherundolo probably won't be in the picture much longer.
Despite the final score (which doesn't reflect most of the game), I thought Nordsjaelland was quite good especially in defense. Parkhurst was extremely solid and did negate Moses for most of the match. However, the best player on the pitch might have been Okore. He's a really good young CD (20 year old) and I wouldn't be suprised to see a ManU or Arsenal go after him. Reminds me a bit of Agger in his aggressivness.
And of course, I'd add Chelsea as a team that might go after him.
I never know with that kind of call. It was obviously unavoidable, then again there's a reason guys try to keep their arms down by their side when they're in that position.
I didn't see it but this sounds like the opposite of a forward who plays a "bad game" but scores two goals. At some point you have to consider what the job is and for the fullback that is to keep the ball out of the net. If he was wholly or partially responsible for 2 goals in 90 minutes it's hard for me to get too excited by it.
Subotic was launching into a tackle, though, I don't think you can expect defenders to run and tackle effectively with their arms behind their backs. I can see it waiting for a move though.
Lloris
Walker, Dawson, Caulker, Vertonghen
Huddlestone, Dembele
Lennon, Dempsey, Bale
Defoe
Subs: Cudicini, Gallas, Sandro, Sigurdsson, Falque, Mason, Townsend
I am obviously biased, but I will just point out that FIFA's rules are very clear, that intent is all that matters.
That certainly seemed to be the "standard" applied last night.
Interesting then that AVB is fielding full squads for Europa league matches.
I thought they were doing okay (not great, but at least on near even terms) until the 3-5-2 was rolled out. Holy Hell are they terrible in that formation.
Someone is going to have to explain to me why Mancini would choose a formation that highlights the team's primary weakness (solid backline) at the expense of it's strength (forwards and creative mids). Seems baffling to me.
Anyone have any good reason why he's trying it other than the fact he is Italian (it is quite common in Serie A, no)?
Just wondering.
Well written, but you've got to get rid of the dark background and light font. It is so painful and jarring.
I'm not going to defend it, but he seems to think that they're going to dominate the ball to an extent that it won't matter. Unfortunately, it's not working. I also don't get why Lescott has been buried this year.
I think the easy answer is the right one here. Even the best managers/coaches have systems they just feel a little more comfortable with. It's why speedy 2nd baseman with .307 OBPs get lead off jobs and why closers have jobs. You're completely right about it being a lousy formation for City. They look incredibly uncomfortable in it.
Thank you. I agree re: the site design, but it ain't my site.
First of all, a back 3 can actually help a shaky back line. A back 4 is a very static construct, and is basically only as good as the weakest link of the chain, since that's the point the other team will usually use to attack. A back 3 with 2 wingbacks allows for much more flexibility if executed well. You basically can move protection and defenders around so that you always have the opponent outnumbered in he key areas. Of course to pull it off, you need to understand what those areas are at various points in the game, and you need players who understand their responsibilities in the scheme, and have the versatility to play out of position at least some of the time.
Secondly, when did City's defense turn into immobile, calamitous shell of its former self? They allowed the fewest goals in the PL last season. Clichy, in particular, has become a liability. I am surprised Dortmund didn't switch Reus to that side (he plays in that position frequently). i think he's the type of player that would have totally overwhelmed him.
And I know everybody wants to highlight the switch from a back 4, because that's when they conceded, but that ignores 2 key factors to me. One, the goal came from a terrible pass from Rodwell. That kind of "assist" would have been lethal with any defensive formation. And two, it's not like Dortmund wasn't creating chances practically at will before the change. As I said they should have scored at least 2 by half time. Yes they looked bad after the switch... but they looked bad all night.
And the main reason Dortmund was getting those chances imo was because City couldn't deal with their pressing and their tempo (which did cause Dortmund some issues of their own defensively). I think Mancini made the switch for 2 reasons. First to spread out his team more, in order to open up more passing lanes, to prevent turning the ball over in key areas, and allowing Dortmund to break, which had been an issue all night. And secondly to give the team the defensive flexibility and structure to deal with those breaks when they did invariably occur. It didn't work, but I can see why he felt he needed to do something, because City were getting steamrolled at the back.
Twellman just dropped the classic, "now people are going to be talking about the handshake instead of the game." You're on television yourself! You can choose to talk about the game!
He hasn't decided if he is going to appeal yet.
No doubt stalling to get it to happen some point in November and December when the schedule is Liverpool, West Brom, Man City, Fulham, West Ham, Sunderland, Southampton, Aston Villa, Norwich, Everton, QPR and Stoke. The rest of October is Spurs then Man U back to back. Delay the appeal as long as possible to try to play those games then take it the suspension when the schedule gets easier.
It works in baseball.
That was completely excessive, but I felt for the ref in that spot with the game headed to an even more humiliating finish.
Grant Holt was complete class today, though you can't say that for the rest of his squad. That's a man that I wouldn't mind having a pint with, though I'm guessing bare knuckle brawls follows him from pub to pub.
Praise Jebus. Now keep it tight please, Hugo.
Conversely, is there any other EPL keeper who looks more incompetent on crosses than De Gea, he is a mess.
Looking at the stats I assume it was a really frustrating draw for Liverpool. I guess Spurs just made Man U angry...
Is there any other kind against Stoke?
Good to see Newcastle is well under way to their biannual slaughtering by Man U.
he was much better than Torres for sure. It's weird, torres obviously has confidence problems and a body totally lacking any pace, but he's doing a lot of dirty work, which is nice to see. This is like Shevchenko 06-07, the skill is obviously there, the confidence and pace is not, but still trying
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main