|
|
|
|
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: Primer Dugout (and link of the day) 5-24-2013 (16 - 6:28pm, May 24)Last: Eric J can SABER all he wants toNewsblog: HHS: Autin: Miguel Cabrera to the max (27 - 6:27pm, May 24)Last: KT's Pot ArbNewsblog: Tangotiger Blog: Ensberg and Tango speak on being locked-in (63 - 6:26pm, May 24)Last: Sunday silenceNewsblog: [OTP-May] Politico: Congressional baseball game, May 1, 1926 (4395 - 6:26pm, May 24)Last:  Rickey Fredonia Fudge Duckery Precious TwiddleNewsblog: Paul Daugherty: Old-v-New schools of thought (21 - 6:25pm, May 24)Last: Kiko SakataNewsblog: Fox Sports: McLouth catch earns thrown beverage (8 - 6:24pm, May 24)Last: KT's Pot ArbNewsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread - May 2013 (1231 - 6:17pm, May 24)Last:  andrewbergNewsblog: OT: The Soccer Thread, May 2013 (1157 - 6:13pm, May 24)Last:  Swedish ChefNewsblog: MLB: Don Sutton never shy about voicing his opinion (9 - 6:12pm, May 24)Last: Steve TrederNewsblog: LATimes: Microsoft unveils new Xbox One console (38 - 5:57pm, May 24)Last: CrosbyBirdNewsblog: OT: NHL is finally back thread (376 - 5:47pm, May 24)Last:  Random Transaction GeneratorNewsblog: OMNICHATTER for May 24, 2013 (10 - 5:45pm, May 24)Last: Joey B. has ignited his October #NatitudeNewsblog: ESPN: Forging bond with Pete Rose has helped fuel Joey Votto's desire to be great (174 - 5:11pm, May 24)Last:  The Id of SugarBear BlanksNewsblog: Fay Vincent: THE UMPIRE FIX (9 - 5:00pm, May 24)Last: Johnny Sycophant-Laden ForaNewsblog: FanGraphs: Cameron: The 2013 Cubs: Better Than We Think (41 - 4:47pm, May 24)Last: The District Attorney
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
The funniest might have been Newt Gingrich selling himself as an outsider.
Yes, an opinion with which right-wingers like Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Chris Dodd, et al., seem to agree.
NOW, you're starting to understand the GOP's 'substance'!
It's Treder in a walk.
Hmmmmm, where does being against juicers for the Hall of Fame put me on the political spectrum? With the liberal Treder or the wingnut Ray?
Other than that, the wingnuts here are so completely clueless about liberals and liberalism that it scarcely matters what they think. You could fit their knowledge of actual American social conditions over the past 100 years into a thimble and still leave plenty of room.
As to who's the most consistent of the wingnuts, though, that's a tough call. After disqualifying the obvious trolls like Joey and Good Face, I'd say that it'd be Edgar Bergen Nieporent and Charlie McCarthy DiPerna on "Don't steal my person" economics, "Bear thy rapist's child, woman" snapper on cultural and religious matters, and Kehoskie on the 2012 election. There are some promising wannabee benchwarmers who show up from time to time, but their Wingnut Above Replacement score needs to be burnished by a bigger career total. But I'd say that a few years in the loo with Ayn Rand might be enough to bring them up to speed.
You give the states a choice whether to spend it or not. States can choose to be high tax/high benefit or low tax/low benefit, or somewhere in between, and people can vote with their feet.
Yup.
...and sealed in a mayonnaise jar stored on Funk & Wagnels porch.
At gunpoint.
How 'Pro-Choice' are Democrats?
Funny stuff.
I think hidden inside a hollowed-out pumpkin in the pumpkin patch would be more apropos.
umm, no...
By contrast, in 2012, Mitt Romney's major policy proposals are the repealing of Obama's policies. He has no health care plan, no financial regulation plan, no tax plan beyond "I'll cut taxes and it'll be revenue neutral because... look! it's Halley's Comet!"
The GOP has drummed its serious policy people out of the party, and now it's just these Mayberry Machiavellis who see policy as just another campaign in which the party is always right.
Good one. Shows that certain segments of both sides are can be as hypocritical. FTR, I'm opposed to most of those mandates talked about in the piece. But one can take this freedom of choice thing too far. Should I have a choice to not pay taxes? Should I have a choice to not educate my children? Should I have a choice to smoke in a public library? Should I have a choice to not wear pants in public?
Er, except for Paul Ryan, who was ... nominated to be vice president.
(I know, I know — Ryan isn't "serious.")
The fewer plans, the better, as far as I'm concerned.
But it's kind of funny how liberals criticize the "oppose everything Obama does" tactic used by the Republicans, since that's precisely what Democrats did to Bush for 8 years.
Democracy, Democrat style
also...DRINK! DRINK! DRINK!!!
Wow! That's ridiculous.
I was going to say something, but 724 came first...
No. Yes. No. Yes.
The Democratic base has two main problems - (1) it just isn't as big as the Republican base, see polling on self-identification as "liberal" vs "conservative" and (2) its alternative infrastructure is fractured between a variety of different causes, which makes it extremely hard to build a significant left-wing group that can put broad pressure on the party. So you get that ########.
First of all, I can now claim that you are not pro-choice.
And second, #2, really? To me, that's child abuse.
The man on the street stuff may be fish in a barrel, but Zach Weissmueller is one of my favorite youngsters over at Reason. In contrast to the long-winded, Dennis Miller-style libertarians that I associate with, it's nice to see some clean-cut kids who apparently pattern their demeanor and sartorial tastes after Matt Welch representing.
And what a revelation that Democrats are universally pro-choice, provided that those choices are based on sound reasoning.
-the tax cuts
-the war in Iraq
-no child left behind
-Medicare Part D
-Social Security privatization
Tax Cuts: 12 Senate Dem ayes, 13 House Dem ayes
Iraq: 29 Senate Dem ayes, 86 House Dem ayes
NCLB: 47 Senate Dem ayes, 197 House Dem ayes
Part D: 11 Senate Dem ayes, 9 House Dem ayes
Social Security privatization is the one where you see a disciplined party apparatus standing against the President's policy. Bush wasn't even able to get enough Republicans to sign on to get it to a vote, but there was only one Democrat outstanding who hadn't already promised to vote against it.
Compare to Obama's primary policy goals and achievements:
-stimulus
-Obamacare
-financial regulation
-cap and trade
ARRA: 3 Senate Rep ayes, 0 House Rep ayes
ACA: 0 Senate Rep ayes, 1 House Rep ayes
Finreg: 4 Senate Rep ayes, 3 House Rep ayes
Cap: 8 House Rep ayes, no Senate vote
As with Social Security privatization, the Democrats were unable to wrangle their own party to even make a vote happen in the Senate. It seems highly likely that every Senate Republican would have voted against if a vote had occurred, but it is possible that a few would have supported the bill, while the Democrats were likely to slough off several votes of their own.
The Democrats in several areas were obstructionist, but I don't think the two records are particularly comparable.
Um, I think there's more than 3 Democrats in the entire universe.
My Jeffersonian sensibilities are a little raw on this topic, but it's always been my position that libertarians (a hideous portmanteau) are the only ones who merit the liberal title. Lefties can have leftist, democrat, progressive, revolutionary, People's, populist, and anything else they can dream up that doesn't evoke liberty, but it's a shame that they've claimed squatters' rights on a name that doesn't befit them in any way. It's even more of a shame that Republicans have bought into that little scam, which trickles down to the third parties.
Parse again, fellow BotB fan.
How you raise your kids is your business. I suppose I would say you have to educate your kids but how you do it isn't up to me.
As to the smoking in a public library - if I stipulate that public libraries are truly public then, no, you can't subject people in a public place to harmful agents. I don't think you should be free to fire guns off anywhere you like, either.
I think people should be a lot more free in their choices than they are; doesn't mean there should be NO curbs on behavior. If that means I'm not "pro-choice" fine, what a zinger. It's like pointing out that if a "pro-life" person steps on a bug, they aren't really pro-life. Those terms are well defined in the social lexicon as pertaining to abortion.
I know lots of pro-death penalty, pro-life people and plenty of pro-choice folks who think they should be able to tell me what ingredients to use in the kitchen. I agree, if read literally, those are silly terms. But they aren't literal.
You have it all backwards, it's the conservatives who have labeled what they don't like as "liberal" and it's those that the conservatives who have labeled "liberal" who "have bought into that little scam."
Other than that, yes you are right, the so-called "libertarians" are closer to what used to be called (100+ years ago) liberals, than current day "liberals"
As far as libertarian being a hideous portmanteau, I disagree, it's a nice little riff on liberty.
that's an interesting pair, I assume they voted no for different reasons...
On this refrain, what's so conservative about current conservatives today? Their platform is actually pretty radical.
I wish that were right, but the existence of hundred-year-old leftist groups across the pond who've used "liberal" in the same way that most Americans do leads me to believe that it's the lefties who coopted it, not the neocons. I'd be interested to see a dedicated study on the ideological drift of the language of political identification.
To the last point, "libertarian" has at least one too many syllables; we're just a few letters away from being in the same boat as the infralapsarians.
God is BACK, BABY! - in the Democratic platform
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-dnc-platform-god-jerusalem-20120905,0,558903.story
Careful, David. That's neoconfederate talk!
I had a lefty prof who defined "conservative" (in any culture) as "those with economic power and who want to keep economic power"
if you use that definition, then yes, today's conservatives are conservatives
if you define conservatives as being the ones who want to keep doing what we've been doing then, then, economically speaking, no, they are quite radical.
If you ignore economic issues and look at religious/family issues they are conservative bordering on reactionary
I didn't pay attention to the primaries, but if this is what Gingrich did I'll agree it is hilarious.
Well, that's fine, and not what I meant. I'm thinking of the "They don't need no book leaning" kind of person. Not that there are many of those, but that's what I mean by not educating your kids.
I'm with you 100%. Just pointing out the potential silliness of "Democrats aren't really pro choice, because they oppose some choices." bit
Not all that different. Both see immigrants as taking jobs away from Americans. Their ideas about what would be ideal working conditions for Americans probably differ: Sanders's tending toward some pipe dream of protected, unionized industries and DeMint's tending toward some pipe dream of rugged unregulated entrepreneurship. But both see a steady supply of immigrant workers as damaging to that ideal.
His moonbase was pretty outsiderish.
1: it wasn't the neocons who labeled american dems "liberals"
2: the fact that in Europe some lefties were called liberals would be a reason for america righties to label their opponents as being liberals, not a reason for American non-conservatives to name themselves such.
He did, and it is. And I actually like Newt. He's probably the smartest guy who ran for president this year. I think he'd be a terrible president, but I hope he doesn't go away.
yes it was what he tried to do, what was really hysterical is that some people were buying- Palin for one, who claimed that the fact the so-called establishment disliked him was evidence he was really an outsider...
hey, I liked that part!
When in fact the reason the establishment disliked him is that it's rather clear that everyone who has ever gotten to know Gingrich dislikes him.
I agree that he would probably be a fun guy to BS with. But I wouldn't trust him as far as I can throw him, and he weighs about 300 pounds.
I sort of like him for the entertainment value, but good gawd do we have all sorts of ex-pols running around who have absolutely no personal sense of shame whatsoever, Gingrich, Spitzer, I hear that Weiner has been mulling a "comeback*"
*In NYC, and you know what, he might get elected to some position...
1: Correct.
2: "Liberal" had a meaning long before it was co-opted by 19th-/early 20th-century leftists who were influenced by socialist thought. Locke and Jefferson were liberals; what happened between then and now that so twisted the word?
Edit: Pelosi is killing it tonight with her weird chants and insistence that our republic is, in fact a democracy. I can really see why she's such a powerful figure within her party and only a few steps behind Biden within the intellectual leadership. "We made college more affordable..." Pop quiz, Rep: what happens when you subsidize a massive increase in demand within an industry? Do prices go down?
"Liberals" in the 18th century might hold slaves and deny the full humanity of various non-European folks. That changed too.
Evolution of language, which has been happening since the first grunt?
Irregardless, I'm disinterested and could care less about it.
Which is why those who followed "The Way" laid out by Jeshua ben Joseph are now known as moslems. Incisive insight.
Nice, but needs more less/fewer confusion.
Edit: I tuned in for the DNC but somehow wound up watching the Miss America pageant.
Whoever gets elected in November could do quite a bit worse than to hire Gingrich and Clinton, chain them in the corner of the Oval Office (you know what a I mean) and listen to them carefully at the end of each day.
Fixed that for you.
Radicals want to change the world immediately, usually in a revolutionary manner. Libertarians are radicals.
Liberals want to change the world incrementally, usually in from within a standard model. Liberals are liberals.
Conservatives want to arrest change and maintain the status quo. There are no real conservatives in the US. Tories are conservatives.
Reactionaries want to reverse time and return to a previous state or "golden era." Republicans are reactionaries.
Watch what now?
Ah, thanks for the reminder. 17 minutes to kickoff
Appears to be a hoax, since the links to the story seem to be disappearing. However, it is somewhat surprising that a purported Watergate-stlyle burglary to obtain Romney's tax returns has been referred to several times by the Democratic partisans here without a word of disapproval. Interesting.
Because it is a silly claim and a false dichotomy. Feel free to prove that the GOP is somehow different.
So, you think it's a hoax. Many other who commented on it think it's a hoax, and yet a lack of outrage about something that no one believes really happened is indicative of something?
The fact that you're not outraged about the plans of the 12 Zionist bankers in Zurich to take over the world is also interesting.
Names please.
Did not work very well for Bush II. Perhaps he should have started five or six more wars.
They do want to progress.
Most of the rest of the world now has some sort or government mandated/controlled/provided health care. We don't
Most of the rest of the world has disbanded the death penalty. We haven't.
Most of the rest of the world has a progressive tax system. We don't.
Did you read the thread? Several posts point to this story without any indication that story is a hoax or that the poster disapproves of the tactic.
ObamaCare is progress as we join with the rest of the first world. We want to expand the New Deal, but since it is under attack we have to defend it as well. And Keynes is more of a 20th century economist than 19th, but even so we want to build on the success of the past. Progress isn't about throwing away the past, it is about honoring it, learning from it, and then building out something better.
a) If you liked WW2 ration booklets, you'd love government mandated/provided/controlled health care. "Progress" =)
b) Most of the rest of the world or Europe? Careful now.
c) But, speaking of Europe...
1. I would like to introduce you to medicare, medicaid, and state-licensed physicians.
2. Disbanded? Were they on tour previously? But agreed.
3. I wasn't aware that my betters in government had done away with Social Security, according to which the young/relatively poor are forced to give money to the old/relatively rich according to the "progressive" model. Needless to say, you made my day.
I, for one, think it's total fabricated crapola. Something real occurs, I'll be happy to disapprove; I'm not going to get my underwear in a twist over hypotheticals.
Concern troll is concerned.
Show me that 1) this actually happened and 2) the Obama campaign was involved in the planning and execution of it and then you can start comparing #### to Watergate, numbnuts.
And theeeeeeerrrrre goes the kewpie doll.
Hutcheson hasn't just removed all doubt, he's obliterated it back to the Stone Age.
Maybe that's because the plot is so completely farfetched. If these hackers / burglars really wanted a million dollars, the last thing they'd do would be to make their demand public, which would guarantee that they'd never get it. Plus they'd have to know that they could get $10 million or even $50,000,000 just as readily as they could get a measly million. But not by demanding the money in a ####### public announcement.
In fact if anything, it's more plausible that it was a story planted by the GOP, in order to give Romney an "I'm not giving into ransom" cover for hiding those tax returns. Not that either of these scenarios are the remotest bit likely unless the perpetrators are just trying to break into a Chuck Shepherd column.
Europe, Canada, Japan, Australia, ... IOW, the countries where people are most free.
Top 10 countries in number of people executed in 2011:
China
Iran
Saudi Arabia
Iraq
US
Yemen
North Korea
Somalia
Sudan
Bangladesh
Do you like that company?
And yet...most developed countries "most like us" have it and most of their citizens are happy with it.
If Joe K has taught me anything, it's that payroll taxes aren't taxes.
That is some shitpoor form, Prior.
Yeah, as civility goes, a 15K spreadsheet with economic data is worse than the n-word. Might waste a few valuable seconds on a 2400 baud modem.
I agree. I suggest you remove it while you can.
Lassus's mock outrage and scolding at having downloaded a 15K spreadsheet is absolutely absurd. He could've said "Hey, that link isn't clearly labeled, can you take care of that so people don't worry about downloading a virus?" instead of accusing me of "shitpoor form." Tell me, how many people did you scold in the flame wars of these political threads for actual bad behavior? Zero?
Feeling a little bloated today, are we?
Well, as I couldn't be bothered to reprimand you for calling Americans "clueless twats", I guess zero is about right.
The fact that this fascist, Ted Kennedy-quoting thing is actually considered for office is evidence that this nation is lost. Did she really just proclaim the need for a "newer world"? I want my tuition back with interest.
And if we build it together, miss, then just build the damn thing and leave those who don't want it out of it. If it works, then the rest of us will gladly join you after our voluntaryist, free society collapses in the disrepair that has so often followed decency and even modestly free markets.
Check your numbers. And if you're happy with socialized, rationed, vets-administration-style health care with no alternative, then by all means forge your own mutual aid society. I'm on your side in that respect, and I'll support you all the way.
Just leave me and every other individual who didn't snooze through Economics 101 and who actually finished the Marx/Engels Reader out of it.
And Clinton is being pretty hard on the Republicans given that he was one for four years. Nice of him to venture out to support the Amateur, though.
Huh?
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main