User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
For wholesale prices on baseball gifts and equipment, check these stores out! |
Page rendered in 0.9561 seconds
53 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
How many make the opposite assumption (that you are a neo-Nazi)? And of those, how many don't turn tail and leave the store, but rather linger...
Funny you ask that particular question. Back in the 80's, one of the books I had in my shop was a set of Houston Stewart Chamberlain's Foundations of the Nineteenth Century, a rather infamous tract published in the decade before the First World War. Chamberlain was a Germanophilic Englishman who was a serious anti-Semite, and it's been said that Hitler regarded this particular book as one of the intellectual inspirations for Mein Kampf. It's quite an uncommon book, and having had to travel all the way into the no-telephone part of central Pennsylvania to find it, I was quite proud to be able to offer it in my shop, along with books by Raul Hilberg, Deborah Lipstadt, Eugene Kogon, etc. But within just a few days after I'd put it on the shelf, a self-announced Jewish man picked it up, slammed it on the counter, and started giving me this elongated "DO YOU KNOW WHAT THIS BOOK IS?" harangue, demanding that I remove it from the shelf immediately. It took me a good ten minutes to calm this excited little man, and I considered myself extremely lucky that he never came into my shop again. People often just see what they want to see.
Put her next to an average woman and I think dainty probably works.
Looks don't have to be optional if its Nicole Curtis. Anyone seen her show on DIY Network? She renovates old houses, and can do every bit of the work herself, from carpentry to tile to laying sod to driving a backhoe. If we're doing a draft of apocalypse companions, she's going first.
Does anyone really think stars and starlets are going to maintain those figures in zombie apocalypse?
That's kind of my point.
Do you want a greyhound that's put on some pounds or do you want a healthy labrador?
I might go with Jillian Michaels. I'll need a bodyguard.
I figure most folks who survive a decent length of time would probably wind up with a lean, sinewy look. Everyone's physical activity would go up a ton, while the food supply would be scarce and irregular. Fatties would be first to go. Gym bunnies of either gender might do OK, but their diets and the kind of exercise they'd be getting would change, and so would their physiques.
ZombApoc is pretty much your paleodiet/Crossfit workout dream. You're basically eating hunted animal proteins and foraged fruits and nuts. At least in the first few decades of ZA you're not going to get a lot of grain based carbs. Nobody's going to be farming and processing wheat or corn in volume. And the nomadic lifestyle, both for hunting animals for food and sprinting away from zombie hordes is going to favor the CrossFit mentality, minus the modified Olympic lifting.
But hey I am not going to survive anyway (probably) so I'll gladly pair up with a hottie and enjoy myself while I last.
EDIT: That said personality and intelligence are more important for hottie status than looks anyway.
Initially people are going to be loading up on processed food as all the perishable food will have vanished rather quickly. After that we'll get semi nomadic farming/hunting depending on the region. Zombies aren't territorial and if 90% of the population is wiped out because of zombies there isn't any real competition for land and resources between sentient beings. A tribe of 12 or os people could utilize several square miles of land to create and process their food supply while putting their base camp in a well protected area.
I will also modify my comment on all classical music being religious to note that I consider any thinking or creative act that is hinged on nostalgic longing to be religious (which shouldn't be confused with "spiritual" per se, nor should it be confused with any specific religion.)
The trouble with this is that as you are defining your own term with "religious" that no one else could be expected to have by default. If I don't agree with your definition of religious, there's nowhere to go.
Regarding that definition, the creative act that brings about a Mozart piano concerto is no more nostalgic than any of your 45 bands in 45 days. Music that is defined as classical, as stated above, can certainly be religious, or nostalgic, or both. However, the amount of music composed that can without debate be classified as classical and not belong to anything nostalgic or religious is so immense, it makes your definition absolutely unusable.
i'm liking the wallbangers vs. the zombies challenge
it would be kind of sweet if my ex son in law was a zombie and i could with no repercussions chop off his head. that would be a net positive outcome right there.
For myself I am at the point where almost any change is welcomed in the hopes it will help them get out of this stupid cycle of violence and hate they (all parties in the region) are currently in.
On the downside, you're like 120 already. Hell, you may actually be a zombie for all we know.
Maybe the paleodiet, not so sure on Crossfit. Explosive power/burst strength isn't really that important in a ZA; slow zombies can be escaped with a steady run as opposed to sprinting that leaves you winded. Fast zombies can't be outrun. Engaging in melee combat with any kind of zombie should be a last resort only unless you're Zatoichi or somesuch.
I'm thinking cardio/endurance training is the way to go here. Combined with enough strength training to carry heavy amounts of gear a very long way. Doing a lot of rough hiking and/or rock climbing would probably be helpful.
One thing I remember about the Nathaniel Philibrick book about the wreck of the whaleship Essex was that the fat captain survived three months in an open boat (gnawing human bones and so forth) reasonably well. My guess is that a fat person who was basically healthy but carrying 50+ extra pounds (a former college linebacker would be an ideal example) would be an ideal survival candidate. A lot of it depends on the realities of the situation. If food is scarce the fat person will have more reserves to survive and so is a better bet than the skinny model. If there are lots of Piggly Wigglys to loot and the main problem is surviving attacks then the slow and unfit would be the first to go. We need to define the apocalypse before predicting who will come out of it OK.
Since the defining feature of a Zombie Apocalypse is, you know, zombies, I think we have to assume that fighting and running from zombies will be a critical element of the scenario.
I think you're more likely to spend the first two years living off Spam and Twinkies.
As far as I can tell it is regular humans being losers and backstabbing each other, while the zombies are often set dressing (that wants to kill you I admit), but I don't like the genre so I probably shouldn't be in charge of defining it.
It's about the only Xmas music I like very much. I guess Springsteen doing "Merry Xmas Baby" is good.
KlingonGerman.As far as other tunes, I'd go with "Coventry Carol" and "Wassail Song".
But there's so much more to it. Fast zombies or slow zombies? How easy to kill? Do they eventually die of starvation? If they starve to death then your best bet is to hole up somewhere and try to starve more slowly than the zombies. That requires a different skill set (or at least body type) than a situation where you're fighting zombie hordes all of the time. The starvation situation would be a wonderful opportunity for people who say they're fat only because of a slow metabolism to put up or shut up.
My kids agree that come the Zombie Apocalypse I will be one of the first to go. If you can't buy prewashed bag salad, I'll quickly starve.
A walking tour I did of the churches in the City of London (helped by John Betjeman's guidebook) is still one of the best days of my life. In the last few years I have covered a small portion of the Backsteingotik "trail" that stretches around the Baltic, finding old and rebuilt brick churches in out-of-the-way places. Wonderful stuff, despite my unbelief.
You need to look up now and again.
Many years back I saw Springsteen (& the E Street Band) in a mid-December concert. They played "Santa Claus is Coming to Town" as part of the encore, complete with Clarence Clemons dressed in a Santa suit.
The Others take you.
Me either actually, but like I said at this point I value change for changes sake. I think the region needs a Gandhi, Mandela, or MLK, luck, and time. Absent that I will settle for random non-harmful change and the US not actively screwing things up in the region*.
* The US part is included because I want my country to at least not be making things worse.
You know nothing.
Zombies that can starve are no zombies at all!
Even if they did require food though, trying to starve them out by turtling probably wouldn't work unless you had a TON of resources. Zombies could just cannibalize dead zombies when the going gets rough, and they wouldn't suffer from the effects of starvation the way living, feeling humans would.
So there has been no job growth in silicone valley?
Since this is a stats oriented site: Mathematical model of a zombie outbreak (includes MATLAB code)
"In summary, a zombie outbreak is likely to lead to the collapse of civilisation, unless it
is dealt with quickly. While aggressive quarantine may contain the epidemic, or a cure may
lead to coexistence of humans and zombies, the most effective way to contain the rise of
the undead is to hit hard and hit often. As seen in the movies, it is imperative that zombies
are dealt with quickly, or else we are all in a great deal of trouble."
GB--do you have a link to the info you're posting? It's the kind of stuff I love poking around in.
Yes, me too; between that and the stats showing increased House incumbency, I'm getting a lot of my 11th grade Social Studies homework done. I guess our froward friend does serve a purpose. This site had the most tax-in/tax-out information, although it's only good through 2005. For 2006 on, I had to do it piecemeal, with a few non-comprehensive sites like this one.
Zombies don't fellow zombies nor do they eat downed zombies. If they did we wouldn't have a zombie apocalypse.
Hiding isn't a good choice if you live in a major metropolis as your food supply is scarce and your predators numerous. If you live out in Wyoming or Bucktooth, Indiana it can be a good choice.
Why? Talent is talent. You assume that their works would not have been as magnificent if they had not been so inspired. Who is to say they might not have been greater, if their talent had not been shackled to dogma?
I'm not saying you may not be right. I am saying it is an unprovable assumption.
Since this is a stats oriented site: Mathematical model of a zombie outbreak (includes MATLAB code)
I think this link came up in the last conversation about this and I didn't agree with it then. The model uses some assumptions that I don't really agree with (I believe). Zombies are just too easy to kill, impair, outrun, and avoid infection from for them to ever overtake humanity or seriously impair us.
Bach was not inspired by god to write a cantata about coffee.
Seconded, Thirded and Fourthed. I never saw the appeal beyond the campiness of the original George Romero works.
At this point, I am done with all forms of sci-fi-last remaining humans-dsytopic future works, including post-alien invasion apocalypses, post-plague apocalypses, zombie apocalypses, and post breakdown of technological civilization apocalypses. The whole genre is completely played out for me.
No way. People on the run are going to have very short lives. The people who make it are going to be the ones with the skills and sense to find some acres to wall off, raise animals and crops for food, fend off not just zombies but marauders. Look at your average farm couple--that's what our typical ZA survivors are going to resemble.
Hey, sour patch! Take it on over to the steroids thread!
You know, I honestly don't know. I intuited early it wasn't, but the fact that Ray and John McCain think it is definitely means it wasn't.
(This doesn't copy properly, but it'll give a notion of the detail the authors went to)
Susceptibles can become deceased through ‘natural’ causes, i.e., non-zombie-related
death (parameter ). The removed class consists of individuals who have died, either
through attack or natural causes. Humans in the removed class can resurrect and become
a zombie (parameter ). Susceptibles can become zombies through transmission via an
encounter with a zombie (transmission parameter ). Only humans can become infected
through contact with zombies, and zombies only have a craving for human flesh so we do
not consider any other life forms in the model. New zombies can only come from two
sources:
The resurrected from the newly deceased (removed group).
Susceptibles who have ‘lost’ an encounter with a zombie.
In addition, we assume the birth rate is a constant, . Zombies move to the removed class
upon being ‘defeated’. This can be done by removing the head or destroying the brain of
the zombie (parameter ). We also assume that zombies do not attack/defeat other zombies.
Thus, the basic model is given by
S0 = ???? SZ ???? S
Z0 = SZ + R ???? SZ
R0 = S + SZ ???? R:
This model is illustrated in Figure 1.
(after which it gets complicated)
Racist assumption
where do all the hobby farmers and organic farmers fall? because they are farmers but i doubt most of them would adapt to a hostile environment very quickly
i also think you overstate my peer group's abilities in general
So there has been no job growth in silicone valley?
No, the article is misleading on that point. There has been net job growth in Silicon Valley over the past decade, though clearly not as dramatic as the high-tech sector job growth in Asian countries.
In the great Zombie apocalypse draft, don't forget water and probably fishing. I have no idea where the group in Walking Dead are getting water from, but I think they'd have died of thirst by now.
The number of better ways to spend my time is astronomical.
I don't play video games.
I can't say I never have. I played asteroids. On an MIT mainframe around 1973. Also pong.
Much preferred pinball machines, so I never got into it.
In fairness, then, as your intestines are being devoured like gourmet sausages expect to hear 'We told you so'.
The purpose of the ZA in serious works is to intensify conflict and thereby intensify meaning. It's probably a sign of our jaded times, though, that we need that intensification. Love isn't difficult or interesting enough until ravening ghouls dot the landscape. Sad to say, it also legitimizes mass murder. If we ran around the landscape killing dozens of human beings, we'd be branded monsters. Turn those human beings into shadows of themselves and the thrill of killing is still there, but the guilt largely disappears. That's one reason zombies are typically not allowed to retain even traces of their humanity, as that would interfere with the pleasures of killing them.
Depends on the zombie type. A Walking Dead zombie could never take over. The infection takes to long to zombify, and they are too weak and easy to kill. A 28 Days Later zombie (fast infection, fast and strong zombie) could easily take over, with only a natural border being able to stop it.
I'll guess hobby farmers are people who came to the practice comparatively late in life and don't have nearly the broad skill set those born and raised on farms possess. A lot of hobby farmers 'farm out' (sorry) mechanical and electrical and construction work, key Not sure about organic farmers--some of those folks grew up on farms and found the organic niche as a way to make a living. Others came to it late after tiring of more conventional lives. Not sure where they fit or how they'd do.
that's why its a group thing. you need folks who can be pretty hard (some might say ruthless) to get you through the immediate chaos and then you get into some kind of equilibrium state. who knows how long the transition state lasts.
Unhealthy octogenarians are your new market efficiency? Sorry Zombieball-guy, that #### won't work in the apocalypse.
Scroll down to Parquet Courts
QFT. Very, very few people would survive completely on their own, or as a couple. Like Harvey, I have a well, lots of stored food and a large garden, wood heat, and enough deer in my back yard to to keep me in meat for a long time. I went out to get some firewood the other night and one of them blew (anyone who knows about deer will know what I mean) and scared the hell out of me. There were two does, only about 20' away from me, and I whistled a bit to get their attention. I think I could have probably got them to eat out of my hand, but it was too cold and I got tired of it.
you don't want to hunt nearby if you can avoid it because once you do animals sense the smell of death and avoid you. you need to range away as much as possible so that hunting nearby is your fallback in a pinch. like if you get hurt and can move some but not much and need to rely on a fresh kill to survive
Thirded. Groups are critical as is being able to function together. In some ways attitude matters as much as skills.
The delicious irony in this is that the one thing Romney was supposed to bring to the party was hard-headed competence, "business sense," the organizational and technical skill and knowledge to do things well and correctly. And instead he and his team utterly bungled one of their most crucial tasks, that of collecting and understanding intelligence regarding the electorate and what to expect. Wow.
Speaking of vote fraud, in a development that will surprise exactly no one,
The problem with DayZ is nothing seems to happen. In every walkthrough I've seen on youtube some guy runs and runs and runs through an empty landscape, then an empty industrial area, then an empty landscape, then empty RR tracks,... It just doesn't look very exciting.
They've gotcha covered. T-Dog, bless his departed soul, mentioned a nearby stream that could easily be brought in through a culvert under the fence to provide water for crops.
edit: @11071--that really struck me too, Steve. The one thing you figure he should have been able to ace, he completely whiffed on.
I thought all the apparent confidence in October was the usual campaign bluster. It never occurred to me that Joe was polling more accurately than the campaign.
Parkour.
Dies.
Someone should tie Joe to a chair and force him to read and re-read that article, until it finally sinks in on him that his entire set of assumptions about the 2012 electorate were based largely on wishful thinking. But then in that respect he wasn't any more delusional than his candidate.
Paleo diet is crap. Most of a caveman's scavenged protein came from insects or small animals like mice and frogs. If you're eating nice big steaks, you're putting totally different amino acids into your body than the guy you're supposedly trying to emulate.
Fixed that for you.
remember the scene from crocodile dundee where he pulls out the canned goods versus eating off the land? that is very true.
I do love when haters gonna hate. I mean, you're nitpicking the marketing term of a protein heavy diet. It's beyond silly.
Well, that's the whole thing. There are lots of different kinds of fictional zombies. The assumptions that you make in defining exactly what a zombie is and how it works will make a zombie apocalypse seem more or less realistic. Are they dead bodies animated by voodoo magic, or animated corpses under the control of alien parasites, or the righteous dead returned to seek vengeance on those who wronged them, or powered by an unknown chemical interaction from radiation and industrial waste, or what? Do corpses rise from the dead passively in any context, or is active intervention of some sort needed? Does animation require the application of some substance or the performance of some kind of ritual? Are they fast or slow? Can you kill them by damaging the brain, or do you need to destroy the entire corpse? Can they think? Consciously pursue goals? Communicate? Use tools? Are they immediately evident as zombies, or can they pose as the living until they start to rot? Will they suffer from attrition as time passes? Is it only people that can come back from the dead, or will animal corpses do so as well?
No, I'm nitpicking the philosophical underpinnings of that particular protein-heavy diet. If you think people should eat that particular balance of nutrients, fine - use science to show why. But cavemen don't have anything to do with it. That's just a load of soft-headed marketing horseshit, designed to separate dippy consumers from their money.
BRAAAAAAIIIIIIINNNNNNNS
Cite? The fact is, we have no idea what quantity of protein sources were used by paleolithic hunter/gatherers. We can measure animal bones at a site, but we can't determine which ones were eaten by humans.
Define "protein heavy".
S0 = ???? SZ ???? SZ0 = SZ + R ???? SZ
R0 = S + SZ ???? R:
I haven't looked at the site but knowing a little about modeling, if you set the ???? low enough I am sure you can get this model to spit out "Zombie Apocalypse is no problem" rather trivially.
Since we have no real data on zombies to fit.
We actually can, to an extent, because of cut-marks on the bones of butchered animals. My understanding is that this is something of an emerging field of research, even though people have been working on it for 60 or 70 years. Recent work has, for example, used butchering marks to make some inferences about the social order of early Homo sapiens groups, and also about their (our!) place in the food chain.
This is one of those things I expect to be transient -- while most tech workers are liberal NorCal/Washington types, it's not as though there isn't an enormous contingent of right-libertarian techies out there. I expect the 2016 candidate, whoever he is, to have a lot of people on his staff. Liberals should feel good about tapping into the data revolution more effectively the last two cycles, but don't expect it to continue.
It's the demographic bomb that's a problem. Running wealthy Cubans isn't going to solve it, either.
This is really crazy. In Romney's internal polls, he was losing the election. His internal polls, which were incredibly unrealistic and way off in Iowa, Colorado and Minnesota, still had him losing 267-271. Remarkably, when his own polls showed him losing, he still thought he was going to win so much that he did not prepare a concession speech.
Wow.
And tying it back into the article I posted earlier, a very high proportion of these young, ultra-tech-savvy, and affluent Democrats are Asian-American.
Which just leads me to think, (a) man I love my homies, and (b) could there possibly be a more vivid illustration of the structural disadvantages the GOP has systematically constructed for itself?
Mittmentum, baby!
Speaking from out here, the fact is that there is not an enormous contingent of right-libertarian techies, at least not as measurable by any polling or electoral data. From Silver's article:
Not exactly indicative of an enormous contingent of right-libertarian techies.
Speaking of - hilarious post-election interview with Dean Chambers
The pic alone is worth the click.
Agreed. What we can't do is measure the percentage of protein from those sources compared to others like grubs. We can't measure protein as a % of daily calories either.
You might be right, but I thought this slideshow is fairly realistic portrayal of society breaking down after a zombie outbreak.
Some good background on paleolithic and neolithic entomophagy here.
(1) True enough. I guess what I meant is that there are enough right-libertarian techies that they should be able to get good people to run their operations.
(2) I was, weirdly, just g-chatting with a friend of mine who works for Google, and I asked him about this question. His input was this: though the libertarian streak is powerful in his experience of the tech community*, there's also a very strong pro-science bias among techies, and Republicans are going to have to come to Jesus (pun fully intended) on that subject before they start capturing any significant portion of that community, wealthy and libertarian though it may be. He also pointed out that both parties are pretty good at pissing off (small-L) libertarians right now: Republicans socially, Democrats economically. He said his sense (whether or not this is widely true) is that the social stuff is much more difficult to swallow at the moment.
*He's from Oregon and lives in Washington, though, so that might exaggerate this contingent in his mind.
(3) As a left-libertarian, this squares with my feeling. I usually vote Democratic because I find Republican social stances odious and the economic messages of the parties, despite all the caviling that goes on over them, not radically different. Neither is particularly interested in actually restraining the size of government -- they just want to waste the money in different places. If Republicans could moderate on science & social issues, they might find an audience in people like me. They would have 40 years ago, for sure. I probably would have voted for Nixon at least once, had I been born in 1950 instead of 1980.
If the economic messages of the parties are not radically different, and they just want to waste the money in different places, why should the hypothetical science-&-social-moderated-Republicans find an audience in people like you?
I'm a straight white guy with a Ph.D in a hard science; Nixon is also the last Republican presidential candidate I would've voted for. Republicans these days love Reagan, but he's where I say \"#### that ####."
Have you ever met a human being?
Taxes.
Yep. I'm working on an MFA instead of a PhD, but that's pretty much where I land.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main