Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Wednesday, January 09, 2013
To all you Hall of Famers out there, happy birthday! we’re looking at players’ first year on the Hall of Fame ballot, their percentage and what happened to those players.
More than two votes but less than 5%—176 players.
... [Ralph] Kiner first appeared on the ballot in 1960… He got three votes… He got fewer votes than Nick Altrock, who was once a good pitcher and by then had started to perform comedy routines with Al Schact (the “Clown Prince of Baseball”). He got fewer votes than Bing Miller, Max Bishop, the Catcher Who Was A Spy Moe Berg, Hal White, Joe Dugan, Jimmie Wilson and a pitcher named Orval Grove who went 63-73 with a 3.78 ERA. Listen to this: Ralph Kiner in 1960 got fewer votes than Lefty Grove. You ask: What’s wrong with that? Grove was perhaps the greatest left-handed pitcher of all time. True. But there’s this: Lefty Grove was ALREADY IN THE HALL OF FAME, had been since 1947…
Kiner is just an extreme example of what happens all the time in the Hall of Fame voting… When Jack Morris went on the ballot in 2000, 77.8% of the voters said that he was NOT a Hall of Famer. A year later, more than 80% voted that he was NOT a Hall of Famer. But over time, a lot of people looked more closely and the vote turned his way. I don’t agree with Jack Morris as a Hall of Famer, but I absolutely do agree with him deserving to have his case heard over time. I would say that guys like Lou Whitaker, Dwight Evans, Kevin Brown and others deserve the same chance to get the years to help them make their case.
5% to 10%—27 players.
... I wonder when Joe Torre will get into the Hall of Fame. We KNOW he’s going in as a manager, so let’s get that done already. He was a really, really good player with a legitimate Hall of Fame case. He became, as we know, a legendary manager with four World Series rings. Let’s stop waiting and put him in already.
10% to 20%—18 players.
... I didn’t vote for Dale Murphy this year because I thought there were 10 players on the ballot better than him and, anyway, he’s not getting in through the BBWAA. I hope the veteran’s committee, in whatever form, will stop pontificating about Deacon White and other players who are long gone and start thinking about who were the best players of the last 40 or 50 years who have been overlooked.
20% to 30%—15 players.
....if you get between 20 and 30% on first ballot you have about a 50-50 shot of getting into the Hall of Fame… it will be interesting to see how [Mark] McGwire and [Sammy] Sosa and others are viewed after [Barry] Bonds and [Roger] Clemens get in. I don’t know when Bonds and Clemens get in, by the way. It won’t be for a few years. It might not be for a decade. But it will happen, I think.
30% to 40%—7 players.
...If Luis Tiant retired two years earlier, I believe he’s in the Hall of Fame right now. But he stuck around those two years and got jobbed by the timing. He got a lot of support in his first year—he looked like a sure Hall of Famer, not unlike his contemporary and comp Catfish Hunter. Then he was washed away by a historic rush of 300-game winners who came on the Hall of Fame ballot, and his vote totals plunged.
50% to 75%—16 players.
... Every player who got 50% on first ballot is in the Hall of Fame.
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: OMNICHATTER for 6/17/2013 (117 - 1:47am, Jun 18)Last:  DanNewsblog: OT: NHL is finally back thread (1005 - 1:39am, Jun 18)Last:  zackNewsblog: Gackle: A's pitcher Bartolo Colon becoming Bud Selig's worst nightmare (41 - 12:59am, Jun 18)Last: Walt DavisNewsblog: LATimes: Microsoft unveils new Xbox One console (176 - 12:54am, Jun 18)Last:  Jack Carter, calling Beleaguered CastleNewsblog: Berg: Rumored trivia legend Nick Swisher bats .429 in pub trivia (24 - 12:54am, Jun 18)Last: Cooper NielsonNewsblog: Calcaterra - You can thank Major League Baseball for the sewage mess in the Oakland Coliseum (5 - 12:51am, Jun 18)Last: Jack Carter, calling Beleaguered CastleNewsblog: Mark Appel signs under slot deal with Astros (97 - 11:59pm, Jun 17)Last: Jack Carter, calling Beleaguered CastleNewsblog: Keidel: Bob Costas Blurs Line Between Illuminating And Illuminati (44 - 11:39pm, Jun 17)Last: Jolly Old St. Nick Done Jumped The ShipNewsblog: WSJ: Well That Was an Unlikely Mets Comeback (65 - 11:36pm, Jun 17)Last: Jack Carter, calling Beleaguered CastleNewsblog: Wil Myers promoted by the Tampa Bay Rays (44 - 11:17pm, Jun 17)Last: catomi01Newsblog: Numbers For Dodgers Do Not Add Up As Baseball Takes More Of Team's TV Money (11 - 11:08pm, Jun 17)Last: Walt DavisNewsblog: With defensive shifts on the rise in baseball, Orioles among leading proponents (10 - 11:00pm, Jun 17)Last: ellsbury my heart at wounded kneeNewsblog: WaPo - Sheinin | For Angels' Mike Trout, no ceiling applies (1 - 10:59pm, Jun 17)Last: Walt DavisNewsblog: OT: NBA Finals and June thread (632 - 10:42pm, Jun 17)Last:  RollingWaveNewsblog: OT: The Soccer Thread June, 2013 (543 - 10:09pm, Jun 17)Last:  Weekly Journalist_
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: January 09, 2013 at 01:03 PM (#4342916)According to the Gizmo, that would put Biggio and Piazza in (unbelievably not Bonds or Clemens).
Why did voters vote for active players back in the day? Just as a tip of the cap?
Also, what happens now if you're on the ballot and you unretire? I assume you're ineligible for inclusion on the ballot until six years after you retire again. But do you still get the 15 full years, or is it 15 minus how ever many ballots you were on before (so, 15 total)?
I'm pretty sure they can do both. It's not that mentally taxing, really.
I'm pretty sure they can do both. It's not that mentally taxing, really.
I'm pretty sure the Vets commmittee will meet later this year to vote on the best players of the last 40 or 50 years, just as they did three years ago. Really, Joe should know this.
It's 15 total. See Minnie Minoso and Jose Rijo for guys who retired twice.
The old analysis doesn't apply anymore.
And really we're going to now have players with like 30% who would otherwise have gotten 50% if not for the pouting by the writers and thus should have been in the 50% box.
Resistance is futile. Prepare to be joe-similated.
(On the opposite end, I skipped on his "HOF inner sanctum" idea because presumably all sensible people agree.)
Since we're here, he's actually chatting right now and said something that surprised me:
Also...there's Vizquel, who'll do better than Lofton.
That would be bleakly hilarious, if the BBWAA put him in as the sole rep from that group. Like Morris ahead of Trammell, Whitaker, Parrish, Evans, and Lemon.
Lofton should make a tour of spring training sites and see which team needs an upgrade in LF. If he only batted against RHP he could still add value. And then re-hit the ballot in 6 years.
Never too much Posnanski. (there is of course always too much Paterno though)
It's not a choice between one or the other. There are clearly some players from the early days of baseball (Bill Dahlen, Tony Mullane, Ross Barnes) who have been overlooked and should be hall of famers. Why should their candidacies be ignored because of when they played?
Because they played a thousand million years ago and if they weren't elected by now it's time to move on, already.
But, but, but some of his players used PEDs.
• Has some Hall of Fame support: Jimmy Wynn, Roy White, Ken Singleton.
Singleton has 302 career Win Shares, which I believe is the most of any HOF candidate who got zero BBWAA votes.
Well, if you want to get picky, Eddie Murray was there from '94-'96 and in '95 put up a .323/.375/.516 line in 113 games that was good for 2.2 WAR...
and if you want to get even pickier, Dave Winfield finished off his career in Cleveland in '95.
The major problem with this article, is he starts off saying he's going to stick with post 1966 results, then spends a majority of the time talking about pre-1966 results.
This is one argument I have never really gotten. If you are a roid purist, it shouldn't matter if someone got in already. Just like you don't use Jim Rice as the baseline for determining which outfielders should go in, you don't use one mistake to justify a wave of players you don't feel deserve to go in.
Ray gave the blunt and essentially correct answer. At the least they should do what they did with the Negro Leaguers -- have one final "look, just put in everybody you think has any sort of case already" committee on pre-war, maybe even pre-expansion, guys.
Hey. Ross Barnes made eight thousand one hundred dollars in his career. That should be enough for anyone.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main