Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Monday, June 27, 2011
What’s brown and sounds like a bell?
Why is baseball fun to watch? There are many answers—different ones for different people. The connection to the past. The battle of pitcher and hitter. The geometry of the field and the way fielders try to cover it. The tense moments. On and on. But at its core, for me at least, the fun of baseball comes down to the connection of ball and bat. That is where so much of the action begins. That’s what leads to triples, double plays, diving catches, plays at the plate, long home runs. Bat meets ball leads to motion, leads to action, leads to heroics and mistakes and cans of corn. Sure, there is excitement found in other places—in the fastball that brushes the outside corner, the curveball that buckles the knees, the big swing and miss. Sure, there is fun in the cat-and-mouse game between pitcher, catcher and a great base runner and in the well-earned walk. But, for the most part, the game needs a trigger. And the trigger is ball hitting bat.
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: Sports on Earth: Super-Royal (47 - 4:14am, Jun 20)Last: LassusNewsblog: ESPN.com: Yankees Acquire Fartinez (28 - 4:09am, Jun 20)Last: Jack Carter, calling Beleaguered CastleNewsblog: Former New Orleans baseball player Gene Freese dies at age 79 (5 - 3:55am, Jun 20)Last: esseffNewsblog: Matt Harvey challenged Jon Rauch to a fight (81 - 3:55am, Jun 20)Last: Jack Carter, calling Beleaguered CastleNewsblog: [OTP-June] Economic Times: Hope politics, sports don’t get mixed up: Manmohan Singh (2286 - 3:08am, Jun 20)Last:  Jack Carter, calling Beleaguered CastleNewsblog: Neyer: Computing Manny Machado's shot at the record (48 - 3:02am, Jun 20)Last: OCFNewsblog: Perry: Josh Hamilton and the terrible, horrible, no good, very bad night (52 - 3:01am, Jun 20)Last: Walt DavisNewsblog: OT: NHL is finally back thread (1131 - 2:45am, Jun 20)Last:  zackNewsblog: LATimes: Microsoft unveils new Xbox One console (237 - 2:11am, Jun 20)Last:  CrosbyBirdNewsblog: Deadspin: Manny Ramirez is Leaving Taiwan (9 - 1:17am, Jun 20)Last: RollingWaveNewsblog: OT: NBA Finals and June thread (1028 - 1:12am, Jun 20)Last:  Los Angeles El Hombre of AnaheimNewsblog: Murphy: Ruben Amaro Jr. doesn't "do" five-year plans, but the Phillies need a good one (36 - 1:07am, Jun 20)Last: Jack Carter, calling Beleaguered CastleNewsblog: Draft signings (142 - 1:07am, Jun 20)Last:  Der_KNewsblog: ‘Old man’ Arroyo pitching better than ever (14 - 12:42am, Jun 20)Last: base ball chickNewsblog: OMNICHATTER for JUNE 19, 2013 (87 - 12:41am, Jun 20)Last: Los Angeles El Hombre of Anaheim
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Padraic Posted: June 27, 2011 at 09:45 PM (#3863838)Babe Ruth invented these kinds of seasons in 1925, of course. However, he was Babe Ruth, so for him it just looked like a good Adam Dunn year shortened by injury. No, I'm not accusing Dunn of being on a season-long bender, though that would also make him more exciting.
My nominee couldn't field, couldn't throw, didn't hit for average, didn't hit for power, couldn't run, and was just generally blah at every phase of the sport.
You can't pick a scrub, because they actively suck.
And if you're TOO good, even if dull, your production is somewhat exciting.
McReynolds hits just the right sweet spot...
Dunn might still hit 30 homers this year. 23 homers in half a season isn't beyond his abilities. He hit 21 from July through the end of the year last year.
the only other one I can think of would be Harold Baines
For position players I'd say either Brooks Conrad or Cliff Pennington. The most generic pitcher is definitely Kevin Correia. Did you know he's been in the majors for NINE YEARS?
This is a racist thread.
Harold Baines says hi..
No...you're right. Kotchman's a certified non-entity.
I agree with this--the most boring player has to be above average--maybe well above average, but BORING
so here's a list of players with >5000 PAs with an OPS+ between 110 and 120-who is the most boringest?
(I still vote for Baines)
EDIT:--list since 1980
Raul Ibanez is extremely boring, but his fielding ineptitude is a little bit too entertaining.
Aubrey Huff is boring. Even last year, playing a key roll for a colorful and memorable WS winner, he exuded boredom.
I think that Steve Trachsel is an answer that's tough to beat. Probably the only name here that transcends "uninteresting" and actually makes your baseball viewing experience worse.
so here's a list of players with >5000 PAs with an OPS+ between 110 and 120-who is the most boringest?
Strangely enough, the first guy on that list was the guy that
spranglurched to mind, when I first saw the headline...A different version: the Whiteyball Cardinals featured a flock of skinny little black guys. Some of them, like McGee or Ozzie, were instantly recognizable from almost any angle or distance. Then there was the guy who wasn't any of the ones you recognized. That would have been Curt Ford. (OK, he only had about 800 PA.)
Wow, I spent a good fifteen minutes trying to remember Rich Becker's name last week.
And its a shame whatever's happened to Dunn this year. He sure was exciting last year.
most boring HOFer: Mel Ott
most boring VERY good player: Harold Baines
most boring good player: McReynolds
most boring average player: a cast of thousands
most boring BAD player: Ray Oyler or Jack Heidemann
I'll give you the late-model version. But I always thought the 80s Hal was a treat to watch play.
Trachsel would be a good pick except that his constant pickoff throws to 1st base alienated him in a big way to even his own fans.
McReynolds didn't even have that "vibe."
Jeff Francoeur should be the most boring player in baseball yet he's a constant source of entertainment -- that's what makes this game great!
Hmmm ... talk about unsatisfying ... a P-I search of expansion era seasons with 500+ PA and 1.9<WAR<2.1 doesn't turn up anybody with a long list of perfectly average seasons. I didn't see anybody with more than 3 and one of those was a good player. Still, it did pop up one boring candidate in Mark Kotsay who was pretty unexciting in pretty much every way.
By the way, in the last 50 years, only 348 perfectly average seasons ... what's up with that?
Anyway, I lowered my sights a bit and went with 1.5 to 2.1 WAR -- if we want boring, we want below-average boring. Fair enough, Pat Burrell is pretty boring. Pedro Feliz wasn't putting fannies in the seats. Bobby Knopp did not live up to his cool name. Todd Walker. But I will not accept Felix Millan (cool name and he choked up about 15 inches on the bat).
This deep, thoroughly thought out analysis does help us see that 1B is the most boring position of all. Even Derrek Lee gets 4 seasons here. And it reveals the most boring player of the last 50 years ...
Paul Konerko with a stunning 7 seasons with a WAR between 1.5 and 2.1
EDIT: also with 262 Rrep and 252 RAR, Konerko is almost dead on average for his entire career.
Al Oliver smacked line drives remarkably hard. But he's from my home town so I have to stick up for him.
This admittedly isn't interesting to most people, but a few years ago I was looking through different leaderboards and saw that everybody ahead of Oliver on the doubles leaderboard was in the HOF, on a HOF track or was Peter Rose.
That probably changed at some point in the middle of the last decade with Luis Gonzalez (I should also mention Rafael Palmeiro, who was on a HOF track at one point).
This is preposterous. Younger Kotsay was a really good defender and very fun to watch.
I must say that Cliff Pennington is, in fact, entirely uninteresting, even to this A's fan. A good candidate.
To me this argument really has nothing at all to do with statistics. McReynolds approached the game in the same way your average office worker approaches 9 AM on Monday morning. His body language indicated that winning or losing didn't really matter- he was being paid to do a job and that's all there was to it for him. I can't recall seeing him display an ounce of emotion, ever.
And of the HOF crowd, no one was more boring than Tom Glavine. Just seeing him on the mound made NLCS games feel like split-squad ST starts.
I loved seeing these two posts back-to-back. But Anderson actually did convey some genuine emotion to me while watching him...I always got the impression that he truly hated baseball.
Al Oliver, OTOH, was a wicked line-drive hitter. In terms of TEH FEAR, which I maintain is generated by the probability of an RBI double every time up, Oliver was one of the great ones, in a league with Brett, Molitor, Garciaparra – a guy you never wanted to see bat against your club, and a guy you hoped got traded to your club (and usually, Oliver eventually would get traded to your club).
Eddie Murray was someone I didn't fear and didn't enjoy watching. I don't know if he qualifies as "boring," exactly (he had an often-discussed "mystique," as if he knew something about baseball the rest of us didn't), but he was a mechanical man in terms of consistency and low-key affect. A hell of a hitter, no question; but I'd nominate him as Most Boring HOFer.
One of the more nondescript players I ever saw a lot of was Jerry White, a long-career pinch hitter for the Expos c1980. He may have been a swell guy and a clubhouse cutup or something, but on the field he was completely generic.
IIRC, Murray usually spent time during batting practice hitting squibs and bloops by batting one handed, off-balance, etc. Part of me thinks that's really cool. Another part thinks that's incredibly boring and mechanical.
Of course, Murray was my favorite player when I was a kid, so I don't know what that says about me. I also really liked guys like Lendl and Borg and disliked McEnroe and Connors.
I disagree re Francoeur -- OFs with strong arms are never boring.
My parents found this odd but let me do it anyway, although I would occasionally get some strange looks, especially when I lost the little jersey he came with and it just looked like I had a doll of a moustachioed black dude for some reason.
That's McReynolds all right. To me he always looked like a guy engaged in a necessary but moderately distasteful task... say scooping a litter box or taking out the garbage.
Good call. And his case is aided by a boring name (that's another strike against Frency's boringness).
Von Hayes, in spite of his sweet swing and speed, was pretty boring. I'm surprised that he manages in the indy leagues because he never showed any joy on the field.
But Von Hayes...
(a) has a cool name
(b) had a lot of doubles and SBs, and
(c) played a bunch of different positions
Plus Hayes was an odd looking guy for a MLB player. Very tall, very thin, with freaky long arms and legs. He looked like a cross between a stick figure and a praying mantis at the plate.
Hayes's informal nickname in Philly was "Five-for-One," which made him less boring from the start.
But Sexson was freakishly tall, was involved in that huge Milwaukee trade, and had that bizarre freakout a couple years back where he about went apoplectic and into full-on "hold me back! no really, hold me back!" mode about an eye-high pitch three feet outside. I'll always remember him for that. Also his name has "sex" in it.
Kotsay's wife is too hot for him to be boring.
I thought Geoff Jenkins was a splendid choice.
No way. 5'7" guy with his foot in the bucket, NL record for homers until 1969, rifle for an arm, teenage prodigy is boring?
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main