|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
“President, GM address questions about No. 2 pick, money matters, and what happened with Wieters”
Q: Obviously, neither of you was here when the Pirates bypassed Matt Wieters last summer. But I also know that both of you have done due diligence on what came before, just as I know you have scouts still on your staff who were involved. What is the best way, based on the information you have, to explain what happened?
COONELLY: Let me start by saying I don’t think it’s very productive to engage in that. But my diligence has led me to believe that, one, the scouts we’ve retained, we like and think are productive members of the organization. Two, the decision was made by the former baseball operations department to take Danny Moskos over Matt Wieters. That was their decision.
Q: For baseball reasons only?
COONELLY: That was their baseball decision. It was not a decision that was dictated to them by ownership. I do know that much.
Thanks to Bucs Dugout.
Repoz
Posted: May 27, 2008 at 11:40 AM | 8 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags:
pirates
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: Wilmoth: Nate McLouth Designated For Assignment (13 - 7:52am, May 26)Last: RussNewsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread, May 2012 (1835 - 7:45am, May 26)Last: thokNewsblog: Maddon on Red Sox beaning Luke Scott: 'I think it's ridiculous, I think it's absurd, idiotic' (1 - 7:23am, May 26)Last: zachtomaNewsblog: The Hall of Very Good: Former Cards Slugger Critical of "LaRussa's Regime" (6 - 7:16am, May 26)Last: Shooty: Applying to be Fearless LeaderNewsblog: Matschulat: Did I Miss The "Paul Konerko Is So Overrated OMG" Bandwagon? (30 - 7:15am, May 26)Last: baudibNewsblog: CSN to host ‘Phillies at the Beach’ on Memorial Day (19 - 7:11am, May 26)Last: GodNewsblog: T.R. Sullivan: Of Frank Robinson, Milt Pappas and Jim Palmer (10 - 7:09am, May 26)Last: GodNewsblog: Bud Selig -- No need for more MLB replay for now - ESPN (88 - 6:12am, May 26)Last: LassusNewsblog: HP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind (59 - 5:24am, May 26)Last: bjhankeNewsblog: Himrich’s Top Ten Target Field Foods (8 - 2:43am, May 26)Last: Long John McCaine Mutiny on the Bounty (scott)Newsblog: Boston.com: Curt Schilling’s 38 Studios lays off all staff (119 - 1:28am, May 26)Last: Swedish ChefHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1973 Discussion (15 - 12:13am, May 26)Last: DanGHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1972 Ballot (28 - 11:25pm, May 25)Last: lieiamSox Therapy: A Winning Ballclub? (20 - 11:24pm, May 25)Last: DanNewsblog: TBO: Nerdy Rays head north (17 - 10:07pm, May 25)Last: PreservedFish
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. ECBucs Posted: May 27, 2008 at 12:06 PM (#2795280)Reports have Moskos hitting 87-91 on rader gun consistently.
I know the Bucs over drafted him at pick number 4 but he was still rated as first round talent.
Is he trying to hard now or was he just not first round talent in first place?
On the other hand, struggling as a starter while working on pitches, command issues could help his develop in the long run.
I think it's more the latter. It shouldn't come as a surprise that he had better stuff as a reliever than as a starter, since that's the way it works for most pitchers. He probably had first-round talent anyway since he was a college lefty with a good slider, but I had him pegged before the draft as the one guy who was way too high in BA's rankings. That's at least half of the reason why I predicted pre-draft that the Pirates would take him, actually...
I'm convinced that Littlefield took Moskos because he thought that Moskos could be moved quickly enough as a reliever to potentially give Littlefield some job security if he managed to hold the job into 2008. That'd explain why they used him exclusively out of the pen after he signed. The actual needs of the franchise didn't factor into it.
Those are great beers, and they're just run-of-the-mill for the Belgians. God, how I love that country.
I thought this quote was interesting and an honest admission of the sort you rarely see by GMs in interviews. Unfortunately for the Pirates, Littlefield used to take those guys starting in the second round.
I can tell you that, of the top nine or 10 players on our board, almost every one of our supervisors has seen every one of those players. That gives us nine or 10 reports on each kid. We could have three looks on a 10th-rounder.
Overall, our number of scouts now is in the upper half of the industry. We're a little heavier on the top than we'd like to be, but we have some very young area scouts, and we feel we can get a lot of energy, a lot of production from them.
Plus, we've changed the valuation process for each player to a system that allows for us to have a detailed, comprehensive look where we're all on the same page.
I wonder whether the "top heavy" part indicates that they've added more supervision than usual to make up for the fact that most of their area scouts are the same guys who scouted under the previous regime.
Sounds like they've got a few more supervisors than usual because they've got a bunch of young, inexperienced scouts.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main