|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Friday, December 23, 2005
This article is chock full o’ rumors, including this one pointed out by JBH. Sounds too good to be true:
The Red Sox are reportedly involved in three-way talks with the Padres and Devil Rays about a deal that would send pitcher David Wells to San Diego and Tampa Bay shortstop Julio Lugo to Boston. To complete the trade, Padres prospects would go to the Devil Rays. SOURCE: ESPN and several radio stations.
Then there’s this:
bs starting pitcher Mark Prior would head to Boston along with a package of other players—which may include shortstop Ronny Cedeno and center fielder Corey Patterson—in a trade that would send Manny Ramirez to Baltimore and shortstop Miguel Tejada to Chicago.
Maybe it’s the Christmas spirit, but I am feeling pretty confident that the Sox will put together a good roster for next year.
|
Support BBTF
Thanks to Francis for his generous support.
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: OT: The Soccer Thread, May 2013 (1124 - 4:58am, May 24)Last:  Arnett Mead (Arjun)Newsblog: Mitchell: Pedroia, Cano and Magical Thinking (24 - 4:06am, May 24)Last: Walt DavisNewsblog: OT: NHL is finally back thread (363 - 3:49am, May 24)Last:  BurlyBuehrleNewsblog: Mariners sending Jesus Montero to Triple-A (66 - 2:32am, May 24)Last: rb's team is hopeful for the new year!Newsblog: Richie Ashburn’s Widow in Tears Over His Endangered Gladwyne Grave (5 - 2:30am, May 24)Last: Sunday silenceNewsblog: [OTP-May] Politico: Congressional baseball game, May 1, 1926 (4284 - 2:17am, May 24)Last:  Joe KehoskieNewsblog: Mets’ Ike Davis On Struggles: ‘I Can’t Do Any Worse’ (24 - 12:28am, May 24)Last: bobmNewsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread - May 2013 (1216 - 12:12am, May 24)Last:  thokNewsblog: Demystifying Red Sox Ownership - What Do They Do? (WEEI) (27 - 12:06am, May 24)Last: KT's Pot ArbNewsblog: OMNICHATTER for MAY 23, 2013 (77 - 11:10pm, May 23)Last: Los Angeles El Hombre of AnaheimNewsblog: ESPN: Forging bond with Pete Rose has helped fuel Joey Votto's desire to be great (127 - 11:03pm, May 23)Last:  Everybody Loves Tyrus RaymondNewsblog: Astros vendor brings snow cones into bathroom stall, gets fired (21 - 10:03pm, May 23)Last: Sunday silenceNewsblog: Leyland breaks his own rule, lets Verlander get win after delay (26 - 9:01pm, May 23)Last: the Hugh Jorgan returnsNewsblog: Daugherty: Brandon Phillips has been Reds' MVP so far (18 - 8:14pm, May 23)Last: TJHall of Merit: 2014 Hall of Merit Ballot Discussion (86 - 8:02pm, May 23)Last: Ivan Grushenko of Hong Kong
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: December 23, 2005 at 03:55 PM (#1791701)I love the Wells/Lugo trade, though I'm having trouble believing it's for real- maybe Towers is still secretly working for Lucchino.
The Manny trade is certainly interesting, I'll give them that. It sounds a wee bit like the Red Sox inserting themselves into a trade where they're not necessarily wanted, and it's hard to believe that there are no other prospects in the deal (last I heard, both the Cubs and Orioles were demanding young players along with the principles, and this reported trade has all the young players going to the Sox.)
That Manny trade also reads very much like the first step in a multi-step makeover process - the Sox would need a brand new LF who could hit some, and a right-handed hitter who could handle CF (a Payton type...) who could platoon with Trot if Patterson panned out and take over for Patterson if he hit like he did, you know, last year. I assume they'd trade one of their 75 extra pitchers in that case, but I don't know where.
As to whether it's a good trade, that all depends on Prior's health, Patterson's mental health, Manny's defense (-20 or -40?), and what the Sox do with the leftover cash and empty positions. Sure would be interesting.
I'd miss Manny >> Damon but << Pedro. It would be a very sad day, regardless of the on-the-field considerations. Watching Manny hit, every day, all summer, has been a real treat. I still hope he stays.
At the top of the article, Cherington used the word <u>rebuilding</u>. That is accurate. This team is no longer in "hole-filling" mode; it's in the process of being torn down and reconstructed. Next it's adios Manny, and once that happens you might as well forget about the Glauses and Lugos and (shudder) Pattersons and start planning for '07.
How well do you think Cedeno would do? Lugo is a pretty good player right now. Sure, he's not a good person, and that might cause problems. But Lugo is significantly above average at SS with the bat, on defense and on the basepaths. Is Cedeno really almost that good?
If we traded Clement and Wells for Drew and Lugo, I'd die of happiness
Don't you think that if the Sox did a deal for Tejada, they might not go after Cedeno from the Cubs? I think the general thrust of the article is that the Sox have a lot of possible deals, that if they were able to pull the trigger on some of them, would have them ready to go in 06.
As for the Cubs rumor, anything that brings back Prior has to be considered a huge coup. His 05 injury was a fluke and returned pretty strongly from it, IIRC. (I don't think he's a bs starting pitcher, despite my typo.)
Why not Murton instead of Cedeno/Patterson? He'd be blocked by Jones/Manny anyway and Dusty would probably only use him as a pinchrunner or something silly. Yes, I'm dreaming again. Please slap me.
FWIW, it's not Cherington that used the word rebuild, and I read his point as being "we're not going to rush into a deal just to make a splash to offset losing Damon, but we'll have our team in good shape by spring." But I guess he could have meant a more longterm approach.
Hey, what about Marte at SS?
I know Levski among others has said that Marte can't play left, but I imagine that next year he couldn't be worse than Manny in left fielding wise, and even if he were -15 he'd be better. If we had to take a rational guess on what Marte could do in left next year, what would it be?
I know its his right arm, but he looks like he's throwing.
Yer right, Darren. I'm a bs reader today.
I do believe the "Manny is furious" part about the article, though, and would guess that if there was a Vegas line on his coming back, it'd be a long shot. And that ultimately we'll send him to either the Mets or Angels for prospects we were offered a while ago but at which we turned up our noses. And that we'll then send some or all of those prospects to the desert for Glaus+ or to TB for Lugo/Huff or some other package of veterans that might keep us on the cusp of contention.
Wish I could be as Sunshiney as some here, but the way the Damon thing went down, causing even our field manager to express shock, suggests that this FO really doesn't have their stuff together. And why should they? LL's frequently distracted, and you've put a couple of rookies in a job share, with a 71-y.o. suffering from leukemia (and assorted other maladies) looking over their shoulders. And the shelves are getting more and more bare while this crew goes on its first real shopping trip. This is not a pretty picture. Mind Game's sequel might be Things Fall Apart.
OPS+ last 4 years
Renteria:
116, 130, 90, 91
Lugo:
84, 95, 94, 105
I can see the trend argument, that Lugo seems to be getting better and Renteria getting worse, but they're the same age, and Renteria has been awesome in the not-distant past. Both have been pretty durable, and they're the same age. Of course, Renteria netted Marte, which is great and I wouldn't take it back, so I'm even not sure what I'm getting at here. I'm a bs poster today too. Just ignore me.
Well that's the thing, he's so much cheaper then Renteria and he's been better (much better) over the last two years. He's a fantastic baserunner, a plus defender, and since he's become a full time player he's turned into a pretty good hitter. He doesn't have any power, he doesn't have much discipline, but he does well enough in the other facets of the game to make him pretty valuable and IMO undervalued. Of course, he beats women, so he's got character issues, but it hasn't been an issue in Tampa as far as I know. I'd be really upset if the Sox got Lugo, and not so much if they got many of the other options being rumored.
As to the Sox FO not knowing that Damon signed, how do front offices usually know this stuff? Spies? Bugged offices? Unless Gammons was in the room with Boras and Cashman, seriously how would they know? Maybe I'm hopelessly naive. I don't consider myself a FO apologist (even though I might sound like one) but I'm willing to give them some time to do their jobs before I get all concerned about their office politics.
Lugo was much better last year, but the year before he wasn't all that much better, and the years before that Renteria has the clear advantage. I guess I just don't like saying that one player sucks and another player is good when I think they'll probably be close to the same player. I know Renteria was/is overpaid, but that doesn't effect how he plays.
I'd be thrilled if the Sox got Lugo for Wells. It would be tough to root for Lugo because of the whole domestic abuse thing, but as a place holder/mercenary he'd be great.
On a seperate topic, has anyone thought that Cherrington as a player development guy coming into the GM office could mean that a greater focus and higher priority is being placed on player development within the organization? That would be sweet.
I agree with you generally, but in the context of this conversation, who said Renteria sucked? He seems like an average shortstop, and very durable. If anyone says Renteria sucks, they're wrong. I'm only happy that Renteria's gone because he brought Marte back.
If the Sox now go and get a similar replacement, that's great. Lugo looks to me like an upgrade defensively (Renteria was the 3nd worst shortstop in the AL last year, and the worst shortstop who wasn't a bad 2B inexplicably stuck at SS because he's gritty, white and lovable), but even if he isn't, the Sox would be in good shape.
I could have sworn I read a bunch of people saying that Renteria sucked a little while ago in a thread far, far away. This was a belated defense, I guess.
Vaux, the insane musicologist Posted: December 06, 2005 at 11:04 PM (#1765015)
That would be totally insane. Renteria SUCKS.
Shoot, that's all I could find.
Beckett for Wells
Lugo for Renteria
Lowell/Marte for Mueller
Not too shabby...
Of course, there is the matter of a center fielder.
The actual rumor is Wells to San Diego, Padres prospects to Tampa, Lugo to Boston.
Of course, if you really wanted to know that, you could just RTFA.
i don't see what the big deal is. you can watch the sunset over here over the cape cod bay if that's your thing.
I think I would be willing to risk it.
- Why all the Lugo/wife beater talk? He was arrested for domestic abuse, but weren't the charges dropped shortly thereafter?
- Not that Wells wants to play for the DRays, but doesn't he live in Tampa? Or is it Miami?
- FWIW, We get sunsets over the Atlantic Ocean proper here on Nantucket , and we are still technically part of the Bay State. I can't recommend the commute to Boston, however.
Bob Loblaw is funny. You are not.
So take that for what it's worth. Gammons has been wrong before, and this was just him talking to a clerk in a liqour store. Depending on who is traded, though, I'd be thrilled to get Crisp. And I really, really want my girlfriend's dad to become friends with Peter Gammons.
That is the coolest rumor ever. Girlfriend's dad's liquor store connection to Gammons! That means you've got what, about 4 people between you and Gammons, and then who knows how many between Gammons and the actual people involved. It's very fun, though, to think about.
A couple of points on that:
--I originally thought you were saying that the liquor store owner was disappointed to lose Johnny as a customer. I thought we had another DLowe situation.
--Then I thought Coco was also a big partier. Then I realized what you were saying.
--Was Gammons stopping in for some booze before writing his column? What's his pleasure?
--I have given up all rational hope of getting Crisp. They don't really have a replacement for him. Maybe if they're blown away by an offer of Marte, but even then maybe not.
wait,... don't tell me...
bushmills?
That's a fact.
I think you may mistake what Boston's concept of "rebuilding" is with what we traditionally think the term means.
I try to keep mum about my time there, but I will say that one discussion I had a lot of was just what are the right ways to go about turning over a roster and taking a look at how other teams have gone about trying to do it and what the results were. There is a belief, and one I personally hold as well, that a team can "rebuild" and compete at the same time.
Whether this can be pulled off or not by the Red Sox is another discussion, but I wouldn't read a statement of "rebuilding" to imply the jettisoning of the season.
It could be a case of mistaken identity.
Best Regards
John
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main