|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Saturday, May 10, 2008
Pete Kozma wasn’t considered to be a “sexy” pick at the time he was drafted. A lot of different media outlets said that while he had solid tools across the board, other then power, he possessed no real standout tool. Yet so far Pete has been played extremely well. Are you surprised at how well Pete’s performed early?
If we wanted a “sexy” pick, we would read Baseball America, read Keith Law’s articles, and pick based on their opinions. But we don’t, and neither do any other clubs, because while the journalists are doing a good job of expressing their opinions based on the information they have, we have to live and die with our selections and the future of the organization is impacted by these picks. If the journalist is wrong, he just admits it (maybe) and keeps writing about the next guy or the next draft. They will still sell papers or get eyeballs. If we are wrong, we’ve missed a huge opportunity to make our organization better, and nobody wants to do that.
Pete’s performance is not a surprise to me or to our scouts. I’m happy he is doing well and I sure hope and expect he will keep it up. I know he will have his rough patches as he goes through our system, everybody except Albert does. By the way, a player with average tools across the board who plays a premium position is incredibly valuable! When we as scouts say “average”, we mean average at the major league level. Theoretically, he would be in the top 15 shortstops at the major league level if that were true. Those players get paid well because they are so valuable.
|
Support BBTF
Thanks to Backlasher for his generous support.
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: Maddon on Red Sox beaning Luke Scott: 'I think it's ridiculous, I think it's absurd, idiotic' (4 - 7:58am, May 26)Last: TomHNewsblog: YESNetwork: A look at five Yankees' cases for enshrinement in Monument Park (1 - 7:55am, May 26)Last: bjhankeNewsblog: HP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind (60 - 7:55am, May 26)Last: Designated Sitter (GGC)Newsblog: Wilmoth: Nate McLouth Designated For Assignment (13 - 7:52am, May 26)Last: RussNewsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread, May 2012 (1835 - 7:45am, May 26)Last:  thokNewsblog: The Hall of Very Good: Former Cards Slugger Critical of "LaRussa's Regime" (6 - 7:16am, May 26)Last: Shooty: Applying to be Fearless LeaderNewsblog: Matschulat: Did I Miss The "Paul Konerko Is So Overrated OMG" Bandwagon? (30 - 7:15am, May 26)Last: baudibNewsblog: CSN to host ‘Phillies at the Beach’ on Memorial Day (19 - 7:11am, May 26)Last: GodNewsblog: T.R. Sullivan: Of Frank Robinson, Milt Pappas and Jim Palmer (10 - 7:09am, May 26)Last: GodNewsblog: Bud Selig -- No need for more MLB replay for now - ESPN (88 - 6:12am, May 26)Last: LassusNewsblog: Himrich’s Top Ten Target Field Foods (8 - 2:43am, May 26)Last: Long John McCaine Mutiny on the Bounty (scott)Newsblog: Boston.com: Curt Schilling’s 38 Studios lays off all staff (119 - 1:28am, May 26)Last:  Swedish ChefHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1973 Discussion (15 - 12:13am, May 26)Last: DanGHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1972 Ballot (28 - 11:25pm, May 25)Last: lieiamSox Therapy: A Winning Ballclub? (20 - 11:24pm, May 25)Last: Dan
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. philly Posted: May 10, 2008 at 09:03 PM (#2776101)Why would he have to "hope" he does well in the future since his current performance is not a surprise at all? ;)
Otoh, I completely agree with this:
And think that plays a big part in the way college infielders tend to be mid to late rd sleepers. Scouts may do a decent job of evaluating their skills, but don't appreciate how valuable a solid and cheap player can be even if he doesn't fit the toolsy profile.
And think that plays a big part in the way college infielders tend to be mid to late rd sleepers. Scouts may do a decent job of evaluating their skills, but don't appreciate how valuable a solid and cheap player can be even if he doesn't fit the toolsy profile.
Did you write up a study on this somewhere? I seem to recall you mentioning it before but I can't find it when I search around the internets. Any link?
No, but I hope to before the draft.
Sox were babies complaining about a trip to Japan.
It's typical. I talked to an assistant SD the other day who'd been home one day in the last 30. I was on a flight yesterday morning with three other guys going from ATL to STL, and we were all flying out in different directions last night too.
I can't tell you how sad this makes me.
I even bolded my little lame joke.
You know... to Jupiter as in the planet!
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main