|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Friday, April 11, 2008
I recently talked to Jim Callis, Executive Editor of Baseball America, about B.J. Upton’s chances for 30/30 and the comparison to Alfonso Soriano I mentioned earlier. “I think B.J. almost certainly will go 30-30 at some point in his career. If I have to put a number on his chance for this year, I’d say 30 percent” Callis said. On the comparision to Soriano, Jim said “Not a bad comparison, I think B.J. is significantly better OF, though.”
I also talked to a writer from Baseball Prospectus about the same topics. He said the Soriano comparison was fair, but wasn’t so optimistic about the 30/30 chances. The writer gave Upton a 10 percent chance and mentioned that his PECOTA mean has him at 30 steals, but 18 homers. Even his 90% is a bit shy of the mark. He also mentioned that the percent could possibly be higher, because Upton is probably bigger than his listed weight of 185 lbs and thinks Justin Upton has a better chance at 30/30 anyway.
Eric Seidman who writes for Statistically Speaking and is currently writing the book Bridging the Statistical Gap, told me “I feel that there is a very high chance Upton will get to 30/30 and I would even go so far as to say upwards of 70%. Now of course this is given that a few factors play out the correct way, including his ability to maintain a high BABIP and stay on the field. I do not think steals will be his problem but rather the HR. I say 70%, but I am fully acknowledging that it is more likely that the 70% refers to him being extremely close, like with 27 HR and 35 SB or something along those lines as opposed to say 38 HR and 46 SB. He’s got a very good chance, but it will not surprise me at all if he ends up with a 28-28 or something just missing it.”
JoeRays
Posted: April 11, 2008 at 04:24 PM | 9 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags:
rays
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: Neyer: Computing Manny Machado's shot at the record (43 - 7:32pm, Jun 19)Last: vivaelpujolsNewsblog: Murphy: Ruben Amaro Jr. doesn't "do" five-year plans, but the Phillies need a good one (32 - 7:31pm, Jun 19)Last: DanNewsblog: Perry: Josh Hamilton and the terrible, horrible, no good, very bad night (47 - 7:30pm, Jun 19)Last: bobmNewsblog: OT: The Soccer Thread June, 2013 (632 - 7:28pm, Jun 19)Last:  The John Wetland Memorial Death (CoB)Newsblog: OT: NBA Finals and June thread (1015 - 6:55pm, Jun 19)Last:  PJ MartinezNewsblog: Matt Harvey challenged Jon Rauch to a fight (69 - 6:55pm, Jun 19)Last: michaelplankNewsblog: [OTP-June] Economic Times: Hope politics, sports don’t get mixed up: Manmohan Singh (2273 - 6:53pm, Jun 19)Last:  Morty CausaNewsblog: Draft signings (136 - 6:50pm, Jun 19)Last:  Meatwads stronger now, ready for the houseNewsblog: OT: NHL is finally back thread (1014 - 6:48pm, Jun 19)Last:  Meatwads stronger now, ready for the houseNewsblog: Stan "The Fan" Charles: After Biogenesis, Should MLB Players Still Have The Right To Arbitration? (39 - 6:37pm, Jun 19)Last: Jack Carter, calling Beleaguered CastleNewsblog: Primer Dugout (and link of the day) 6-19-2013 (5 - 6:22pm, Jun 19)Last: Eric J can SABER all he wants toNewsblog: Berg: Rumored trivia legend Nick Swisher bats .429 in pub trivia (46 - 6:16pm, Jun 19)Last: Crispix Attacks 2: Swag AirlinesNewsblog: Sports on Earth: Super-Royal (26 - 6:13pm, Jun 19)Last: gef the talking mongooseNewsblog: Dunson: Yasiel Puig Is Not An All-Star, Somebody Lied (8 - 6:04pm, Jun 19)Last: The Yankee ClapperNewsblog: ‘Old man’ Arroyo pitching better than ever (11 - 6:01pm, Jun 19)Last: Walt Davis
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. DKDC Posted: April 11, 2008 at 04:50 PM (#2739505)It is, but that's beside the point of the article.
Maybe it's a new form of lasik
20/20 means you can see something 20 feet away that a person with normal vision can see 20 feet away.
30/30 means you can see something 30 feet away that a person with normal vision can see 30 feet away.
A person with normal vision has, by definition, both 20/20 and 30/30 vision. But just because you have one doesn't mean you have the other.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main