Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Wednesday, December 06, 2006

Red Sox reach $36 million agreement with Lugo

Lugo…the greatest player in the galicia!

The Boston Red Sox reached a preliminary agreement Tuesday with shortstop Julio Lugo that would pay him $36 million over the next four years.

Details of the agreement were provided to The Associated Press by a person involved in the negotiations who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the deal was not final. Lugo must pass a physical.

Repoz Posted: December 06, 2006 at 05:17 AM | 204 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: red sox

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 
   1. Matt Waters Posted: December 06, 2006 at 05:25 AM (#2252427)
A million dollars more would have matched his RBI total.

Just saying.
   2. PJ Martinez Posted: December 06, 2006 at 05:35 AM (#2252431)
I posted this in the Drew thread, but it's so fun I'll put it here, too:

How about

Youkilis
Drew
Manny
Ortiz
Lowell
Varitek
Crisp
Lugo
Pedroia

Don't know if they'll keep Manny, or if they'll insist on speed at the top, or how often all those guys will be healthy. But if they ran that lineup out there 130 or so times, Ortiz might drive in 175 runs.
   3. PJ Martinez Posted: December 06, 2006 at 05:36 AM (#2252432)
Or if they'll insist on having Manny behind Ortiz. And 175 might be hyperbolic. Still.

Also, not sure what Lugo's recent RBI totals have to do with anything.
   4. Шĥy Posted: December 06, 2006 at 05:36 AM (#2252433)
Providence Journal says that there is a vesting option for a fifth year.
   5. Gold Star for Robothal Posted: December 06, 2006 at 05:38 AM (#2252434)
Yeah, cuz the Red Sox are looking for a big RBI man at short.

Seems like a completely appropriate deal, if a year longer than ideal. I'd rather spend the money on a Lugo than a Padilla or Matthews. Lugo-Pedroia should be a good combo for at least the next few years; slide Youk back to third, if not this year then next; Ellsbury in center maybe starting next year. Plug a good platoon in a first base to save on cash. Etc.
   6. I Love LA (OFF) Posted: December 06, 2006 at 05:39 AM (#2252435)
I'm glad the Mets passed.
   7. Biff isn't really an apt handle anymore Posted: December 06, 2006 at 05:39 AM (#2252436)
A million dollars more would have matched his RBI total.

Just saying.


Wow, Lugo had 37 million RBIs last season? What a bargain at this price!
   8. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: December 06, 2006 at 05:41 AM (#2252437)
I'm glad the Mets passed.

Despite reports, I don't think Minaya was ever in the running.
   9. unemployed Jeff Posted: December 06, 2006 at 05:41 AM (#2252438)
Renteria part II, now with $4M less dollars!
   10. xErikx Posted: December 06, 2006 at 05:41 AM (#2252439)
RBIs mean nothing.
   11. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: December 06, 2006 at 05:45 AM (#2252440)
Renteria part II, now with $4M less dollars!

That just means they'll only have to send the Mets 14 million dollars to take him off their hands next year.

All kidding aside, this offense is going to be scary if they keep Manny and Drew can stay healthy.
   12. xErikx Posted: December 06, 2006 at 05:47 AM (#2252442)
It's going to be scarier if they do the right thing and bat Youk/Drew in front of Manny/Ortiz....I highly doubt they'll do that though. They'll end up going with Crisp/Lugo at 1 and 2. :(
   13. Sean McNally Posted: December 06, 2006 at 05:52 AM (#2252443)
Regardless of how these signings perform on the field... they do two things that make me happy:

1) In hindsight make the lowball offer to Johnny Damon look silly (and the Yanks' offer, given the current market, look insightful)... and

2) Really drives the stake through the heart of "Boston Red Sox, Plucky Underdogs."

Good bye media-created provincial darlings... RIP
   14. unemployed Jeff Posted: December 06, 2006 at 05:52 AM (#2252445)
Wow, a youk/drew/manny/ortiz 1 through 4 would create some amazing OBP
   15. joshtothemaxx Posted: December 06, 2006 at 05:54 AM (#2252448)
Red Sox fans have no sense of humor. They're the new Yanks I tells ya.
   16. xErikx Posted: December 06, 2006 at 05:54 AM (#2252449)
and some amazing run totals
   17. IronChef Chris Wok Posted: December 06, 2006 at 05:56 AM (#2252451)
UGGGHHHHH

Can't believe we lost a draft pick for Edgar Renteria II
   18. akrasian Posted: December 06, 2006 at 05:59 AM (#2252454)
Can't believe we lost a draft pick for Edgar Renteria II

And we Dodger fans appreciate it.
   19. npurcell Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:00 AM (#2252455)
how dodger fans rationalize the draft picks

20th pick for drew

1st round comp pick for Guzman+pedroza

eh.
   20. akrasian Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:03 AM (#2252460)
No pick for Drew.

20th pick for Lugo, plus the sandwich pick.

And yes, the trade for Lugo was still insanely stupid. But at least the Dodgers get two draft picks, including a reasonably high first.

I still don't understand the Lugo trade - why trade so much for a guy to be a supersub?
   21. Tim D Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:06 AM (#2252463)
What's the underdog's payroll going to be? 150?

Career OPS = 92.
   22. Tim D Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:07 AM (#2252464)
Make that OPS+
   23. Ozzie's gay friend Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:08 AM (#2252465)
This guy couldn't even break the starting lineup for the dodgers last year and now the Sox give him $36million?

Shortstop descent 2004-2007
Pokey-Nomar-OC-Rentawreck-AGone/Cora-Lugo
   24. akrasian Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:09 AM (#2252466)
Career OPS = 92.

Which is good for a shortstop, especially if it's OBP heavy.

Incidentally, you mean OPS+. If you are going to rag on a signing, at least get your terms of disparagement correct.
   25. Social media assassin (Templeusox) Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:10 AM (#2252468)
Make that OPS+

When do your comments get interesting?
   26. akrasian Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:13 AM (#2252473)
This guy couldn't even break the starting lineup for the dodgers last year and now the Sox give him $36million?

Behind Rafael Furcal, who's better than any of those shortstops except Nomar at his peak.

Lugo didn't react well to bouncing around as a supersub.
   27. npurcell Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:13 AM (#2252474)
No pick for Drew.


yes i know. But in my head, we get the 20th pick for drew and first round comp for lugo.

It makes me feel betting for Boras effing the dodgers over again with the drew contract.
   28. "Andruw for HoF" sure died down Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:14 AM (#2252475)
Can just *one* stadium music guy play "Smack My ##### Up" when Lugo comes to bat? Please?
   29. jtuohey Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:16 AM (#2252478)
Lugo in Fenway over the past three years:

.330 .382 .532 .914

I just might be able to convince myself on this one...
   30. akrasian Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:18 AM (#2252479)
It makes me feel betting for Boras effing the dodgers over again with the drew contract.

The only part I don't like is the no arbitration clause. If the Dodgers were getting two draft picks for him, I'd be more than fine - he gave the Dodgers half a good season before a hbp in 2005, and was arguably the Dodgers best player in 2006. And didn't cost the Dodgers a draft pick when they signed him.
   31. PJ Martinez Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:18 AM (#2252480)
"Good bye media-created provincial darlings... RIP"

And good riddance.
   32. Tim D Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:18 AM (#2252481)
This place used to be fun. Nothing but nitpicky a-holes anymore.

Congratulations Sox, you have the third best SS in the division. Although to be fair $36M is chump change in this market.
   33. PJ Martinez Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:21 AM (#2252487)
Well, career numbers are pretty silly anyway. As I wrote in Sox Therapy, Lugo hasn't been below 94 since 2002. And his low SLG is offset by high OBP, made more useful by decent speed.

Lugo is the third-best SS in the division, and appropriately enough, the third-highest-paid SS in the division, too.

The Red Sox are a lot better today than they were yesterday.
   34. Rough Carrigan Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:22 AM (#2252488)
Sean. The Red Sox spent the second most on payroll last year. They're likely to spend the second most on payroll in 2007 behind the same team. And the watershed change was what exactly . . . ?
   35. Ozzie's gay friend Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:23 AM (#2252490)
wait, why did the dodgers trade from him?

I don't like that GM, he makes lots of big-splash deals, but only because he's trading away parts of insane good system.
I don't even mind trading pospects, just do better than 1/2 season rentals of old and mediocre players.

He probably could have had Willis and Beckett in his staff right now.
   36. Foster Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:24 AM (#2252492)
Jesus H. And don't forget Dice K.
   37. Foster Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:25 AM (#2252493)
And there's still the matter of a closer. Does Manny go or stay?
   38. MB Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:37 AM (#2252504)
has anybody posted this idea yet...
Move Ortiz to 1b, Manny to DH. Trade Lowell...
Youkilis 3b
Drew cf
Ortiz 1b
Manny dh
Pena rf
Varitek c
Lugo ss
Crisp lf
Pedroia 2b
   39. AROM Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:42 AM (#2252515)
That's a scary lineup. They'll be back to 900+ runs in 2007.

At least us non Red Sox fans won't have to hear about the great 2007 draft. Your picks belong to the Dodgers now. Small consolation.
   40. Bitter Calculus Instructor Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:44 AM (#2252517)
Good riddance, Lugo. I hope the draft pick becomes somebody worthwhile.
   41. Ignatius J. Reilly Posted: December 06, 2006 at 06:45 AM (#2252520)
"At least us non Red Sox fans won't have to hear about the great 2007 draft. Your picks belong to the Dodgers now. Small consolation."

Wrong. They'll just go over slot again...
   42. xErikx Posted: December 06, 2006 at 07:04 AM (#2252536)
It makes me feel betting for Boras effing the dodgers over again with the drew contract.

How exactly did BORAS eff the dodgers over? Maybe...the DODGERS effed themselves over by allowing the clause for him to opt out?
   43. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: December 06, 2006 at 07:09 AM (#2252541)
Supposedly there was some talk between the Braves and the Dodgers over Andruw Jones, and the Dodgers are not particularly happy about trading for a Boras client, as per rotoworld..
   44. Hendry's Wad of Cash (UCCF) Posted: December 06, 2006 at 07:10 AM (#2252543)
I'm not torn up that the Cubs couldn't make this happen. The idea of having him around in CF for a year and then moving him to replace Izturis at SS in 2008 was a decent one, but we've already got one displaced infielder roaming the outfield. I'm not sure we really needed another one.
   45. MB Posted: December 06, 2006 at 07:13 AM (#2252545)
Ive never understood how people like Plaschke could knock DePodesta for the signing...and then criticise him again when Drew opts out.

Its either a bad signing(then you should be happy he opted out) or a good signing with a dumb escape clause.
   46. Flynn Posted: December 06, 2006 at 07:14 AM (#2252546)
Good bye media-created provincial darlings... RIP

Hi, my name is Sean McNally and I completely underestimate the influence of New Englanders and New England educated people in the media.
   47. Biff isn't really an apt handle anymore Posted: December 06, 2006 at 07:16 AM (#2252549)
Yeah, I don't care if they're media darlings. I want to win.
   48. Matt Waters Posted: December 06, 2006 at 07:21 AM (#2252553)
His RBI's don't mean anything. I just thought it was funny that he had 37 RBI's and made 36 million. I mean, say what you want about the market, but nine million is nine million, and that's a great deal of money to pay for a guy like Lugo. But than again, I should probably take the market more into account. I think Lugo is a pretty good player, comfortably above average, and if the Red Sox had signed him to a more reasonable deal, I wouldn't have had a problem with this at all. But as is, this a rather sizable commitment for a player who I’d say had a rather disappointing season last year, setting aside any extenuating circumstances. I apologize to those who were bent out of shape about my RBI quip. I wasn’t trying to judge Lugo or the signing at the basis at all. I do think, however, that he is vastly over-paid, but than again, he has plenty of company this winter...
   49. Norcan Posted: December 06, 2006 at 07:39 AM (#2252564)
This is a blah deal to me. I never actively liked or disliked Lugo, he was just an okay player. My main impression was that he was one skinny guy. 4 years just seems like a long time to have him on the team, not because of how he'll play in four years, but because it'll be boring to be stuck with him. After he moves on, I'm guessing he'll be forgotten soon.
   50. Long John McCaine Mutiny on the Bounty (scott) Posted: December 06, 2006 at 08:23 AM (#2252586)
this is worse than the rentaria signing.
   51. Darren Posted: December 06, 2006 at 12:11 PM (#2252619)
2) Really drives the stake through the heart of "Boston Red Sox, Plucky Underdogs."


Hey Sean, the Yankees will still outspend the Red Sox by $50 mil when it's all said and done. I know you'd like to forget that, but it's still true. The Red Sox are still tremendous underdogs, payroll-wise, when compared to the Yankees.
   52. Infinite Yost (Voxter) Posted: December 06, 2006 at 12:18 PM (#2252621)
As a Red Sox fan, I'm not too worried about being plucky underdogs. I'm pretty happy we're using our money in an attempt to win.

That said, four years is much too long for Julio Lugo. By 2010, even I will be 30.

Then again, by 2010, 9 million bucks may be what you pay a back-up catcher.
   53. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: December 06, 2006 at 12:51 PM (#2252623)
Lugo doesn't do much for me. He projects pretty well, on the strength of an excellent '05, but I guess I'm just a bit gunshy after the Renteria signing, given that Lugo effectively is Renteria. Plus I don't like the guy and don't cotton rooting for him.

But odds are he plays good next year. More, I'm happy about Drew and Matsuzaka, and this is just a piece next to that.

Philly's payroll stuff is useful, suggests the Sox will be a chunk over the luxury tax threshold this year, barring a Manny trade. That's a pretty big bump in payroll. Yankee fans appear to be quite scared of watching about a third of their team's massive previous advantage disappear. Fun.

While you're at SoSH, Eric M. Van arguing that the only useful data for projecting Julio Lugo is 2005, and 2006 before the trade to the Dodgers. Lugo reached a new level of ability in 2005 so previous numbers don't count, and then was so emotionally hurt by changing positions that his Dodgers numbers don't count. He's going to be totally awesome!
   54. Buster Olney the Lonely Posted: December 06, 2006 at 12:51 PM (#2252624)
2) Really drives the stake through the heart of "Boston Red Sox, Plucky Underdogs."

Remember the first time this happened when the Sox signed Matt Young, Jack Clark and Danny Darwin?
   55. RB in NYC (Now with New iPhone!) Posted: December 06, 2006 at 01:19 PM (#2252628)
Yankee fans appear to be quite scared of watching about a third of their team's massive previous advantage disappear. Fun.
I think we'd be more scared if it the Sox new money wasn't being spent on guys who prompt comments from their own fans like "can't believe we lost a draft pick for Edgar Renteria II," "Lugo doesn't do much for me," and "Drew is going to wish he had an out-clause like he did in L.A."
   56. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: December 06, 2006 at 01:25 PM (#2252629)
I think we'd be more scared if it the Sox new money wasn't being spent on guys who prompt comments from their own fans like "can't believe we lost a draft pick for Edgar Renteria II," "Lugo doesn't do much for me," and "Drew is going to wish he had an out-clause like he did in L.A."
Hey, I ain't talking about you, I'm talking about McNally.

I love the Drew signing, and you left off Matsuzaka, who was the prize off the offseason for pretty much all the super-market clubs. Matsuzaka + Drew is a great offseason, all I coulda asked for. (Well, I coulda asked for Drew to be cheaper, but I still like his contract better than those of Lee, Soriano, MAtthews or Pierre.)
   57. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: December 06, 2006 at 01:53 PM (#2252633)
did i miss this? when was matsuzaka signed?!

poor Wily mo pena, what happens to him now?
   58. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: December 06, 2006 at 01:57 PM (#2252636)
Not yet, but he will be.

Wily Mo will probably start 80 games next year. He'll start against almost all lefties, and he'll probably get chances to rest Coco and Drew against righties, some, too. He'll start when one of the front three outfielders inevitably gets hurt, and he can give Ortiz a day off once a month or so.
   59. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: December 06, 2006 at 02:07 PM (#2252641)
I'd rather Pena play than Crisp. Crisp just ins't very good.
I'm amenable to this argument, but I'm pretty confident the Sox prefer Crisp. They have been keeping it year-to-year with Wily Mo, while they signed Crisp to a relatively rich four-year extension in May. I'm skeptical that they have changed their opinion on him already.
   60. IronChef Chris Wok Posted: December 06, 2006 at 02:10 PM (#2252643)
For those that have taken high school probability:

What are the chances that AT LEAST one of Veronica, Manny, Wily Mo, and Crisp will be injured during any random time of the season? I don't need think to finish the quesiton to know our need for 4 OFs + a guy like Hinske that is a good LH bat and can play 4 field positions.

I like Crisp on the bench. He can defensive sub/pinch run for Manny, and he can start some games.
   61. Liver of blaspheming 'zop Posted: December 06, 2006 at 02:17 PM (#2252645)

Hey Sean, the Yankees will still outspend the Red Sox by $50 mil when it's all said and done. I know you'd like to forget that, but it's still true. The Red Sox are still tremendous underdogs, payroll-wise, when compared to the Yankees.


Ah, there's nothing like a little ######## to sniff over my morning coffee.
   62. JC in DC Posted: December 06, 2006 at 02:18 PM (#2252646)
I think Crisp and Wily Mo both kinda suck, and I'm with those who feel this signing is kinda blah. That said, the Matsuzaka and Drew signings are significant, and I much preferred the old Red Sox approach to the new, aggressive one.
   63. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: December 06, 2006 at 02:25 PM (#2252649)
Hmm me thinks the toast is Crisp too. sent to Padres for Linebrink maybe
   64. JC in DC Posted: December 06, 2006 at 02:31 PM (#2252653)
Why would the Pads make that deal?
   65. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: December 06, 2006 at 02:37 PM (#2252656)
Why would the Pads make that deal?

they would get a better than league average OF to play LF at a very reasonable price for the next 3 yrs, and get rid of a setup man, who is finally starting to show some wear from being worked like a rented mule for 4 yrs..
   66. IronChef Chris Wok Posted: December 06, 2006 at 02:41 PM (#2252659)
JC, I really like Pena. The dude has mucho power. He's getting better.


So do I. He also took 20 walks in 300+ at bats last year. I think 370something.

My person goal for Wily Mo Pena is for him to take 35 walks in a whole year. If he can keep his .349 OBP like he did this year, his power TOTALLY justifies his bat in the lineup.
   67. IronChef Chris Wok Posted: December 06, 2006 at 02:42 PM (#2252660)
Wait he only hat 300 or so PAs. and he had 20 walks. Imagine if he can improve to like 35 walks in 400+ PAs. That would make him BADASS.
   68. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: December 06, 2006 at 02:42 PM (#2252661)
why would the Red Sox want Linebrink, if he was fading?

That should be the deal breaker in my opinion, but the way the media is talking up Linebrink, they make him sound like the second coming of Mariano Rivera waiting for a chance to close
   69. JC in DC Posted: December 06, 2006 at 02:53 PM (#2252667)
Pena's got great power and no plate discipline. As a Yankee fan, I don't mind seeing him come to bat at all.
   70. Slinger Francisco Barrios (Dr. Memory) Posted: December 06, 2006 at 02:53 PM (#2252668)
Can't believe we lost a draft pick for Edgar Renteria II

Gee, I don't recall Renteria smacking his wife around.
   71. cercopithecus aethiops Posted: December 06, 2006 at 02:54 PM (#2252669)
Hey Sean, the Yankees will still outspend the Red Sox by $50 mil when it's all said and done. I know you'd like to forget that, but it's still true. The Red Sox are still tremendous underdogs, payroll-wise, when compared to the Yankees.

First of all, I'm not sure that the gap will be that big when all is said and done. But the point, Darren, as you doubtless realize, is that the Red Sox payroll disadvantage is clearly just a matter of choice. They spend right up to the luxury tax threshold every year. When a new CBA increases that threshold by $30M, they increase their payroll by $36M in the blink of an eye. If I were a Red Sox fan, rather than drinkingthe limited resources kool-aid, I'd be pissed at them for putting an arbitrary limit on the use of their exceedingly ample resources to improve the quality of the product on the field. You have, in fact, expressed this sentiment yourself on several ocaisions. Yet it seems you still need to cling to some vestige of the whole unfair disadvantage myth, which actually makes Sean's point for him rather than refuting it.
   72. Cowboy Popup Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:01 PM (#2252676)
Well, I don't like this as a Yankee fan. Lugo gets on base and is fast, faster then Damon IMO, so I think he's probably going to be the Sox biggest speed threat in a while. Also, before he went to LA, he was having a career year. Hopefully he didn't figure anything out.
   73. JC in DC Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:07 PM (#2252680)
Speed threat? When was the last time the Sox utilized a "speed threat?" I'm not concerned about Lugo's stolen bases.
   74. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:08 PM (#2252681)
I disagree that John Henry's personal choices about the budget should matter in the comparison of the Red Sox and Yankees competitive (dis)advantages.

David Glass has the money to buy every player in the world, as do a number of other owners. Lots of owners are making profits which aren't being spun back into the roster. This doesn't really affect the fans one way or the other.

That is, I'm a fan of the Red Sox, not of John Henry's business ventures. Whether Henry is funneling profits into an underground money pit or clipping coupons to cover the Sox payroll, the raw facts of the Sox budget are all that matter to fans. The Red Sox are thus disadvantaged to the Yankees by a large number of millions of dollars, while having an advantage of a smaller number of millions over the Mets, Cubs, Angels and Rangers and an advantage of a large number of millions over many other clubs. The background business details are unimportant.
   75. Cowboy Popup Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:13 PM (#2252686)
"I'm not concerned about Lugo's stolen bases."

I'm concerned about someone going from first to third on Damon's arm with Papi and Manny coming to the plate.
   76. TVerik Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:14 PM (#2252688)
I was more concerned when they signed Renteria. I think Lugo will be good, though not exceptional, and this deal will look better than the Drew deal in ten years.
   77. JC in DC Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:16 PM (#2252690)
Do you have to be fast to go from 1st to 3rd on Damon's arm? C'mon, gimme a break.
   78. Sean McNally Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:17 PM (#2252692)
Hey Sean, the Yankees will still outspend the Red Sox by $50 mil when it's all said and done. I know you'd like to forget that, but it's still true. The Red Sox are still tremendous underdogs, payroll-wise, when compared to the Yankees.


[Channeling Lee Corso] Not so fast my friend!

Using figures from Cot's and the back of this here envelope, here's what I have figured.

Boston has 22 players likely to be on their big league club next year:

Manny, Ortiz, Schilling, Drew, Clement, Lowell, Lugo, Varitek, Beckett, Hinske, Wakefield, Crisp, Tavarez, Timilin, Cora, Okajima, Pena, Hansen, Youkilis, Papelbon, Lester, Peoria.

If I haven't missed anyone and my math is more or less right - that'll be $128 million in commitments without Matsuzaka nor a closer and a 25th man - so Boston's payroll for '07 looks to be about $150ish million.

New York has 20 players that are likely to be on the '07 roster
ARod, Jeter, Giambi, Unit, Abreu, Damon, Matsui, Moose, Mo, Pavano, Farnsworth, Myers, Cano, Wang, Proctor, Phillips, Britton, Bruney, Melky.

Again, the Yanks appear likely to add some more players (Igawa and others) and payroll, but right now they have $158 million in commitments, so their opening day payroll is likely to be about $175-$180 million.

So, while there is a disparity, but it is certainly not the gap it once was and it's highly unlikely it will be $50 million. But hey, whatever helps you sleep at night, Darren ;-)
   79. TVerik Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:18 PM (#2252693)
Anyway, Cowboy, the only way that Papi and Manny will hit back-to-back is when the MLB All-Stars storm Japan next offseason.
   80. Cowboy Popup Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:20 PM (#2252696)
"I was more concerned when they signed Renteria."

I was convinced that Renteria wouldn't be good. In fact, I won a bet with MCOA on that, which might be the only I was right and he wrong.

I don't neccesarily think Lugo is an impact player, but the Sox had such a hole at SS and just filled it with a good player. It's kind of like the Bernie Williams effect. Damon was good, but Bernie had been so bad that it was a gigantic boost. Alex Cora would have been so terrible (PM SLWTS has him as 2 wins better then Gonzalez too), but now they have a good player there, with upside and speed, instead of a hole. Kinda changes everything for me. They are a very balanced and deep team right now.
   81. TVerik Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:25 PM (#2252700)
I think that the total difference between Bernie and Damon in NY is more than double as significant as the total difference between Cora and Lugo in BOS.

Other than that, I agree with your point.
   82. AROM Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:26 PM (#2252702)
Speed threat? When was the last time the Sox utilized a "speed threat?" I'm not concerned about Lugo's stolen bases.

Dave Roberts, October 2004.

A year ago it would have hurt me to type this, but I can laugh about it now.
   83. IronChef Chris Wok Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:28 PM (#2252706)
We don't need a big bat "behind" Ortiz. We need big bats IN FRONT of Ortiz. This protection business is BS, as is this "200 walks" Business. (of course, it woudl be nice if there were big bats in front and behind... but yeah)

You put Youkilis, Drew, and Manny in front of Ortiz...

They WON'T walk Ortiz for Mike Lowell when there's a guy on 1, or guys on 1 and 2. They just won't. They'll pitch to him. And boom goes the dynamite. The only tiem they WON'T pitch to Ortiz is if the bases are empty or if there's a base open on 1B, and even that gets stupid. I mean, loading up the bases for Mike Lowell, forcing you to pitch to him? That's just retarded. He can still hurt you with the .475 SLG.

The best way to protect Ortiz is to make sure there's at least one guy on base when he comes up. And nobody on the Red Sox does that better than Manny.
   84. AROM Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:29 PM (#2252708)
Again, the Yanks appear likely to add some more players (Igawa and others) and payroll, but right now they have $158 million in commitments, so their opening day payroll is likely to be about $175-$180 million.

Wow. Yankees are going cheap this year. I'll be pulling for these underdogs.
   85. Sean McNally Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:32 PM (#2252711)
Wow. Yankees are going cheap this year. I'll be pulling for these underdogs.


I'm not saying they should be seen as anyone's sentimental favorites, just that mythos around Boston's constant struggle to keep up with the Yankees, fed by their city's Napoleon complex, their GMs quotes and the Worldwide Leader's coverage, can now be taken out back, tied to a tree and bashed in the head with a shovel.
   86. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:36 PM (#2252716)
If I haven't missed anyone and my math is more or less right - that'll be $128 million in commitments without Matsuzaka nor a closer and a 25th man - so Boston's payroll for '07 looks to be about $150ish million.
You're budgeting $10M for a closer, I don't think that's happening. Payroll will be ~$140M.

The Yankees payroll in the last couple years has been in the $190-200M range. I guess it's possible that they're cutting back spending, but Igawa + Pettitte would put them at $180M, and they need a first baseman, and hteir bench sucks. I think $50M seems about right.
   87. Nasty Nate Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:38 PM (#2252718)
Hey Wok: Amen for post 87. The people who are saying Ortiz will never see a pitch and will walk 200 times without Manny are delusional.

People forget that Ortiz batted AFTER Manny for 2003 and 2004. So in the playoffs in 04, after 2 full seasons of .600 slugging so everyone knew how dangerous he was, he still saw plenty of pitches with guys on base (to the tune of 19 rbi in 14 games).

In fact, his walk totals went UP once he started hitting in front of Manny.



{{{is this a possibility: WM Pena traded for some set-up man who will close for Boston}}}
   88. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:40 PM (#2252719)
I'm not saying they should be seen as anyone's sentimental favorites, just that mythos around Boston's constant struggle to keep up with the Yankees, fed by their city's Napoleon complex, their GMs quotes and the Worldwide Leader's coverage, can now be taken out back, tied to a tree and bashed in the head with a shovel.
Huh? The Red Sox are chasing the Yankees, who are spending lots more money on ballplayers. That's pretty much all indisputable.

Does it make what the Red Sox are doing noble? No, but if that's all you're exercised about, that's pretty sad. I grant that the baseball team I root for is not also objectively the source of all good in the universe.

There are lots of teams which spend less than the Red Sox, and teams whose fans thus have a right to note that they're not competing on a totally even field. But the same is true of the Red Sox and Yankees.
   89. Cowboy Popup Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:41 PM (#2252720)
"I mean, loading up the bases for Mike Lowell, forcing you to pitch to him? That's just retarded. He can still hurt you with the .475 SLG."

I don't like IBB for anyone, but if I did, I would walk Ortiz to face Lowell anytime there was two outs, and probably in a dozen other situations too. Lowell had a good two months last year and has sucked hard for two years outside of that. I wouldn't expect a .475 SLG out of him again next year.
   90. Perros Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:41 PM (#2252722)
Forget comparing payroll to the Yanks, they're following Yankee philosophy by signing high-priced, 30+ vets who have likely seen their best days pass them by.

Lugo might out-perform his career averages for one year of this contract, but it's likely he'll decline over the length of the contract. That's what happens to mediocre players over 30.

And how is a .340 OBP "high"?
   91. Josh Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:48 PM (#2252731)
In calculating the payroll, we also should include benefits - these matter practically and for lux tax purposes. So, take the lux tax and subtract set benefits to get the true tax level. (Any idea how munch to budget there? Previously it was about $9mm?)

There is no indication that the lux tax won't be the limit for the RS - it has been (for whatever reason) the past few years, and each year they've been very close to that limit. I suppose they could blow by that this, but I don't expect it. So, a budget of roughly $140 seems about right. Which is a long winded way of writing that I agree with MCoA - they money is pretty much all gone.
   92. IronChef Chris Wok Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:52 PM (#2252736)
And how is a .340 OBP "high"?

Relative to Alex Gonzalez/Alex Cora's OBP

I don't like IBB for anyone, but if I did, I would walk Ortiz to face Lowell anytime there was two outs, and probably in a dozen other situations too. Lowell had a good two months last year and has sucked hard for two years outside of that. I wouldn't expect a .475 SLG out of him again next year.


I think Mike Lowell can repeat his performance last year.

It's really too bad Jason Varitek decided to excrete his feces on the bed last year.
   93. OlePerfesser Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:53 PM (#2252737)
I must be getting wishy-washy: I find myself agreeing with much of what BOTH McNally and MCoA are saying.

If it will make McNally happier, I for one will stop referring to the Yankees as the Evil Empire, since Cashman has obviously been making a real effort to do economically sensible things. And I will also stipulate that the rich owners of the Red Sox have been indulging themselves a little--OK, a lot--by shopping at Neiman-Marcus, in the hopes of avoiding disappointment next October. The bottom line is '07 is shaping up to be big fun if you're a fan of this rivalry.
   94. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:53 PM (#2252738)
Forget comparing payroll to the Yanks, they're following Yankee philosophy by signing high-priced, 30+ vets who have likely seen their best days pass them by.
Yeah, what a stupid strategy. It sure has screwed those poor Yankees over the years!

I mean, they nearly lost the division once, I think.
   95. cercopithecus aethiops Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:55 PM (#2252741)
Payroll will be ~$140M.

Tax threshold is $148M, right? Boston's payroll will be $147.9M.

The Red Sox are thus disadvantaged to the Yankees by a large number of millions of dollars, while having an advantage of a smaller number of millions over the Mets, Cubs, Angels and Rangers and an advantage of a large number of millions over many other clubs. The background business details are unimportant.

Why the hell aren't the details important? The disadvantage is (almost) entirely a matter of choice. If you and I can both afford to drive a Maserotti, but I choose to drive a 1968 Dodge Dart Swinger instead, then I don't get to complain about how nice your car is.
   96. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: December 06, 2006 at 03:58 PM (#2252746)
If it will make McNally happier, I for one will stop referring to the Yankees as the Evil Empire, since Cashman has obviously been making a real effort to do economically sensible things.
If you're evil, being economically sensible merely makes you more effectively evil.

At least for me, the whole "Evil Empire" thing died in October 2004. You can't be an evil empire and choke like that. The evil of the Yankees was always dependent on their emerging victorious against the Sox.
   97. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 06, 2006 at 04:01 PM (#2252750)
Lugo in Fenway over the past three years:

.330 .382 .532 .914


That, of course, was against Red Sox pitching.
   98. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: December 06, 2006 at 04:02 PM (#2252752)
Tax threshold is $148M, right? Boston's payroll will be $147.9M.
Exactly. As Josh pointed out above, the luxury tax calculation includes about $9M more in other benefits. ~$140M is the classic Red Sox, just-under-the-wire payroll.

Why the hell aren't the details important? The disadvantage is (almost) entirely a matter of choice. If you and I can both afford to drive a Maserotti, but I choose to drive a 1968 Dodge Dart Swinger instead, then I don't get to complain about how nice your car is.
I agree that John Henry has no right to complain to George Steinbrenner about payroll. I don't see how that relates to me and you, given that neither of us own ballclubs, but merely root for them.
   99. IronChef Chris Wok Posted: December 06, 2006 at 04:02 PM (#2252753)
As long as Derek Jeter is boning the likes of Jessica Alba and Jessica Biel, they'll never stop being evil to me.
   100. IronChef Chris Wok Posted: December 06, 2006 at 04:05 PM (#2252757)
That, of course, was against Red Sox pitching.

Already said it in the Sox Therapy thread.
Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
SugarBear Blanks
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogHP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind
(11 - 8:31am, May 25)
Last: SandyRiver

NewsblogFS Midwest: Streaker halts Cardinals-Phillies game
(3 - 8:27am, May 25)
Last: depletion

NewsblogMatinale: WADJ: Wins Above Derek Jeter
(2 - 8:24am, May 25)
Last: Fancy Pants is braggadocious about his Handle

NewsblogOT: NBA Monthly Thread, May 2012
(1773 - 8:14am, May 25)
Last: Famous Original Joe C

NewsblogBoston.com: Curt Schilling’s 38 Studios lays off all staff
(45 - 8:04am, May 25)
Last: Golfing Great Mitch Cumstein

NewsblogNeyer: New Yankee Stadium: A Review
(75 - 8:01am, May 25)
Last: Harveys Wallbangers

NewsblogGreenberg: Cubs' Ricketts decries proposal
(750 - 7:54am, May 25)
Last: Jolly Old St. Neck Wound, Moral Idiot

NewsblogRoy Halladay bobblehead with glove on wrong hand selling on MLB.com
(12 - 6:46am, May 25)
Last: Doris from Rego Park

NewsblogSullivan: Dan Haren Makes Mariners Look Like Mariners
(1 - 6:40am, May 25)
Last: The cushions are crowded for Edmundo

Newsblog12 Baseball Feats That Only Happened Once
(25 - 6:25am, May 25)
Last: Greg (U)K

NewsblogShawn Green to play for Israel in World Baseball Classic
(12 - 5:50am, May 25)
Last: shoewizard

NewsblogPrimer Dugout (and link of the day) 5-25-2012
(1 - 5:33am, May 25)
Last: Tim Stauffer, Trot Nixon's Coming (Dan Lee)

NewsblogWins Above Replacement: Distribution and Rarity of Talent 2011 - Beyond the Box Score
(9 - 4:18am, May 25)
Last: bobm

NewsblogDodgers want to host NHL's Winter Classic
(15 - 3:07am, May 25)
Last: Greg (U)K

NewsblogOT: NHL Playoff Thread
(1731 - 1:45am, May 25)
Last: baudib

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 0.6304 seconds
54 querie(s) executed