Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Rob Neyer: Explaining some new math

As you know, I’ve been wrestling with this notion of positional adjustments, which on Thursday led to the following e-mail exchange with FanGraphs’ Eric Seidman …

Eric: Rob, I thought I would try to see if I could clarify the adjustments for you. Basically, it is all due to defense. Tom Tango likes to refer to the adjustments as “Runs Over Willie” (in honor of Willie Bloomquist, who can play everywhere). Essentially, the idea is that if you took Willie Bloomquist and put him anywhere on the field, what would an average fielder produce, runs-wise, compared to his production?

So, if you put Willie at 1B, the average 1B would cost his team 12.5 runs more than Willie. If you put Willie at shortstop, the average SS would save 7.5 runs more than Willie.

It’s really just a quantifiable way of showing which positions are the toughest to play. Catcher gets +12.5 runs because not everyone can play there. Shortstop gets +7.5 runs because it is the toughest non-catching position. Then comes 2B/3B/CF, at +2.5 runs apiece. LF/RF are docked -7.5 runs, and 1B docked -12.5 runs. Using these adjustments allows us to compare Carl Crawford in LF to Chase Utley at 2B.

If Crawford is +15 runs via UZR and Utley is +19 runs, it really isn’t as close as it seems, given that LF are docked -7.5 runs and 2B gain +2.5 runs. Before even factoring in offensive contribution or adding two wins (20 runs) to be above replacement level, Utley would be a +21.5 run defender, Crawford a +7.5 run defender.

Hope that makes some more sense. It is a very confusing concept, but basically it just allows us to make cross-positional comparisons so someone like Crawford doesn’t have an overstated defensive value.

Me: Is this a new thing? I don’t recall seeing any discussion of positional adjustments before the last couple of weeks. I’m just wondering if everything we thought we knew about player valuations have been wrong. Is Dave Concepcion worth more than we thought? Tony Perez less?

Eric: I wouldn’t necessarily call it two weeks new, but definitely new in the last year or two, as far as I know. Granted, I didn’t really “come onto the scene” until May 2007, but I can recall as far back as June 2007 reading Tango’s positional adjustment work.

I don’t think it means that everything we have already done is wrong, per se, because defensive stats weren’t really ever taken into account outside of Fielding Percentage for the longest time.

Huh, I didn’t realize that positional adjustments is considered so ‘new’.

Tripon Posted: December 20, 2008 at 05:01 AM | 301 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: general

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 4 of 4 pages ‹ First  < 2 3 4
   301. JoeD has the Imperial March Stuck in His Head Posted: December 22, 2008 at 10:18 PM (#3036203)
Yeah, that's basically right . . . Longoria assuming no injury would go $1-2008, $3-2009, $5-2010, and then vault to $24 from 2011-2014 or $29 from 2011-2015. That would be the typical career path.

But there is still 'irrational' overbidding for stars in every league I've ever been in. The highest end players get more than they are actually worth, and I've been in some pretty good leagues.

I cannot think of a season where the top handful of players didn't get more than the Benson software I use (which adjusts for inflation) says they should, for example.

Part of that is probably paying the 'certainty' of performance.
Page 4 of 4 pages ‹ First  < 2 3 4

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.



<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF


Thanks to
greenback changed his travels
for his generous support.


You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogESPN: Stark: Why super teams don't win the World Series
(18 - 11:22pm, Oct 23)
Last: ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick

NewsblogOTP 2016 Oct 17: Politics, Sports, and the 'League of Legends' World Championship
(2077 - 11:18pm, Oct 23)
Last: Renegade JE (((Jason))), Fermenting Violence

NewsblogWhy Steve Bartman should throw the first pitch at Game 3 of the World Series
(61 - 11:15pm, Oct 23)
Last: ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick

NewsblogOT: NBA 2016-17 Preseason Thread
(234 - 11:06pm, Oct 23)
Last: knowledge is STIGGLES, france is bacon

NewsblogWelcome back, Kyle Schwarber! | 2080 Baseball
(17 - 9:25pm, Oct 23)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogOT: October-November 2016 Soccer Thread
(73 - 9:16pm, Oct 23)
Last: jmurph

Gonfalon CubsNL pennant thread
(35 - 9:13pm, Oct 23)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogNLCS Game 6 Chatter
(675 - 8:55pm, Oct 23)
Last: Howie Menckel

Newsblogred sox - Inside story of David Ortiz's injury: 'He was essentially playing on stumps' - WEEI | Rob Bradford
(31 - 5:35pm, Oct 23)
Last: Walt Davis

Newsblog2016 Season Prediction OMNICHATTER
(80 - 5:13pm, Oct 23)
Last: Kiko Sakata

NewsblogEpstein on Cubs clinching NLCS |
(6 - 5:04pm, Oct 23)
Last: Kiko Sakata

NewsblogSunday Notes: DH Dilemma, Indians, Gallardo, Glasnow, HoF Managers, more | FanGraphs Baseball
(3 - 5:02pm, Oct 23)
Last: escabeche

NewsblogVerlander deal? Astros all-in? Why MLB hot stove could be trade-heavy | New York Post
(3 - 4:55pm, Oct 23)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogProspect Retrospective: Ricky Vaughn, RHP, Cleveland Indians - Minor League Ball
(13 - 2:07pm, Oct 23)
Last: Man o' Schwar

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 2016 Discussion
(6 - 7:17am, Oct 23)
Last: bjhanke

Page rendered in 0.1349 seconds
47 querie(s) executed