Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Rob Neyer: Explaining some new math

As you know, I’ve been wrestling with this notion of positional adjustments, which on Thursday led to the following e-mail exchange with FanGraphs’ Eric Seidman …

Eric: Rob, I thought I would try to see if I could clarify the adjustments for you. Basically, it is all due to defense. Tom Tango likes to refer to the adjustments as “Runs Over Willie” (in honor of Willie Bloomquist, who can play everywhere). Essentially, the idea is that if you took Willie Bloomquist and put him anywhere on the field, what would an average fielder produce, runs-wise, compared to his production?

So, if you put Willie at 1B, the average 1B would cost his team 12.5 runs more than Willie. If you put Willie at shortstop, the average SS would save 7.5 runs more than Willie.

It’s really just a quantifiable way of showing which positions are the toughest to play. Catcher gets +12.5 runs because not everyone can play there. Shortstop gets +7.5 runs because it is the toughest non-catching position. Then comes 2B/3B/CF, at +2.5 runs apiece. LF/RF are docked -7.5 runs, and 1B docked -12.5 runs. Using these adjustments allows us to compare Carl Crawford in LF to Chase Utley at 2B.

If Crawford is +15 runs via UZR and Utley is +19 runs, it really isn’t as close as it seems, given that LF are docked -7.5 runs and 2B gain +2.5 runs. Before even factoring in offensive contribution or adding two wins (20 runs) to be above replacement level, Utley would be a +21.5 run defender, Crawford a +7.5 run defender.

Hope that makes some more sense. It is a very confusing concept, but basically it just allows us to make cross-positional comparisons so someone like Crawford doesn’t have an overstated defensive value.

Me: Is this a new thing? I don’t recall seeing any discussion of positional adjustments before the last couple of weeks. I’m just wondering if everything we thought we knew about player valuations have been wrong. Is Dave Concepcion worth more than we thought? Tony Perez less?

Eric: I wouldn’t necessarily call it two weeks new, but definitely new in the last year or two, as far as I know. Granted, I didn’t really “come onto the scene” until May 2007, but I can recall as far back as June 2007 reading Tango’s positional adjustment work.

I don’t think it means that everything we have already done is wrong, per se, because defensive stats weren’t really ever taken into account outside of Fielding Percentage for the longest time.

Huh, I didn’t realize that positional adjustments is considered so ‘new’.

Tripon Posted: December 20, 2008 at 05:01 AM | 301 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: general

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 4 of 4 pages ‹ First  < 2 3 4
   301. JoeD has the Imperial March Stuck in His Head Posted: December 22, 2008 at 10:18 PM (#3036203)
Yeah, that's basically right . . . Longoria assuming no injury would go $1-2008, $3-2009, $5-2010, and then vault to $24 from 2011-2014 or $29 from 2011-2015. That would be the typical career path.

But there is still 'irrational' overbidding for stars in every league I've ever been in. The highest end players get more than they are actually worth, and I've been in some pretty good leagues.

I cannot think of a season where the top handful of players didn't get more than the Benson software I use (which adjusts for inflation) says they should, for example.

Part of that is probably paying the 'certainty' of performance.
Page 4 of 4 pages ‹ First  < 2 3 4

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

News

All News | Prime News

Old-School Newsstand


BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Tuque
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogChris Russo thinks the latest selections have ruined Hall of Fame
(90 - 11:21am, Jan 22)
Last: JohnQ

NewsblogGary Sheffield and the war on WAR - Beyond the Box Score
(7 - 11:20am, Jan 22)
Last: Morty Causa

NewsblogOTP 16 Jan. 2017: The ‘honor’ Trumps politics in scheduling Cubs’ White House visit
(1967 - 11:19am, Jan 22)
Last: David Nieporent (now, with children)

NewsblogPrimer Dugout (and link of the day) 1-20-2017
(22 - 11:11am, Jan 22)
Last: JJ1986

NewsblogMets' Jay Bruce problem: Ex-GMs weigh in on what team should do - NY Daily News
(2 - 11:02am, Jan 22)
Last: 'Spos

NewsblogHall of Fame's Rule of 10 should be changed | MLB.com
(77 - 9:29am, Jan 22)
Last: DanG

NewsblogMLB Tonight: Jorge Posada | MLB.com
(31 - 9:19am, Jan 22)
Last: Adam Starblind

Hall of Merit2018 Hall of Merit Ballot Discussion
(114 - 9:14am, Jan 22)
Last: Dr. Chaleeko

Newsblog2017 Baseball Hall of Fame election results | MLB.com
(202 - 6:25am, Jan 22)
Last: Fancy Pants with a clinging marmoset on his Handle

NewsblogJayson Stark: Casting my 2018 Hall of Fame ballot ... today
(85 - 4:43am, Jan 22)
Last: Walt Davis

Sox TherapyThe Kids Are or Are Not Alright
(18 - 1:56am, Jan 22)
Last: Nasty Nate

NewsblogEx-Astro Luis Valbuena reportedly agrees to deal with Angels - Houston Chronicle
(19 - 1:51am, Jan 22)
Last: JAHV

NewsblogOT - December 2016 NBA thread
(1215 - 12:07am, Jan 22)
Last: maccoach57

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 2000 Discussion
(26 - 11:09pm, Jan 21)
Last: DL from MN

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 2000 Ballot
(2 - 8:52pm, Jan 21)
Last: OCF

Page rendered in 0.2764 seconds
47 querie(s) executed