Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Rob Neyer: Explaining some new math

As you know, I’ve been wrestling with this notion of positional adjustments, which on Thursday led to the following e-mail exchange with FanGraphs’ Eric Seidman …

Eric: Rob, I thought I would try to see if I could clarify the adjustments for you. Basically, it is all due to defense. Tom Tango likes to refer to the adjustments as “Runs Over Willie” (in honor of Willie Bloomquist, who can play everywhere). Essentially, the idea is that if you took Willie Bloomquist and put him anywhere on the field, what would an average fielder produce, runs-wise, compared to his production?

So, if you put Willie at 1B, the average 1B would cost his team 12.5 runs more than Willie. If you put Willie at shortstop, the average SS would save 7.5 runs more than Willie.

It’s really just a quantifiable way of showing which positions are the toughest to play. Catcher gets +12.5 runs because not everyone can play there. Shortstop gets +7.5 runs because it is the toughest non-catching position. Then comes 2B/3B/CF, at +2.5 runs apiece. LF/RF are docked -7.5 runs, and 1B docked -12.5 runs. Using these adjustments allows us to compare Carl Crawford in LF to Chase Utley at 2B.

If Crawford is +15 runs via UZR and Utley is +19 runs, it really isn’t as close as it seems, given that LF are docked -7.5 runs and 2B gain +2.5 runs. Before even factoring in offensive contribution or adding two wins (20 runs) to be above replacement level, Utley would be a +21.5 run defender, Crawford a +7.5 run defender.

Hope that makes some more sense. It is a very confusing concept, but basically it just allows us to make cross-positional comparisons so someone like Crawford doesn’t have an overstated defensive value.

Me: Is this a new thing? I don’t recall seeing any discussion of positional adjustments before the last couple of weeks. I’m just wondering if everything we thought we knew about player valuations have been wrong. Is Dave Concepcion worth more than we thought? Tony Perez less?

Eric: I wouldn’t necessarily call it two weeks new, but definitely new in the last year or two, as far as I know. Granted, I didn’t really “come onto the scene” until May 2007, but I can recall as far back as June 2007 reading Tango’s positional adjustment work.

I don’t think it means that everything we have already done is wrong, per se, because defensive stats weren’t really ever taken into account outside of Fielding Percentage for the longest time.

Huh, I didn’t realize that positional adjustments is considered so ‘new’.

Tripon Posted: December 20, 2008 at 06:01 AM | 301 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: general

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 4 of 4 pages  < 1 2 3 4
   301. Joey Numbaz (Scruff) Posted: December 22, 2008 at 11:18 PM (#3036203)
Yeah, that's basically right . . . Longoria assuming no injury would go $1-2008, $3-2009, $5-2010, and then vault to $24 from 2011-2014 or $29 from 2011-2015. That would be the typical career path.

But there is still 'irrational' overbidding for stars in every league I've ever been in. The highest end players get more than they are actually worth, and I've been in some pretty good leagues.

I cannot think of a season where the top handful of players didn't get more than the Benson software I use (which adjusts for inflation) says they should, for example.

Part of that is probably paying the 'certainty' of performance.
Page 4 of 4 pages  < 1 2 3 4

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Brian
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogOMNICHATTER for 4/23/2014
(77 - 5:48pm, Apr 23)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogJosh Lueke Is A Rapist, You Say? Keep Saying It.
(177 - 5:48pm, Apr 23)
Last: vivaelpujols

NewsblogOTP April 2014: BurstNET Sued for Not Making Equipment Lease Payments
(2327 - 5:47pm, Apr 23)
Last: 'zop sympathizes with the wrong ####### people

NewsblogMLB takes a swing at the video game business
(21 - 5:44pm, Apr 23)
Last: CWS Keith plans to boo your show at the Apollo

NewsblogDoyel: How was Gerrit Cole not suspended? He basically started the brawl
(12 - 5:41pm, Apr 23)
Last: ellsbury my heart at wounded knee

NewsblogDaniel Bryan's 'YES!' chant has spread to the Pirates' dugout
(179 - 5:40pm, Apr 23)
Last: NJ in DC (Now unemployed!)

NewsblogOT: NBA Monthly Thread - April 2014
(493 - 5:37pm, Apr 23)
Last: Darkness and the howling fantods

NewsblogPrimer Dugout (and link of the day) 4-23-2014
(8 - 5:36pm, Apr 23)
Last: Eric J can SABER all he wants to

NewsblogThe Five “Acts” of Ike Davis’s Career, and Why Trading Ike Was a Mistake
(43 - 5:31pm, Apr 23)
Last: thetailor

NewsblogRoyals G.M. Dayton Moore believes hitting will come around
(17 - 5:28pm, Apr 23)
Last: Shibal

Newsblog4 balls, you’re out!
(43 - 5:06pm, Apr 23)
Last: A triple short of the cycle

NewsblogMike Trout And Bryce Harper Are Baseball’s Best Young Position-Player Duo Ever
(16 - 5:03pm, Apr 23)
Last: Steve Treder

NewsblogThe rise and fall of Ike Davis' New York Mets | Capital New York
(25 - 5:03pm, Apr 23)
Last: formerly dp

NewsblogTwo Brewers, two Pirates suspended for fracas | MLB.com: News
(17 - 4:33pm, Apr 23)
Last: Sunday silence

NewsblogOT: The NHL is finally back thread, part 2
(196 - 4:15pm, Apr 23)
Last: Fear is Moses Taylor's Bacon Bits

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

 

Page rendered in 0.4813 seconds
53 querie(s) executed