User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
For wholesale prices on baseball gifts and equipment, check these stores out! |
Page rendered in 0.1819 seconds
50 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. DarrenDon't forget, people miss games for the birth of their child all the time. Seems a person's religious beliefs are just as important.
I think the Marlins had an unusual lineup for that game.
Yes, even Al Martin, who claimed to be Cuban, sat out that game.
BLASPHEMOUS!
Why change a guy who has dominated every level of ball he's played at? Their reasoning is even more silly.
Here's the real question. Will Jack Cust be the next Ken Phelps? I think he is a better hitter at the same age (though that is arguable) and his future looks brighter, but as long as Ricciardi and er, Beane, maybe, continue to leave poor Cust rotting in Triple-A there is that distinct possibility.
If you think about it, Cust pretty much is just wasting time at Colorado Springs. I mean, his defense isn't goign to get much better in the next year and so if the Rox keep this attitude he simply wont play for them ever or they will eventually concede that his offense makes him useful and bring him up and start him.
Why a team that needs a big bat (every team in baseball practically) hasn't traded for him is beyond me.
The reason that some other team hasn't traded for him yet is that O'Dowd knows the sort of hitter that Cust is and he isn't willing to give him up for as little as Arizona was. Remember, it takes two people to make a deal. I'm sure O'Dowd would trade him, but he probably recognises him as a potential All-Star hitter, and any deal would have to reflect Cust's potential. Just because Ricciardi and Beane have embraced sabermetric principles, it doesn't mean that other GMs don't (or can't) recognize talent (except in a couple of notable cases).
That's a deal I could go for.
AGREED. I wonder if it's possible the union put him up to it to, as they say in chess, 'fork' the owners on their crying-poor position?
Certainly if (1) the Snakes' finances actually were what they claimed they were, AND (2) the Snakes were a public company (had to file 10-Ks with the SEC), then all suppliers, not just Walker, would demand collateral for deferred payment.
How sharper than a serpent's tooth it is, to have a thankless child!
Jim, that's a pretty cheap shot and you know it. Heaven forbid a player actually tell us his feelings. It's not like Walker's not giving a full effort out there. He's just telling you what it feels like inside for him.
Aren't we always asking that players be about "more than the money?" When one is, we slam him anyway.
I liked Walker's reason for not deferring, but I'd be even happier if he said. "No. Why should I defer money when I'm the one already making concessions (allowing a trade) in the first place? If anything, they should be offering me a bonus."
When did the positive about athletes being willing to speak their minds start outweighing the negative about what they're actually saying? As a Philadelphia fan, I've seen this change over the last few years. Ricky Watters still hasn't lived down the "For who? For what?" comment about not trying to catch a pass late in a game the Eagles were going to lose. But then last year, Allen Iverson was practically celebrated in the media for speaking his mind in his "Practice? We're talking about ****ing practice??" outburst. Now we're supposed to pat Walker on the back for giving us this "What's my motivation?" line. Wow.
As to the deferred payments--From The Law of Bankruptcy, by Charles J. Tabb, Professor of Law at the University of Illinois College of Law (Gotta plug the alma mater, and Tabb was my favorite professor, and former employer):
"Wages and other benefits based on pre-petition labor are not entitled to first priority, although the may qualify for third or fourth priority."
Basically, if something were to happen, as did with the Pens, and the D-Backs were to declare bankruptcy, I think those with deferred payments would be unsecured creditors. That would be bad. How big is the risk that they would file? I'm guessing not very big, but that's a lot of money to gamble on a World Series appearance.
I'm not surprised. On Primer, old jokes never die. Although some of them smell like something that died. (Are all of you "Mike Piazzas" listening?)
Basically, if...[a team] were to declare bankruptcy, I think those with deferred payments would be unsecured creditors.
Shredder, thanks for the info. Based on that and other factors, I think the union ought to establish a policy that they will no longer accept deferred money contracts. Consider:
The industry keeps crying poor.
Walker's agent is backpedaling over the D'Backs comment, eh? I'm betting someone in the league office threatened to take away his credentials for exposing MLB's dirty laundry.
Rocky Mountain News
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main