Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Thurm: Rodriguez Arbitration Decision A Clean Sweep For MLB

And I thought this was fast stacking!

Wait a second. The Players Association argued that the maximum penalty was 50 games as a first violation, but that Section 7.G.2 provided the “governing framework”? And that Section 7.A. — which does contain the 50-100-lifetime penalty scheme — doesn’t apply when there has been “continuous use or possession of multiple substances”? Frankly, that doesn’t make a lot of sense, and it makes me wonder if the Players Association didn’t clearly articulate its view of the governing agreements or the arbitrator misconstrued the union’s position.

Moreover, the arbitrator’s interpretation of Section 7.A. omits a key portion of the language. He points to the first part of the section that talks about a player “who tests positive for a Performance Enhancing Substance” (his emphasis) and concludes that the section couldn’t apply to a situation involving evidence of multiples uses of a PED. But he completely ignores the second part of the section: a player who otherwise violates the Program through the possession or use of a Performance Enhancing Substance will be subject to the 50-100-lifetime regime (my emphasis). What does that language mean if it doesn’t apply to players found to have used or possessed PEDs absent a positive drug test?...

In other words, 50-game suspensions can be stacked one on top of the other when MLB has evidence that a player used one or more PEDs on multiple occasions.

Think about that. When a player tests positive for a PED, and it’s the first violation, he is suspended for 50 games. But how many players use a PED only one time and that just happens to be when he is tested? Isn’t is more likely that a player who tests positive for PEDs had used on multiple occasions over an extended period of time?

And yet the arbitrator’s decision grants MLB broad powers to discipline players much more harshly when the league’s own testing program fails and the league develops independent evidence of use.

Whatever you think of Alex Rodriguez, Tony Bosch, and the entire Biogenesis mess, it’s hard to accept such an absurd legal result.

The District Attorney Posted: January 14, 2014 at 01:07 PM | 2 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: alex rodriguez, legal, ped, yankees

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. thetailor (Brian) Posted: January 14, 2014 at 04:49 PM (#4638976)
This is a really good analysis. Essentially, the MLBPA got hosed on the JDA. MLB can stack punishments, despite the fact that the JDA says:

“If a player tests positive for multiple substances, he will only be punished for the singular substance that allows for the longest ban”.

It's really amazing, what's happened here. A-Rod had a non-analytical positive, which allowed them to circumvent the above despite the plain language and intent of the agreement.

The players have no protection here. Not only can MLB stack punishments, but can use the "best interests" clause to essentially render the JDA useless. I dislike A-Rod as much as the next guy, and think he should be suspended and yada yada, but honestly, this appears to be an enormous failure on the MLBPA's part in collectively bargaining it this way.
   2. Ray (RDP) Posted: January 14, 2014 at 09:25 PM (#4639148)
Thurm has been excellent on this subject.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

News

All News | Prime News

Old-School Newsstand


BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Adam S
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogLCS OMNICHATTER for October 18, 2017
(462 - 1:28am, Oct 19)
Last: What did Billy Ripken have against ElRoy Face?

NewsblogAfter Yasiel Puig tried and failed to avoid Javy Baez's tag, Baez teased him and they both laughed | MLB.com
(32 - 1:26am, Oct 19)
Last: Voodoo

NewsblogOTP 16 October 2017: Sorry, Yankee fans: Trump’s claim that he can ensure victory simply isn’t true
(1136 - 1:17am, Oct 19)
Last: PepTech

Gonfalon CubsFive minute Los Angeles Dodgers Preview
(64 - 12:49am, Oct 19)
Last: Voodoo

Gonfalon CubsFive minute Washington National Preview
(182 - 12:32am, Oct 19)
Last: Meatwad in 7

NewsblogAngell: Yanks Get Even
(5 - 11:47pm, Oct 18)
Last: ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick

NewsblogOT: New Season August 2017 Soccer Thread
(1164 - 11:33pm, Oct 18)
Last: Baldrick

NewsblogOT - NBA 2017-2018 Tip-off Thread
(335 - 11:11pm, Oct 18)
Last: Mike A

NewsblogYankees even ALCS with late rally vs. Astros | MLB.com
(97 - 10:52pm, Oct 18)
Last: Nose army. Beef diaper? (CoB)

NewsblogMemes roast Astros after unexpected loss to New York Yankees - Houston Chronicle
(10 - 9:45pm, Oct 18)
Last: rconn23

NewsblogDo the Cubs realize how badly the Dodgers insulted them on national TV? - Chicago Tribune
(31 - 8:58pm, Oct 18)
Last: Voodoo

NewsblogDallas Keuchel embraces the ‘calmness’ of being Yankees killer | New York Post
(2 - 8:48pm, Oct 18)
Last: ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick

NewsblogOT - 2017 NFL thread
(139 - 6:22pm, Oct 18)
Last: zenbitz

NewsblogThe story behind Los Angeles Dodgers utility man Chris Taylor's unbelievable season
(13 - 6:16pm, Oct 18)
Last: Omineca Greg

NewsblogDodgers aren’t showing any shortcomings even without Corey Seager | LA Times
(11 - 4:34pm, Oct 18)
Last: Walt Davis

Page rendered in 0.1845 seconds
47 querie(s) executed