Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Thurm: Rodriguez Arbitration Decision A Clean Sweep For MLB

And I thought this was fast stacking!

Wait a second. The Players Association argued that the maximum penalty was 50 games as a first violation, but that Section 7.G.2 provided the “governing framework”? And that Section 7.A. — which does contain the 50-100-lifetime penalty scheme — doesn’t apply when there has been “continuous use or possession of multiple substances”? Frankly, that doesn’t make a lot of sense, and it makes me wonder if the Players Association didn’t clearly articulate its view of the governing agreements or the arbitrator misconstrued the union’s position.

Moreover, the arbitrator’s interpretation of Section 7.A. omits a key portion of the language. He points to the first part of the section that talks about a player “who tests positive for a Performance Enhancing Substance” (his emphasis) and concludes that the section couldn’t apply to a situation involving evidence of multiples uses of a PED. But he completely ignores the second part of the section: a player who otherwise violates the Program through the possession or use of a Performance Enhancing Substance will be subject to the 50-100-lifetime regime (my emphasis). What does that language mean if it doesn’t apply to players found to have used or possessed PEDs absent a positive drug test?...

In other words, 50-game suspensions can be stacked one on top of the other when MLB has evidence that a player used one or more PEDs on multiple occasions.

Think about that. When a player tests positive for a PED, and it’s the first violation, he is suspended for 50 games. But how many players use a PED only one time and that just happens to be when he is tested? Isn’t is more likely that a player who tests positive for PEDs had used on multiple occasions over an extended period of time?

And yet the arbitrator’s decision grants MLB broad powers to discipline players much more harshly when the league’s own testing program fails and the league develops independent evidence of use.

Whatever you think of Alex Rodriguez, Tony Bosch, and the entire Biogenesis mess, it’s hard to accept such an absurd legal result.

The District Attorney Posted: January 14, 2014 at 01:07 PM | 2 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: alex rodriguez, legal, ped, yankees

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. thetailor (Brian) Posted: January 14, 2014 at 04:49 PM (#4638976)
This is a really good analysis. Essentially, the MLBPA got hosed on the JDA. MLB can stack punishments, despite the fact that the JDA says:

“If a player tests positive for multiple substances, he will only be punished for the singular substance that allows for the longest ban”.

It's really amazing, what's happened here. A-Rod had a non-analytical positive, which allowed them to circumvent the above despite the plain language and intent of the agreement.

The players have no protection here. Not only can MLB stack punishments, but can use the "best interests" clause to essentially render the JDA useless. I dislike A-Rod as much as the next guy, and think he should be suspended and yada yada, but honestly, this appears to be an enormous failure on the MLBPA's part in collectively bargaining it this way.
   2. Ray (RDP) Posted: January 14, 2014 at 09:25 PM (#4639148)
Thurm has been excellent on this subject.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.



<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF


Thanks to
Dock Ellis on Acid
for his generous support.


You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogNLCS Game 6 Chatter
(667 - 1:59am, Oct 23)
Last: SteveM.

Gonfalon CubsNL pennant thread
(2 - 1:46am, Oct 23)
Last: Cabbage

NewsblogProspect Retrospective: Ricky Vaughn, RHP, Cleveland Indians - Minor League Ball
(8 - 1:12am, Oct 23)
Last: puck

NewsblogOTP 2016 Oct 17: Politics, Sports, and the 'League of Legends' World Championship
(2011 - 1:03am, Oct 23)
Last: The Yankee Clapper

NewsblogOT - October 2016 College Football thread
(152 - 12:24am, Oct 23)
Last: Tulo's Fishy Mullet (mrams)

NewsblogESPN: Stark: Why super teams don't win the World Series
(9 - 12:13am, Oct 23)
Last: SteveM.

NewsblogA well-rested Kenley Jansen makes Cubs’ task more daunting | New York Post
(5 - 11:46pm, Oct 22)
Last: CFiJ

NewsblogOT: NBA 2016-17 Preseason Thread
(226 - 10:56pm, Oct 22)
Last: knowledge is STIGGLES, france is bacon

NewsblogOT: October-November 2016 Soccer Thread
(70 - 9:31pm, Oct 22)
Last: Biff, highly-regarded young guy

NewsblogThe Oral History of Baseball on 'Seinfeld' | Complex
(77 - 9:31pm, Oct 22)
Last: Morty Causa

Newsblogred sox - Inside story of David Ortiz's injury: 'He was essentially playing on stumps' - WEEI | Rob Bradford
(30 - 8:21pm, Oct 22)
Last: Joe Bivens, Floundering Pumpkin

Gonfalon CubsThe Long Wait
(119 - 7:26pm, Oct 22)
Last: CFiJ

NewsblogWhat we learned: The Dodgers can't hit Jon Lester
(29 - 6:08pm, Oct 22)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogBeating Clayton Kershaw is Cubs' biggest barrier to 1st pennant since 1945 - Chicago Tribune
(11 - 5:48pm, Oct 22)
Last: ReggieThomasLives

NewsblogThe Blue Jays Should Rebuild | FanGraphs Baseball
(45 - 5:41pm, Oct 22)
Last: Walt Davis

Page rendered in 0.1300 seconds
47 querie(s) executed