Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Thurm: Rodriguez Arbitration Decision A Clean Sweep For MLB

And I thought this was fast stacking!

Wait a second. The Players Association argued that the maximum penalty was 50 games as a first violation, but that Section 7.G.2 provided the “governing framework”? And that Section 7.A. — which does contain the 50-100-lifetime penalty scheme — doesn’t apply when there has been “continuous use or possession of multiple substances”? Frankly, that doesn’t make a lot of sense, and it makes me wonder if the Players Association didn’t clearly articulate its view of the governing agreements or the arbitrator misconstrued the union’s position.

Moreover, the arbitrator’s interpretation of Section 7.A. omits a key portion of the language. He points to the first part of the section that talks about a player “who tests positive for a Performance Enhancing Substance” (his emphasis) and concludes that the section couldn’t apply to a situation involving evidence of multiples uses of a PED. But he completely ignores the second part of the section: a player who otherwise violates the Program through the possession or use of a Performance Enhancing Substance will be subject to the 50-100-lifetime regime (my emphasis). What does that language mean if it doesn’t apply to players found to have used or possessed PEDs absent a positive drug test?...

In other words, 50-game suspensions can be stacked one on top of the other when MLB has evidence that a player used one or more PEDs on multiple occasions.

Think about that. When a player tests positive for a PED, and it’s the first violation, he is suspended for 50 games. But how many players use a PED only one time and that just happens to be when he is tested? Isn’t is more likely that a player who tests positive for PEDs had used on multiple occasions over an extended period of time?

And yet the arbitrator’s decision grants MLB broad powers to discipline players much more harshly when the league’s own testing program fails and the league develops independent evidence of use.

Whatever you think of Alex Rodriguez, Tony Bosch, and the entire Biogenesis mess, it’s hard to accept such an absurd legal result.

The District Attorney Posted: January 14, 2014 at 01:07 PM | 2 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: alex rodriguez, legal, ped, yankees

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. thetailor Posted: January 14, 2014 at 04:49 PM (#4638976)
This is a really good analysis. Essentially, the MLBPA got hosed on the JDA. MLB can stack punishments, despite the fact that the JDA says:

“If a player tests positive for multiple substances, he will only be punished for the singular substance that allows for the longest ban”.

It's really amazing, what's happened here. A-Rod had a non-analytical positive, which allowed them to circumvent the above despite the plain language and intent of the agreement.

The players have no protection here. Not only can MLB stack punishments, but can use the "best interests" clause to essentially render the JDA useless. I dislike A-Rod as much as the next guy, and think he should be suspended and yada yada, but honestly, this appears to be an enormous failure on the MLBPA's part in collectively bargaining it this way.
   2. Ray (RDP) Posted: January 14, 2014 at 09:25 PM (#4639148)
Thurm has been excellent on this subject.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Ray (RDP)
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogJosh Hamilton could soon be gone from Los Angeles Angels - MLB - SI.com
(94 - 11:53pm, Apr 27)
Last: Sunday silence

NewsblogOT: Monthly NBA Thread - April 2015
(1755 - 11:52pm, Apr 27)
Last: Athletic Supporter is trying to remember your name

NewsblogVideo: A-Rod's solo homer | MLB.com
(43 - 11:51pm, Apr 27)
Last: Jim (jimmuscomp)

NewsblogPitchers batting is dumb and the DH should be universal | HardballTalk
(363 - 11:50pm, Apr 27)
Last: Sunday silence

Newsblog4-27-2015 OMNICHATTER
(79 - 11:30pm, Apr 27)
Last: Cloude Atlas (Voxter)

NewsblogFraley: Baseball history has plenty examples of why Josh Hamilton reunion won't be as fruitful as before | Dallas Morning News
(28 - 10:54pm, Apr 27)
Last: Mike Emeigh

NewsblogSource: Matt Harvey to get at least 30 starts but no more than 32 - Newsday
(12 - 10:41pm, Apr 27)
Last: the Hugh Jorgan returns

NewsblogOTP - April 2015: Church, baseball, politics: Rahm and Chuy work to close the deal
(4150 - 10:39pm, Apr 27)
Last: ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick

NewsblogPrimer Dugout (and link of the day) 4-27-2015
(10 - 10:39pm, Apr 27)
Last: shoewizard

NewsblogOT: 2015 NHL Playoff thread
(82 - 9:58pm, Apr 27)
Last: Jose Is The Most Absurd Thing on the Site

NewsblogOT: NBC.news: Valve isn’t making one gaming console, but multiple ‘Steam machines’
(1656 - 9:18pm, Apr 27)
Last: PASTE Thinks This Trout Kid Might Be OK (Zeth)

NewsblogBaseball Past and Present: Womack: MLB salaries stayed low longer than people may think
(2 - 9:01pm, Apr 27)
Last: DavidFoss

NewsblogThe early leaders in MLB’s “Franchise Four” thing have been announced
(88 - 8:50pm, Apr 27)
Last: shoewizard

NewsblogNats playing miserably; perhaps just as bad, some seem depressed - CBSSports.com
(39 - 8:49pm, Apr 27)
Last: boteman asks Where's My Ring?

NewsblogMax Scherzer: No one wants to see pitchers bat
(72 - 8:46pm, Apr 27)
Last: boteman asks Where's My Ring?

Page rendered in 0.1730 seconds
50 querie(s) executed