Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Monday, August 31, 2009

Roto Savants: Jebens: Comparing Ichiro to Other Players

Hopefully it’s not Goose Agoos or Ntsoelengoe!

Jeff Passan wrote an article last week talking about poor sabermetric comparisons for Ichiro Suzuki. He also talked about how Ichiro could reach 4,000 MLB hits by playing well into his mid-forties. In his criticism of sabermetric comparisons (Baseball-Reference’s top match is Ralph Garr, and PECOTA’s is Lance Johnson), he’s quick to dismiss (or he never actually researched) statistics that are extremely similar. Instead of Ichiro being “beyond the comprehension of computers,” as he puts it, instead Passan doesn’t take a deep enough look into the sabermetrics to understand the comparisons.

Regarding Passan’s criticism of PECOTA, there are several factors to consider. First, there has never been a case like Ichiro before; of course PECOTA has trouble understanding an elite hitter who didn’t start playing major league ball until he was 27. PECOTA uses minor league numbers as well as major league numbers to make player comparisons, but Ichiro didn’t play in the minors, removing one of the factors that can be used to create more accurate comparisons.

Conclusion

I respect Ichiro’s amazing hitting ability. I don’t think PECOTA is perfect. I know that players defy the odds and predictions (sabermetric or otherwise) and do great things. If one wants to freely admit to subjective analysis and use “adjectives and onomatopoeia” instead of “a cold and callous spreadsheet,” that’s fine. But the criticism of stats and sabermetrics, which are objective instruments of measurement, needs to be objective in turn. Passan looked at surface statistics like batting average, and he dipped his toe in the shallow end of sabermetric analysis by referencing OPS (which is mostly mainstream now), but he failed to really dive into why Baseball-Reference and PECOTA compared Ichiro to Ralph Garr and Lance Johnson, respectively. All three hitters excelled at making a lot of contact, beating out close plays, and stealing bases. I’ll be the first to say that Ichiro does most of these things better than the other two, but that doesn’t mean that their style of baseball isn’t very similar, as the sabermetrics show.

Repoz Posted: August 31, 2009 at 12:52 PM | 15 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: history, mariners, projections, sabermetrics

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. CFiJ Posted: August 31, 2009 at 02:48 PM (#3309666)
I like Jebens' article. I'm lukewarm on Passan's. But it seems that Jebens' primary criticism of Passan is that he didn't write the article Jebens wanted to read. The point of Passan's article is simply that Ichiro is an unusual, exciting player who defies expectations. The references to Similarity Scores and PECOTA are just used to emphasize that. And legitimately, as Jebens concedes their limits in describing Ichiro.
   2. cardsfanboy Posted: August 31, 2009 at 03:28 PM (#3309701)
The whole time I was reading the article I kept thinking "why Lance Johnson?" as Ichiro is being compared to a guy who basically spiked at the same age as Ichiro is right now. That just doesn't make sense with Ichiro, this is a guy who by almost everybody was an elite batting average hitter with great speed from the time he was 20 years old, I think Ichiro is closer to Ty Cobb than Ralph Garr/Lance Johnson.
   3. RJ in TO Posted: August 31, 2009 at 03:39 PM (#3309709)
I think Ichiro is closer to Ty Cobb than Ralph Garr/Lance Johnson.


Ichiro may be closer to Cobb than Garr or Johnson, but he's still not actually close. In terms of players, the one who always comes to mind for an Ichiro comp is Sam Rice - corner outfielder, liked to run the bases (although at a much worse percentage than Ichiro), hit for a high average and, despite not starting in MLB until his late 20s, made a serious run at 3000 hits.
   4. Dan Szymborski Posted: August 31, 2009 at 03:47 PM (#3309723)
Sam Rice is my top ZiPS comp for Ichiro as well (I noted that in the comment section for this article).
   5. cardsfanboy Posted: August 31, 2009 at 03:48 PM (#3309725)
Ichiro may be closer to Cobb than Garr or Johnson, but he's still not actually close. In terms of players, the one who always comes to mind for an Ichiro comp is Sam Rice - corner outfielder, liked to run the bases (although at a much worse percentage than Ichiro), hit for a high average and, despite not starting in MLB until his late 20s, made a serious run at 3000 hits.

agree, and Dan did list Sam Rice in the comment section. I was wondering how well Nap Lajoie compares, he seems to have the closest raw numbers to Ichiro at ages 33-35. Of course era adjustments ruin any true comparison and Ichiro still has the stolen base speed over him.
   6. RJ in TO Posted: August 31, 2009 at 03:52 PM (#3309733)
Sam Rice is my top ZiPS comp for Ichiro as well (I noted that in the comment section for this article).


It's enough of a strain to read the excerpt. There's no way I have the energy to read both the articles AND the comments.
   7. JPWF13 Posted: August 31, 2009 at 04:05 PM (#3309745)
All baseball players, 1901-2009, ages 33-35
1750+ PAs, .325+ Avg
less than .450 SLG, less than .400 OBP, Sb 75+

Ichiro!

That's it.

All baseball players, 1901-2009, ages 33-35
1500+ PAs, .300+ Avg
less than .475 SLG, less than .425 OBP, Sb 60+

Cnt Player              BA   SB   SLG   OBP    PA  From  To   Ages
+----+-----------------+-----+----+-----+-----+-----+----+----+-----+
    
1 Ichiro Suzuki      .338  104  .425  .381  2027 2007 2009 33-35 
    2 Sam Rice           .334   70  .445  .384  2092 1923 1925 33
-35 
    3 Max Carey          .315  146  .452  .390  2002 1923 1925 33
-35 
    4 Paul Molitor       .313   68  .473  .382  1907 1990 1992 33
-35 
    5 Sam Crawford       .310   62  .468  .375  2039 1913 1915 33
-35 
    6 Brett Butler       .304  130  .372  .403  2138 1990 1992 33
-35 
    7 Lou Brock          .304  251  .391  .363  2103 1972 1974 33
-35 
    8 Barry Larkin       .303   70  .462  .402  1589 1997 1999 33
-35 


How about that, Sam Rice...
   8. puck Posted: August 31, 2009 at 04:13 PM (#3309755)
BTW, after yesterday's 4 for 5, Tulo's June-August monthly OPS are 1.008, 1.007, and 1.006. I guess I'll boo him in March when it drops under 1.000.
   9. Bob Dernier Cri Posted: August 31, 2009 at 04:24 PM (#3309776)
It's hard to be definite about such things, but I have the impression that both Cobb and Lajoie would have hit with pretty good power if they'd played 90-100 years later than they did. They both hit tons of doubles (as did Honus Wagner). Cobb would have hit much more like George Brett than like Ichiro, Lajoie a lot more like Derek Jeter, maybe with even more power than Jeter. Cobb, Lajoie, and Wagner were all high-average but middle-of-the-order hitters.

Ichiro strikes me as a Willie Keeler type, with an insane number of singles. Sam Rice, absolutely, yes. Doc Cramer would be the poor man's version.
   10. Neal Traven Posted: August 31, 2009 at 07:02 PM (#3309947)
Cobb is absolutely not a good comp for Ichiro!, unless you believe that Suzuki is one of the premier sluggers of his era and a potential Triple Crown winner.

Remember that Cobb played mostly in the Deadball Era. He averaged 39 doubles per 162 games, reaching 30 doubles in 15 seasons, and 40 four times. In sharp contrast, Ichiro! has reached 30 doubles precisely once, though he might get there again this year. Even if you limit Cobb to his age 27-35 seasons to match Ichiro!, it's six 30-double seasons, two of them over 40.

In a low-homer era, Cobb averaged 61 EBH per 162 games, far more than Ichiro!'s 43 per 162. His career SLG of .512 dwarfs Ichiro!'s anemic .433. And when you start adjusting for era, well, ... Ichiro!'s best OPS+ was 130, in his 262-hit 2004 season. Ty Cobb failed to exceed the very best OPS+ achieved by Ichiro! in only three of his 24 seasons -- 1905 (18-year-old rookie, .240/.288/.300 in 41 games, 86 OPS+), 1924 (age 37, .338/.418/.450, 125 OPS+ as the rest of the game started belting homers), and 1928 (final season at age 41, .323/.389/.431, 112 OPS+).

It seems to me that Garr is a very good comp for Ichiro!, as a guy whose entire offensive value is in his empty batting average, though of course Ichiro! is a significantly better basestealer and fielder than The Roadrunner. As is Sam Rice a decent comparison, as a late-to-arrive MLBer. Lance Johnson not so much.
   11. Walt Davis Posted: August 31, 2009 at 08:12 PM (#3310072)
Garr's not a good comp because he was in decline by age 32.

Anyway, comps for what purpose? Guys with career numbers similar to Ichiro through age 35 ... just to find them? OK, sure, there aren't gonna be any of those except Rice and to an extent Garr and maybe a couple others.

Guys over the last 60 years who, from ages 33-35, had at least 1200 PA, BA>=300, ISO<=120 ... there are 10 of those guys. Including, knock me over with a feather ... Darryl Hamilton! 308/389/406 in 1350 PA. Why do I remember him as being Tom Goodwin-esque? OK, part of it is that he was in Colorado for over half of that so he has Coors inflation.

anyway, also on the list are Carew and Rose. They both aged well although Ichiro will have to last longer than Carew to make 3,000 hits. Brett Butler's on that list too -- not a bad comp. Also good comps in my opinion are Gwynn (Gwynn really boosted his power in his 30s which is why he didn't make the comp list) and maybe Lofton (he was a pretty good comp through 30-31 or so but he lost a good chunk of BA while adding power in his 30s).

Still, even here, Ichiro is rather unique if you want to drill down further. Rose, Butler and (to a lesser extent) Carew all walked more than Ichiro while Gwynn and Lofton added power in their 30s. In BA, Ichiro beats all these guys handily except Gwynn (372!! from ages 33-35). All of them aged rather well though and, given his past durability and current speed, there's certainly no reason to expect Ichiro to age worse than they did and it's hard to see his BA falling apart rapidly enough to destroy his value. Given that (and his popularity), he's an awfully good bet to play at least another 5 full years which will have him close enough to 3000 (and maybe over it) that he'll come back at age 41.
   12. Bob Dernier Cri Posted: August 31, 2009 at 08:37 PM (#3310110)
Darryl Hamilton [...] Why do I remember him as being Tom Goodwin-esque?

Each spent some time with the Rangers during the late 90s – Hamilton had one of his worst years here, and Goodwin one of his best, and they were pretty similar years. So they are not entirely distinct in my mind, either ...
   13. Walt Davis Posted: August 31, 2009 at 08:59 PM (#3310136)
And we should add Lou Brock to the comp list. Of course his BA isn't up to Ichiro's standards but was still 304 from ages 33-35 and he hit 300 at ages 36, 37 and 40 too. His baserunning was off the charts (his season of 118 steals was at age 35). He didn't walk much either. Brock had substantially more power in his 20s but from ages 31-40 his ISO was just 91. Brock was not good at 38 and awful at 39 but was standard Brock at ages 36, 37 and 40 (including 56 steals in both his 36 and 37 seasons).

So Brock is another reason similar sort of hitter (and baserunner) to Ichiro who lasted rather well. Ichiro is better than Brock overall (due to better BA and better defense) and there's no reason to expect him to age worse. To reach 3000, Ichiro will have to be more durable and effective than Brock going forward but the latter is almost guaranteed. With Brock's playing, Ichiro would probably be around 2750 hits through age 40 ... which puts him right on the cusp of whether it's worth bringing him back for 2 years to break 3000.
   14. JPWF13 Posted: August 31, 2009 at 09:23 PM (#3310155)
It seems to me that Garr is a very good comp for Ichiro!


Garr is a decent comp in that he's a similar type of hitter, but other than that not so good.

He had seasons that looked like Ichiro seasons:
.343/.372/.441 in 1971, .325/.359/.430 in 1972, .353/.383/.503 in 1974,

but he also logged years like 1973: .299/.323/.415; 1975: .278/.327/.384; and 1978: .275/.314/ .377

The later year he was 32 and toasty.
Ichiro's "worst"was .310/.361/.386, and he's at 333/.378/.433 for his career.

Garr's 1974 was probably better than any Ichiro season, but that was basically a fluke.
   15. Ray (RDP) Posted: August 31, 2009 at 09:26 PM (#3310159)
Dan, where's your Kazmir trade analysis?

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Harry Balsagne's transparent jealousy
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 0.2022 seconds
54 querie(s) executed