Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Sabermetric Research: Birnbaum: Bill James website and “cursed” teams

Hello, and welcome to Phil Birnbaum’s take on Bill James Online.

In the study called “Curses” (subscription required), Bill figures out that the chance of a team winning the World Series is almost exactly proportional to the cube of the difference between its wins minus its losses. So if the Yankees go 100-62 (38 games over .500), while the Red Sox go 97-65 (32 games over .500), New York has almost a 50% higher chance to win the World Series than Boston does.

Of course, that doesn’t mean *in the same season*. Obviously, if the Yankees and Red Sox had those records in the old two-division AL, the Red Sox would have *zero* chance. Rather, what it means is that if those teams had those records in two separate seasons, the Yankees would be 50% likelier to win their WS than the Red Sox would be to win theirs.

Bill nonetheless uses this method to figure the chances in the same season. He lists all the teams with winning records from 2003, and gives them “claim points” based on the cubes of their games over .500. The Yankees were 40 games over, so get 64,000 points. The Blue Jays were 10 games over, and get 1,000 points. Therefore, the Yankees have 64 times the chance the Blue Jays have.

The sum of all the teams’ cubes is 272,767. So the Yankees chances of winning the WS are 64,000 divided by 272,767, which is 23%. The Blue Jays are 1/64 of this, at an 0.4% chance.

Repoz Posted: February 27, 2008 at 06:22 PM | 7 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: online, sabermetrics

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Wakefieldfan Posted: February 27, 2008 at 06:31 PM (#2701243)
Does anyone else get the sense that James sits around squaring and cubing numbers all day, hoping to find some highly tenuous descriptive or predictive relationship between them?
   2. Slinger Francisco Barrios (Dr. Memory) Posted: February 27, 2008 at 06:45 PM (#2701255)
Not really... but what do you have for us?
   3. Robert in Manhattan Beach Posted: February 27, 2008 at 06:48 PM (#2701260)
He is very fond of claim points, that's for sure.
   4. PepTech Posted: February 27, 2008 at 06:58 PM (#2701265)
That's..... dumb.
   5. Scott Kazmir's breaking balls Posted: February 28, 2008 at 01:04 AM (#2701682)
I wonder if Bill James does his own taxes?
   6. joshtothemaxx Posted: February 28, 2008 at 05:16 AM (#2701833)
This is why I hate Bill James. It's like people that believe in the Bible code crap. If you stare at something long enough just ####### around with letters and numbers, eventually something is going to have some correlation, but golly gee that sure doesn't imply causation.

/recites the notes from Stat 101
   7. fret Posted: February 28, 2008 at 05:53 AM (#2701854)
If you stare at something long enough just ####### around with letters and numbers, eventually something is going to have some correlation, but golly gee that sure doesn't imply causation.


We all know that teams with better regular-season records have a better chance of winning the World Series. There's no bogus correlation/causation issue here.

This is similar in spirit to the simple runs created formula, OBP*SLG*AB, and the original Pythagorean formula. Those don't have any theoretical basis, but they still work extremely well (and inspired others to come up with more accurate formulas).

I'm not saying this is a magnificent piece of research, but it gives a reasonable answer to an interesting question.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

News

All News | Prime News

Old-School Newsstand


BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Downtown Bookie
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogPrimer Dugout (and link of the day) 8-23-2017
(6 - 11:50am, Aug 23)
Last: Rennie's Tenet

NewsblogOT-NBA off season thread
(1888 - 11:50am, Aug 23)
Last: jmurph

Gonfalon CubsThat counted as Now
(31 - 11:50am, Aug 23)
Last: Moses Taylor, Unwavering Optimist

NewsblogOTP 22 August 2017: The myth of baseball’s depoliticalization
(399 - 11:49am, Aug 23)
Last: DavidFoss

Newsblog25 Best Baseball Nicknames in History | MLB.com
(19 - 11:46am, Aug 23)
Last: JAHV

NewsblogRoyals get Perez, may lose Herrera | The Kansas City Star
(1 - 11:45am, Aug 23)
Last: Davoice of Dapeople

NewsblogNever get involved in a land war in OMNICHATTER!, for August 22, 2017
(138 - 10:59am, Aug 23)
Last: Joyful Calculus Instructor

NewsblogThat time Tommy Lasorda got the Expos mascot tossed out of a 22-inning, 1-0 game - CBSSports.com
(1 - 10:19am, Aug 23)
Last: Batman

NewsblogMets' Steven Matz goes on disabled list | MLB.com
(37 - 10:18am, Aug 23)
Last: Blastin

Sox TherapyJust Keep Going
(4 - 10:05am, Aug 23)
Last: Jose is El Absurd Bronson Y Pollo

NewsblogThe totality of Rafael Devers, who is eclipsing everything thought possible
(27 - 9:47am, Aug 23)
Last: The Anthony Kennedy of BBTF (Scott)

Sox TherapyThe Gauntlet
(90 - 9:35am, Aug 23)
Last: Dag Nabbit at ExactlyAsOld.com

NewsblogThe Worst Pro Baseball Team of 2017 Doesn't Want Your Pity
(5 - 9:18am, Aug 23)
Last: Russ

NewsblogColon becomes third active pitcher to beat all 30 teams
(74 - 8:56am, Aug 23)
Last: Greg Pope

NewsblogHow much is Tanaka worth? MLB execs weigh in on $67M mystery | New York Post
(3 - 8:55am, Aug 23)
Last: snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster)

Page rendered in 0.1616 seconds
47 querie(s) executed