Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Sabermetric Research: Birnbaum: Bill James website and “cursed” teams

Hello, and welcome to Phil Birnbaum’s take on Bill James Online.

In the study called “Curses” (subscription required), Bill figures out that the chance of a team winning the World Series is almost exactly proportional to the cube of the difference between its wins minus its losses. So if the Yankees go 100-62 (38 games over .500), while the Red Sox go 97-65 (32 games over .500), New York has almost a 50% higher chance to win the World Series than Boston does.

Of course, that doesn’t mean *in the same season*. Obviously, if the Yankees and Red Sox had those records in the old two-division AL, the Red Sox would have *zero* chance. Rather, what it means is that if those teams had those records in two separate seasons, the Yankees would be 50% likelier to win their WS than the Red Sox would be to win theirs.

Bill nonetheless uses this method to figure the chances in the same season. He lists all the teams with winning records from 2003, and gives them “claim points” based on the cubes of their games over .500. The Yankees were 40 games over, so get 64,000 points. The Blue Jays were 10 games over, and get 1,000 points. Therefore, the Yankees have 64 times the chance the Blue Jays have.

The sum of all the teams’ cubes is 272,767. So the Yankees chances of winning the WS are 64,000 divided by 272,767, which is 23%. The Blue Jays are 1/64 of this, at an 0.4% chance.

Repoz Posted: February 27, 2008 at 06:22 PM | 7 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: online, sabermetrics

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Wakefieldfan Posted: February 27, 2008 at 06:31 PM (#2701243)
Does anyone else get the sense that James sits around squaring and cubing numbers all day, hoping to find some highly tenuous descriptive or predictive relationship between them?
   2. Slinger Francisco Barrios (Dr. Memory) Posted: February 27, 2008 at 06:45 PM (#2701255)
Not really... but what do you have for us?
   3. Robert in Manhattan Beach Posted: February 27, 2008 at 06:48 PM (#2701260)
He is very fond of claim points, that's for sure.
   4. PepTech Posted: February 27, 2008 at 06:58 PM (#2701265)
That's..... dumb.
   5. Scott Kazmir's breaking balls Posted: February 28, 2008 at 01:04 AM (#2701682)
I wonder if Bill James does his own taxes?
   6. joshtothemaxx Posted: February 28, 2008 at 05:16 AM (#2701833)
This is why I hate Bill James. It's like people that believe in the Bible code crap. If you stare at something long enough just ####### around with letters and numbers, eventually something is going to have some correlation, but golly gee that sure doesn't imply causation.

/recites the notes from Stat 101
   7. fret Posted: February 28, 2008 at 05:53 AM (#2701854)
If you stare at something long enough just ####### around with letters and numbers, eventually something is going to have some correlation, but golly gee that sure doesn't imply causation.


We all know that teams with better regular-season records have a better chance of winning the World Series. There's no bogus correlation/causation issue here.

This is similar in spirit to the simple runs created formula, OBP*SLG*AB, and the original Pythagorean formula. Those don't have any theoretical basis, but they still work extremely well (and inspired others to come up with more accurate formulas).

I'm not saying this is a magnificent piece of research, but it gives a reasonable answer to an interesting question.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
tshipman
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogOTP 2016 May 2: The Anti-Moneyball Election
(1991 - 9:40pm, May 05)
Last: McCoy

NewsblogOT: NBA Playoffs Thread 2016
(1181 - 9:37pm, May 05)
Last: smileyy

NewsblogOMNICHATTER 5-5-16
(82 - 9:35pm, May 05)
Last: Jay Seaver

NewsblogAstros aren't doomed yet, but front-office mistakes hurting 2016 team - SweetSpot- ESPN
(25 - 9:35pm, May 05)
Last: Dag Nabbit at ExactlyAsOld.com

NewsblogThe Marlins revelation who may doom Yankees’ Eovaldi trade | New York Post
(17 - 9:18pm, May 05)
Last: Cowboy Popup

NewsblogRogers: 'Run differential' is becoming Cubs' favorite phrase
(40 - 9:13pm, May 05)
Last: tshipman

Sox TherapyTalkin' Baseball
(6 - 9:13pm, May 05)
Last: villageidiom

NewsblogMinor-league Phillies put on the healthy feedbag
(4 - 9:00pm, May 05)
Last: What did Billy Ripken have against ElRoy Face?

NewsblogOT Gaming: October 2015
(399 - 8:59pm, May 05)
Last: Poster Nutbag

NewsblogESPN edited Curt Schilling out of its 30 for 30 episode on the '04 Red Sox and people are mad.
(45 - 8:27pm, May 05)
Last: Jose Remains The Most Absurd Thing on the Site

NewsblogAtlanta Braves should bring back Chief Noc-A-Homa and the teepee
(150 - 8:13pm, May 05)
Last: theboyqueen

Gonfalon CubsAs I Was Saying...
(17 - 7:33pm, May 05)
Last: Andere Richtingen

NewsblogBoston Globe - Red Sox usually avoid insuring major contracts
(14 - 7:33pm, May 05)
Last: Fancy Pants with a clinging marmoset on his Handle

NewsblogBreaking down the Top 30 International Prospects list
(3 - 6:02pm, May 05)
Last: bfan

NewsblogPrimer Dugout (and link of the day) 5-5-2016
(9 - 5:37pm, May 05)
Last: Eric J can SABER all he wants to

Page rendered in 0.2242 seconds
47 querie(s) executed