Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Sabermetric Research: Birnbaum: Bill James website and “cursed” teams

Hello, and welcome to Phil Birnbaum’s take on Bill James Online.

In the study called “Curses” (subscription required), Bill figures out that the chance of a team winning the World Series is almost exactly proportional to the cube of the difference between its wins minus its losses. So if the Yankees go 100-62 (38 games over .500), while the Red Sox go 97-65 (32 games over .500), New York has almost a 50% higher chance to win the World Series than Boston does.

Of course, that doesn’t mean *in the same season*. Obviously, if the Yankees and Red Sox had those records in the old two-division AL, the Red Sox would have *zero* chance. Rather, what it means is that if those teams had those records in two separate seasons, the Yankees would be 50% likelier to win their WS than the Red Sox would be to win theirs.

Bill nonetheless uses this method to figure the chances in the same season. He lists all the teams with winning records from 2003, and gives them “claim points” based on the cubes of their games over .500. The Yankees were 40 games over, so get 64,000 points. The Blue Jays were 10 games over, and get 1,000 points. Therefore, the Yankees have 64 times the chance the Blue Jays have.

The sum of all the teams’ cubes is 272,767. So the Yankees chances of winning the WS are 64,000 divided by 272,767, which is 23%. The Blue Jays are 1/64 of this, at an 0.4% chance.

Repoz Posted: February 27, 2008 at 06:22 PM | 7 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: online, sabermetrics

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Wakefieldfan Posted: February 27, 2008 at 06:31 PM (#2701243)
Does anyone else get the sense that James sits around squaring and cubing numbers all day, hoping to find some highly tenuous descriptive or predictive relationship between them?
   2. Slinger Francisco Barrios (Dr. Memory) Posted: February 27, 2008 at 06:45 PM (#2701255)
Not really... but what do you have for us?
   3. Robert in Manhattan Beach Posted: February 27, 2008 at 06:48 PM (#2701260)
He is very fond of claim points, that's for sure.
   4. PepTech Posted: February 27, 2008 at 06:58 PM (#2701265)
That's..... dumb.
   5. Scott Kazmir's breaking balls Posted: February 28, 2008 at 01:04 AM (#2701682)
I wonder if Bill James does his own taxes?
   6. joshtothemaxx Posted: February 28, 2008 at 05:16 AM (#2701833)
This is why I hate Bill James. It's like people that believe in the Bible code crap. If you stare at something long enough just ####### around with letters and numbers, eventually something is going to have some correlation, but golly gee that sure doesn't imply causation.

/recites the notes from Stat 101
   7. fret Posted: February 28, 2008 at 05:53 AM (#2701854)
If you stare at something long enough just ####### around with letters and numbers, eventually something is going to have some correlation, but golly gee that sure doesn't imply causation.


We all know that teams with better regular-season records have a better chance of winning the World Series. There's no bogus correlation/causation issue here.

This is similar in spirit to the simple runs created formula, OBP*SLG*AB, and the original Pythagorean formula. Those don't have any theoretical basis, but they still work extremely well (and inspired others to come up with more accurate formulas).

I'm not saying this is a magnificent piece of research, but it gives a reasonable answer to an interesting question.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

News

All News | Prime News

Old-School Newsstand


BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Darren
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogWhat the Hall of Fame elections will look like through 2022
(85 - 12:51am, Jan 20)
Last: QLE

NewsblogOTP 16 Jan. 2017: The ‘honor’ Trumps politics in scheduling Cubs’ White House visit
(1325 - 12:20am, Jan 20)
Last: Renegade (((JE)))

NewsblogPredicting every Hall of Fame class through 2045 | ESPN.com
(14 - 11:49pm, Jan 19)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogJayson Stark: Casting my 2018 Hall of Fame ballot ... today
(21 - 11:41pm, Jan 19)
Last: Misirlou doesn't live in the restaurant

Sox Therapy2017 in Review
(6 - 11:15pm, Jan 19)
Last: Jose is El Absurd Pollo

NewsblogOrioles, Mark Trumbo agree to deal | MLB.com
(6 - 11:06pm, Jan 19)
Last: Misirlou doesn't live in the restaurant

NewsblogMarlins Acquire RHP Straily from Reds
(5 - 11:02pm, Jan 19)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogHall of Fame's Rule of 10 should be changed | MLB.com
(8 - 10:52pm, Jan 19)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogOT - December 2016 NBA thread
(1178 - 10:48pm, Jan 19)
Last: tshipman

NewsblogAlex Rodriguez to host CNBC reality show featuring cash-strapped former athletes
(28 - 10:16pm, Jan 19)
Last: ReggieThomasLives

Newsblog2017 Baseball Hall of Fame election results | MLB.com
(188 - 10:11pm, Jan 19)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogOn the Polo Grounds: When Fans Were Fans
(41 - 9:39pm, Jan 19)
Last: ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick

Newsblog2017 Top 10 Catching prospects | MLB.com
(2 - 7:16pm, Jan 19)
Last: cardsfanboy

Sox TherapySox In The Hall
(8 - 6:30pm, Jan 19)
Last: The Anthony Kennedy of BBTF (Scott)

NewsblogJosh Hamilton Prepared to Earn Spot on Rangers' Roster
(42 - 5:55pm, Jan 19)
Last: Dan

Page rendered in 0.2122 seconds
47 querie(s) executed