User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.5849 seconds
55 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
It's outstanding.
Haven't read it at all and probably never will at this point of my life. However, I did read Shoeless Joe years ago (still have my copy) and only wish Field of Dreams could have included Salinger in it.
Not at all. The book is accessible and loved by many, but not all critics love it. Not then, not now.
Salinger's little Greta Garbo act was pretty annoying.
In terms of reclusive authors, Pynchon > Salinger, in pretty much every way.
Apparently, Salinger has/had at least 15 books in the vault. What's beautiful about Salinger (to me, anyway) is that he didn't write for you and me; he wrote for himself and because he loved it. Somewhere along the line, he decided he didn't need to be published to have his work validated. It's like what Holden said about being a lawyer. Sure, you get to help innocent people from going to jail but do you become a lawyer because you want to help people or because you want everyone slapping you on the back telling you what a great lawyer you are? There's something wonderful and ego-less about that, I think.
I think the floodgates will open sooner or later, and all that stuff will be published. Unfortunately, it'll probably also result in The Catcher in the Rye movie, starring Michael Cera, Zooey Deschanel as Jane, Channing Tatum as Stradlater, adapted for the screen by Dave Eggers, directed by Zach Braff, with music by the Shins. I can see the camera now, lingering on Jane's teardrop plopping on the checkerboard...
Though the worst are the kind who read E.E. Cummings...man that guy is so overrated....
What's nice for him was that he was able to live off the royalties that his earlier books continued to provide for him. Most authors (even good authors) don't have that luxury.
Salinger was a very good writer, but he was just one of many great 20th-century American writers.
That was one of the real problems I had with "Field of Dreams." Here's this guy who supposedly wrote a generation-defining novel along the lines of "The Catcher in the Rye" - and it has a horribly cliched title like "The Boat Rockers"? Nothing with a title that bad could ever mean anything to anybody. It's a little thing, but it took me totally out of the movie.
cripes, the guy fought for his privacy for 50 years. that doesn't sound like an act. some of his tactics to keep his work suppressed seem obsessive, but it's pretty hard to escape the conclusion that he really wanted to be left alone.
**throws up**
Ugh. I read both, and thought I was hot #### because I was the only one of my peers who read Kerouac. Now I see On the Road for what it is, an accidental Great American Novel that resulted from a lucky combination of drugs and run-on sentences. Other than that book, Kerouac is mostly crap.
Nah, you were playing the percentages. If she loves it like most English/Lit teachers do, and you write a negative review, your grade is toast. If she's in the minority and hates it, and you write a positiver review, she's going to be aware of its reputation and at least be somewhat lenient with your grade, even if it means an A-worthy paper might get a B instead.
Agreed, although his poem in tribute to Warren G. Harding is legendary.
That's what took you out of Field of Dreams?
Among other things.
An example of a well-chosen title is "The Arsonist's Daughter" written by the Michael Douglas character in "Wonder Boys" (at least the film version). Not a great movie, but the title of the fake book is a good one.
If the teacher is a dumbass, yeah. Not all of us are.
"Seinfeld" was always great at coming up with fake titles that sounded real. "Prognosis Negative." "Rochelle, Rochelle."
Well, my narrow experience was that most of them are, particularly English/Lit teachers. I had one good one, capable of independent thought, and a long string of dumbasses. Your mileage may vary.
(EDIT: If you stretch it back into middle school, I had another good one there. So that's something, I guess.)
you remember what Truman Capote said about Kerouac: "that's not writing, that's typing"
Salinger
Kerouac
Camus
Tolkien
Rand
maybe Sylvia Plath
this might have just been my high school, but wehad a Pablo Neruda cadre
Yep. Kerouac probably likened the music of the typewriter to a jazz record or such such crap. He even wrote it on a single roll of paper. He couldn't be bothered to interrupt the jazz record in his head long enough to put in a new sheet of paper.
My senior paper was on J.D. Salinger.
Mine too, Larry. Franny and Zooey and Raise High...
That was one of the real problems I had with "Field of Dreams." Here's this guy who supposedly wrote a generation-defining novel along the lines of "The Catcher in the Rye" - and it has a horribly cliched title like "The Boat Rockers"? Nothing with a title that bad could ever mean anything to anybody. It's a little thing, but it took me totally out of the movie.
What the hell made Kinsella think that no, this decades-long famous recluse, no, he really will LOVE being in my book? Really?
Camus
Tolkien
Rand
maybe Sylvia Plath
Man, I just feel bad for you.
Here's your key phrase. Sort of like if I generalized about Libertarians based on the ones here at BTF.
Yes, obviously. That would be why I included the word 'narrow' in it.
Tolkien obviously had tremendous talent for worldbuilding and creating interesting characters, but man, his writing holds several major records for tediousness.
Not quite.
Salinger couldn't carry Kerouac's jock strap. Go pick up Visions of Cody and tell me if precious little JD could have written three paragraphs of that quality. Salinger is the freaking Wes Anderson of literature; who wants to be a middle-aged man spending decades writing like a child genius?
Unless you include those who read "just for the articles."
Probably. I don't think they ever lived in the same place at the same time, and besides that I doubt Kerouac wore jock straps very often.
This is one of the keys to why Salinger lasts--he gets people a little riled up, even 59 years after CTR hit the bookstores.
For the record, Richard Kinsella was the Caulfied classmate. Ray Kinsella was a main character in the Salinger short story "A Young Girl In 1941 With No Waist At All".
[/pedantry]
Kerouac was a big baseball fan. I think I heard that he once invented a tabletop dice game. But I don't know how much he played - he seems more like a beer league softball player, and they usually don't wear jocks.
And made sure that everyone knew it, especially the media. He loved being the "reclusive author", no doubt about it.
Correct. Salinger liked baseball too, I believe.
Only read him in college, but he's quite good. I don't know why you wouldn't like e.e. Very talented and creative poet who has a lot of crap dumped on him.
the only people I don't get are the ones who like Steinbeck. Or who claim that Steven King writes literary fiction.
And my wife would move this to the top of our Netflix queue, all while lying to me that "Fat City" isn't yet available.
Spielberg and Elia Kazan, among others, approached Salinger's handlers/lawyers about optioning CTR for the screen while Salinger was alive. I am not sure of the legalities, but I agree that it will eventually happen in some way.
Right here, dude.
Another Jeter-type thing. cummings is not a personal favorite, but there is a lot there.
Catcher in the Rye is Salinger's worst book. Better than most people's best, of course, but not exactly in the pantheon of American literature.
The Grapes of Wrath is way better than Catcher. It's not close.
Kerouac would aim for a certain word count per day, and then would keep track of his daily output, and then tally up his batting average.
Cummings is pretty interesting; fully-formed by the time he was thirty, and then got neither worse nor better from there. Significant if just for taking typography and the typewriter as a serious venue for exploration and expression, he was essentially a very basic poet, with set, ultra-traditional themes.
Also, since the movie version was brought up, everyone should read Leonard Gardner's Fat City -- the only novel the man made, pitch perfect neo-noir about rundown boxers. Even Denis Johnson acknowledges it as his daddy.
I find this to be an arrogantly modern and cynical view, the implication being that the media had absolutely no interested on their own in the author who wrote one of the most famous books of the last 100 years and then retreated into reclusion.
Of course, the point of this thread is at least partially that Salinger didn't last.
Stephen King may be a niche writer, but he is a tremendously skilled writer.* That a person doesn't write 500+ page metaphorical social commentaries or surreal literary acid trips says nothing about his skill as a writer, good or bad.
* I personally have no interest in 90%+ of what he writes. Horror/supernaturality doesn't catch my attention much at all. But the man is good at what he does.
Indeed. Salinger was a skilled short story writer, which is often forgotten about him.
.
Check Kinsella's quote above:
“Salinger made a career out of being publicized for not seeking publicity,” Kinsella said. “It was controlled and planned, and it kept his name in the media for 50 years.”
What is classic about this is that Salinger's name stayed in the media for 50 years in large part because a lot of people care about what he wrote, which, of course, is the main reason Kinsella himself used a fictionalized Salinger as a character in his book and wanted to use his name in the title.
I'll dance around and stand behind plenty of artistic justifications on why one author is better than another empirically, but between Steinbeck and Salinger I'm really going to have to go with subjectivity being the call.
Did Ellis bag on Salinger today or something? I assume so.
***
Oddly enough, I read Kinsella before I'd heard of Salinger, so I missed on this connection.
***
6/Wry: Yes, it was.
***
We've had a few Kerouac threads ... think I posted one on a NYT bit on his homebrewed sports games.
Do we know this is not a Twitter hoax? I can't picture Ellis' being this dumb, but I don't know much about him. I am going to reserve judgment. However, if it is really him, that is truly pathetic.
Ray Bradbury was one author that successfully walked that fine line between genre writing and literature.
BTW, King was really the guy that jump-started my love for fiction in the mid-'80s. Not that I didn't read any novels before that as a kid or teenager, but I actually started buying them regularly after picking up King's Night Shift in 1985.
I'll defend King from here to the end. He is an amazing storyteller, which is an important skill that comes through even when his writing bricks.
He was a peak guy.
Garry Trudeau once said he was baffled that it was considered arrogant for him to have no interest in making himself famous.
Pure-d horseshit. Salinger did no such thing. The media did it all. He did nothing except refuse to take part. Kinsella's got a nice little epistemological whipsaw in mind, but that's all it is.
And, yes, the movie's terrific. John Huston, Stacy Keach, Jeff Bridges. I was lucky enough to catch a screening at the Castro Theatre in SF once, with Gardner there to talk about the whole production. Don't know if there's a commentary track on the DVD, but there should be, and there should be lots of great stuff on it.
Most of my 10th grade English class hated Catcher in the Rye. Our teacher loved it, but didn't hold that against us.
In high school, I read The Hamlet, The Town and the Mansion AKA the Snopes Trilogy by Faulkner. Snopes is now best known as the urban legend web site.
Dhalgren by Samuel R. Delany meant a lot to me when I was 19.
He's always had a knack for getting you to turn the page, and for the telling detail -- for example, realizing that he was an alcoholic when they started recycling in his household, and by midweek the bin was already full of beer cans (and nobody else in the house drank).
Being Stephen King, that same detail also apparently shows up in his most recent novel, about one of his characters. Because, hey: it works.
as Tom Stoppard put it: "an essentially private man, who wished his total indifference to public acclaim to be universally recognized"
I remember being really impressed with MacBeth, Beowulf and The Odyssey in HS.
The Reivers and Of Mice and Men were two more high school reads that I enjoyed, too.
Still gets me. This and GoW make Steinbeck an author I like, in spite of some of his other stuff not working for me.
Not so much. Most of the literature forums feature bitter discussions of Ted Kluszewski vs. Joe Adcock.
I know why Phillip K. gets all the attention, but Delany has always deserved it far more.
Most of my 10th grade English class hated Catcher in the Rye. Our teacher loved it, but didn't hold that against us. In high school, I read The Hamlet, The Town and the Mansion AKA the Snopes Trilogy by Faulkner. Snopes is now best known as the urban legend web site.
Hearing about all this stuff from other's peoples' curricula, I'm curious if my experience was more unique than I thought. Partially due to living in a town of 1400 people, and partially due to hiring incompetence, I had the same English teacher for three years in a row, 10th, 11th, and 12th grade. In 10th grade, we read Zindel's "Pigman", which was an awesome book for 12-year-olds. It rarely got any better from there (a random "Bovary" by accident and the MOVIE of Silas Marner) and I've blocked most of everything else out because of that. (In contrast, in 8th grade we read "Enemy of the People" and "Antigone".) I was homicidal by my senior year, and said some of the meanest things I've ever said to anyone in my entire life to that teacher. I made her cry in front of class. Twice.
[Re: Trudeau] As Tom Stoppard put it: "an essentially private man, who wished his total indifference to public acclaim to be universally recognized"
This quote again makes me think it is just way more about the person talking than the person they are talking about. And right in line with this, I've been a fan of Doonesbury since I was tiny, and I'd never heard of this tremendous eschewing of the public until quite recently.
Aaaahhh Lassus. We are more alike than you know.
I was also required to read Winter of Our Discontent by Steinback which was one I liked, but not usually mentioned.
Do the literary boards digress into baseball discussions?
Eric Enders once said Kinsella was a prick, but that sucks. I liked a few of his things.
i'm pretty weirded out right now because i'm agreeing with morty on this thread. hating on salinger for his obsessive need for privacy is just ... misguided.
um, that says more about stoppard than salinger.
So I did -- a little section on non-Latin etymologies of English words. Hey, I was still a nerd, even if I didn't care at all about "A Separate Peace."
EDIT: grammar.
8th grade, again. I'm going to have to consult some old friends to see if I can come up with some more of my high school reading. Nope, no Lord of the Flies.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main