Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Friday, January 29, 2010

Salinger featured in ‘Shoeless Joe’

The reclusive Salinger, who died Wednesday, was a character in author W.P. Kinsella’s novel “Shoeless Joe,” the 1982 book that became the movie “Field of Dreams,” both set in Iowa.

“When I was writing the novel I was a fan of Salinger,” said Kinsella, who lives in Canada but earned a master’s degree at the Iowa Writers’ Workshop in 1978. ” ‘Catcher in the Rye’ was the quintessential book of growing up male in North America.”


In Kinsella’s book, the main character - Ray Kinsella - takes Salinger to a baseball game to discover why he was called to build the field of his dreams.

“What if - which is what authors spend their time considering - what if Ray got into this adventure when he goes off to wherever he goes off to,” author Kinsella mused Thursday.

...
Kinsella said the working title of the book was “The Kidnapping of J.D. Salinger.”

After a name change and publication of “Shoeless Joe,” Salinger’s lawyers wrote Kinsella, outraged about the portrayal of the world-wary author.

“Salinger made a career out of being publicized for not seeking publicity,” Kinsella said. “It was controlled and planned, and it kept his name in the media for 50 years.”

But the lawyers had a warning: “In a legalese way, they basically said we don’t have enough money to sue you but we will (expletive) on your wish to use it in a movie,” Kinsella said.

That’s why, in the “Field of Dreams” movie, Ray Kinsella seeks out fictional author Terence Mann.

The Salinger-Baseball Connection.

Gamingboy Posted: January 29, 2010 at 03:58 PM | 303 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: books, obituaries

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 4 pages  1 2 3 4 > 
   1. robinred Posted: January 29, 2010 at 06:18 PM (#3449781)
I re-read The Catcher in the Rye last night--first time since I was 21. Read it at 15 and again at 21. My own little good-bye to Salinger.
   2. phredbird Posted: January 29, 2010 at 06:32 PM (#3449805)
haven't read 'catcher' in years ... but i guess i should. there are several books i like to come back to now and then. i make a point of reading 'the horse's mouth' every couple of years. it's a book that captures the mind of a working artist like no other i've ever encountered.
   3. Best Regards, Larry M. Posted: January 29, 2010 at 06:36 PM (#3449811)
My senior paper was on J.D. Salinger.
   4. robinred Posted: January 29, 2010 at 06:36 PM (#3449812)
'the horse's mouth' every couple of years


It's outstanding.
   5. John (You Can Call Me Grandma) Murphy Posted: January 29, 2010 at 06:42 PM (#3449826)
haven't read 'catcher' in years


Haven't read it at all and probably never will at this point of my life. However, I did read Shoeless Joe years ago (still have my copy) and only wish Field of Dreams could have included Salinger in it.
   6. John (You Can Call Me Grandma) Murphy Posted: January 29, 2010 at 06:44 PM (#3449828)
BTW Catcher in the Wry was great. ;-)
   7. Rodder Posted: January 29, 2010 at 06:44 PM (#3449829)
In high school, there was an instance where we had to choose a novel to read and write a book report. I chose "Catcher in the Rye," and hated every page of it. Then I thought to myself, I can't write a book review about how much I disliked what is considered by every lit critic to be a modern masterpiece. So I had to really think about what I would have liked (keep in mind, this is before the internet), and wrote about how good it was. The following year I had the teacher for another class, and once in passing she mentioned how terrible she thought "Catcher in the Rye" was. So, at least I learned a lesson in not being afraid to offer up my own independent, critical thought.
   8. robinred Posted: January 29, 2010 at 06:48 PM (#3449835)
what is considered by every lit critic to be a modern masterpiece.


Not at all. The book is accessible and loved by many, but not all critics love it. Not then, not now.
   9. esseff Posted: January 29, 2010 at 06:53 PM (#3449842)
What isn't mentioned in the linked story is that Salinger used the name Kinsella in a couple of works long before Kinsella incorporated Salinger.
   10. Tim McCarver's Orange Marmalade Posted: January 29, 2010 at 06:55 PM (#3449844)
"Catcher in the Rye" pales in comparison to "The Boat Rocker".
   11. Dock Ellis on Acid Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:02 PM (#3449855)
The Catcher in the Rye was my favorite book when I was younger but now that I'm older, I much prefer Franny and Zooey.
   12. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:12 PM (#3449862)
“Salinger made a career out of being publicized for not seeking publicity,” Kinsella said. “It was controlled and planned, and it kept his name in the media for 50 years.”

Salinger's little Greta Garbo act was pretty annoying.

In terms of reclusive authors, Pynchon > Salinger, in pretty much every way.
   13. Dock Ellis on Acid Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:16 PM (#3449866)
[9] Indeed, Ray Kinsella was the boy who digressed in Holden's class.

Apparently, Salinger has/had at least 15 books in the vault. What's beautiful about Salinger (to me, anyway) is that he didn't write for you and me; he wrote for himself and because he loved it. Somewhere along the line, he decided he didn't need to be published to have his work validated. It's like what Holden said about being a lawyer. Sure, you get to help innocent people from going to jail but do you become a lawyer because you want to help people or because you want everyone slapping you on the back telling you what a great lawyer you are? There's something wonderful and ego-less about that, I think.

I think the floodgates will open sooner or later, and all that stuff will be published. Unfortunately, it'll probably also result in The Catcher in the Rye movie, starring Michael Cera, Zooey Deschanel as Jane, Channing Tatum as Stradlater, adapted for the screen by Dave Eggers, directed by Zach Braff, with music by the Shins. I can see the camera now, lingering on Jane's teardrop plopping on the checkerboard...
   14. Tuque Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:17 PM (#3449868)
I'm glad I was the kind of teenager who read Salinger and not the kind who read Kerouac.

Though the worst are the kind who read E.E. Cummings...man that guy is so overrated....
   15. winnipegwhip Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:18 PM (#3449870)
Bob Uecker also claimed the Salinger's lawyers advised him to cease.
   16. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:22 PM (#3449873)
What's beautiful about Salinger (to me, anyway) is that he didn't write for you and me; he wrote for himself and because he loved it. Somewhere along the line, he decided he didn't need to be published to have his work validated.

What's nice for him was that he was able to live off the royalties that his earlier books continued to provide for him. Most authors (even good authors) don't have that luxury.

Salinger was a very good writer, but he was just one of many great 20th-century American writers.
   17. Tom Nawrocki Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:22 PM (#3449876)
"Catcher in the Rye" pales in comparison to "The Boat Rocker".


That was one of the real problems I had with "Field of Dreams." Here's this guy who supposedly wrote a generation-defining novel along the lines of "The Catcher in the Rye" - and it has a horribly cliched title like "The Boat Rockers"? Nothing with a title that bad could ever mean anything to anybody. It's a little thing, but it took me totally out of the movie.
   18. phredbird Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:23 PM (#3449877)
“Salinger made a career out of being publicized for not seeking publicity,” Kinsella said. “It was controlled and planned, and it kept his name in the media for 50 years.”

Salinger's little Greta Garbo act was pretty annoying.


cripes, the guy fought for his privacy for 50 years. that doesn't sound like an act. some of his tactics to keep his work suppressed seem obsessive, but it's pretty hard to escape the conclusion that he really wanted to be left alone.

I think the floodgates will open sooner or later, and all that stuff will be published. Unfortunately, it'll probably also result in The Catcher in the Rye movie, starring Michael Cera, Zooey Deschanel as Jane, Channing Tatum as Stradlater, adapted for the screen by Dave Eggers, directed by Zach Braff, with music by the Shins. I can see the camera now, lingering on Jane's teardrop plopping on the checkerboard...


**throws up**
   19. Dock Ellis on Acid Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:25 PM (#3449879)
I'm glad I was the kind of teenager who read Salinger and not the kind who read Kerouac.

Ugh. I read both, and thought I was hot #### because I was the only one of my peers who read Kerouac. Now I see On the Road for what it is, an accidental Great American Novel that resulted from a lucky combination of drugs and run-on sentences. Other than that book, Kerouac is mostly crap.
   20. PASTE is not impressed by Albert Pujols (Zeth) Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:27 PM (#3449886)
The following year I had the teacher for another class, and once in passing she mentioned how terrible she thought "Catcher in the Rye" was. So, at least I learned a lesson in not being afraid to offer up my own independent, critical thought.


Nah, you were playing the percentages. If she loves it like most English/Lit teachers do, and you write a negative review, your grade is toast. If she's in the minority and hates it, and you write a positiver review, she's going to be aware of its reputation and at least be somewhat lenient with your grade, even if it means an A-worthy paper might get a B instead.

Though the worst are the kind who read E.E. Cummings...man that guy is so overrated....


Agreed, although his poem in tribute to Warren G. Harding is legendary.

That was one of the real problems I had with "Field of Dreams." Here's this guy who supposedly wrote a generation-defining novel along the lines of "The Catcher in the Rye" - and it has a horribly cliched title like "The Boat Rockers"? Nothing with a title that bad could ever mean anything to anybody. It's a little thing, but it took me totally out of the movie.


That's what took you out of Field of Dreams?
   21. Tom Nawrocki Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:28 PM (#3449887)
That's what took you out of Field of Dreams?


Among other things.
   22. Sexy Lizard Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:30 PM (#3449889)
That was one of the real problems I had with "Field of Dreams." Here's this guy who supposedly wrote a generation-defining novel along the lines of "The Catcher in the Rye" - and it has a horribly cliched title like "The Boat Rockers"? Nothing with a title that bad could ever mean anything to anybody. It's a little thing, but it took me totally out of the movie.

An example of a well-chosen title is "The Arsonist's Daughter" written by the Michael Douglas character in "Wonder Boys" (at least the film version). Not a great movie, but the title of the fake book is a good one.
   23. robinred Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:31 PM (#3449891)
If she loves it like most English/Lit teachers do, and you write a negative review, your grade is toast.


If the teacher is a dumbass, yeah. Not all of us are.
   24. Tom Nawrocki Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:34 PM (#3449896)
An example of a well-chosen title is "The Arsonist's Daughter" written by the Michael Douglas character in "Wonder Boys" (at least the film version). Not a great movie, but the title of the fake book is a good one.


"Seinfeld" was always great at coming up with fake titles that sounded real. "Prognosis Negative." "Rochelle, Rochelle."
   25. PASTE is not impressed by Albert Pujols (Zeth) Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:35 PM (#3449900)
If the teacher is a dumbass, yeah. Not all of us are.


Well, my narrow experience was that most of them are, particularly English/Lit teachers. I had one good one, capable of independent thought, and a long string of dumbasses. Your mileage may vary.

(EDIT: If you stretch it back into middle school, I had another good one there. So that's something, I guess.)
   26. Pasta-diving Jeter (jmac66) Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:36 PM (#3449903)
Now I see On the Road for what it is, an accidental Great American Novel that resulted from a lucky combination of drugs and run-on sentences. Other than that book, Kerouac is mostly crap.


you remember what Truman Capote said about Kerouac: "that's not writing, that's typing"
   27. Sexy Lizard Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:38 PM (#3449905)
I'm glad I was the kind of teenager who read Salinger and not the kind who read Kerouac.

Salinger
Kerouac
Camus
Tolkien
Rand
maybe Sylvia Plath
this might have just been my high school, but wehad a Pablo Neruda cadre
   28. Dock Ellis on Acid Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:40 PM (#3449908)
you remember what Truman Capote said about Kerouac: "that's not writing, that's typing"

Yep. Kerouac probably likened the music of the typewriter to a jazz record or such such crap. He even wrote it on a single roll of paper. He couldn't be bothered to interrupt the jazz record in his head long enough to put in a new sheet of paper.
   29. Lassus Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:41 PM (#3449909)
Two threads with different people posting interesting things on the same topic! Boooooo!

Lassus Posted: January 29, 2010 at 12:14 PM (#3449778)
I re-read The Catcher in the Rye last night--first time since I was 21. Read it at 15 and again at 21. My own little good-bye to Salinger.

I had possibly the most awesomely stereotypical Catcher in the Rye moment ever when I, like many others, blasted through the book one night at 14 or so. It wasn't required reading in my high school, which completely blew in terms of anything intelligent or diverse being taught. In fact, the only decent English teacher we had was retiring that year, before I was going to be old enough to take senior English with her, so I had started talking to her to glean whatever I could out of class whenever I could. I ran into her outside of the school library the next morning, me all completely and utterly a-twitter and yammering about how amazing the book was, and how insightful, and this and that and got to the point where I said, "It really felt like I was reading about myself!" "Oh, that's the wonderful thing about Catcher," said Ms. Conway, "it's completely universal." And off she went.

Blank stare of utter deflation.

The book + that one sentence = formative life moment.


(I did always end up liking Raise High the Roof-Beam, Carpenters and Franny and Zooey more, personally.)



My senior paper was on J.D. Salinger.

Mine too, Larry. Franny and Zooey and Raise High...


That was one of the real problems I had with "Field of Dreams." Here's this guy who supposedly wrote a generation-defining novel along the lines of "The Catcher in the Rye" - and it has a horribly cliched title like "The Boat Rockers"? Nothing with a title that bad could ever mean anything to anybody. It's a little thing, but it took me totally out of the movie.

What the hell made Kinsella think that no, this decades-long famous recluse, no, he really will LOVE being in my book? Really?
   30. Tuque Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:43 PM (#3449911)
Kerouac
Camus
Tolkien
Rand
maybe Sylvia Plath


Man, I just feel bad for you.
   31. Dock Ellis on Acid Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:44 PM (#3449913)
Actually, I wish I went to Sexy Lizard's high school. No one I knew read literature for pleasure. Hell, not many people read at all for pleasure.
   32. robinred Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:44 PM (#3449914)
my narrow experience


Here's your key phrase. Sort of like if I generalized about Libertarians based on the ones here at BTF.
   33. gef the talking mongoose Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:45 PM (#3449916)
Let's see -- in high school, among (non-assigned) non-genre writers I read Salinger (only Catcher, though) & ... ummm ... Sinclair Lewis. That's it, pretty much, or at least that's all that seems to have made any impression whatsoever. Definitely not Kerouac: not then, not now, not ever.
   34. PASTE is not impressed by Albert Pujols (Zeth) Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:47 PM (#3449917)
Here's your key phrase.


Yes, obviously. That would be why I included the word 'narrow' in it.

Tolkien obviously had tremendous talent for worldbuilding and creating interesting characters, but man, his writing holds several major records for tediousness.
   35. DL from MN Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:48 PM (#3449918)
At my high school most kids prided themselves on not reading anything that wasn't assigned by the teacher.
   36. robinred Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:49 PM (#3449921)

Yes, obviously


Not quite.
   37. DL from MN Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:49 PM (#3449920)
I liked Dharma Bums better than On the Road.
   38. Lassus Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:52 PM (#3449927)
As a kid who just never drank and never did drugs, I admit to subjectively finding all the beats about as insightful as watching someone get drunk or do drugs.
   39. Gold Star for Robothal Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:54 PM (#3449931)
What did Mailer say about Salinger, the greatest mind to never graduate from prep school?

Salinger couldn't carry Kerouac's jock strap. Go pick up Visions of Cody and tell me if precious little JD could have written three paragraphs of that quality. Salinger is the freaking Wes Anderson of literature; who wants to be a middle-aged man spending decades writing like a child genius?
   40. Pat Rapper's Delight Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:55 PM (#3449933)
Hell, not many people read at all for pleasure.

Unless you include those who read "just for the articles."
   41. Tuque Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:57 PM (#3449936)
Salinger couldn't carry Kerouac's jock strap

Probably. I don't think they ever lived in the same place at the same time, and besides that I doubt Kerouac wore jock straps very often.
   42. Barry`s_Lazy_Boy Posted: January 29, 2010 at 07:58 PM (#3449937)
Colts owner Irsay owns the original On The Road toilet paper roll. Thats what I learned this week.
   43. robinred Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:00 PM (#3449940)
. Go pick up Visions of Cody and tell me if precious little JD could have written three paragraphs of that quality. Salinger is the freaking Wes Anderson of literature; who wants to be a middle-aged man spending decades writing like a child genius?


This is one of the keys to why Salinger lasts--he gets people a little riled up, even 59 years after CTR hit the bookstores.
   44. esseff Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:01 PM (#3449942)
Indeed, Ray Kinsella was the boy who digressed in Holden's class.



For the record, Richard Kinsella was the Caulfied classmate. Ray Kinsella was a main character in the Salinger short story "A Young Girl In 1941 With No Waist At All".

[/pedantry]
   45. Dock Ellis on Acid Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:03 PM (#3449947)
Thank you!
   46. Tom Nawrocki Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:07 PM (#3449951)
I doubt Kerouac wore jock straps very often.


Kerouac was a big baseball fan. I think I heard that he once invented a tabletop dice game. But I don't know how much he played - he seems more like a beer league softball player, and they usually don't wear jocks.
   47. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:09 PM (#3449954)
cripes, the guy fought for his privacy for 50 years.

And made sure that everyone knew it, especially the media. He loved being the "reclusive author", no doubt about it.
   48. robinred Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:09 PM (#3449955)
Kerouac was a big baseball fan. I think I heard that he once invented a tabletop dice game
.

Correct. Salinger liked baseball too, I believe.
   49. tshipman Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:12 PM (#3449960)
Though the worst are the kind who read E.E. Cummings...man that guy is so overrated....


Only read him in college, but he's quite good. I don't know why you wouldn't like e.e. Very talented and creative poet who has a lot of crap dumped on him.

the only people I don't get are the ones who like Steinbeck. Or who claim that Steven King writes literary fiction.
   50. Forsch 10 From Navarone (Dayn) Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:12 PM (#3449961)
I think the floodgates will open sooner or later, and all that stuff will be published. Unfortunately, it'll probably also result in The Catcher in the Rye movie, starring Michael Cera, Zooey Deschanel as Jane, Channing Tatum as Stradlater, adapted for the screen by Dave Eggers, directed by Zach Braff, with music by the Shins. I can see the camera now, lingering on Jane's teardrop plopping on the checkerboard...

And my wife would move this to the top of our Netflix queue, all while lying to me that "Fat City" isn't yet available.
   51. Dock Ellis on Acid Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:13 PM (#3449964)
I agree that Cummings is quite good but but the kids wouldn't've bothered if he didn't write in lowercase.
   52. robinred Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:15 PM (#3449966)
And my wife would move this to the top of our Netflix queue, all while lying to me that "Fat City" isn't yet available
.

Spielberg and Elia Kazan, among others, approached Salinger's handlers/lawyers about optioning CTR for the screen while Salinger was alive. I am not sure of the legalities, but I agree that it will eventually happen in some way.
   53. robinred Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:15 PM (#3449968)
the only people I don't get are the ones who like Steinbeck


Right here, dude.
   54. robinred Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:18 PM (#3449971)
Very talented and creative poet who has a lot of crap dumped on him


Another Jeter-type thing. cummings is not a personal favorite, but there is a lot there.
   55. Jarrod HypnerotomachiaPoliphili(Teddy F. Ballgame) Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:23 PM (#3449974)
The New York Public Library produced a book of Kerouac's fantasy sports creations a while back. He did love baseball, but also horse racing, apparently.

Catcher in the Rye is Salinger's worst book. Better than most people's best, of course, but not exactly in the pantheon of American literature.
   56. Smyly Smile (Walewander) Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:26 PM (#3449980)
the only people I don't get are the ones who like Steinbeck.

The Grapes of Wrath is way better than Catcher. It's not close.
   57. Bob Dernier Cri Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:27 PM (#3449981)
Kerouac, incidentally, was a football star in high school, and played freshman football at Columbia.
   58. Gold Star for Robothal Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:36 PM (#3449988)
Steinbeck is pretty huge, great large generous vision, took on adult concerns and put them into narratives that often rose up to feel like parables or myths; kind of like Flannery O'Connor, but better in just about every facet.

Kerouac would aim for a certain word count per day, and then would keep track of his daily output, and then tally up his batting average.

Cummings is pretty interesting; fully-formed by the time he was thirty, and then got neither worse nor better from there. Significant if just for taking typography and the typewriter as a serious venue for exploration and expression, he was essentially a very basic poet, with set, ultra-traditional themes.

Also, since the movie version was brought up, everyone should read Leonard Gardner's Fat City -- the only novel the man made, pitch perfect neo-noir about rundown boxers. Even Denis Johnson acknowledges it as his daddy.
   59. Lassus Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:38 PM (#3449991)
And made sure that everyone knew it, especially the media. He loved being the "reclusive author", no doubt about it.

I find this to be an arrogantly modern and cynical view, the implication being that the media had absolutely no interested on their own in the author who wrote one of the most famous books of the last 100 years and then retreated into reclusion.
   60. akrasian Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:39 PM (#3449995)
This is one of the keys to why Salinger lasts

Of course, the point of this thread is at least partially that Salinger didn't last.
   61. Pops Freshenmeyer Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:40 PM (#3449997)
"Nine Stories," dudes.
   62. PASTE is not impressed by Albert Pujols (Zeth) Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:41 PM (#3449998)
Steinbeck was hit-and-miss. The Grapes of Wrath is good and I liked East of Eden, but The Red Pony remains the worst piece of literature I've ever had the displeasure to read.

Stephen King may be a niche writer, but he is a tremendously skilled writer.* That a person doesn't write 500+ page metaphorical social commentaries or surreal literary acid trips says nothing about his skill as a writer, good or bad.

* I personally have no interest in 90%+ of what he writes. Horror/supernaturality doesn't catch my attention much at all. But the man is good at what he does.
   63. robinred Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:46 PM (#3450005)
"Nine Stories," dudes


Indeed. Salinger was a skilled short story writer, which is often forgotten about him.

I find this to be an arrogantly modern and cynical view, the implication being that the media had absolutely no interested on their own in the author who wrote one of the most famous books of the last 100 years and then retreated into reclusion
.

Check Kinsella's quote above:

“Salinger made a career out of being publicized for not seeking publicity,” Kinsella said. “It was controlled and planned, and it kept his name in the media for 50 years.”

What is classic about this is that Salinger's name stayed in the media for 50 years in large part because a lot of people care about what he wrote, which, of course, is the main reason Kinsella himself used a fictionalized Salinger as a character in his book and wanted to use his name in the title.
   64. Lassus Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:48 PM (#3450007)
The Grapes of Wrath is way better than Catcher. It's not close.

I'll dance around and stand behind plenty of artistic justifications on why one author is better than another empirically, but between Steinbeck and Salinger I'm really going to have to go with subjectivity being the call.
   65. Dock Ellis on Acid Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:49 PM (#3450008)
####### Bret Easton Ellis. What a classless douche bag. Hate on Catcher if you want but try having a career without him, you #######. Man, I'm so angry.
   66. robinred Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:50 PM (#3450012)
####### Bret Easton Ellis

Did Ellis bag on Salinger today or something? I assume so.
   67. Dock Ellis on Acid Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:51 PM (#3450013)
Google his twitter. I'm too angry to link.
   68. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:53 PM (#3450015)
Nine Stories indeed.
***
Oddly enough, I read Kinsella before I'd heard of Salinger, so I missed on this connection.
***
6/Wry: Yes, it was.
***
We've had a few Kerouac threads ... think I posted one on a NYT bit on his homebrewed sports games.
   69. robinred Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:54 PM (#3450016)
Yeah!! Thank God he's finally dead. I've been waiting for this day for-#######-ever. Party tonight!!!


Do we know this is not a Twitter hoax? I can't picture Ellis' being this dumb, but I don't know much about him. I am going to reserve judgment. However, if it is really him, that is truly pathetic.
   70. Lassus Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:55 PM (#3450018)
Good lord, that wasn't even the most douchbaggy thing on that page. Twitter's pathetic.
   71. John (You Can Call Me Grandma) Murphy Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:56 PM (#3450020)
Stephen King may be a niche writer, but he is a tremendously skilled writer.* That a person doesn't write 500+ page metaphorical social commentaries or surreal literary acid trips says nothing about his skill as a writer, good or bad.


Ray Bradbury was one author that successfully walked that fine line between genre writing and literature.

BTW, King was really the guy that jump-started my love for fiction in the mid-'80s. Not that I didn't read any novels before that as a kid or teenager, but I actually started buying them regularly after picking up King's Night Shift in 1985.
   72. Dock Ellis on Acid Posted: January 29, 2010 at 08:57 PM (#3450022)
AFAIK, it's Bret's page. I'd been following him for awhile. I suppose it's possible it was hacked but that was posted 24 hours ago and has been retweeted by many.
   73. Lassus Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:01 PM (#3450024)
One of the most unusual literary friendships I've heard of: William Kennedy and Hunter Thomspon. WTF?

I'll defend King from here to the end. He is an amazing storyteller, which is an important skill that comes through even when his writing bricks.
   74. Dock Ellis on Acid Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:05 PM (#3450028)
Count me in as a King defender. I learned to read on him.
   75. Nasty Nate Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:06 PM (#3450032)
re: Steinbeck. I just read East of Eden, and I thought it was a big mess. I would have quit partway through but had nothing else handy to read at the time.
   76. Styles P. Deadball Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:11 PM (#3450039)
Steinbeck was hit-and-miss. The Grapes of Wrath is good and I liked East of Eden, but The Red Pony remains the worst piece of literature I've ever had the displeasure to read.


He was a peak guy.
   77. Tom Nawrocki Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:14 PM (#3450041)
“Salinger made a career out of being publicized for not seeking publicity,” Kinsella said. “It was controlled and planned, and it kept his name in the media for 50 years.”


Garry Trudeau once said he was baffled that it was considered arrogant for him to have no interest in making himself famous.
   78. Morty Causa Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:16 PM (#3450045)
“Salinger made a career out of being publicized for not seeking publicity,” Kinsella said. “It was controlled and planned, and it kept his name in the media for 50 years.”


Pure-d horseshit. Salinger did no such thing. The media did it all. He did nothing except refuse to take part. Kinsella's got a nice little epistemological whipsaw in mind, but that's all it is.
   79. Fred Lynn Nolan Ryan Sweeney Agonistes Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:16 PM (#3450048)
Also, since the movie version was brought up, everyone should read Leonard Gardner's Fat City -- the only novel the man made, pitch perfect neo-noir about rundown boxers. Even Denis Johnson acknowledges it as his daddy.


And, yes, the movie's terrific. John Huston, Stacy Keach, Jeff Bridges. I was lucky enough to catch a screening at the Castro Theatre in SF once, with Gardner there to talk about the whole production. Don't know if there's a commentary track on the DVD, but there should be, and there should be lots of great stuff on it.
   80. DL from MN Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:18 PM (#3450054)
I also read Shoeless Joe way before I read Catcher in the Rye. I liked Shoeless Joe better too.
   81. OsunaSakata Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:20 PM (#3450055)
Jack Kerouac bobblehead.

Most of my 10th grade English class hated Catcher in the Rye. Our teacher loved it, but didn't hold that against us.

In high school, I read The Hamlet, The Town and the Mansion AKA the Snopes Trilogy by Faulkner. Snopes is now best known as the urban legend web site.

Dhalgren by Samuel R. Delany meant a lot to me when I was 19.
   82. Fred Lynn Nolan Ryan Sweeney Agonistes Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:22 PM (#3450057)
Another King fan here. Read everything he'd written up to when I was in HS (1985 or so), and really liked his recent book "On Writing."
He's always had a knack for getting you to turn the page, and for the telling detail -- for example, realizing that he was an alcoholic when they started recycling in his household, and by midweek the bin was already full of beer cans (and nobody else in the house drank).
Being Stephen King, that same detail also apparently shows up in his most recent novel, about one of his characters. Because, hey: it works.
   83. Pasta-diving Jeter (jmac66) Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:23 PM (#3450059)
Garry Trudeau once said he was baffled that it was considered arrogant for him to have no interest in making himself famous.



as Tom Stoppard put it: "an essentially private man, who wished his total indifference to public acclaim to be universally recognized"
   84. Dock Ellis on Acid Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:24 PM (#3450061)
I agree with Morty. I don't know what benefit Salinger got from the publicity about his lack of publicity. Sure, his recluse added to his legend, but so would've publishing the stuff he was writing. Even if it sucked, everyone would be saying it's no Catcher.
   85. John (You Can Call Me Grandma) Murphy Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:25 PM (#3450062)
In high school, I read The Hamlet, The Town and the Mansion AKA the Snopes Trilogy by Faulkner.


I remember being really impressed with MacBeth, Beowulf and The Odyssey in HS.

The Reivers and Of Mice and Men were two more high school reads that I enjoyed, too.
   86. Sean Forman Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:26 PM (#3450065)
I have to say that the digressions are one of my favorite bbtf things. I'm not in to fiction much anymore, but I have to wonder if there are lit bboards where Kerouac and Salinger fans taunt each other regularly.
   87. Gaelan Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:27 PM (#3450067)
That's a nice quote from Bret Easton Ellis considering that American Psycho is easily the worst book I have ever read. There is a lot of room for disagreement about what counts and does not count as good literature. However there is no room for disagreement regarding the merits of American Psycho. It has none. Written by a man without intelligence or sensibility for barely literate infants incapable of discernment and taste. Complete and utter trash.
   88. robinred Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:28 PM (#3450068)
Of Mice and Men


Still gets me. This and GoW make Steinbeck an author I like, in spite of some of his other stuff not working for me.
   89. Bob Dernier Cri Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:33 PM (#3450077)
I have to wonder if there are lit bboards where Kerouac and Salinger fans taunt each other regularly

Not so much. Most of the literature forums feature bitter discussions of Ted Kluszewski vs. Joe Adcock.
   90. Lassus Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:33 PM (#3450078)
Dhalgren by Samuel R. Delany meant a lot to me when I was 19.

I know why Phillip K. gets all the attention, but Delany has always deserved it far more.


Most of my 10th grade English class hated Catcher in the Rye. Our teacher loved it, but didn't hold that against us. In high school, I read The Hamlet, The Town and the Mansion AKA the Snopes Trilogy by Faulkner. Snopes is now best known as the urban legend web site.

Hearing about all this stuff from other's peoples' curricula, I'm curious if my experience was more unique than I thought. Partially due to living in a town of 1400 people, and partially due to hiring incompetence, I had the same English teacher for three years in a row, 10th, 11th, and 12th grade. In 10th grade, we read Zindel's "Pigman", which was an awesome book for 12-year-olds. It rarely got any better from there (a random "Bovary" by accident and the MOVIE of Silas Marner) and I've blocked most of everything else out because of that. (In contrast, in 8th grade we read "Enemy of the People" and "Antigone".) I was homicidal by my senior year, and said some of the meanest things I've ever said to anyone in my entire life to that teacher. I made her cry in front of class. Twice.


[Re: Trudeau] As Tom Stoppard put it: "an essentially private man, who wished his total indifference to public acclaim to be universally recognized"

This quote again makes me think it is just way more about the person talking than the person they are talking about. And right in line with this, I've been a fan of Doonesbury since I was tiny, and I'd never heard of this tremendous eschewing of the public until quite recently.
   91. Gaelan Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:41 PM (#3450083)
I was homicidal by my senior year, and said some of the meanest things I've ever said to anyone in my entire life to that teacher. I made her cry in front of class. Twice.


Aaaahhh Lassus. We are more alike than you know.
   92. OsunaSakata Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:43 PM (#3450091)
I read The Snopes Trilogy for fun. I think Intruder in the Dust may be my favorite Faulkner, but I was required to read that.

I was also required to read Winter of Our Discontent by Steinback which was one I liked, but not usually mentioned.

Do the literary boards digress into baseball discussions?
   93. Dock Ellis on Acid Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:44 PM (#3450092)
The Catcher in the Rye, Anthem, The Great Gatsby, 1984, Childhood's End and some Shakespeare. That was my required reading in high school, other than the short stories in the textbooks.
   94. Designated Sitter (GGC) Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:45 PM (#3450093)
Kinsella, who is in his 70s, said he also is facing death because of failing kidneys and hopes to finish his own finale in the next couple years. "One last kick at the cat," he said.


Eric Enders once said Kinsella was a prick, but that sucks. I liked a few of his things.
   95. phredbird Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:46 PM (#3450094)
don't understand the dislike of steinbeck. i found GoW and east of eden incredibly moving. the ending of GoW had me depressed for days.

i'm pretty weirded out right now because i'm agreeing with morty on this thread. hating on salinger for his obsessive need for privacy is just ... misguided.

as Tom Stoppard put it: "an essentially private man, who wished his total indifference to public acclaim to be universally recognized"


um, that says more about stoppard than salinger.
   96. Fred Lynn Nolan Ryan Sweeney Agonistes Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:49 PM (#3450095)
By contrast, I didn't make it as far as senior year, but sophomore year my English teacher got tired of me not doing any work and making snarky comments all the time, so she said "You're so smart, why don't YOU teach the class?"
So I did -- a little section on non-Latin etymologies of English words. Hey, I was still a nerd, even if I didn't care at all about "A Separate Peace."

EDIT: grammar.
   97. Dock Ellis on Acid Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:50 PM (#3450097)
A Separate Peace! That was another one. No Faulkner, Melville or Hemingway, though.
   98. John (You Can Call Me Grandma) Murphy Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:53 PM (#3450102)
Forgot about Lord of the Flies. That might have been my favorite book that I read in HS.
   99. Dock Ellis on Acid Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:53 PM (#3450104)
Damn, Lord of the Flies, too. I wonder what else I've forgotten.
   100. Lassus Posted: January 29, 2010 at 09:55 PM (#3450107)
A Separate Peace! That was another one. No Faulkner, Melville or Hemingway, though.

8th grade, again. I'm going to have to consult some old friends to see if I can come up with some more of my high school reading. Nope, no Lord of the Flies.
Page 1 of 4 pages  1 2 3 4 > 

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Infinite Yost (Voxter)
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 0.5849 seconds
55 querie(s) executed