Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Should we ever use a complex ERA estimator?

KISS.

There’s a chance that the more complex estimators work better for special circumstances, like pitchers who change teams, throw a ton of groundballs, or are remarkably adept at keeping the ball in the yard. Also, they could add descriptive value over simply using the combination of FIP and batting average on balls in play, but I have yet to hear a really great argument explaining that fact.

What I can tell you though is that when a predictor is made more complex, it must add more predictive value, by a significant amount. If it does not, then my only response can be just two words:

Occam’s Razor.

Jim Furtado Posted: October 25, 2012 at 09:51 AM | 10 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: sabermetrics

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Drew (Primakov, Gungho Iguanas) Posted: October 25, 2012 at 09:58 AM (#4282854)
Why isn't the response, "Scrap it"?
   2. Mike Emeigh Posted: October 25, 2012 at 10:41 AM (#4282896)
What I can tell you though is that when a predictor is made more complex, it must add more predictive value, by a significant amount. If it does not, then my only response can be just two words:

Occam’s Razor.


Or maybe it's an indication that the underlying behavior is more complex that your simple model of the relationship.

-- MWE

   3. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: October 25, 2012 at 10:44 AM (#4282902)
What I can tell you though is that when a predictor is made more complex, it must add more predictive value, by a significant amount. If it does not, then my only response can be just two words:

Occam’s Razor.


I don't necessarily agree with this. All these FIP/xFIP etc are already way past the point that the avg. fans (even stat inclined) can calculate them himself. With modern computing power, who cares how complex it is?

If a full projection system like ZiPs/Oliver/Cairo is necessary to get the best estimate, why do I care if it's complex?
   4. DJS, the Digital Dandy Posted: October 25, 2012 at 11:03 AM (#4282917)

If a full projection system like ZiPs/Oliver/Cairo is necessary to get the best estimate, why do I care if it's complex?


Yeah, it's not like I make you guys run ZiPS! Whether you like or don't like the projections, for the end-user, the only complexity is looking at a website.
   5. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: October 25, 2012 at 11:36 AM (#4282942)

Yeah, it's not like I make you guys run ZiPS! Whether you like or don't like the projections, for the end-user, the only complexity is looking at a website.


Question, Dan. Is ZiPs a full blown regression/forecasting model?
   6. cardsfanboy Posted: October 25, 2012 at 12:49 PM (#4283007)
What I can tell you though is that when a predictor is made more complex, it must add more predictive value, by a significant amount. If it does not, then my only response can be just two words:


Is Fip better than component era by a significant amount? I thought it was barely noticeable difference.
   7. TomH Posted: October 25, 2012 at 01:54 PM (#4283102)
Tom's postulate:
differences in pitching projections are not primarily driven by differences in ERA estimator systems
differences in pitching projections are primarily driven by differences in change-over-time, park-and-defense effect adjustments, and possibly minor-league weighting of estimator systems

(edited)
   8. Tricky Dick Posted: October 25, 2012 at 02:19 PM (#4283117)
I like having all of the estimators available. I think the mistake is to fall in love with one particular estimator as the be all, end all method. My philosophy: look at all of the results and use your judgement in how to weight them. If one method produces an outlier result for a pitcher, think about why that may be the case, and either reject the outlier or use the outlier to temper your view of the other methods (depending on the circumstances).

Generally, FIP and x-FIP are pretty good (and produce similar results to SIERA or tERA), but I think there are occasions when factors like groundball tendency are important, and the more complex estimator may provide additional useful information.
   9. birdlives is one crazy ninja Posted: October 25, 2012 at 07:02 PM (#4283432)
Question, Dan. Is ZiPs a full blown regression/forecasting model?

I've heard Dan say that ZiPs relies on Monto Carlo simulations, which I believe doesn't rely upon any linear or non-linear regression models.
   10. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: October 25, 2012 at 09:35 PM (#4283667)
I've heard Dan say that ZiPs relies on Monto Carlo simulations, which I believe doesn't rely upon any linear or non-linear regression models.

How does he get the means and distributions for the simulations? i.e. how do you translate past stats into future probabilities w/o regression?

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

News

All News | Prime News

Old-School Newsstand


BBTF Partner

Dynasty League Baseball

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Guts
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogOTP 2018 Apr 23: The Dominant-Sport Theory of American Politics
(812 - 11:57pm, Apr 25)
Last: Misirlou doesn't live in the restaurant

NewsblogOT - 2017-18 NBA thread (All-Star Weekend to End of Time edition)
(2742 - 11:56pm, Apr 25)
Last: Tom Cervo, backup catcher

NewsblogOT: Winter Soccer Thread
(1627 - 11:38pm, Apr 25)
Last: Count Vorror Rairol Mencoon (CoB)

NewsblogRaissman: Mike Francesa returning to WFAN in the 3 pm - 7 pm time slot, sources tell News
(67 - 11:09pm, Apr 25)
Last: Stormy JE

NewsblogThere are lies, damn lies, and OMNICHATTER! for April 25, 2018.
(109 - 10:52pm, Apr 25)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogOT - Catch-All Pop Culture Extravaganza (April - June 2018)
(390 - 10:12pm, Apr 25)
Last: Fernigal McGunnigle

NewsblogVIDEO: Rockies Announcers Sound Like Complete Idiots Talking About Javier Baez
(42 - 8:08pm, Apr 25)
Last: bunyon

Gonfalon CubsRiding the Rails of Mediocrity
(27 - 7:45pm, Apr 25)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogKyle Schwarber hits 2 homers in Cubs' win
(27 - 7:36pm, Apr 25)
Last: Michael Paulionis

NewsblogRonald Acuna being called up by Braves | MLB.com
(52 - 7:33pm, Apr 25)
Last: Hank G.

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 1942 Ballot
(4 - 5:59pm, Apr 25)
Last: bjhanke

NewsblogTaking Back the Ballparks - Marlins voting thread
(15 - 5:31pm, Apr 25)
Last: Greg Pope

NewsblogThe unwritten rules of using a position player to pitch ... when you’re winning big
(81 - 3:48pm, Apr 25)
Last: David Nieporent (now, with children)

NewsblogPrimer Dugout (and link of the day) 4-25-2018
(51 - 2:42pm, Apr 25)
Last: Rennie's Tenet

Newsblog'Family' and sense of 'brotherhood' has Diamondbacks picking up right where they left off
(19 - 1:39pm, Apr 25)
Last: shoewizard

Page rendered in 0.1330 seconds
47 querie(s) executed