Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Should we ever use a complex ERA estimator?

KISS.

There’s a chance that the more complex estimators work better for special circumstances, like pitchers who change teams, throw a ton of groundballs, or are remarkably adept at keeping the ball in the yard. Also, they could add descriptive value over simply using the combination of FIP and batting average on balls in play, but I have yet to hear a really great argument explaining that fact.

What I can tell you though is that when a predictor is made more complex, it must add more predictive value, by a significant amount. If it does not, then my only response can be just two words:

Occam’s Razor.

Jim Furtado Posted: October 25, 2012 at 09:51 AM | 10 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: sabermetrics

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Drew (Primakov, Gungho Iguanas) Posted: October 25, 2012 at 09:58 AM (#4282854)
Why isn't the response, "Scrap it"?
   2. Mike Emeigh Posted: October 25, 2012 at 10:41 AM (#4282896)
What I can tell you though is that when a predictor is made more complex, it must add more predictive value, by a significant amount. If it does not, then my only response can be just two words:

Occam’s Razor.


Or maybe it's an indication that the underlying behavior is more complex that your simple model of the relationship.

-- MWE

   3. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: October 25, 2012 at 10:44 AM (#4282902)
What I can tell you though is that when a predictor is made more complex, it must add more predictive value, by a significant amount. If it does not, then my only response can be just two words:

Occam’s Razor.


I don't necessarily agree with this. All these FIP/xFIP etc are already way past the point that the avg. fans (even stat inclined) can calculate them himself. With modern computing power, who cares how complex it is?

If a full projection system like ZiPs/Oliver/Cairo is necessary to get the best estimate, why do I care if it's complex?
   4. DJS, the Digital Dandy Posted: October 25, 2012 at 11:03 AM (#4282917)

If a full projection system like ZiPs/Oliver/Cairo is necessary to get the best estimate, why do I care if it's complex?


Yeah, it's not like I make you guys run ZiPS! Whether you like or don't like the projections, for the end-user, the only complexity is looking at a website.
   5. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: October 25, 2012 at 11:36 AM (#4282942)

Yeah, it's not like I make you guys run ZiPS! Whether you like or don't like the projections, for the end-user, the only complexity is looking at a website.


Question, Dan. Is ZiPs a full blown regression/forecasting model?
   6. cardsfanboy Posted: October 25, 2012 at 12:49 PM (#4283007)
What I can tell you though is that when a predictor is made more complex, it must add more predictive value, by a significant amount. If it does not, then my only response can be just two words:


Is Fip better than component era by a significant amount? I thought it was barely noticeable difference.
   7. TomH Posted: October 25, 2012 at 01:54 PM (#4283102)
Tom's postulate:
differences in pitching projections are not primarily driven by differences in ERA estimator systems
differences in pitching projections are primarily driven by differences in change-over-time, park-and-defense effect adjustments, and possibly minor-league weighting of estimator systems

(edited)
   8. Tricky Dick Posted: October 25, 2012 at 02:19 PM (#4283117)
I like having all of the estimators available. I think the mistake is to fall in love with one particular estimator as the be all, end all method. My philosophy: look at all of the results and use your judgement in how to weight them. If one method produces an outlier result for a pitcher, think about why that may be the case, and either reject the outlier or use the outlier to temper your view of the other methods (depending on the circumstances).

Generally, FIP and x-FIP are pretty good (and produce similar results to SIERA or tERA), but I think there are occasions when factors like groundball tendency are important, and the more complex estimator may provide additional useful information.
   9. birdlives is one crazy ninja Posted: October 25, 2012 at 07:02 PM (#4283432)
Question, Dan. Is ZiPs a full blown regression/forecasting model?

I've heard Dan say that ZiPs relies on Monto Carlo simulations, which I believe doesn't rely upon any linear or non-linear regression models.
   10. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: October 25, 2012 at 09:35 PM (#4283667)
I've heard Dan say that ZiPs relies on Monto Carlo simulations, which I believe doesn't rely upon any linear or non-linear regression models.

How does he get the means and distributions for the simulations? i.e. how do you translate past stats into future probabilities w/o regression?

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

News

All News | Prime News

Old-School Newsstand


BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
The Piehole of David Wells
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogMLB Tonight: Jorge Posada | MLB.com
(23 - 6:42pm, Jan 21)
Last: snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster)

NewsblogOTP 16 Jan. 2017: The ‘honor’ Trumps politics in scheduling Cubs’ White House visit
(1866 - 6:39pm, Jan 21)
Last: Ray (RDP)

NewsblogEx-Astro Luis Valbuena reportedly agrees to deal with Angels - Houston Chronicle
(16 - 6:37pm, Jan 21)
Last: snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster)

NewsblogJayson Stark: Casting my 2018 Hall of Fame ballot ... today
(80 - 6:20pm, Jan 21)
Last: QLE

Hall of Merit2018 Hall of Merit Ballot Discussion
(112 - 6:13pm, Jan 21)
Last: Bleed the Freak

NewsblogHall of Fame's Rule of 10 should be changed | MLB.com
(74 - 6:03pm, Jan 21)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogOT - December 2016 NBA thread
(1212 - 5:50pm, Jan 21)
Last: PASTE does not get put on waivers in August

Newsblog2017 Baseball Hall of Fame election results | MLB.com
(196 - 5:33pm, Jan 21)
Last: Omineca Greg

NewsblogChris Russo thinks the latest selections have ruined Hall of Fame
(40 - 5:12pm, Jan 21)
Last: Howie Menckel

NewsblogOT - NFL stretch drive/playoffs (December 2016 - February 2017)
(622 - 4:12pm, Jan 21)
Last: Greg K

NewsblogThe Trumbo agreement, the ripple effect and what's next - School of Roch
(3 - 12:52pm, Jan 21)
Last: RMc's Yelling Mob of Hackmen

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 2000 Discussion
(25 - 11:18am, Jan 21)
Last: MrC.

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 2000 Ballot
(1 - 10:11am, Jan 21)
Last: Chris Fluit

NewsblogJosh Hamilton Prepared to Earn Spot on Rangers' Roster
(45 - 11:38pm, Jan 20)
Last: Sunday silence

NewsblogOrioles, Mark Trumbo agree to deal | MLB.com
(10 - 11:16pm, Jan 20)
Last: Infinite Yost (Voxter)

Page rendered in 0.2302 seconds
47 querie(s) executed