User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.1785 seconds
54 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. RobertMachemer Posted: October 02, 2008 at 07:38 PM (#2964867)I find it funny that the lead in talks about the suprising teams, and then admits that the formula wouldn't have accounted for the surprising teams either.
It would have been more work. That's a good default answer to use whenever you wonder why someone didn't do something.
This is just another version of the Bill James Playoff Prediction System which also was derived from past results and which also didn't actually work all that much better than flipping a coin. That's not to say that there might not be a system which does work, but one which basically ignores half the game? I don't buy it. I want to see it work better than a coin-flipping monkey on future events first.
Research I did on the Bill James Playoff Prediction System through 2003
Research I did on predicting playoff winners based on differences in won-lost records and projected won-lost records, through 2003.
probably, but usually they don't seem to mind the work. It's just somewhat annoying seeing your team getting bashed by everyone (keith law predicted the Mets beat the Cardinals in three games in a seven game series) and watching them judge the team solely based upon their regular season roster, not the roster they had in the series.
I mean it would be like judging the dodgers offense based upon their entire season, and not adjusting for the addition of Manny, Furcal, or even Blake.(except to count their numbers in the team numbers)
in the years that I care(otherwords the years my team is in it) I like to look at the teams rc/27 for their projected lineup and ra/era for their rotation and most likely used relievers and use that as a comparison for quality of the post season team, a 5th guy out of the pen isn't going to make a difference for the most part, the game is probably won or loss by the time he arrives into the game.
Because no one wants to be known as the gaywad who invented Adjusted Special Sauce?
Really? Are there baseball postseasons I'm not aware of?
Even in this age of expanded playoffs, there are at most 41 postseason games a year. Compare to the regular season where there are roughly 90 games a week, so that's less than half a week. Given the small number of postseason games in previous eras, I'm not sure you'd have one full season worth of games (today's standards) if you went back to the start of the WS.
If they analysed at the level of post-season series, I think you're talking fewer than 200 such series. If they analysed at the level of WS, you're talking just over 100.
One of the great punch lines of all time, regardless of the lead-in
Aah-zoom-ming ze horze eez sphreeerical ...
And even that doesn't tell you everything. The Dodgers, even with Manny, looked terrible in three games at Nationals Park.
"Less important" doesn't mean "irrelevant". Pitchers who get strikeouts and quality defense tend to counter or even negate two of the main aspects of offense; in-play hits and non-HR extra bases. What's left is HR power and the ability to get on base by means other than hits - that's still a considerable factor, as the White Sox and Dodgers have shown.
-- MWE
Agreed. At home, they hit 109 home runs, while on the road, they only managed to hit 105.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main