Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Monday, December 10, 2012

Sickels: George McClellan, Dayton Moore, and the Kansas City Royals

Dayton Moore is trying to avoid being McClellan. He’s got the farm system built up, the army trained and organized. He’s good at that. Now he’s taking the field of battle and deploying those forces. That’s admirable.

Of course, what’s the next part of the story? Is Moore going to turn into an aggressive, brilliant field commander like Ulysses S. Grant or William Tecumseh Sherman? Will he be cautious but effective like George Gordon Meade? Mercurial and erratic like Joe Hooker? Or will he be the well-meaning but dangerously inept Ambrose Burnside? The suicidally aggressive John Bell Hood?

Heinie Mantush (Krusty) Posted: December 10, 2012 at 08:25 PM | 621 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: civil war, history, rays, royals

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 7 of 7 pages ‹ First  < 2 3 4 5 6 7
   601. Ron J2 Posted: January 10, 2013 at 03:12 PM (#4344314)
#598 Rocket armed fighter-bombers were the weapon of choice in the west. (Though I recall reading an after action report saying that the allies considerably overestimated how effective these were)

Also, naval bombardments were extremely effective against strong static defensive points. Naval support pretty much prevents massive gathering of tanks.

In the action McCoy describes the Mayo came to within 500 yards of the coast and did indeed engage specific targets. The Brooklyn was much bigger and had many more guns (15 six inch guns as well as 8 five inch as opposed to the Mayo which I believe had only 5 five inch guns) but couldn't come in nearly as close as the Mayo.
   602. zonk Posted: January 10, 2013 at 03:14 PM (#4344317)
Rommel's experiences in North Africa made him extremely fearful of Allied air power. Thus, he wanted to position his forces so as to neutralize that as best he could. Rundstedt knew the invasion would be fast and hard, and he wanted to maintain a flexible response, and he feared naval bombardment. In truth, the Germans were between and a rock and a hard place. They were at the choose your poison stage, podnuh.

Was it his experience in North Africa -- or -- his own experience, but from the other end, in the invasion of France?

One of the other advantages the Wehrmacht had in 1940 was that their tank columns were able to call in air support via radio in then-amazingly quick timeframes (15 minutes to 45 minutes, depending on which sources you use). The allies didn't quite have that advantage during the Normandy landings but would once they were able to secure a few airstrips.
   603. Ron J2 Posted: January 10, 2013 at 03:15 PM (#4344319)
#600 Large guns were called in to specific map coordinates. As at Salerno, the destroyers worked much closer in and could potentially go after a specific target. (typically fixed emplacements like pillboxes_
   604. Ron J2 Posted: January 10, 2013 at 03:19 PM (#4344324)
#602 He talked about his own experience on the receiving end.

And during the Normandy campaign as long as the weather cooperated it was pretty common to have fighter-bombers lurking -- waiting for targets of opportunity (or to be called in). The allies often had more tactical air power than they could effectively use. The extreme example being Falaise -- where the fighter-bombers had to queue up waiting their turn to attack.
   605. zenbitz Posted: January 10, 2013 at 07:54 PM (#4344586)
The other thing restricting the German armor in Normandy was lack of fuel... but they could barely even move during the day because of the allied planes.
   606. McCoy Posted: January 11, 2013 at 05:10 PM (#4345227)
I've been on a war jag the last couple of weeks but I'm slowly running out of books to read. Wouldn't mind reading something about the Spanish American war but I can't seem to get my hands on any good ones. Also wouldn't mind reading some of Mosier's books but again I can't get my hands on any of them.
   607. Ron J2 Posted: January 11, 2013 at 05:24 PM (#4345242)
#605 The effectiveness of the resistance is generally overplayed, but they also did a good job here. I remember reading that Das Reich encountered so many sabotaged bridges and what have you that it took them more than two weeks longer than expected to reach Normandy.

   608. Johnny Sycophant-Laden Fora Posted: January 11, 2013 at 05:38 PM (#4345259)
Wouldn't mind reading something about the Spanish American war

My favorite thing I read about the Spanish American War was how during the Battle of Cavite/Manila, Gridley was worried that they were running low on ammo and wanted to do a weapons check, but Dewey didn't want to worry the crew, so he called off firing and had the gun crews go to breakfast...
   609. The Chronicles of Reddick Posted: January 11, 2013 at 05:43 PM (#4345263)
So what it sounds like was irregardless of what the Germans did, the Allies were going to be successful because of the amount of men and material they had. It was just going to be the question of how much casualties they were going to run into on that first day because there was no way the Germans would have been able to knock them off that beach head.

This link supposes what might have happened had it failed.
   610. The Chronicles of Reddick Posted: January 11, 2013 at 05:50 PM (#4345268)
   611. McCoy Posted: January 11, 2013 at 06:24 PM (#4345300)
It's possible that the Allies could have failed on D-Day but under the conditions they did fight the battle under it was highly unlikely that they would fail and we only know that because we get to look back in hindsight and have all the information from both sides.
   612. Johnny Sycophant-Laden Fora Posted: January 11, 2013 at 08:21 PM (#4345371)
It was just going to be the question of how much casualties they were going to run into on that first day because there was no way the Germans would have been able to knock them off that beach head.

Omaha went as badly as it was possible to go- the preliminary bombardment (both Naval and Aviation) completely missed- the shore defenses were untouched- but we still took and held the beach area (and even if we hadn't Omaha would have been untenable for the Germans after a few days anyway- we had 5 landing beaches and Point du Hoc - the Germans would have to have outright repelled at least 3 of those landings (if not all of them)to have chance- but they only came close at one.

Te Japanese defended quite few more naval landings than Germany, they eventually decided that defending the beach given our naval and air superiority was futile - so they adopted the "cornered rat" defense- which was basically designed to inflict as many casualties on us as possible- while simultaneously conceding that the battle was going to be lost. Bad strategy/tactics- if the enemy has naval and air superiority that does in fact make to tougher to repel the initial landing- but it ALSO make repelling it imperative- when the guy with air and naval superiority gets toehold- he's in fact won the damn war- you can never dislodge him and he can build up and build up without you being able to prevent it
   613. GGC don't think it can get longer than a novella Posted: March 07, 2013 at 07:37 AM (#4382647)
I see commercials for a movie about MacArthur starring Tommy Lee Jones.
   614. Ron J2 Posted: March 07, 2013 at 10:16 AM (#4382704)
#613 Interesting casting. I think it rates to work.
   615. Morty Causa Posted: March 07, 2013 at 10:31 AM (#4382715)
MacArthur, the general, has not been served well by cinema. I don't see that changing with this movie. Now, had Daniel Day-Lewis taken the role...? Part of the reason the MacArthur representations in film are unsatisfying is that MacArthur is not an easily accessible character like, oh, say, Patton.

Also, as to the movie's subject itself, I don't think MacArthur ever seriously considered doing away with the emperor. He thought the emperor had a real use. He understood what symbolism meant to a culture like Japan--indeed, he had been something of a symbol like that.
   616. zonk Posted: March 07, 2013 at 10:36 AM (#4382718)
Was this the thread that spawned some Diplomacy games?

If so - did anyone catch the news that Allan Calhamer, inventor of the board game -- died a week or so back?
   617. Esoteric Posted: May 02, 2013 at 10:32 PM (#4432542)
Sure, this thread is old. But it's still possibly one of the greatest OT threads in the history of Primer, at least for history buffs.
   618. Mayor Blomberg Posted: May 02, 2013 at 10:45 PM (#4432558)
what Eso quotes in 25 is straight out of the Faulkner playbook.

Withdrew in 12 years to assure compliance the law. Well, that's one way of euphemising it.
   619. GregD Posted: May 03, 2013 at 01:45 PM (#4433038)
Brooks Simpson came up in this thread and his blog post today shows what he can do when he is not distracted by stomping on every neo-Confederate commentator but instead shows his own analysis to argue that the decisions 150 years ago today in Mississippi have a better case to be turning points than the simultaneous action near Chancellorsville. link
   620. GGC don't think it can get longer than a novella Posted: October 11, 2013 at 09:11 PM (#4569692)
Sure, this thread is old. But it's still possibly one of the greatest OT threads in the history of Primer, at least for history buffs.

This is the last thread I ever bookmarked. It could be edited and published as an ebook.
   621. Esoteric Posted: October 20, 2013 at 11:42 PM (#4579254)
Still a great thread!
Page 7 of 7 pages ‹ First  < 2 3 4 5 6 7

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.



<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF


Thanks to
Randy Jones
for his generous support.


You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogOT: NBA Monthly Thread - April 2014
(292 - 2:56pm, Apr 17)
Last: Manny Coon

NewsblogOMNICHATTER for April 17, 2014
(27 - 2:55pm, Apr 17)
Last: CFBF Is A Golden Spider Duck

NewsblogPaine: Advanced Stats Love Jackie Robinson
(23 - 2:55pm, Apr 17)
Last: BDC

NewsblogOTP April 2014: BurstNET Sued for Not Making Equipment Lease Payments
(1501 - 2:52pm, Apr 17)
Last: The Id of SugarBear Blanks

NewsblogDaniel Bryan's 'YES!' chant has spread to the Pirates' dugout
(58 - 2:49pm, Apr 17)
Last: My name is Votto, and I love to get blotto

NewsblogGleeman: Mets minor league team is hosting “Seinfeld night”
(114 - 2:48pm, Apr 17)
Last: TerpNats

NewsblogDoug Glanville: I Was Racially Profiled in My Own Driveway
(235 - 2:48pm, Apr 17)
Last: Johnny Sycophant-Laden Fora

NewsblogOT: The NHL is finally back thread, part 2
(133 - 2:34pm, Apr 17)
Last: Mess with the Meat, you get the Wad!

NewsblogChris Resop - The Most Interesting Reliever in the World
(8 - 2:30pm, Apr 17)
Last: Jose Can Still Seabiscuit

NewsblogGeorge Brett, Inspiration for the Song “Royals”, Meets Lorde
(22 - 2:23pm, Apr 17)
Last: puck

NewsblogHartlaub: For the love of the snot rocket: Why Bumgarner’s Farmer John is good for baseball
(6 - 1:54pm, Apr 17)
Last: KT's Pot Arb

NewsblogPrimer Dugout (and link of the day) 4-17-2014
(11 - 1:49pm, Apr 17)
Last: Dan Lee prefers good shortstops to great paintings

NewsblogOrioles launch D.C. invasion with billboard near Nationals Park
(1 - 1:48pm, Apr 17)
Last: Joey B. is being stalked by a (Gonfa) loon

NewsblogMinuteman News Center: Giandurco: This means WAR
(65 - 1:37pm, Apr 17)
Last: DJS and the Infinite Sadness

NewsblogOMNICHATTER: Wednesday April 16, 2014
(107 - 1:35pm, Apr 17)
Last: The Chronicles of Reddick

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats





Page rendered in 0.1979 seconds
53 querie(s) executed