Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Wednesday, December 05, 2007

Statistically Speaking: What does John Smoltz throw?

Fast…very, very Mike Fast.

Smoltz’s fastball runs 91-95 mph and looks like a pretty garden-variety four-seam fastball, except for the fact, of course, that he can still get it up to 95 mph as a 40-year-old. Smoltz apparently is quite the athlete. He uses his fastball equally with lefties and righties, about 45% of his pitches.

To right-handed hitters, Smoltz features the slider prominently (44% of pitches), and he throws it in the 85-90 mph range. Lefties don’t see the slider nearly as often, only about 23% of the time.

Instead, to lefties, Smoltz works with the split-finger fastball and changeup. I had a bit of a hard time telling the two pitches apart, but the splitter seems to be thrown a little harder and with the spin axis tilted over a little more such that it has slightly more lateral and less vertical spin deflection than the changeup. The splitter runs 84-88 mph and is used almost exclusively to lefties (15% of pitches). The changeup runs 82-86 mph and is also used more to lefties (11%) than to righties (3%).

Finally, Smoltz mixes in a few curveballs in the 75-81 mph range, making up about 7% of his pitches.

Repoz Posted: December 05, 2007 at 12:00 PM | 6 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: braves, sabermetrics

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. joker24 Posted: December 05, 2007 at 01:07 PM (#2635174)
The circle graph is definitely the most intuitive way of displaying the data I've seen although he needs to throw some quantitative (by angle measures?) break x/y numbers on there...that and the pitch filter must suck as I doubt Smoltzie threw a 92 mph slider that ran into a righty.
   2. Mike Fast Posted: December 05, 2007 at 03:05 PM (#2635255)
Repoz, thanks for the link!

The circle graph is definitely the most intuitive way of displaying the data I've seen although he needs to throw some quantitative (by angle measures?) break x/y numbers on there


I'm glad you like it. I'll see about putting some angle numbers on there. I'm still working out the best way to do polar plots in Excel. Good suggestion. The break in terms of x-z is also dependent on the spin rate, and there's just no great way to plot three parameters on a 2-dimensional graph.

the pitch filter must suck as I doubt Smoltzie threw a 92 mph slider that ran into a righty.


I hope it doesn't suck too much since the pitch filter is me. :)

One of the reasons I looked at Smoltz is because I am investigating the slider and what that term is used to mean in baseball today. Some pitchers use it to describe something that moves more like a cutter, and Smoltz borders on that, but when he talks about his own repertoire, he calls it a slider, not a cutter (see http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20070515&content_id=1966438&vkey=news_mlb&fext;=.jsp&c_id=mlb).

The 91.8-mph "slider" in question was the 1-2 pitch to Chris Duncan in the bottom of the 1st inning in St. Louis on August 24. The PITCHf/x system records Smoltz as being fast in that game. I don't know whether that's accurate or a result of miscalibration, but it has his fastball running 95 mph to start that game, in which case a 92-mph slider is maybe a little more realistic. The Fox gun clocked that pitch at 90 mph. It was definitely one of his more cutter-ish pitches, but it moved much more like his sliders than it did his fastballs in that game, so I classified it with the sliders.
   3. joker24 Posted: December 05, 2007 at 03:51 PM (#2635325)
Haha I assumed you were using an algorithm. Maybe the Pitch F/X data sucked then haha.

I'd say the biggest issue with classifying slider vs. cutter vs. whatever is that pitchers "cut" their fastball but I wouldn't call it a cutter. #1 it's really hard to see from the behind the pitcher perspective that they did anything and then #2 just looking at the data it's not going to show up as a distinct cluster as the difference is tiny in numbers but big in missing the barrel i.e. it's going to be a continuum not a real separate pitch. Then you have the different types of sliders (power, slurvy, Lidge etc) and you really end up with a bunch of pitches that will be tough to say 'this is what a slider is' and such just from the data.

Just on my own visual observations, Homer Bailey comes to mind as a guy that really cuts his fastball and he should probably be easiest to detect with the data if it's possible (the Pitch F/X tool didn't register any cutters over at Baseball Analysts. I guess if I'm coming up with my definitions: Carpenter throws/threw the most distinguishable cutter in the non-Rivera division, Smoltz is the definition of a power slider and I dunno Andrew Miller's slider gets slurvy sometimes when it drops into the lower 80s (at least when he was at UNC).
   4. Mike Fast Posted: December 05, 2007 at 04:43 PM (#2635405)
I haven't found any algorithm that works very well unless you baby it a whole lot and are willing to do a lot of adjustments by hand, in which case, I'm not really sure it's an algorithm any more. I don't know if you're familiar with Josh Kalk's work--I'm guessing maybe yes, if that's what you mean by the PITCHf/x tool which Josh has running at Hardball Times. Josh is the only one who's published the results of an algorithm applied to every pitcher with a decent sample size, and I'd say his old algorithm misclassified about 30% of pitches. He doesn't have the player cards up for his new algorithm, but it appears to be doing a little better, so maybe there's some hope on that front. For example, his old algorithm completely missed both the curveball and the split-finger for Smoltz, now at least his new one finds the curveball.

When I do stuff by hand, I can hopefully knock the errors down under 5-10% in the worst case and sometimes very close to zero if the pitcher has only two or three very distinct pitches, like Joba Chamberlain, for instance.

With Smoltz, I'm pretty sure I'm missing the boat on some of his split-finger fastballs. I looked at the data on a game-by-game basis, but in most cases I did not look at individual pitches. If Smoltz threw a hard splitter early in the game, I may have confused it with a fastball from the end of the game where he's starting to lose a few mph. If I go back and check each pitch by hand, I can usually figure that out, or there are some automated methods I can apply to help me, but I don't always dig that deep depending on what I want from the data and how much time I want to spend. I'm also quite sure that I've confused some splitters and changeups since they move so similarly for Smoltz.

I like the idea of an algorithm in principle since who's going to have the time to look at every major league pitcher individually, but in practice the results of an algorithm are a very rough approximation and generally not good enough when you want to evaluate a specific pitcher.

I completely agree with your comments about there being different types of sliders and how many pitchers will sometimes put a "cut" on their regular fastball without throwing a distinct cutter as a separate pitch. That definitely lines up with what I see in the PITCHf/x data.

Thanks for your observations about who throws a distinct cutter. Those are some guys that I can look into. Rivera's cutter is obvious, if only because that's the pitch he throws 90% of the time and he can crank it up to 94. Other than Rivera, Greg Maddux was the only other guy I'd run across so far who threw the cutter as a distinct pitch.
   5. Corn On Ty Cobb Posted: December 11, 2007 at 09:00 AM (#2641107)
The pitch Smoltz throws to lefties that rides in on their hands is more cutter than slider. His slider to righties has way more downward tilt, whereas the pitch to lefties flatter; not completely flat but more so than his standard slider. Very Rivera-esque. He also occasionally throws the Maddux cutter that starts way inside and comes back over the inside corner against lefties. IMO, that's his least effective pitch, command wise. He often doesn't start it out far enough inside and it runs right out over the middle of the plate. Eep.

As someone who watched pretty much all of his starts last year, I can tell you he went away from the split sometime around midseason when his elbow was acting up (he always stops throwing his split when he's in pain, it's a dead giveaway and has been for years). He threw a lot more changeups as the season progressed.

Your description of the difference between his split and change-up is dead on. Well done.
   6. Mike Fast Posted: December 12, 2007 at 05:40 PM (#2642498)
Corn, thanks for your comments. It's very helpful to have insight from someone who's seen many games by a pitcher and paid attention to which pitches he was throwing.

My initial pass through the data didn't show much difference between lefties and righties in the pitch group I called the slider, except that the lefties didn't see it as often. Since I also didn't see a cutter mentioned in scouting reports on Smoltz or in comments he himself had made, I discounted the possibility of a cutter hiding in there.

However, now that I go back and look specifically for the pitches you are talking about, those that are thrown inside to lefties, I think I may see a signature of a cutter. I'll have to give it a more detailed look, but thanks much for your help.

Given this info, the 92-mph "slider" pitch that was mentioned previously was almost certainly a cutter, and many of the other 86+ mph "sliders" to lefties may also really have been cutters.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
1k5v3L
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogPrimer Dugout (and link of the day) 7-22-2014
(16 - 7:16pm, Jul 22)
Last: Eric J can SABER all he wants to

NewsblogOTP - July 2014: Republicans Lose To Democrats For Sixth Straight Year In Congressional Baseball Game
(2711 - 7:16pm, Jul 22)
Last: The Id of SugarBear Blanks

NewsblogAs shifts suppress offense, time has come to consider a rule change
(6 - 7:14pm, Jul 22)
Last: Pat Rapper's Delight

NewsblogRangers' Yu Darvish Pushes for a Six-Man Pitching Rotation - NYTimes.com
(11 - 7:07pm, Jul 22)
Last: Srul Itza

NewsblogMLB: Astros telecasts catching on to advanced metrics
(8 - 7:04pm, Jul 22)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogOT: Monthly NBA Thread- July 2014
(815 - 7:04pm, Jul 22)
Last: andrewberg

NewsblogChase Headley traded to New York Yankees from San Diego Padres - ESPN New York
(75 - 7:00pm, Jul 22)
Last: Baldrick

NewsblogFSAZ: D-backs cut off McCarthy’s cutter controversy
(25 - 6:59pm, Jul 22)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogMisremembering Mantle's Final Season
(46 - 6:53pm, Jul 22)
Last: Jolly Old St. Nick Still Gags in October

NewsblogTony Oliva turns 76; Gardenhire: 'He should be in hall of fame'
(41 - 6:44pm, Jul 22)
Last: Tubbs & Minnie Miñoso don't fear Sid Monge

NewsblogOT: The Soccer Thread July, 2014
(317 - 6:41pm, Jul 22)
Last: Darkness and the howling fantods

NewsblogThree Moves The Red Sox Should Make - Tony Massarotti - Boston.com
(26 - 6:18pm, Jul 22)
Last: Joe Bivens, Minor Genius

NewsblogTrading for Price would be right move for Cubs | FOX Sports
(69 - 5:57pm, Jul 22)
Last: SteveM.

NewsblogGeorge "The Animal" Steele Mangles A Baseball
(123 - 5:40pm, Jul 22)
Last: Canker Soriano

NewsblogOT: NBC.news: Valve isn’t making one gaming console, but multiple ‘Steam machines’
(673 - 5:32pm, Jul 22)
Last: TFTIO can't talk like this -- he's so sorry.

Page rendered in 0.2878 seconds
52 querie(s) executed