Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Saturday, March 26, 2011

Steinberg: MASN radio ads defend small ball, reject stats

“Sometimes, you believe in stats. Sometimes, you believe in players.” Sometimes you believe in taking a big ####### bite out of a gaffkaemia-jacked lobster sandwich.

If there’s a dichotomy between Jim Riggleman and the stats folks, the Nats’ manager isn’t necessarily trying to bridge the gap.

  How many ball games are won by one run? Last season, 732. A walk, a bunt, a well-placed single and a sacrifice fly. You call it small ball; I call it SMART ball.

  In baseball there’s a stat for every situation. Tie game, man on second, Ian Desmond at-bat. In day games, he’s batting .219. That’s what the stats say. Do you pinch hit for him? Absolutely not. Sometimes, you believe in the stats. Sometimes, you believe in the players.

Sure, and sometimes you order peanut-butter-and-jelly sandwiches and yet the waiter shows up with avocado rolls, I suppose. You call it a mistake. I call it a Mississippi.

Repoz Posted: March 26, 2011 at 04:04 PM | 11 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: announcers, media, nationals, sabermetrics

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Los Angeles El Hombre de Anaheim Posted: March 26, 2011 at 04:34 PM (#3778745)
As if the Nats had anyone better waiting on the bench.
   2. Kiko Sakata Posted: March 26, 2011 at 04:51 PM (#3778750)
In baseball there’s a stat for every situation. Tie game, man on second, Ian Desmond at-bat. In day games, he’s batting .219. That’s what the stats say. Do you pinch hit for him? Absolutely not. Sometimes, you believe in the stats. Sometimes, you believe in the players.


Of course, Riggleman's right here. Desmond's overall batting line was .270/.308/.392 which is almost certainly a better reflection of his "true talent" than the small-sample .219. Overall, NL pinch hitters batted .223/.293/.348 last year (and Nationals' pinch-hitters were worse). So, yes, Desmond is the better option there, without even getting into the issues of roster management (who then plays SS? who does that leave to PH for the pitcher later in the game?).
   3. PreservedFish Posted: March 26, 2011 at 04:57 PM (#3778754)
In day games, he’s batting .219. That’s what the stats say.


I have outgrown my annoyance at mother's basement jokes, at "you take the fun out of the game" criticisms, and at invocations of intangibles. But this characterization of statheadiness still bothers me.
   4. cardsfanboy Posted: March 26, 2011 at 05:00 PM (#3778756)
I have outgrown my annoyance at mother's basement jokes, at "you take the fun out of the game" criticisms, and at invocations of intangibles. But this characterization of statheadiness still bothers me.


agreed, what I find funny about those type of stats, is that those are the stats that tv announcers/radio announcers like to bring to the table, and those same people are the ones who belittle statheads.
   5. jwb Posted: March 26, 2011 at 05:43 PM (#3778775)
So you're saying that if the only stats you focus on are either dumb, small sample size relics, or both, you'll think any attempt to approach the game using stats is also dumb?
   6. Jim Wisinski Posted: March 26, 2011 at 06:02 PM (#3778781)
How many ball games are won by one run? Last season, 732. A walk, a bunt, a well-placed single and a sacrifice fly. You call it small ball; I call it SMART ball.


Ah, but how many games would have been decided by more than one run except the manager reduced the chances of a big inning with small-ball tactics? Or how many games failed to be tied up because the manager gave up outs and nothing happened anyway instead of allowing more batters the chance to do something?
   7. Brian Posted: March 26, 2011 at 07:08 PM (#3778797)
What Riggleman doesn't say is that in his scenario it's the first inning.
   8. Tripon Posted: March 26, 2011 at 07:24 PM (#3778805)
So 732 out of 4860 games were decided by one run? That's a fairly high 15.06% I suppose, but you'll still need more than the one run scores advocated by small ball. It would take at least 2 runs for the team on the losing side to go to winners in 'one run games'.

I'm guess what I'm saying that, if you're losing by one run, you probably want to go for a strategy that emphasizes scoring multiple runs. Its not good enough to tie, you need to win the game.
   9. TomH Posted: March 26, 2011 at 07:25 PM (#3778806)
if the single was well-placed, either the bunt or the sac fly was superfluous. Not very SMART, Jim!
   10. Dr. Vaux Posted: March 26, 2011 at 08:11 PM (#3778818)
I just learned from Rick Sutcliffe that the Rangers won the pennant last year by making outs.
   11. Dog on the sidewalk Posted: March 27, 2011 at 02:11 AM (#3778963)
Well then the Royals are going to be unstoppable this year.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

News

All News | Prime News

Old-School Newsstand


BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
James Kannengieser
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogBraves urge fans to plan as traffic test looms with exhibition game
(8 - 8:34pm, Mar 27)
Last: Los Angeles El Hombre de Anaheim

NewsblogTHE B/R Q&A: ROB MANFRED WANTS MLB TO 'OWN THE NEXT GENERATION' OF SPORTS FANS
(18 - 8:32pm, Mar 27)
Last: Brian C

NewsblogOTP 27 March 2017: Trump, Healthcare, and the Art of the Botched Deal
(203 - 8:31pm, Mar 27)
Last: PreservedFish

NewsblogOakland A's 'understand' Raiders need to move, remind us they need a new stadium
(3 - 8:23pm, Mar 27)
Last: Bote Man

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 2002 Discussion
(13 - 8:19pm, Mar 27)
Last: Moeball

NewsblogPrimer Dugout (and link of the day) 3-27-2017
(21 - 7:59pm, Mar 27)
Last: AndrewJ

NewsblogHeyman: Cardinals, Molina Making Big Progress Toward Extension
(2 - 7:58pm, Mar 27)
Last: The Duke

NewsblogTwins' attempt to chart fatigue raises concerns with players union
(19 - 7:40pm, Mar 27)
Last: Like Flies On Sherbert

NewsblogOT: March-April 2017 Soccer Thread
(173 - 7:07pm, Mar 27)
Last: madvillain

NewsblogCleveland Indians 2017 opening day roster projections: Paul Hoynes | cleveland.com
(11 - 6:41pm, Mar 27)
Last: Edmundo got dem ol' Kozma blues again mama

NewsblogWong would rather be traded than platoon at second base
(10 - 5:37pm, Mar 27)
Last: RMc's Yelling Mob of Hackmen

NewsblogTiebreaker, intentional walk rules added to minor league games
(27 - 5:30pm, Mar 27)
Last: RMc's Yelling Mob of Hackmen

NewsblogOT - March 2017 NBA thread
(887 - 5:29pm, Mar 27)
Last: . . . . . . . . . .

NewsblogRaul Mondesi wins starting second base job for the Royals
(34 - 5:11pm, Mar 27)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogWill teams blow White Sox away for Jose Quintana?
(4 - 5:00pm, Mar 27)
Last: snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster)

Page rendered in 0.6738 seconds
47 querie(s) executed