The Civil War helped facilitate the spread of the “New York game” as soldiers idled away time in camp, prisons, and even the front lines. Just as other social organizations, such as fireman units, enlisted together, so to did some baseball clubs. On April 5, 1861 the Jefferson Base Ball Club demonstrated their dedication to the Union by erecting a flag pole at their regular Franklin Square playing grounds at 14th and I Streets NW.
Amongst the thousands of New York troops arriving in Washington in 1861 were baseball players who brought their New York game with them. Naturally, matches between regiments soon ensued. An item in the Washington National Republican on June 28, 1861 announced a game to be played between New York units and hinted at the future NY Yankees/Giants-Brooklyn Dodgers rivalries:
“BASE BALL MATCH- There will be a match played at Camp Wool on tomorrow afternoon at 4 o’clock, between the first nine of the Baldwin B.B. Club (Co. D) and the first nine of the Steers B.B. Club (Co. E). Those interested in the noble game of base ball are invited to witness the contest. As the above clubs are composed of some of the best players of Brooklyn and New York, it is expected that the game will be very interesting.”
There were also matches between various New York units and the local Washington clubs The New Yorkers usually won these matches by lopsided scores such as when members of the New York 71st Regiment beat the Nationals 42 to 13 on July 12, 1861. However, the Nationals got revenge a year later, defeating the 71st 28-13 on August 7, 1862. The rematch brought out a large number of spectators, including a number of women, and guards from the regiment were posted to keep the crowds from encroaching on the playing field.
For civilians, watching a base ball match in the capital had the added advantage of being a wee bit safer than holding a picnic during the fireworks at Bull Run!
H/T Sarah S.
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. TerpNats Posted: August 29, 2011 at 04:53 PM (#3911449)edit: according to this http://thefatherlife.com/mag/2009/08/02/the-150th-anniversary-of-the-box-score/ it was in 1859.
True enough. However, as historians like Peter Morris (BUT DIDN'T WE HAVE FUN?) insist, the Civil War also decimated the lineups of most town ballclubs in both the North and South; by the end of the 1860s, amateur town clubs were on their way out.
Yeah, the Nationals were the first to adopt the use of contrabands, and they had a competitive advantage for awhile.
Published reports at the time of the decision indicated that Selig pushed hard for the relocated Expos to be called the Senators, but the DC government vetoed it as unrepresentative of current Washington, DC. Since they were paying for the stadium, and there wasn't any local ownership, they got their way on that.
I'm pretty sure they have Senators when Congress is in session.
And if one replies that they are not citizens of the District, well, they are still part of the scenery, like the Rays of Tampa and the Diamondbacks of Arizona. The local wildlife, as it were.
I recommend A Game of Inches and But Didn't We Have Fun? both by Peter Morris (as noted in 4 above). A Game of Inches is a catalog of baseball "firsts", informative and well organized.
The Bill James Historical Baseball Abstract has a good overview decade-by-decade.
edit: according to this http://thefatherlife.com/mag/2009/08/02/the-150th-anniversary-of-the-box-score/ it was in 1859.
According to A Game of Inches and other sources, the box score dates back to 1845:
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B01E7D71230F931A35757C0A9609C8B63
See also:
http://baseballhistoryblog.com/1173/first-known-box-score/
and
http://thornpricks.blogspot.com/2008_03_01_archive.html
I thought they would go with "Grays". It's not exactly a thrilling moniker, but at least it has one hell of a history. I'm surprised they didn't choose it. "Nationals" is ultra-mega-bland. I guess it beats "Wizards" though.
I recommend A Game of Inches and But Didn't We Have Fun? both by Peter Morris (as noted in 4 above). A Game of Inches is a catalog of baseball "firsts", informative and well organized.
I also like John Thorn's recent book Baseball in the Garden of Eden.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main