Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Subtraction,com: Watching Yankees Spending

I’ve always thought, too, that vilifying the Yankees payroll was a perspective that lacked dimension. Yes, it’s a consistently stratospheric number, but isn’t it significant, too, that by making their home in New York the Yankees are at the epicenter of the biggest baseball market on the planet? The team franchise has a payroll that’s commensurate with its huge valuation, if nothing else.

However, as a counter-argument, declaring the team a victim of its own incredibly lucrative circumstances seems equally one-dimensional. So I wondered recently if it might also be true that the Yankees are not just big spenders, but big investors, as well. Anecdotally at least, I knew that their single-minded dedication to winning championships year after year no matter the cost stands in contrast to the perpetual inefficiencies I’ve heard about at other clubs, where owners routinely pocket revenues from the so-called “luxury tax” that they receive from free-spending teams like the Yankees, rather than re-investing the money in talent.

So I dug around a bit online and compiled some figures, dumped them into Excel and found that, relative to the value of their franchise, the Yankees actually invest a fairly high percentage of their revenues directly in their payroll.

Ignore the improper description of the MLB luxury tax, and this is an interesting overview — using the rough numbers available — at how MLB teams re-invest in the on-field product at the Major League level.

NaOH Posted: November 10, 2009 at 04:16 AM | 4 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: business, teams

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Avoid running at all times.-S. Paige Posted: November 10, 2009 at 05:52 AM (#3383787)
Not that I know business at all, but I would expect the Yanks to be at the top of the list since their insane revenue numbers provide the opportunity for insane profit margins. An 80% reinvestment of $10 revenue allows for a $2 profit. An 80% reinvestment of $100 allows for a $20 profit. In other words, it would seem high revenue teams have greater room to reinvest at high percentages since their take-aways will be larger. I feel I'm missing something here and being overly simplistic. I guess the point is that I'm not impressed by the Yanks' reinvestment percentage, and I'm a Yanks fan.
   2. SteveF Posted: November 11, 2009 at 11:57 AM (#3384727)
This would be a great study if we had any reason to believe the revenue numbers were accurate. Baseball teams have an incentive to misrepresent their revenues, especially from television. The Red Sox have historically done so with NESN, and I can only assume other teams that own the cable outlets that broadcast their games do as well.
   3. zonk Posted: November 11, 2009 at 02:36 PM (#3384753)
The Red Sox have historically done so with NESN, and I can only assume other teams that own the cable outlets that broadcast their games do as well.


It's going to be VERY interesting to see what happens when the Cubs' current broadcast contracts expire. It's no secret that the Ricketts would like to set up some sort of YES type deal... and for a real rarity, the Tribco actually has admitted in the past that the radio deal between the Cubs and WGN (both Tribco entities) is below market value.

I could foresee a messy breakup on its way -- add to that, one of the broken hearted being a media empire, perhaps then with an axe to grind and full, based on actual internal experience, knowledge of exactly what a team DOES make off of broadcast rights...
   4. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: November 11, 2009 at 03:42 PM (#3384805)
One of the interesting things about this list is how much revenue even "small market" teams bring in. If you look at the team with the least revenue on this list (the Marlins), they're at $139,000,000, and that's assuming that they're not hiding any revenue, which they probably are.

And that's a team that's owned by Jeff Loria, that's actively trying to undermine the value of their franchise in an attempt to get a publicly-funded stadium, that doesn't care whether or not they win. Revenue numbers go up pretty quickly from Florida.

I understand that player salaries aren't the only expenses that Major League teams have, but looking at this list, I have an even harder time believing that there are really big league teams that "can't afford" $80-90 million payrolls.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
aleskel
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 0.1776 seconds
57 querie(s) executed