Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

The Believer - Interview with Kevin Goldsmith

No, this is not an Onion article; this exists.

Conceptual poet Kenneth Goldsmith’s work is simultaneously among the most mundane and the most maddeningly provocative writing being done today.

A few years ago, I published a super-boring book that was a radio transcription of a Yankees–Red Sox game. I included everything that was on the radio, from the pre-game show to the ads to the broadcast-booth patter.

. . . .

When the book was published, I sent a copy to the Yankees organization. Naturally, I never heard from them.

Clearly, Goldsmith missed his true calling as a court reporter, instead of a “conceptual poet.”

The Fallen Reputation of Billy Jo Robidoux Posted: November 29, 2011 at 11:27 PM | 8 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: books, yankees

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Bob Evans Posted: November 30, 2011 at 01:51 AM (#4003296)
For his next work, he's going to sample Moby-Dick.
   2. akrasian Posted: November 30, 2011 at 05:00 AM (#4003390)
Let's not forget his work, Day for which he retyped the entire contents of an issue of the New York Times. In the article, Goldsmith admits that "My books are better thought about than read. They’re insanely dull and unreadable"

Not to mention basically transcriptions of copyrighted material (owned by others).
   3. Jim (jimmuscomp) Posted: November 30, 2011 at 06:51 AM (#4003427)
Damn. What a friggin' racket. Those of us actually CREATING art can't get any press and this jerk-off gets press for typing up previously published material?

Amazing.
   4. Jesse Barfield's Right Arm Posted: November 30, 2011 at 02:56 PM (#4003526)

Not to mention basically transcriptions of copyrighted material (owned by others).

Those of us actually CREATING art can't get any press and this jerk-off gets press for typing up previously published material?


Man, you guys would be no fun to be around. This kind of thing is great - almost more fun because of the petty reactions it produces. I think the most valuable part of conceptual art is that it's a great litmus test of interesting people, meaning those people who can accept things that simply make no sense in any conventional economic or rational way.

I'm also guessing he's not bothered by copyright, considering he teaches a course on "poetic practice and the art of plagiarism."

Great stuff!
   5. akrasian Posted: November 30, 2011 at 03:20 PM (#4003543)
I'm also guessing he's not bothered by copyright, considering he teaches a course on "poetic practice and the art of plagiarism."

Time to scan his "works", and call the released edition "Copies of Kevin Goldsmith"

I'm wondering - does every student in his class just turn in the same term paper?
   6. Greg K Posted: November 30, 2011 at 03:37 PM (#4003557)
It's like retrosheet but better!

My books are better thought about than read. They’re insanely dull and unreadable

This is usually my reaction to the craze for really terrible movies. Sure, the IDEA of a whole movie based on a grudge match between a giant crocodile and a giant octopus is kind of amusing, but to sit through 2 hours of it seems like a bit more dedication than the joke deserves. I guess I'd say I find conceptual art interesting, but if you dropped the art and just had a discussion of the concepts I'd probably find it just as ineresting. But then again I've always had a firmer grasp on words than visuals...to each his own.
   7. Non-Youkilidian Geometry Posted: November 30, 2011 at 04:22 PM (#4003605)
I guess I'd say I find conceptual art interesting, but if you dropped the art and just had a discussion of the concepts I'd probably find it just as ineresting.

I agree. I thought his interview was fairly interesting and thought-provoking, but I'm not sure it makes any difference to me whether or not the books he discusses having written actually exist. I suppose it makes some difference that he *claims* to have actually written them, since contemplating the possibility that he has actually wasted his time on an utterly pointless task like copying an entire issue of the NY Times affects my thinking -- it would be less thought-provoking if he had merely discussed the concept of the books as a thought experiment about something an imaginary conceptual artist might do. But since I have no interest in or intention of ever actually looking at his books, it doesn't really matter to me if he is lying about actually having written them.
   8. Jesse Barfield's Right Arm Posted: November 30, 2011 at 07:52 PM (#4003873)
I thought his interview was fairly interesting and thought-provoking, but I'm not sure it makes any difference to me whether or not the books he discusses having written actually exist.


Agree with this agreement. I think it's more interesting to see these ideas in the context of a piece of fiction, which is in itself actually fun to read. Say, Borges or Phillip K. Dick, who invent all kinds of interesting ideas without being so literal as to actually do them. That way you get to think about cool things and get a good read. In this case, the interview itself.

In any case, it's probably a more interesting world than not to have one guy who types out a transcript of a complete Yankees game.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Randy Jones
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogOT: Soccer June 2015
(1423 - 6:50am, Jul 31)
Last: Swedish Chef

NewsblogJon Heyman on Twitter: "carlos gomez and mike fiers go to houston"
(6 - 6:40am, Jul 31)
Last: Harveys Wallbangers

NewsblogOTP - July 2015: Winning the Political Game: Politics is More Like Baseball Than Football
(6083 - 5:49am, Jul 31)
Last: The Id of SugarBear Blanks

NewsblogMets-Brewers nix deal for Carlos Gomez | MLB.com
(17 - 4:42am, Jul 31)
Last: Drexl Spivey

NewsblogTrade Chatter - 2015 Deadline
(508 - 4:18am, Jul 31)
Last: Shibal

NewsblogLookout Landing: Ackley Traded to Yankees for Flores and Ramirez
(6 - 3:26am, Jul 31)
Last: Shibal

NewsblogOT: Monthly NBA Thread - July 2015
(1703 - 1:50am, Jul 31)
Last: tshipman

NewsblogKeith Law - ESPN (Insider) - Phillies effectively reload their farm system with Cole Hamels deal
(6 - 1:41am, Jul 31)
Last: Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad)

NewsblogDodgers To Acquire Latos, Wood, Jim Johnson In 3-Team Deal; Olivera To Braves - MLB Trade Rumors
(80 - 1:33am, Jul 31)
Last: Squash

NewsblogPirates acquire Joakim Soira from Tigers | MLB.com
(4 - 1:11am, Jul 31)
Last: Petunia inquires about ponies

NewsblogOMNICHATTER 7-30-2015
(116 - 12:28am, Jul 31)
Last: just plain joe

Newsblog10 Major Trades that Never Were
(5 - 12:18am, Jul 31)
Last: Dog on the sidewalk

NewsblogLet’s make a steal | NBC SportsWorld
(10 - 10:31pm, Jul 30)
Last: Mike Webber

NewsblogBaseball Hall of Fame to eliminate some inactive voters
(68 - 10:09pm, Jul 30)
Last: Ziggy

NewsblogRangers Get a New Ace in Cole Hamels
(34 - 9:39pm, Jul 30)
Last: Roger McDowell spit on me!

Page rendered in 0.1922 seconds
48 querie(s) executed