|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Sunday, May 11, 2008
Or as Maury sez…“Can’t find a business with this name, but what if “4 out of 5 Dentists” got deal?”
One thing that was not mentioned, possibly due to the hot-button nature of it, has been the possible selling of naming rights to The Friendly Confines. As Kurt Hunzeker and I noted in The Curse of the Ex-Wrigley Field, any company looking to purchase the secondary naming rights for Wrigley would find it nearly impossible for anyone to think of Wrigley Field as, well, anything other than “Wrigley Field”. While secondary naming deals have been able to get out from under the original name’s recognition (best example would be the short-lived Enron Field which is now Minute Maid Park), Wrigley would nearly impossible. As we wrote in Curse, “Hyatt Field? Gatorade Field? State Farm Field? Blue Cross Blue Shield Field? None of them work.”
Beyond the financial implications (based upon Hunzeker’s research, using the Mets Citigroup naming deal as a barometer, a secondary naming deal for Wrigley would run -276 percent of value based on Wrigley’s longstanding history as a name), the political realities of those immersed in the purist and traditional world that baseball, and more importantly, the Cubs hold, show that a complete renaming of Wrigley Field would create a backlash the likes of which the Cubs may have never seen before.
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: Carlos Pena defies the traditional numbers (1 - 10:43am, May 26)Last: Bob Dernier CriNewsblog: Wilmoth: Nate McLouth Designated For Assignment (15 - 10:42am, May 26)Last: DL from MNNewsblog: HP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind (62 - 10:40am, May 26)Last: Bob Dernier CriNewsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread, May 2012 (1836 - 10:37am, May 26)Last:  Famous Original Joe CNewsblog: Matschulat: Did I Miss The "Paul Konerko Is So Overrated OMG" Bandwagon? (35 - 10:33am, May 26)Last: Bob Dernier CriHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1973 Discussion (16 - 10:29am, May 26)Last: DL from MNNewsblog: Maddon on Red Sox beaning Luke Scott: 'I think it's ridiculous, I think it's absurd, idiotic' (13 - 10:22am, May 26)Last: Crispix AttacksNewsblog: Berardino: Heath Bell says he’s no meathead (2 - 10:15am, May 26)Last: Best Regards, Larry M.Hall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1972 Ballot (30 - 10:10am, May 26)Last: DL from MNNewsblog: YESNetwork: A look at five Yankees' cases for enshrinement in Monument Park (4 - 9:38am, May 26)Last: SOLockwoodSox Therapy: A Winning Ballclub? (21 - 8:34am, May 26)Last: DarrenNewsblog: The Hall of Very Good: Former Cards Slugger Critical of "LaRussa's Regime" (6 - 7:16am, May 26)Last: Shooty: Applying to be Fearless LeaderNewsblog: CSN to host ‘Phillies at the Beach’ on Memorial Day (19 - 7:11am, May 26)Last: GodNewsblog: T.R. Sullivan: Of Frank Robinson, Milt Pappas and Jim Palmer (10 - 7:09am, May 26)Last: GodNewsblog: Bud Selig -- No need for more MLB replay for now - ESPN (88 - 6:12am, May 26)Last: Lassus
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Guy LeDouche Posted: May 11, 2008 at 10:26 PM (#2777022)Different situation with the owner of the team slapping his name on the stadium, but still.
Wrigley Field it shall remain for the great Guy LeDouche.
semantics
I dunno, I wouldn't put anything past those chickenshlt radio broadcasters or TV networks, although at some point they might succumb to ridicule.
And even the papers are hypocrites about this. For all the complaints about Candlestick becoming Whatever.com Park, I don't recall the news stories sticking with Candlestick for very long. Wrigley might turn out to be different, but I wouldn't bet the farm on it.
Is Comiskey still Comiskey?
U.S. Cellular Field has a couple things going for it:
1) The money brought in by the naming rights purchase was used to transform the park. U.S. Cellular Field is a different place than Comiskey Park, in terms of the experience.
2) The second Comiskey Park was awkwardly named in and of itself. People called it Comiskey, New Comiskey, Comiskey II, and Sox Park.
Those don't apply to Wrigley's situation.
As is/was the William Wrigley Jr. Company, the Wrigley Building, Wrigley's Spearmint, and the other Wrigley Field. It's no less a brand name than Wal-Mart.
Edit: and if there were a Coke Stadium, I would buy Guts a box seat ticket.
I'm a little shocked that Selig and Company didn't find a way to name Nationals Park "Coke Stadium"... they rarely miss a chance to be racially insensitive.
Busch the stadium predates Busch the beer? Color me shocked.
I don't think so. There are probably some people who have no idea the two are connected. Moreover, I think folks are far more likely to hear Wrigley Field and make no connection to the chewing gum. That's a lot more difficult to do with U.S. Cellular Field or Minute Maid Park. Those two are more ungainly names for a baseball stadium, but better names for brand awareness.
Really? I mean, I take your point in this, that when you hear "US Cellular Field" or "Minute Maid Park", you're not likely to think they're named after Jim US Cellular, but I can't really imagine not thinking Wrigley is Wrigley. How many Wrigleys do you know?
The lesson being:
If some company wants to buy the rights to call themselves Wrigley: OK
If some company wants to but the rights to name the stadium after themselves: Not OK.
I'm not saying most people wouldn't make the connection if they took the time to think about the origins of the park's name. I'm saying more people don't take the time to think about where the name came from, and therefore miss the connection. That simply can't happen with a park named after an unmistakable brand name. (I can say from experience that it can happen with more vague brand names. I didn't realize the United and Delta centers were named after the airlines, since they happened in the infancy of the modern naming rights, until Phoenix opened up the America West Arena).
Sure, but the Wrigley name probably carried more weight when it was getting slapped on everything in the 1920s.
As long as my DNA isn't getting patented, and no one sends me junk mail, I'm perfectly OK with a company doing whatever the hell they want to.
Okay, good point. I was the same about the United Center. I had no idea it was named after United Airlines.
How many lay folk refer to the Rangers park as Ameriquest Field or the Indians park as Progressive Field? Not too many, I'd guess, which is the main point.
From the point of view of the sponsors, having the media refer to the park as "___ at Wrigley Field" won't have nearly the bang for the buck as having the public know it by that name. In the case of Wrigley, that may never happen; at the very least, it will be several years of a lousy investment before it begins to gain positive name recognition.
I agree.
Furthermore, the fact that the company is named Wrigley and the stadium is named Wrigley is coincidental. AFAIK, there is no evidence that the name of the park was changed to connect with the gum company at all. It's like Carnegie Hall -- I don't believe anyone really thinks that Carnegie Steel owned "naming rights." The concept didn't exist. Both were named after one guy.
I thought he named it after his wife....
Sorry.
Best Regards
John
P.S. I don't mind Minute Maid Park since it spawned a pretty good nickname ... The Juice Box. The Tribe still plays at the Jake AFAIC and it's still TBiA in Texas. Personally, when they renamed the Skydome they should have used it as a chance to honour a great Canadian sports figure--Conn Smythe. The Conn-Dome would be perfect considering the Jays' offense are playing like they can't get their lumber unwrapped.
Their evil plan is working! "Ned? Ned <u>Ryerson</u>?"
Great name for a ballpark.
To me, the lesson is that if you want to get in on the naming rights, you should do it before/as the stadium is being built. Renaming an existing park is pretty costly for the name-recognition you're looking for.
It's really not very much money for the types of businesses that buy them. For example, Progressive will pay $58M over 16 years, that's nothing to a company that size (their 2007 revenues were over 14B). Insurance companies and banks provide pretty fungible services, so getting the name out is really all they have.
I dunno. "Pengrowth Saddledome" has to be in the running. Really there are a lot of candidates.
How many of the old civic/community stadium names are left? Soldier Field is the only one I can think of that has a non-profit community-oriented name, unless that's been renamed lately too. HHH and RFK are still going too, though barely ...
IIRC, they were on the verge of selling the naming rights (to help offset the cost of the recent renovations), but after 9/11, they didn't think it would be politically viable.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main