Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Saturday, August 02, 2008

The Book Blog: Tango: Edgar

Tingo Tango! A HOF case for Edgar Martinez…one of these winters.

In short, in order for Edgar to compile a batting career like Wade Boggs, he’d have to hit for 3 more seasons at far below average.

Is it that important to “compile” data in order to prove your overall worthiness of a hitter?  DH or no DH, if Edgar got to 3000 hits, he’d be in.  And if Edgar sucked for 3 years, he’d reach the equivalent of Wade Boggs.

Edgar got his 1000th PA 3 years after Wade Boggs got his.  The only difference between the two is that Boggs proved he had the better glove, but Boggs also managed to play a large portion of his career at Fenway Park.

To deny Edgar the HOF is to admit igorance.  Then again, Edgar will have good company with Tim Raines.

Repoz Posted: August 02, 2008 at 11:28 AM | 212 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: hall of fame, history, mariners

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 3 of 3 pages  < 1 2 3
   201. Francoeur Sans Gages (AlouGoodbye) Posted: August 07, 2008 at 04:03 AM (#2893718)
This is the point. The replacement pool for CF, LF, RF is identical... it's one pool.
Yes it's one pool but there are a bunch of different people in the pool, with different attributes - this is the point.

Let's say there's a guy called Mo Ramirez, Manny's light-hitting cousin. He's league average with the bat, and -2 wins with the glove in left field. Then there's Cito Beltran, Carlos's light-hitting cousin. He's -4 wins with the bat, and +1.5 wins with the glove in left field. Both are in the replacement-player pool for OFs. And we know that if we put a guy from LF into CF he gets twice as many chances in the field so his fielding rate stats double in value. He doesn't get any extra ABs, of course. Well, in LF Mo is a -2 win player, while Cito is -3 wins. But in CF Mo is a -4 win player, while Cito is -1 win. So if we need to replace our LF we'll call up Mo, but if we need to replace our CF we'll call up Cito.

So although the pool is identical the replacement level is different for CF and LF.

Doubling the value of your fielding rate stats is for demonstration purposes only, obviously. You can make it whatever factor you like. But the point is that it is multiplicative.
   202. Blackadder Posted: August 07, 2008 at 11:05 AM (#2893800)
Dan, I think I should be the one thanking you! I have learned a tremendous amount from your research and writing, both about how to properly value baseball players throughout time and the history of the game. I would like to add my voice to those encouraging you to take your research to a more public forum when you are satisfied with it. Among the "casual sabermetric" crowd--the people who read a little Bill James, a little Baseball Prospectus, but aren't total obsessives like us--you hear WARP3 and WS and all sorts of other silly stats getting thrown around all the time. I think it would do a lot of good for general baseball discourse to have an Uber-stat as good as your WARP to refer to. My one piece of advice, should you choose to do so, is to find a different name for it; otherwise, you are just begging for confusion.

I don't know Tango, position-switching in general makes me nervous. Related to a point that AlouGoodbye made about SS and DH, I would expect it to be badly intransitive. I would expect the SS to 1B gap you would see by going SS to CF to LF to 1B to be very different from what you would see by simply swapping all 1B and SS (I am now trying to picture Prince Fielder doing an Ozzie Smith-style backflip...) The reason for that is, at most positions, you see a biased sample of players going between positions, and the more steps you need, the more bias that gets introduced. In general, an empirical based replacement level seems preferable.

Having said that, in the CF to LF/RF situation, position switching does seem more compelling; I don't have a settled opinion on the matter. I'll think about it more.
   203. Tango Posted: August 07, 2008 at 11:22 AM (#2893801)
Alou, definitely if you consider that the CF gets 33% more chances, then we need to include that in the translation. It's not a straight additive translation necessarily. It could be, but we don't know.

Blackadder: right, baby steps. Let's focus on OF first. Then you can do IF. Then OF/1B and IF/1B. Then OF/IF. We have the Fans Scouting Report so we know the kind of players that move around.
   204. Chris Dial Posted: August 07, 2008 at 11:53 AM (#2893811)
The replacement pool for CF, LF, RF is identical... it's one pool. Managers may inefficiently allocate it (or the non-fluidity of player movement between teams may not make it very stable year-to-year), but it's the same pool.
I don't know about that. I think the same statement could be made about MI/OF. There's always lots of talk about moving Jeter to CF or any speedy players, and the Mets routinely play IF in the OF (Easley, Tatis, Anderson). I think the pool for CFs is smaller than for LF/RF. Kruk or Luzinski just aren't getting to play CF, and ther eare lots of those guys (I think).
   205. Rally Posted: August 07, 2008 at 12:03 PM (#2893817)
A Luzinski type could effectively replace a Cf. If your cf went down, and Greg was the best overall of you had, then he goes into a corner and one of your starting corners goes to center. With middle if the problem is it's a one way switch. You might consider moving your ss to center but almost no cf will move to short.
   206. Blackadder Posted: August 07, 2008 at 12:46 PM (#2893833)
I thought CF was harder, not just because there were more total chances, but that the chances themselves tend to be harder to handle? I know that this is true between 2B and SS, which apparently are quite close in chances even though SS is a lot harder.
   207. Chris Dial Posted: August 07, 2008 at 12:50 PM (#2893838)
Average NL chances per inning (2008):
Pos    Ch/Inn
1B    0.198463076
2B    0.350049393
3B    0.296343079
C    0.018581319
CF    0.319377924
DH    0
LF    0.232060263
P    0.136255049
RF    0.254691525
SS    0.373418032 
Yes, that includes IF line drives, but those are a small, small number.
   208. Tango Posted: August 07, 2008 at 07:33 PM (#2894434)
So, what would baseball's equivalent to Orr be? Maybe a catcher or shortstop putting up 6 consecutive MVP-type seasons in his first 8 years.

ARod. Bench.
   209. David Concepcion de la Desviacion Estandar (Dan R) Posted: August 07, 2008 at 07:46 PM (#2894455)
I do use my own numbers in my NY Times columns, Blackadder. Thanks for the kind words. This is a gigantic project, but I will finish it someday. :)
   210. Srul Itza Posted: August 07, 2008 at 08:51 PM (#2894533)
Chris: I notice that right fielders handle more chances than left fielders.

I would have thought it would be the other way around.

Has it ever been thus?
   211. BDC Posted: August 08, 2008 at 05:06 PM (#2895184)
right fielders handle more chances than left fielders

Somewhere once I heard this explained: a majority of batters are right-handed, so a majority of base hits go to LF. But a majority of sliced flyball outs go to RF. Hence a RF will make more POs, and have more total chances, on average, even if a LF touches the baseball more often.
   212. Mike Emeigh Posted: August 08, 2008 at 05:08 PM (#2895188)
Somewhere once I heard this explained: a majority of batters are right-handed, so a majority of base hits go to LF. But a majority of sliced flyball outs go to RF. Hence a RF will make more POs, and have more total chances, on average, even if a LF touches the baseball more often.

This is exactly correct.

-- MWE
Page 3 of 3 pages  < 1 2 3

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.



<< Back to main


All News | Prime News

Old-School Newsstand

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF


Thanks to
for his generous support.


You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogRyan Thibs has his HOF Ballot Tracker Up and Running!
(61 - 3:38pm, Nov 24)
Last: McCoy

NewsblogOT - November* 2017 College Football thread
(208 - 3:37pm, Nov 24)
Last: Rickey! the first of his name

NewsblogOrtiz: Plea to consider 'character' alters Hall of Fame vote | Jose de Jesus Ortiz |
(23 - 3:35pm, Nov 24)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogOTP 20 November 2017: Sheriff’s official suspended 10 days over Cubs World Series sneak-in
(870 - 3:34pm, Nov 24)
Last: Ray (RDP)

NewsblogPrimer Dugout (and link of the day) 11-24-2017
(10 - 3:26pm, Nov 24)
Last: eric

NewsblogHall makes room for an "idiot" on the ballot
(28 - 3:13pm, Nov 24)
Last: Adam Starblind

NewsblogOT - NBA 2017-2018 Tip-off Thread
(1518 - 3:07pm, Nov 24)
Last: don't ask 57i66135; he wants to hang them all

NewsblogJoe Morgan Wants To Keep Steroid Cheats Out Of Baseball Hall Of Fame | MLB |
(190 - 3:04pm, Nov 24)
Last: ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick

NewsblogFavorite Thanksgiving recipes from MLB |
(8 - 2:12pm, Nov 24)
Last: simpleton & childlike gef the talking mongoose

NewsblogWho, me?! Why your team's next closer will probably be a total surprise -- even to him
(5 - 1:21pm, Nov 24)
Last: PreservedFish

NewsblogMLB Sets Record For Revenues In 2017, Increasing More Than $500 Million Since 2015
(1 - 1:00pm, Nov 24)
Last: The Yankee Clapper

NewsblogA Discussion of WAR Wherein I Ardently Attempt to Avoid any WAR-Related Puns |
(62 - 10:30am, Nov 24)
Last: Dr. Chaleeko

NewsblogChambliss Ready to Part With Bat and Ball That Sent Yankees to World Series
(36 - 8:50am, Nov 24)
Last: ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick

Gonfalon CubsLooking to next year
(204 - 7:01pm, Nov 23)
Last: Meatwad in mourning

NewsblogFinding the best spot for Giancarlo Stanton
(12 - 4:18pm, Nov 23)
Last: Walt Davis

Page rendered in 0.2916 seconds
47 querie(s) executed