Altman-Kurosaki, Carnegie-Mellon, Mazeroski-Richardson, Doth-Suck.
In a move not even science could predict, Pittsburgh Pirates owner Bob Nutting revealed last Friday why he wasn’t spending any significant money on improving the team: He was using the money to build a time machine. Nutting then offered a demonstration of the machine by traveling back 50 years ago to the most celebrated year in Pirates history, the year they won the World Series against the New York Yankees in stunning fashion.
...Once Nutting made it to 1960, he used his surplus cash to purchase the team from then-owner John Galbreath, convincing him that he “had come from the future with the secret to winning a championship.” Nutting immediately implemented the same methods he uses today in running the team: already knowing the outcome of the season and the Series, he traded Mazeroski to the Yankees. Mazeroski, he said, because he hit the home run, might one day ask for more money because of it, even though history showed that “Maz” never did such a thing.
Logic would hope that Nutting would have at least traded Mazeroski for the Yanks’ equally light-hitting second baseman Bobby Richardson, who, like Maz, also demonstrated uncharacteristic power during the World Series when he drove in a record six runs during Game 3. But, as Pirates fans today know, Nutting doesn’t necessarily use the same logic as we do when it comes to baseball operations, and Mazeroski was traded for two Players to be Named Later.
“This is a move we deemed necessary not financially, but for the better of the team,” Nutting said as he faked his way through a press conference regarding the trade. “Bill was a great piece of this franchise, and we will miss him dearly. However, the players we will eventually receive from the Yankees are sure to play a part in the rebuilding of this franchise as we work our way back toward a championship. I promise.”
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Dale Sams Posted: March 30, 2010 at 12:22 PM (#3488544)Given that it's Carnegie Mellon, the writer (and/or his parents) probably paid about $35K for that.
The kind of Pirates fan who'd find this funny is the kind of Pirates fan who wants them to stop the only honest rebuilding attempt of the last fifteen years and drop $30M on third-tier free agents and re-start the "drive for 75".
Whereas I'd prefer for them to actually try and win, like they're doing now. So you'll have to excuse me if I don't find this lame, misdirected, piece-of-crap funny because it's trying to drop a few stale jokes while in the middle of collaborating with the enemy
They talked about Hans Lobert in the Hall of Merit deliberations, I'm pretty sure.
It's nice that the Pirates are following statistical theory now, but the fact is that they announced before the 2009 season that the major league record would improve*, and it didn't. You can't be sure of ultimate success if you can't hit the marks you set up along the way.
FTFY
Nutting said that he expected the record to improve (Link), but that was just transparent spin intended to help sell tickets. I don't know anyone who really believed it, and it certainly didn't stop them from making future-oriented moves (like trading Nate).
The McLouth trade was not expected to sacrifice 2009 for future years. Nutting's statement after the trade was:
"The whole idea was a surprise to me. But I listened to the evaluation of the immediate talent impact with Andrew McCutchen and Charlie Morton coming in, and the opportunity to not take a step back on the field, then also to take a step forward with the other talent coming in. It was a really compelling storyline."
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09167/977612-63.stm
In other words, Nutting was told that McCutchen and Morton would at least balance the loss of Mclouth in 2009, and that the trade would gain the Pirates additional prospects. I think that the Pirates were determined to improve on 2008's record at least to the 2009 All Star break, and probably beyond.
Shouldn't they have been? As long as the moves they're making aren't sacrificing the future, they still should be trying to win more games in the present.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main