|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Monday, November 17, 2008
* from Clemenza. (Leave the gun. Takes the ####### cake!)
I had an MVP ballot and voted for Howard first because he almost single-handedly carried the Phillies to the playoffs by batting .352 with 11 homers and 32 RBI in September. I like to weight my voting to teams in the playoff hunt because I think that puts more pressure on players and separates the men from the boys. There’s little pressure on players having big years if their teams aren’t playing for anything at the end.
With the Cardinals finishing fourth, I voted Pujols seventh on my ballot. I don’t consider MVP to be “the most outstanding player” award and therefore don’t just go by who had the best stats. I like to credit players for lifting their teams to the post-season or at least keeping them in the race until the very end.
I understand that the Cardinals would not have been even close to the wild-card berth without Pujols, but I still like players who elevate their game in crunch time and lift their teams to new heights. And I thought Ryan Ludwick had just as much to do with keeping the Cards in the hunt as Pujols did. St. Louis did stay in the wild card race until mid-September, but mainly because the Brewers and Mets were gagging at the time.
|
Support BBTF
Thanks to Backlasher for his generous support.
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Sox Therapy: A Winning Ballclub? (21 - 8:34am, May 26)Last: DarrenNewsblog: Maddon on Red Sox beaning Luke Scott: 'I think it's ridiculous, I think it's absurd, idiotic' (8 - 8:33am, May 26)Last: Der_K is feeling better now.Newsblog: YESNetwork: A look at five Yankees' cases for enshrinement in Monument Park (2 - 8:14am, May 26)Last: Jolly Old St. Neck Wound, Moral IdiotNewsblog: HP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind (60 - 7:55am, May 26)Last: Designated Sitter (GGC)Newsblog: Wilmoth: Nate McLouth Designated For Assignment (13 - 7:52am, May 26)Last: RussNewsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread, May 2012 (1835 - 7:45am, May 26)Last:  thokNewsblog: The Hall of Very Good: Former Cards Slugger Critical of "LaRussa's Regime" (6 - 7:16am, May 26)Last: Shooty: Applying to be Fearless LeaderNewsblog: Matschulat: Did I Miss The "Paul Konerko Is So Overrated OMG" Bandwagon? (30 - 7:15am, May 26)Last: baudibNewsblog: CSN to host ‘Phillies at the Beach’ on Memorial Day (19 - 7:11am, May 26)Last: GodNewsblog: T.R. Sullivan: Of Frank Robinson, Milt Pappas and Jim Palmer (10 - 7:09am, May 26)Last: GodNewsblog: Bud Selig -- No need for more MLB replay for now - ESPN (88 - 6:12am, May 26)Last: LassusNewsblog: Himrich’s Top Ten Target Field Foods (8 - 2:43am, May 26)Last: Long John McCaine Mutiny on the Bounty (scott)Newsblog: Boston.com: Curt Schilling’s 38 Studios lays off all staff (119 - 1:28am, May 26)Last:  Swedish ChefHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1973 Discussion (15 - 12:13am, May 26)Last: DanGHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1972 Ballot (28 - 11:25pm, May 25)Last: lieiam
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. xanthan Posted: November 17, 2008 at 10:48 PM (#3011087)Awesome.
Re: Haudricourt's ballot in #2, that's just pitiful. He has three first basemen ahead of Pujols. I mean, it's one level of stupidity when you say, "Howard had the HR and RBI and had a great September" but to put three -- three, t-h-r-e-e -- first baseman ahead of Pujols, you are skyrocketing stupidity to a whole new dimension.
I mean, really...
Now THERE is a handle for the taking!
Actually, this is worse than giving the Pulitzer Prize to Jugs - at least a piece in Jugs would probably be consistent with the stated aim of the magazine.
I could fill out an MVP ballot in a dream and have it make more sense. Sure, the ballot would contain maybe my old neighbor, Chester A. Arthur, a milk truck, and Jeff Reboulet, but it'd still be better than an MVP ballot that lists Carlos Delgado above Albert Pujols.
Arthur got robbed.
This one's better:
Guess that half game the Astros finished ahead of the Cards made all the difference.
That is wrong on so many levels. For starters, it's Juggs.
Second, if Juggs Magazine had anything to do with the vote, Prince Fielder would have been the unanimous selection.
Awesome. Ma, get the shotgun!!!
Seriously, I wish I could roll into my music theory lectures and talk about Yanni, John Tesh and that guy that sells guitars on QVC and still get paid to "teach" music. That would be awesome.
But alas, while Bach led the league in all fertility related stats, his Lutheran church couldn't get out of second place throughout Europe, so Handel took home many MVP's in the early to mid 1700's. Bach still made it to the HOF, but wasn't appreciated in his time - just like Frank Thomas. And Telemann.
not to mention Sauter-Finegan
No, this is a little-known expression. It comes from Danny Mochary, reserve infielder for the 1888 Skaneateles Plinths, who was such a muffin that the bugs called any foofaraw a "Mochary of the game."
Delgado: 340/400/649 - 8HR 22 RBI - very nice
Pujols: 321/427/702 - 8 HR 27 RBI - wow, and while injured too
So, why is non-playoff member of a team that failed to hold a lead at the end ranked ahead of the guy who out hit him not just overall but also in September?
Sigh. Logic and sports writing do not go together.
The Japanese version of QVC made Esteban Yen.
OK, really quick. Who's the best player in baseball history?
OK, now find a way to slot him at #7 instead of at #1....
Wait, are you saying Telemann was underappreciated in his time??
Ergo,
2. CC Sabathia, Mil
4. Carlos Delgado, NY
6. Prince Fielder, Mil
9. Ryan Braun, Mil
10. David Wright, NY
Right.
Howard
Sabathia
Manny
Delgado
Apparently the MVP is now the "Best numbers in August and September" award and the first four months of the season don't matter at all.
Actually, it's just September stats for players on contending teams. Otherwise, check out the stats from August 1 on:
Manny: .396/.489/.743
Pujols: .363/.461/.725
Howard: .276/.370/.638
Delgado: .292/.371/.569
Andre Ethier would seem to be a top-5 candidate using his system, but he probably credited Ethier's performance to Manny.
Leaving Pujols off altogether would be far more consistent, at least.
But then there is the Aramiz Ramirez thing.
Sportswriters talk all day about the little things, and then declare that all middle infielders and catchers are not as valuable as sluggers. Who hit in September. For playoff teams. And of course, Chase Utley somehow doesn't make the ballot, either, because a gold glove second baseman is not as valuable as a meandering left fielder.
I know, I'm preachin to the choir, but until the BBWAA is stripped of the 100% monopoly on voting, we get stuff like Ryan Braun / Chase Utley. I wouldn't trade two Brauns for Utley, and neither would you, never mind most of the 32 guys with ballots. Who put their stoopid caps on when they vote.
Maybe the BBWAA should elect the President?
Kind of like the guy who voted for Sabathia over Ichiro for ROY on the basis that Ichiro wasn't a rookie, and then he voted Ichiro second.
Yup. If Utley had played his season in reverse the BBWAA wouldn't have been able to resist.
Speaks for itself.
This article is terrible. Pulos clearly deserved to win, and I was very happy he did. But this tom foolery is spouted off in everyone of these threads and it is so clearly wrong it's amazing so many smart people can't see why. Seriosly, I think you may have read too many of these articles to not see why that doesn't follow.
FYI: Howard, CC, Delgado or Manny wouldn't have made my ballot. Aram probably wouldn't have either, but I would need to think about it some.
Wait.
WHAT???
I'm so glad that Pujols won, because the overall results are an utterly ridiculous mess.
OK, now find a way to slot him at #7 instead of at #1....
You need to do more than hit homers to be #1, Babe.
1. Cobb
2. Mays
3. Aaron
4. Hoffman
5. Young
6. Kingman
7. Ruth
Done. And it's the first time I've ever changed my handle!
Pfff.
You're already disqualified from voting.
Next?
But this tom foolery is spouted off in everyone of these threads and it is so clearly wrong it's amazing so many smart people can't see why. Seriosly, I think you may have read too many of these articles to not see why that doesn't follow.
----
I didn't say "better". I said "more consistent". If I played in the majors, my at-bats would be more consistent than Bill Bergen's. I stand by what I said, and I don't agre that it's tomfoolery. Mister.
Not really - I just put down the next Baroque name that came to mind. But I am no scholar of the popularity of Baroque composers - not something I revisit often enough...
But that Augmented 6th chord - I can wax poetic about that - all four versions...
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main