User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
For wholesale prices on baseball gifts and equipment, check these stores out! |
Page rendered in 0.1567 seconds
50 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. boteman Posted: October 23, 2011 at 10:31 PM (#3972498)So umpires are above reproach? The mere act of asking a question is problematic?
To quote Continental Congressman Stephen Hopkins from the movie 1776,
Straw man. He is speaking of that question in particular. I'd say calling an ump a homer is over the line.
Have you stopped beating your wife?
DB
Sit down boteman, sit down boteman, for god's sake boteman, sit down!
At the time my assumption was that the umpires would confer and the home plate ump (or someone else) would help to overturn the call.
I think you are speculating what Kulpa thinks or thought, obviously. It's possible he thought this, but let's play your scenario out.....how does Kulpa "process" the information longer? Does he go for a walk? You said 10 seconds....does he call time and then ponder the play? Baseball doesn't have a whistle. These plays need to be ruled on immediately since there is often other action to play out. While Kulpa ponders the play for 10 seconds, does he entertain Tony LaRussa's arguments on the matter?
I'm not saying your suggestion isn't a good one, it probably is, but let's play out the scenario a little. I think a huddle with home plate ump or crew chief is probably only way you can change a call without eroding umpire's trust, this reversed call needs some kind of charade or photo opt to give the changed call authenticity, where fans and media can rest easy at night knowing the upms huddled up in a professional manner. By the way, the NFL calls this "replay", w/the ref using a "hood". Even though replay gets the call wrong at least half the time.
I'd like to see the NFL allow penalties, or non calls for that matter, to be reviewed. Makes zero sense penalties are considered "un-reviewable" in the NFL. Dumb really.
Have you seen his other posts? What makes you think he's playing?
I think the process in this case involved understanding the order in which he saw the things he saw. He saw Napoli tag Holliday and he saw Holliday trip over the bag. In an instant flash, he might not be able to logically connect that therefore Holliday is out, but after a bit more time to put the rudimentary logic together, it's obvious that he was.
And I've never seen an ump reverse his own call without help. I've seen them allow their call to be overruled by someone else, but not someone suddenly decide on their own that they were wrong and they just needed a few extra seconds to logically order what it was that they saw. Maybe you're exactly right that he should have invented a pretense for an umpire meeting after calling time, and then just reversed himself and asked his crew mates to play along. But that's also a hard thing to do.
Best regards,
robinred
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main