Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

USA Today: Steinbrenner: ‘They’re not supermen’

“I’m not writing off this season,” the team’s co-chairman said Tuesday. “They’re trying hard to win. There’s only so much you can do. They’re not supermen.”

The Yankees are missing starting pitcher Chien-Ming Wang, who likely will miss the rest of the season because of a foot injury, and Joba Chamberlain, who hopes to return from right rotator cuff tendinitis. Phil Hughes and Ian Kennedy have missed most of the season.

“I think it’s very simple, we’ve been devastated by injuries. No team I’ve ever seen in baseball has been decimated like this. It would kill any team,” Steinbrenner said. “Imagine the Red Sox without (Josh) Beckett and (Jon) Lester. Pitching is 70 percent of the game. Wang won 19 games two straight years. Chamberlain became the most dominating pitcher in baseball. You can’t lose two guys like that.”

Chamberlain has been great as a starter, but the most dominating pitcher in baseball?  I don’t think he’s the most dominating pitcher on his own team.

Besides, even with Wang and Chamberlain, the Yankees would be struggling.  It’s been the offense that’s killed them, and it will need to be the offense that saves them, or wins for them next season.

Best Regards, Larry M. Posted: August 12, 2008 at 11:17 PM | 203 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: obituaries, yankees

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 
   1. Mr2bits Posted: August 13, 2008 at 12:08 AM (#2900146)
Or imagine the Rays if they lost Kazmir, Garza, Percival, Pena, Bartlett, Floyd, Crawford, and Longoria to injuries.

And it's not like the Red Sox haven't had to deal with injuries of their own.

Edit: Bartlett is apparently so important to me that I initially listed him twice
   2. Vaux, A.B.D. Posted: August 13, 2008 at 12:22 AM (#2900175)
I don't know if I'd call Mussina "dominating."

Oh, wait . . . I guess guys who throw less than an inning every two games are still pitchers.
   3. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: August 13, 2008 at 12:27 AM (#2900196)
It's not going to be easy for any team to make the playoffs every year, no matter how well they are run, when the other other teams in the division are well-run as well. The Braves were amazing but it helped that the Mets and Phils weren't very well run and the Expos/Marlins were poor.

I think the same thing will happen to the Yanks.
   4. Phil Coorey. Posted: August 13, 2008 at 12:27 AM (#2900201)
The Red Sox were pretty decimated in 2006.
   5. Vaux, A.B.D. Posted: August 13, 2008 at 12:31 AM (#2900215)
If the Devil Rays were still bad, the Yankees would be four games out of first and 3 games out of the wild card spot behind a Minnesota team that's over-performing its pythagorean record. Tampa has a good team right now, and will for the next three years, but unless they're planning to spend a lot of money in the future, they're going to be bad a lot more than they're good. What they have right now is a once-in-a-decade crop of young players--that's why they're beating the Yankees and Red Sox. They can't replenish that every time they trade off the arbitration eligibles.
   6. JRVJ (formerly Delta Socrates) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 12:31 AM (#2900218)
Yes, it's the offense not performing, but (a) Posada and Matsui's absence (and A-Rod's for a month), surely adds up to that non-performance;

(b) Wang, Hughes, Chamberlain, Bruney, Albeladejo (and to a lesser extent, IPK)'s injuries all add up too....

Sure, non-Yankee fans will say "Cry me a river", and this team has indeed underperformed. But there's reasons for that underperformance.....
   7. Ray (RDP) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 12:43 AM (#2900236)
BP's postseason odds give the Yankees a 7% chance to make the playoffs. Even if it's twice that, they're obviously in big trouble, at 5 games behind in the wild card race and needing to beat out two other teams to get there. And it's not like there's nobody behind them, either.

The Devil Rays have slammed the front door shut on them, and the Yankees are now trying to run around the house to get in through the back door before that closes. I know I'm shocked, Mike Francesa, that looking at the Names of the respective teams turns out not to have been sound analysis.

In any event, their best month this year is 15-10 in July, and they'll have to do better than that to really make a run at the wild card. I don't really see how the starting staff can fuel such a run, what with a rotation consisting of Mike Mussina, Andy Pettitte, Kevin Costner, Tim Robbins, and Sam Malone. It seems that such a run would have to be sustained by the offense; the aging stars will probably need to get hot at the same time. I wouldn't count on Melky or Pudge helping much.

Cano, Posada, and Melky have really killed them this year.

Actually, they could really use Clemens this year; even as an average pitcher he'd be better than a lot of the starts they've been getting.
   8. Gonfalon Bubble Posted: August 13, 2008 at 12:55 AM (#2900277)
"There’s only so much you can do. They’re not supermen.”

Would they get a 30-day reprieve if they said "Mientkiewicz" backwards?
   9. PASTE is not impressed by Albert Pujols (Zeth) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 01:13 AM (#2900343)
Here's the money quote, guys:

"We're going to win it next year," he said. "If we need to add a top veteran pitcher, we'll do that. We'll do whatever we need to do. Next year we'll be extremely dangerous."


Translation: Yes, Virginia, you had better believe I will personally be handing CC Sabathia a blank check this winter.
   10. The District Attorney Posted: August 13, 2008 at 01:34 AM (#2900393)
They’re not supermen.
They can't do this all on their own.

Wait, is he calling them scrubs?
   11. Belfry Bob Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:09 AM (#2900533)
"We're going to win it next year," he said. "If we need to add a top veteran pitcher, we'll do that. We'll do whatever we need to do. Next year we'll be extremely dangerous."

Ah, the Seattle Mariner Gambit.
   12. Gamingboy Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:12 AM (#2900545)
Other then the pitchers though, they are all batmen.

(ba dum dum)
   13. JMPH Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:00 AM (#2900698)
Sure, non-Yankee fans will say "Cry me a river", and this team has indeed underperformed. But there's reasons for that underperformance.....

Yep, and I think it's understandable to do so. This is from a pretty neutral perspective--I'm not a Yankee hater.

Let's say the Padres (just to pick a team) are expected to do well a certain year, compete for their division and for the wild card. Let's say they completely underperform and miss the playoffs, like the Yankees have done this year. The injuries, the disappointing performers, everything. The Padres are, in all likelihood, screwed. They lost a year when they were expecting to compete. They lost a year that was carefully planned to be a successful one. Their fans would really have something to complain about. At the very least, they're in a much less desirable situation than the Yankees are in right now.

The Yankees are going to reload this offseason, signing CC, signing Teixeira, whatever you like. They will be expected to compete next year, and every year for the foreseeable future. (I don't have a problem with this. It's business, they have the money, the players bring in more money in that market, they should make big money. It's fine with me. I'm not complaining.)

I'm sure it's frustrating to see this happen to your favorite team. But consider how much worse it would be if this happened to a different franchise. The Yankees don't have it so bad, and that's why people will say "cry me a river."
   14. PASTE is not impressed by Albert Pujols (Zeth) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:19 AM (#2900742)
Excellent explanation, Joe.
   15. Ray (RDP) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:27 AM (#2900747)
It's pretty amazing that the Yankees haven't had a year like this in the past 15, where things just didn't break right for them, causing them to miss the playoffs. (Though I'm not counting them out by any stretch; the wild card is certainly still a realistic option.)

Whoever fired Torre might be re-thinking that now :-) (If losing in the playoffs wasn't good enough, I wonder how Girardi's miss-the-playoffs act will be taken.)
   16. Jolly Old St. Neck Wound, Moral Idiot Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:28 AM (#2900748)
Yankee haters have every right to gloat when they stink up the joint, though it kind of reminds me of how some sickos seem to enjoy it when America loses a war. The younger generation just doesn't seem to have the same patriotic sentiments as previous generations used to.
   17. Darren Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:30 AM (#2900751)
Any time anyone every mentions a spate of injuries as contributing to a team doing badly, 85 people stand up and shout "stop making excuses." Steinbrenner comes off as quite reasonable here. He's taking the heat off the players, if not the front office and manager.
   18. gay guy in cut-offs smoking the objective pipe Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:31 AM (#2900753)
It's pretty amazing that the Yankees haven't had a year like this in the past 15, where things just didn't break right for them, causing them to miss the playoffs.

15 years of pretty good to great luck to one year of lousy luck; that's a pretty good ratio.

Yankee haters have every right to gloat when they stink up the joint, though it kind of reminds me of how some sickos seem to enjoy it when America loses a war.

If the Yankees miss the playoffs, the terrorists have won.
   19. Ray (RDP) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:35 AM (#2900757)
3-run bomb to Delmon Young given up by Rivera in the 8th, to turn a 6-3 lead into a 6-6 tie (this would never have happened if Mike Mussina had the ability to win 20 games).

I guess people don't have to wonder anymore why Rivera only pitches well in save situations...
   20. NTNgod Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:38 AM (#2900760)
It's not like any of our cities have been bombed or had a part of our country occupied by a foreign army.

Parts of the War of 1812 didn't turn out so well
   21. Perros Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:49 AM (#2900774)
It's not like any of our cities have been bombed or had a part of our country occupied by a foreign army.


In the winter of sixty-five
We were hungry just barely alive
By May tenth Richmond had fell
It was a time I remember oh so well


Damn Yankees.
   22. PASTE is not impressed by Albert Pujols (Zeth) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:49 AM (#2900776)
3-run bomb to Delmon Young given up by Rivera in the 8th, to turn a 6-3 lead into a 6-6 tie (this would never have happened if Mike Mussina had the ability to win 20 games).


Finally, someone that gets it. Please, give this man a Cy Young vote and a Hall of Fame vote.
   23. Eraser-X is emphatically dominating teh site!!! Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:58 AM (#2900786)
Stupid Yankees! Beat the Twins and go back to sucking!
   24. Ron Johnson Posted: August 13, 2008 at 04:48 AM (#2900816)
#24, there's also http://seaghull.home.texas.net/wm_11.html from "White Mansions"
   25. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: August 13, 2008 at 05:01 AM (#2900827)
Kind of surprising that he'd be conceding already. It's highly unlikely but hardly impossible.
   26. Mr2bits Posted: August 13, 2008 at 05:38 AM (#2900835)
it kind of reminds me of how some sickos seem to enjoy it when America loses a war.


I guess I don't see/pay attention to this sentiment. Having been against the Iraq war from the beginning, one of the more disheartening aspects (aside from the obvious real costs of war in lives and dollars) is the fact that there is no point in saying 'I told you so' If anything, it makes the whole situation MORE frustrating on a personal level. People are dying, and no amount of virtual GM'ing is going to change that fact.
   27. Ray (RDP) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 06:33 AM (#2900844)
Is it time to move Melky out of CF and have Damon or even Nady play there?

For those who want to obsess over Damon's noodle arm as a reason against the move, I direct you to Melky's .635 OPS.
   28. PASTE is not impressed by Albert Pujols (Zeth) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 06:40 AM (#2900846)
Damon's a fine CF, at least average out there, noodle arm or no. He has range. And Melky's a good glove, so their best alignment is Damon in left, Melky in center, Nady in right and Abreu, who is an atrocious RF, DHing.
   29. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: August 13, 2008 at 07:38 AM (#2900863)
Melky is still really young but he is worse now than when he came up. His k/bb ratio has detiorated and so has his power. He's not a better option than Damon if Johnny is going to outhit him by 150-200 OPS points.
   30. PASTE is not impressed by Albert Pujols (Zeth) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 07:56 AM (#2900865)
Yeah, it's likely Cabrera is what he is, but he's a good defensive CF with no power. This isn't Cabrera vs. Damon; it's Cabrera vs. Richie Sexson or Wilson Betemit. I assume the main options we're looking at are:

LF Damon, CF Cabrera, RF Abreu, DH Nady
LF Nady, CF Damon, RF Abreu, DH Sexson/Betemit


And what I think is the optimal arrangement:

LF Damon, CF Cabrera, RF Nady, DH Abreu

I'd rather have Cabrera's glove out there than have Sexson playing every day. Now, once Matsui gets back, then yeah, I think Cabrera is the guy that has to be bumped in favor of Nady/Damon/Abreu/Matsui.
   31. Best Regards, Larry M. Posted: August 13, 2008 at 08:55 AM (#2900870)
Actually, Sexson and Betemit would be playing first base, giving the team an upgrade defensively over Giambi.
   32. Belfry Bob Posted: August 13, 2008 at 11:14 AM (#2900882)
First...blaming the season's woes on injuries is laughable; a team with a $200M payroll should have substitutes better than most teams starters, not dreck like Betemit, et al.

Second...thinking that 'adding a starting front-line vet pitcher will fix everything' is exactly the sort of thinking I was hoping for from the Hankster.

Joe Torre must be loving this.

BTW, the Texiera talk puzzles me - with all of the Yankees' DH/1B candidates already lined up, where is he supposed to play? And if they DO sign him, are his numbers going to bury Giambi's, who would have to be gone if Tex is signed (assuming Posada is the other 1B/DH)? I'm not saying Giambi is a 'better player', but he's creating a lot of runs...so where's the improvement by plugging in Tex's numbers for 2009 instead?
   33. We don't have dahlians at the Palace of Wisdom Posted: August 13, 2008 at 11:16 AM (#2900883)
Joe Torre must be loving this.

I don't think Joe Torre is in a position to tell the Yankees "neener neener neener".
   34. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: August 13, 2008 at 11:37 AM (#2900884)
The younger generation just doesn't seem to have the same patriotic sentiments as previous generations used to.

Sorry I'm not all rah rah about our wars. I'll try harder in the future. As for winnng or losing, we lost as soon as we started that war. My only hope was for as few casualties and injuries as possible and quick return home for the troops. The whole thing has been a nightmare.
   35. Lassus Posted: August 13, 2008 at 12:01 PM (#2900889)
Yankee haters have every right to gloat when they stink up the joint, though it kind of reminds me of how some sickos seem to enjoy it when America loses a war.

Um, no.
   36. Double-Spin Mechanic Posted: August 13, 2008 at 12:13 PM (#2900896)
BTW, the Texiera talk puzzles me - with all of the Yankees' DH/1B candidates already lined up, where is he supposed to play?


Yeah, I'm sure Mark Teixeira is losing sleep over being blocked by Wilson Betemit and the corpses of Richie Sexson and Jason Giambi.

I'm glad the Tigers went ahead and pulled the trigger on Miguel Cabrera despite having Brandon Inge, Jeff Larish, and Mike Hessman already in the fold.
   37. zonk Posted: August 13, 2008 at 12:53 PM (#2900916)
Yankee haters have every right to gloat when they stink up the joint, though it kind of reminds me of how some sickos seem to enjoy it when America loses a war. The younger generation just doesn't seem to have the same patriotic sentiments as previous generations used to.


No - the problem is that far too many people treat foreign policy like its a ####### baseball game, and a baseball game only to be attended by zombie fanboys... so long as we all wear the same jerseys and caps, we ought to just cheer our asses off, no matter what is exactly happening on the field.

Patriotism has nothing to do with who pokes a better finger in a chest.
   38. Big Train Posted: August 13, 2008 at 01:07 PM (#2900924)
Yankee haters have every right to gloat when they stink up the joint, though it kind of reminds me of how some sickos seem to enjoy it when America loses a war.

This is the dumbest thing ever.
   39. Cowboy Popup Posted: August 13, 2008 at 01:19 PM (#2900934)
And if they DO sign him, are his numbers going to bury Giambi's, who would have to be gone if Tex is signed (assuming Posada is the other 1B/DH)? I'm not saying Giambi is a 'better player', but he's creating a lot of runs...so where's the improvement by plugging in Tex's numbers for 2009 instead?

Giambi doesn't play everyday, Tex does. Giambi can't field, Tex can. Giambi is super slow. Tex is only kinda slow. Giambi is making like 20+ mil this, Tex will probably make something like that next year. So some likely improvement over this year because Tex is a pretty well rounded player for a firstbaseman, with the promise of dramatic improvement over whatever other options they have to run out there next year (Giambi again, Nady, Betemit, Miranda).

For those who want to obsess over Damon's noodle arm as a reason against the move, I direct you to Melky's .635 OPS.

I'm shocked it's that high.

And I think China will manage to reignite real patriotism in this country (Not just support the troops bumper stickers and Drill! Drill! Drill!) soon enough, if it hasn't already.
   40. Big Train Posted: August 13, 2008 at 01:29 PM (#2900939)
Today, Buster Olney said that Melky Cabrera was a star.

He said it, on the Mike and Mike show. To repeat, he said that they should stop complaining, because the Yankees have used 6 star outfielders this year, BA, Damon, Matsui, Nady and Cabrera. I assume he is counting Nady or Matsui twice or something, I don't know. But he gets paid to talk about baseball, and he said that.

I was thinking on the way in, the Yankees haven't won a WS since they started singing God Bless American between every half inning. They should stop that.
   41. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: August 13, 2008 at 01:31 PM (#2900942)
Today, Buster Olney said that Melky Cabrera was a star.

Well, relative to me he is!
   42. We don't have dahlians at the Palace of Wisdom Posted: August 13, 2008 at 01:33 PM (#2900943)
And I think China will manage to reignite real patriotism in this country (Not just support the troops bumper stickers and Drill! Drill! Drill!) soon enough, if it hasn't already.

Patriotism as in what, rallying around a common cause in the belief that it should always be a predominantly white, Western nation that holds the title of world's greatest military and economic superpower?

I guess xenophobia is a kind of patriotism...
   43. Cowboy Popup Posted: August 13, 2008 at 01:40 PM (#2900945)
Patriotism as in what, rallying around a common cause in the belief that it should always be a predominantly white, Western nation that holds the title of world's greatest military and economic superpower?

Or taking pride in your country and taking steps to improve it, in whatever means you are capable of (science, art, education) as well as yourself. It doesn't have to be a dirty word.

I guess xenophobia is a kind of patriotism...

I would guess that the difference in race and culture of China will mobilize Americans quicker than say, Canada becoming a rival superpower. But there are also important social and political values at stake, so it's hard to write it all off as xenophobia and racism.

I was thinking on the way in, the Yankees haven't won a WS since they started singing God Bless American between every half inning. They should stop that.

That'd be nice, I could stop changing the channel during every frickin home game during the seventh inning stretch.
   44. robinred Posted: August 13, 2008 at 01:47 PM (#2900954)
Yankee haters have every right to gloat when they stink up the joint, though it kind of reminds me of how some sickos seem to enjoy it when America loses a war. The younger generation just doesn't seem to have the same patriotic sentiments as previous generations used to.


This is pretty funny. I am surprised that some people seem a little miffed by it and didn't get it--unless they are engaged in meta-sarcasm that I am missing.
   45. Lassus Posted: August 13, 2008 at 01:53 PM (#2900963)
If nationalism manifested primarily as an impetus to improve one's country, I'd have no problem with it.

This is not how - for any country - it manifests primarily. It manifests mostly by providing justification to beat down some other country. Or at least say repeatedly over and over how one COULD beat down another country, and should do so and feel justified if the need arises.

I find nationalism to be rather useless, petty, stupid, and one can only hope fleeting in the grand scope of human history.

Please note if someone thinks I'm talking about the U.S. here, that's their problem, not mine. I'm talking about all of them.
   46. bunyon Posted: August 13, 2008 at 01:55 PM (#2900968)
We've never really lost a war, Andy. The worst we've done is have a war not turn out well for us. It's not like any of our cities have been bombed or had a part of our country occupied by a foreign army.

From the guy who has lived in Raleigh and Richmond. (Yes, I read the later comments and discussion - still struck me as funny.)
   47. There are no words... (Met Fan Charlie) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 01:56 PM (#2900970)
I'm coming more & more to the conclusion that Hank Steinbrenner is a raving lunatic.
   48. Cowboy Popup Posted: August 13, 2008 at 01:58 PM (#2900972)
This is not how - for any country - it manifests primarily. It manifests mostly by providing justification to beat down some other country. Or at least say repeatedly over and over how one COULD beat down another country, and should do so and feel justified if the need arises.

So far. As you alluded to, it's a relatively new concept in the history of mankind.
   49. RB in NYC (Now with New iPhone!) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:00 PM (#2900976)
I'm coming more & more to the conclusion that Hank Steinbrenner is a raving lunatic.
So long as he sticks to ranting and raving and signing checks, that's fine with me.
   50. Jolly Old St. Neck Wound, Moral Idiot Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:02 PM (#2900977)
Yankee haters have every right to gloat when they stink up the joint, though it kind of reminds me of how some sickos seem to enjoy it when America loses a war. The younger generation just doesn't seem to have the same patriotic sentiments as previous generations used to.

This is pretty funny. I am surprised that some people seem a little miffed by it and didn't get it--unless they are engaged in meta-sarcasm that I am missing.


More meta-tongue-in-cheek than meta-sarcasm, Robin, but at least you didn't jump to the bait like some of the others. It is pretty amazing just how widespread literalmindedness can be, even on a forum like this.
   51. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:07 PM (#2900984)
This is pretty funny. I am surprised that some people seem a little miffed by it and didn't get it--unless they are engaged in meta-sarcasm that I am missing.

Yeah. I picked up on it after I posted, but I don't like to edit my first responses. It seemed out of character for Andy so I should have known better. The war kills my sense of humor. One more reason I'd kick Bush in his cooze if I ever got the chance. (Here's hoping cooze isn't picked up by CIA internet filters!)
   52. Cowboy Popup Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:08 PM (#2900985)
It is pretty amazing just how widespread literalmindedness can be, even on a forum like this.

I think it's more likely that patriotism is on people's minds, the olympics is an event based on patriotism. I jumped in because the topic was broached, somewhat tangentially, and there seemed to be takers on the conversation. I'm sure this applies for a few people.
   53. There are no words... (Met Fan Charlie) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:08 PM (#2900986)
I'm coming more & more to the conclusion that Hank Steinbrenner is a raving lunatic.

So long as he sticks to ranting and raving and signing checks, that's fine with me.


More years like this? $200 mil. & no playoffs is fine with you????
   54. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:10 PM (#2900988)
More years like this? $200 mil. & no playoffs is fine with you????

Knock it off! The season isn't over yet and the Rays have lost Longoria and Crawford. I'm invoking the no-hitter rule regarding the Yanks missing the playoffs. No talking about it until it happens. Please, work with me on this.
   55. Cowboy Popup Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:12 PM (#2900989)
More years like this? $200 mil. & no playoffs is fine with you????

Hank broke Phil Hughes' rib? And Matsui's knee? And Posada's shoulder? And Wang's foot?
   56. RB in NYC (Now with New iPhone!) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:13 PM (#2900992)
More years like this? $200 mil. & no playoffs is fine with you????
Notwithstanding #59, if the Steinbrenner Bros. stay out of the way of the baseball staff, and keep the payroll where it is, years like this will be the exception rather than the rule. So I see no reason to change my sentiment.
   57. aleskel Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:20 PM (#2901003)
a team with a $200M payroll should have substitutes better than most teams starters, not dreck like Betemit, et al.

just to go back a bit, this is an absurd statement. The most significant position player injuries the Yankees have gone through this year have been Posada, Jeter, and ARod - two of those play a position where it's very, very hard to find a good hitter, and the third is one of the best all-around players of his generation. Replacements for players like that don't just come on trees.
   58. aleskel Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:25 PM (#2901007)
So long as he sticks to ranting and raving and signing checks, that's fine with me.

seconded - can you imagine what Steinbrenner pere would have done in this situation if he were still in his prime? He would have fired Girardi in May then traded Cano for Juan Pierre
   59. The Good Face Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:26 PM (#2901010)
Hank broke Phil Hughes' rib? And Matsui's knee? And Posada's shoulder? And Wang's foot?


Hank also used his eldritch powers to turn Melky's bat into a banjo and Ian Kennedy into Jose Lima. At least he's not responsible for A-Rod's choking... vengeful God took care of that.
   60. robinred Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:28 PM (#2901012)
IMO, the only real "bad luck" thing about the Yankees season is Wang's injury, and of course that is a major, major thing. But nothing else that has happened to them has been too surprising, given the fact that (as many pointed out in pre-season) they have almost no players in their primes. While not all the injuries were age-related, older guys getting hurt and dropping off and young pitchers blowing up/getting hurt is not exactly big, shocking news.

In addition to Wang's injury, I think the other thing I would point to as a perhaps somewhat surprising negative factor is Cabrera's poor performance at the plate. I am not surprised by it
--I have never thought that much of Cabrera and was one of the few who thought the Yankees should have made the proposed Santana trade--but a lot of people who know more about him than I do thought he would do better. To me, he is a KEY guy for NY in 2009. If they give him another chance and he improves his hitting a bit, he could make a difference.

I think Sabathia will sign with the Yankees. Getting him is essentially like adding Santana without giving up young guys, and after Hughes' and Kennedy's performances in 2008, I don't think the Yankees can pass on a guy like Sabathia right now. But I think Teixeira will be elsewhere, and the Yankees will use some of the guys they have now in a 1b job share/rotation (maybe Posada and Giambi, re-signing after being bought out).
   61. Ray (RDP) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:32 PM (#2901016)
Mike Francesa yesterday was appalled at Ian Kennedy's comments after his start the other day, and said that Kennedy, with those comments, punched his ticket out of town.

Absurd. Like the Yankees will give up on him because he made some innocuous comments about pitching into bad luck that day, which was true.
   62. Cowboy Popup Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:32 PM (#2901017)
I think the other thing I would point to as a perhaps somewhat surprising negative factor is Cabrera's poor performance at the plate.

You expected Cano to turn in an 86 OPS+?

What's really killing this team, beyond the injuries, and the youth dramatically underperforming, is that they have not been able to produce with RISP. If they hit as well in clutch spots as they did normally, they'd still be breathing down Boston's neck.

None of this is Hank's fault.
   63. Melo's Love Handles (NJ) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:34 PM (#2901019)
Damon LF
Jeter SS
Teixeira 1B
A-Rod 3B
Matsui DH
Nady RF
Posada C
Cano 2B
Spoiled Milk/Jackson CF

CC
Wang
Joba
Moose
Hughes

I feel reasonably confident about a team with those primary parts...now...just have to actually get Tex and CC signed.
   64. aleskel Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:35 PM (#2901020)
IMO, the only real "bad luck" thing about the Yankees season is Wang's injury, and of course that is a major, major thing. But nothing else that has happened to them has been too surprising, given the fact that (as many pointed out in pre-season) they have almost no players in their primes.

I would add ARod's injury - he's still close to his prime and has been very durable. When you lose your best player for a month and your best starter for 3+, that's a lot to account for.
   65. Ray (RDP) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:38 PM (#2901025)
You expected Cano to turn in an 86 OPS+?


Yes, actually. Not that it was specifically expected for this year, but it was entirely foreseeable that Cano could hit .260 some year instead of .300 or .340, and when that happened, given that his performance is BA-driven, he was likely to end up with something like an 86 OPS+.
   66. The cushions are crowded for Edmundo Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:38 PM (#2901026)
the olympics is an event based on patriotism
I would argue jingoism. I see nothing patriotic about the Olympics.
   67. robinred Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:41 PM (#2901030)
You expected Cano to turn in an 86 OPS+?


People talked about this yesterday. He has hit pretty well since April, but I have never been a huge Cano fan. I would have predicted about 100-105. He may bounce back. If the Yankees add Sabathia, either Hughes OR Kennedy is league average and Cano and Cabrera improve--all very reasonable possibilities--they will be right back in business in 2009.

I would add ARod's injury


Well, he turned 33 in July and has a lot of miles on him.
   68. Melo's Love Handles (NJ) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:46 PM (#2901036)
None of this is Hank's fault.

I've said this before, but I know that Primates love to say "hahahah!!! look at yankee fans and their crazy owner Hank who never worked for a dime in his life and is going to ruin the team hahah!!1"...but Hank has been terrific thus far.
   69. RB in NYC (Now with New iPhone!) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:48 PM (#2901039)
He has hit pretty well since April, but I have never been a huge Cano fan. I would have predicted about 100-105. He may bounce back.
I think he'll bounce back, but that's obviously a second discussion.

But I think your post mostly affirms CP's point. A 100 OPS+ this year for the Yankees is .753, so even someone who has "never been a huge Cano fan" would have to concede he's underperforming unexpectedly by more than 50 points of OPS. That's a bunch.
   70. Belfry Bob Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:49 PM (#2901040)
Giambi doesn't play everyday, Tex does. Giambi can't field, Tex can. Giambi is super slow. Tex is only kinda slow. Giambi is making like 20+ mil this, Tex will probably make something like that next year. So some likely improvement over this year because Tex is a pretty well rounded player for a firstbaseman, with the promise of dramatic improvement over whatever other options they have to run out there next year (Giambi again, Nady, Betemit, Miranda).

Um, Giambi's created 70 runs this year...Tex has created 84. I'm nost saying Giambi = Tex, not by a long shot...but the 'improvement' the Yanks will get be replacing one with the other isn't going to be all that remarkable an impact on the standings in 2009. As for it being a 'dramtic improvement over what they could trot out in 2009', agreed...but that's damning with faint praise. Yankee fans are all too happy to jettison Giambi for Tex/Manny/whoever, but the fact is that Giambi hasn't been the problem with the Yanks' offense, which is their REAL problem, not so much the pitching.

I don't think Tex is going to make them that much better...replacing Giambi with him isn't going to result in a lot more runs in 2009 in comparison with 2008.
   71. robinred Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:50 PM (#2901043)
Fine, but I also agree with DiPerna. Most players whose stats are BA-driven without great K/BB rates have some volatility.
   72. IronChef Chris Wok Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:52 PM (#2901048)
If the Yankees miss the playoffs, the terrorists have won.

Who's flying into buildings again?
   73. Cowboy Popup Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:53 PM (#2901049)
Um, Giambi's created 70 runs this year...Tex has created 84.

So 14, plus, what, 7 or so on defense (being really conservative). That's 2 wins. I'd call that a pretty big improvement. And Giambi is slumping and Tex is red hot, I wouldn't be surprised to see the difference expand.
   74. aleskel Posted: August 13, 2008 at 02:56 PM (#2901053)
Most players whose stats are BA-driven without great K/BB rates have some volatility.

the irony about Cano is that both his BB and K rates have improved over last year. It's inexplicable.
   75. Dizzypaco Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:00 PM (#2901058)
Damon LF
Jeter SS
Teixeira 1B
A-Rod 3B
Matsui DH
Nady RF
Posada C
Cano 2B
Spoiled Milk/Jackson CF

CC
Wang
Joba
Moose
Hughes

I feel reasonably confident about a team with those primary parts...now...just have to actually get Tex and CC signed.


A few things. First, I find it kind of amusing that everyone assumes 1) that CC and Teixera will want to play for the Yankees, and that 2) no other team will be willing to spend a boat load of money on those guys, despite the fact that plenty of teams have shown a willingness to spend lots of money the past couple of off seasons.

Still, if they do sign those two, they will have:
an old catcher, coming off a big injury
A second basemen coming off a terrible year
A somewhat old shortstop
A somewhat old left fielder (coming off a very good year)
A mediocre (or worse) center fielder
A mediocre right fielder
an pretty old and not great DH

First base and third base would look good.

The pitching should be pretty good, assuming they stay healthy, which didn't work out so well this year...
   76. Ray (RDP) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:02 PM (#2901059)
the irony about Cano is that both his BB and K rates have improved over last year. It's nexplicable.


His BB rate is certainly not improved over last year. It's improved over 2005 and 2006, but, with only 16 and 18 walks in those years, respectively, he had nowhere to go but up. I wouldn't say 22 walks in 470 PAs is anything to write home about. Granted if you compare 2007-8 to 2005-6 he has made some improvement there.
   77. Melo's Love Handles (NJ) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:03 PM (#2901062)
Yes, actually. Not that it was specifically expected for this year, but it was entirely foreseeable that Cano could hit .260 some year instead of .300 or .340, and when that happened, given that his performance is BA-driven, he was likely to end up with something like an 86 OPS+.

He is also posting a career low Isolated Power. If he was hitting .260 with his usual power he would have about a 100 OPS+
   78. Melo's Love Handles (NJ) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:05 PM (#2901065)
the irony about Cano is that both his BB and K rates have improved over last year. It's inexplicable.

Not to mention his increased line drive rate.
   79. The Good Face Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:06 PM (#2901067)
So 14, plus, what, 7 or so on defense (being really conservative). That's 2 wins. I'd call that a pretty big improvement. And Giambi is slumping and Tex is red hot, I wouldn't be surprised to see the difference expand.


How much of that difference is based on the playing time disparity? Yes, that's a real advantage for Tex, but when Giambi isn't playing 1B, somebody else is, and contributing numbers. Well, since the Yanks are using Betemit/Sexson, maybe not.

That said, going forward I wouldn't be surprised to see Tex worth 2 wins/year over Giambi. I'm slowly coming around to the idea that he may actually be worth the 8 years, $160M.
   80. Cowboy Popup Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:08 PM (#2901071)
A second basemen coming off a terrible year

He'll be 26, his peripherals have improved and he's been hitting a ton of line drives. I think he's a good bet to bounce back.

A somewhat old shortstop

Who has still been pretty good this year.

A mediocre (or worse) center fielder

Austin Jackson, who's having a good year right now, may be ready to take over by then. And there's no guarantee the Yanks don't sign someone else like Marlon Byrd.

A mediocre right fielder

Who will project better next year than he ever has before.

an pretty old and not great DH

But still pretty good. Stack him up against the rest of the DHs in the league, he'll come out looking alright.

The pitching should be pretty good, assuming they stay healthy, which didn't work out so well this year...

I don't think the Yanks are going to shoe-ins for the playoffs every year from here to eternity like they used to be. But they're still a good team this year missing a lot of key parts, and next year they'll replace two old players with better, much younger ones.
   81. Ray (RDP) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:09 PM (#2901073)
He is also posting a career low Isolated Power. If he was hitting .260 with his usual power he would have about a 100 OPS+


Yeah, his power is typically better.
   82. Dizzypaco Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:18 PM (#2901089)
I figured you could quibble with a lot of what I said, but I stand behind the point that the everyday lineup is generally made up of players who are kind of old or who can't be counted on for other reasons, meaning there's an awful lot that can go wrong. The Yankees could very easily have a pretty good offense next year, but a lot has to go right for it to be great. In past years, you didn't have to count on a whole lot going right in order to project the Yankees to be among the top couple of offenses in the league.

As for Nady, he's 29 and having a break out year. People who have breakout years at age 29 often regress to the players they were at age 27 and 28. No guarantees, but I'll take the under on his projection for next year if you're expecting him to be a lot better than that.
   83. JRVJ (formerly Delta Socrates) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:23 PM (#2901098)
65, Hughes' injury is a bad luck thing. As was Bruney's (same one as Wang's). As was Albeladejo's.

Yes, Bruney and Albeladejo are not exactly the greatest relievers in the world, but they would have been useful if they'd been healthy (and an uninjured Hughes sure would have been helpful).

Matsui's injury is somewhat likely, but Posada's is not (really, was anybody expecting the guy to tear up his shoulder like that? It's one thing to decline with age, another to have a major injury out of the blue).
   84. Melo's Love Handles (NJ) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:25 PM (#2901104)
Matsui's injury is somewhat likely,

Funny how a guy is an iron man for over a decade, suffers his first injury and then becomes brittle.
   85. Cooperstown Schtick Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:26 PM (#2901106)
Hank broke Phil Hughes' rib? And Matsui's knee? And Posada's shoulder? And Wang's foot?

Wang's foot, yes, yes he did. By not using his ownership powers to force the stupid NL to see the light and finally stop their pitchers from hitting, yes, Hank broke Wang's foot.

Um, Giambi's created 70 runs this year...Tex has created 84. I'm nost saying Giambi = Tex, not by a long shot...but the 'improvement' the Yanks will get be replacing one with the other isn't going to be all that remarkable an impact on the standings in 2009. As for it being a 'dramtic improvement over what they could trot out in 2009', agreed...but that's damning with faint praise. Yankee fans are all too happy to jettison Giambi for Tex/Manny/whoever, but the fact is that Giambi hasn't been the problem with the Yanks' offense, which is their REAL problem, not so much the pitching.

Giambi is the most valuable albatross in the league. In 120 Yankee games, he's played first in 76 of them. He's only appeared in a total of 104 games, and he hasn't been on the DL. I think the Yankees would like to have an everyday first baseman, if for no other reason than so when A-Rod, Jeter and Cano look up, they know who the heck they're supposed to throw to.

[Cano] has hit pretty well since April


Those end points really don't do justice to the ways in which Cano absolutely destroyed the Yankees offensively. He was hitting .183 after 40 games with an OPS of .540. That's 25% of the season. After 100 games, his OBP still hadn't cracked .300. If there was a Least Valuable Player Award wherein a player's performance was the difference between making the playoffs and not, Cano would easily be in the discussion.
   86. JMPH Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:29 PM (#2901110)
Matsui's injury is somewhat likely, but Posada's is not (really, was anybody expecting the guy to tear up his shoulder like that? It's one thing to decline with age, another to have a major injury out of the blue).

I don't think you can expect a first major injury for anyone. The only players who have major injuries that don't surprise anyone are the players who have already had one or more major injuries (Griffey, Hampton, Prior, etc.). If there was ever a player you'd expect to go down with his first major injury, I think the 36-year-old catcher who has caught 130+ games for 8 straight seasons is a good bet.
   87. The cushions are crowded for Edmundo Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:32 PM (#2901113)
By not using his ownership powers to force the stupid NL to see the light and finally stop their pitchers from hitting, yes, Hank broke Wang's foot.
35 years of trying, and the AL owners have not come up with a compelling reason yet. <ducking>
   88. JRVJ (formerly Delta Socrates) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:32 PM (#2901114)
90, The Yanks were 4 1/4 behind Tampa and 4 behind Boston after 40 games (which was after the May 13th games).

Yes, Cano sucked, but during that period, the Yankees were without A-Rod, Posada and Hughes (and Melky was still sort of hitting at that point).

Cano's part of the reason, but he's not the sole reason (and that's partially why I hate using sabermetric arguments about how a player killed a team for a specific period without looking at other variables, such as playing Betemit, Alberto González and José Molina regularly).
   89. Melo's Love Handles (NJ) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:36 PM (#2901122)
Cano is probably my favorite position player on the team, so it's been especially frustrating to watch. Not only has his offense gone to ####, some of that due to poor luck, but over the last month he's made innumerable mental errors on the bases (on the rare occasion when he gets on), as well as played some horrendous defense.
   90. RB in NYC (Now with New iPhone!) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:38 PM (#2901125)
He was hitting .183 after 40 games with an OPS of .540. That's 25% of the season. After 100 games, his OBP still hadn't cracked .300.
That doesn't really make any sense, you're double counting the same bad performance. Cano was deplorably bad in April, but to say "He was terrible in April, and then, come July, his numbers weren't great" doesn't really tell us anything about how he hit post-April except that it wasn't world-beatingly great to overcome his April.

A more accurate way of looking at things:

Fist 40 Games: .540 OPS
Since: .774 OPS

Now .774 isn't fabulous or anything (it's probably a 105-07 OPS+) but Cano wasn't a sub-.300 OPB player consistantly through 100 games, he was horrible for the first 40 or so and then fine if not great thereafter.
   91. TomH Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:40 PM (#2901128)
What's really killing this team .... is that they have not been able to produce with RISP. If they hit as well in clutch spots as they did normally, they'd still be breathing down Boston's neck.

Ummm... unless, of course, the Red Sox had ALSO hit in the clutch, in which case the Yankees would be even FURTHER behind.

source: according to BP stats page, the Red Sox have underperformed their estimated runs scored (EqR) by 41 runs. The Yankees by 21 runs. The Rays, OTOH, have overperformed by 31.
   92. aleskel Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:42 PM (#2901132)
Now .774 isn't fabulous or anything (it's probably a 105-07 OPS+) but Cano wasn't a sub-.300 OPB player consistantly through 100 games, he was horrible for the first 40 or so and then fine if not great thereafter

agreed - no one's saying that Cano has had anything but a poor year, but looking forward, is he more likely to be the .540 OPS guy from one month or the .774 guy from the succeeding 3+ months? Cano is very streaky, but it's hardly time to give up on him just yet.
   93. RB in NYC (Now with New iPhone!) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:45 PM (#2901137)
But why Kennedy? He doesn't project at all. That I don't understand.
Was there any deal that featured Kennedy as the sole piece? Or even the centerpiece of a deal?
   94. aleskel Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:46 PM (#2901138)
After all, they did pass on Santana, presumably because they regarded kennedy as an untouchable. Hughes and Joba maybe. But why Kennedy? He doesn't project at all. That I don't understand.

what the Twins were asking from the Yankees has never made it past rumors or innuendo, but I don't think Kennedy was ever the centerpiece of the Yankees' package. If he was included, it was WITH Hughes or the top prospects.
   95. Cooperstown Schtick Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:46 PM (#2901140)
That doesn't really make any sense, you're double counting the same bad performance.

I was making two points to describe how terrible he was for the first quarter of the season.

You ever play in a softball game where a guy in your lineup had to leave early in the game, so that every time subsequently his spot came up you got an automatic out? That was Cano in April.

Am I exceedingly venomous toward Cano? He was my third-round pick on my fantasy team, following Johan Santana and Alex Rios. Yep, I got some venom.
   96. Big Train Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:49 PM (#2901144)
It's still unfathomable to me how any of you thought Cano was going to be better than pedroia.

well, some people would base it off last year, when Pedroia faded at the end, and Cano shot passed him in OPS+
   97. Cowboy Popup Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:49 PM (#2901150)
Pedroia has been kicking his tail in every phase of the game from one end of the field to the other.

We know, it's like the opposite of last year.

Yes. The Santana proposal.

Source?

I'm just kidding, I know you don't have one.
   98. Big Train Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:50 PM (#2901151)
I think Kevin is right one that one, while it wasn't Kennedy for Santana straight up, it was like Kennedy + Melky + Tabata or something, the last offer they made to NY before they traded for spare Mets parts.
   99. Ray (RDP) Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:51 PM (#2901153)
Matsui's injury is somewhat likely, but Posada's is not (really, was anybody expecting the guy to tear up his shoulder like that? It's one thing to decline with age, another to have a major injury out of the blue).


That's part of declining with age.
   100. Cowboy Popup Posted: August 13, 2008 at 03:52 PM (#2901154)
it was like Kennedy + Melky + Tabata or something

And Tabata would have been the centerpiece, not Kennedy. Tabata was really well thought of this offseason.
Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Ray (RDP)
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogYESNetwork: A look at five Yankees' cases for enshrinement in Monument Park
(4 - 9:38am, May 26)
Last: SOLockwood

NewsblogMatschulat: Did I Miss The "Paul Konerko Is So Overrated OMG" Bandwagon?
(33 - 9:36am, May 26)
Last: Greg Maddux School of Reflexive Profanity

NewsblogMaddon on Red Sox beaning Luke Scott: 'I think it's ridiculous, I think it's absurd, idiotic'
(10 - 9:18am, May 26)
Last: Mattbert

Sox TherapyA Winning Ballclub?
(21 - 8:34am, May 26)
Last: Darren

NewsblogHP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind
(60 - 7:55am, May 26)
Last: Designated Sitter (GGC)

NewsblogWilmoth: Nate McLouth Designated For Assignment
(13 - 7:52am, May 26)
Last: Russ

NewsblogOT: NBA Monthly Thread, May 2012
(1835 - 7:45am, May 26)
Last: thok

NewsblogThe Hall of Very Good: Former Cards Slugger Critical of "LaRussa's Regime"
(6 - 7:16am, May 26)
Last: Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader

NewsblogCSN to host ‘Phillies at the Beach’ on Memorial Day
(19 - 7:11am, May 26)
Last: God

NewsblogT.R. Sullivan: Of Frank Robinson, Milt Pappas and Jim Palmer
(10 - 7:09am, May 26)
Last: God

NewsblogBud Selig -- No need for more MLB replay for now - ESPN
(88 - 6:12am, May 26)
Last: Lassus

NewsblogHimrich’s Top Ten Target Field Foods
(8 - 2:43am, May 26)
Last: Long John McCaine Mutiny on the Bounty (scott)

NewsblogBoston.com: Curt Schilling’s 38 Studios lays off all staff
(119 - 1:28am, May 26)
Last: Swedish Chef

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 1973 Discussion
(15 - 12:13am, May 26)
Last: DanG

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 1972 Ballot
(28 - 11:25pm, May 25)
Last: lieiam

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 0.6227 seconds
55 querie(s) executed