Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Saturday, November 17, 2012

Verducci: Cabrera’s win over Trout for AL MVP proves team results matter

SCREW THAT!...Here’s the important biz!

The pejorative nonsense about “new school” and “old school” was sad. Everybody uses advanced statistics, though how they weigh them varies. In fact, if Albert Reach can get on a Hall of Fame ballot next month essentially for publishing a baseball magazine for seven years in the 19th century (it helped sell his baseballs), someday Sean Forman, the brains behind baseballreference.com, should be on one. Who else has put more information just clicks away for fans and media? Delving not so deep into Forman’s mine, for instance, can reveal this:

Repoz Posted: November 17, 2012 at 08:26 AM | 102 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: hof, site news

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 2 of 2 pages  < 1 2
   101. vivaelpujols Posted: November 19, 2012 at 03:46 PM (#4306173)
I look at the two of them and see Trout leading in runs as a leadoff hitter and Cabrera leading in RBI as a three hitter and it's a wash.


Cabrera had 36 more Runs + RBIs compared to Cabrera. So you need 40 runs of defense and baserunning to make Trout better. Not sure most traditionalist really know the scale of defense and baserunning. Also they definitely won't consider park factors or double plays.

Now if by tradionalist you mean BA/OBP/SLG than yes I think anyone using those stats would consider Trout much better overall.

Why are stolen bases so important all of a sudden? And if you want to include them, it should be SB minus CS, cuz just listing stolen bases alone doesn't give an accurate portrayal of value.


I agree that it should be SB-CS but I'm just going for simplicity. Three stats that provide the most coverage of player value while also not being too rare. TB, BB and SB pretty much encompasses all of a player's value IMO. It shows us how many times he got on base via the walk and how many total bases he got with his hits and then what he did when he got on base. The stats are correlated with eachother (it's really hard to lead in BB and TB simultaneously) but they aren't directly related in the same way that RBIs and HRs are.

The problem with that triple crown is that I don't think it's ever been done. Ty Cobb lead in OBP/SLG/SB twice but never in BB or TB. So that's why I subbed out SB for BA. Then it's happened six times.

BA/BB/TB is good, but includes no baserunning. Problem with trying to include baserunning is there is no single metric; SB would be silly (I would've won the TC if it weren't for the valueless Vince Coleman in my league...). RUNS woudl not be bad, if you don't mind hte team dependent thing.

BA/BB/TB also misses park effects.


It's funny this comment is the exact opposite of the preceeding one. If you're trying to acutely measure value you're going to end up with someone close to WAR. The point of the triple crown is to pick 3 really simple stats that provide wide coverage of a player's value.

I think the three elements of the Triple Crown should be as separated as possible: hitting, baserunning, and fielding.


It's impossible to encompass hitting in one stat (unless you use wOBA, but then you're just going back to WAR) and fielding measurements right now are too imprecise.

I think you should be trying to encompass 3 of the 4 major skills (contact, power, walking and running).
   102. Ron J2 Posted: November 19, 2012 at 04:05 PM (#4306195)
#98 It also seems plausible that the new scoreboard screwed up the batter's eye in Anaheim. Certainly things like scoreboard changes have resulted in park factor changes elsewhere.
Page 2 of 2 pages  < 1 2

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

News

All News | Prime News

Old-School Newsstand


BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Downtown Bookie
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogOTP 19 February 2018: Does Buster Posey Have a Post-playing Career in Politics?
(1817 - 2:56pm, Feb 24)
Last: BrianBrianson

NewsblogPrimer Dugout (and link of the day) 2-23-2018
(29 - 2:31pm, Feb 24)
Last: Misirlou doesn't live in the restaurant

NewsblogClosest MLB Park by Drive Time
(22 - 2:31pm, Feb 24)
Last: BDC

NewsblogArizona Diamondbacks analysis: Yasmany Tomas contract keeps hurting
(6 - 2:23pm, Feb 24)
Last: shoewizard

NewsblogOT - 2017-18 NBA thread (All-Star Weekend to End of Time edition)
(205 - 1:37pm, Feb 24)
Last: don't ask 57i66135; he wants to hang them all

Sox TherapyAn Overdue Look at the Roster
(36 - 1:24pm, Feb 24)
Last: Jose is an Absurd Doubles Machine

NewsblogInside Baseball | Picking Jake Arrieta's New Team
(11 - 12:44pm, Feb 24)
Last: snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster)

NewsblogJ.D. Martinez reportedly has deal with Red Sox
(66 - 12:39pm, Feb 24)
Last: shoewizard

NewsblogOT: Winter Soccer Thread
(781 - 12:08pm, Feb 24)
Last: Nose army. Beef diaper? (CoB)

NewsblogMLB Should Embrace Rule That Lets Teams Bat Anyone They Want In 9th Inning
(140 - 11:33am, Feb 24)
Last: Morty Causa

NewsblogInside Baseball MLB Notes | Hanley Ramirez Ready For Comeback
(40 - 12:11am, Feb 24)
Last: Mudpout

NewsblogInside Mickey Callaway’s steps toward modernizing the Mets | New York Post
(15 - 10:45pm, Feb 23)
Last: Howie Menckel

NewsblogWhat if the Rays actually have a good plan?
(44 - 6:55pm, Feb 23)
Last: Itsdrainageeli

NewsblogRays trade Odorizzi to Twins, acquire Cron from Angels, DFA All-Star Dickerson
(70 - 4:52pm, Feb 23)
Last: Walt Davis

Gonfalon CubsFinally
(68 - 2:55pm, Feb 23)
Last: Moses Taylor, aka Hambone Fakenameington

Page rendered in 0.1255 seconds
47 querie(s) executed