There’s an Ed that hangs around my interlocked-up Yankee-fueled bar…but I’m not sure his last name is Roso.
About the best thing you can say about the Yankees’ Series victory is that it’s been too long since the last one—in which they defeated our beloved Mets—for their fans to have achieved total ######### status. True, last night they chanted “Who’s Your Daddy” at Pedro Martinez—which insult, in typical bully fashion, they built off a self-deprecating remark by their target. But, as we saw from the less than ugly celebrations last night, many of them are new to ############# of the sort exhibited by Yankee fans in the 1990s. This will require time and practice to achieve…
In the years 1996-2000, the Yankees had briefly brought back that aura of invincibility the franchise used to have in bygone days, and its fan base became swollen with just the sort of chunkheads you would expect to parasitically attach themselves to a guaranteed winner:
* fat, lonely teenagers;
* dead-eyed stockbrokers with suspenders and goo in their hair who, when they were not pretending to actually watch the games, liked to drink single malt, smoke Cohibas, and purchase lap dances;
* young fogies whose bedrooms were crammed with baseball books and whose lack of a suitable father figure drove them to fantasize that DiMaggio, The Mick, and the Sultan of Swat walked with them;
* dorks and ########.
...Enjoy it while it lasts, guy. Next year a number of your veterans will have aged into sports-commentatorhood, and A-Rod will be revealed to have used HGH and crystal meth when he was 30 and too young know any better. Don’t worry, though—losing is part of the process of growing up, which is why we Mets fans are not merely mature, but practically senile.
Repoz
Posted: November 06, 2009 at 02:30 PM |
19 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags:
mets,
yankees
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Best Regards, Larry M. Posted: November 06, 2009 at 02:50 PM (#3380559)so at least he has some insight....
Poor Cub fans. All the hate, none of the glory.
I don't think Mets fans should be talking about people with goo in their hair. Suspenders, maybe, but is it really any better to be greasy in a wifebeater and gold chains?
And I'm not a Wall Street guy, but Scotch, cigars and strippers are awesome.
As a Red Sox fan, I must admit that Yankee fandom doesn't have a monoploy or stranglehold on the above demographic groups.
I am rather impressed with the level of passion the author displays in this article.
I like the Voice, actually, but it can be a very, very shrill paper. I take frequent breaks from reading it. Still, if you're looking for a she-male--and I'm not here to judge--the Voice is your go-to rag.
Thanks for pointing out the literary qualifications of this paper. And I now see, after closer inspection, one of the other features is about a Gravel-Voiced Chick With Dick Sings "I Am What I Am"
I never thought Mike Bloomberg's voice was that gravelly.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main