Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Thursday, December 20, 2012
Yikes! Even a money train stops once in a while!
A couple of things to recognize about Hamilton. First, he played in one of the most hitter-friendly ballparks for lefty hitters. The Ballpark at Arlington ranked 3rd in terms of the park factor for left-handed hitter home runs, while Angels Stadium in Anaheim ranks 23rd. Considering the 2013 schedules for both the Rangers and the Angels and the parks in which they play, Hamilton will play to a park factor that suggests about 20% less homeruns, than if he remained a Ranger. Another issue, which is perhaps more concerning, is Josh Hamilton’s track record against top-flight pitching. In a recent study, I segmented all starting pitchers into different levels of “quality”, based on the OPS they yielded over a season. I defined “top” pitching as the top 1/3 and “bottom” pitching as the bottom 1/3 of starting pitchers. (I controlled for the lefty-righty factor and I rated pitchers for each season in the study—2009, 2010, and 2011.) The average left-handed hitter has a spread of 182 OPS points in his stats against “top” vs. “bottom” pitching. In other words, a .732 OPS guy (MLB-wide average against starting pitchers) is expected to hit .641 against top pitching and .823 against the bottom third of starters. Josh Hamilton’s spread is far more dramatic. Instead of a spread of 182 points, his is 433 points. Hamilton hit .721 against top pitchers, while banging out an OPS of 1.154 against the weakest pitchers. He performed only 12% above the MLB average against top pitchers, but a bone-crushing 40% above league average against the weakest third of the rotation. This suggests that Hamilton, who was a .909 OPS guy over these three seasons, feasts on weak pitching, but is neutralized by top pitching. Incidentally, this is a consistent pattern over the three years in our sample. Even in Hamilton’s MVP season of 2010, when he batted .359 with a 1.014 OPS, he exhibited the same pattern of hitting. In his MVP year he hit under .800 vs. top pitchers and over 1.200 against weak pitchers for another 400+ point spread. This has serious implications for the postseason, since the mix of pitching in the postseason closely resembles what we call the “top” pitchers. These pitchers represent one-third of regular season innings, but over 60% of postseason innings. Hitters who do not fare well against top pitchers are not as likely to get it done in October. Given the quality of the Angels’ roster, we may have a chance to see how this movie ends over the next several Octobers.
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: Draft Features Rarest of Prospects: Redheads (19 - 12:56am, May 19)Last: Random Transaction GeneratorNewsblog: Phil Wood: It's time for baseball to use technology to make sure umps get it right (5 - 12:45am, May 19)Last: The Yankee ClapperNewsblog: PressBox: Boog Powell: Meat Of The Order (16 - 12:18am, May 19)Last: Misirlou is bad, he's nationwideNewsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread - May 2013 (933 - 12:18am, May 19)Last:  QuakerNewsblog: BBTF SOFTBALL GAME IN NEW YORK--AUG 17 (294 - 12:17am, May 19)Last:  bobmNewsblog: Josh Hamilton's allergies not linked to drug use, doctors say (36 - 12:15am, May 19)Last: Jack Carter, calling Beleaguered CastleNewsblog: Brian Cashman is keeping Ben Francisco around to “piss everybody off” (7 - 12:08am, May 19)Last: RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)Newsblog: Powerball odds? Juan Pierre's homers are long shots, too (15 - 11:50pm, May 18)Last: bobmNewsblog: [OTP-May] Politico: Congressional baseball game, May 1, 1926 (3276 - 11:44pm, May 18)Last:  CrosbyBirdNewsblog: Holmes: Where does Miguel Cabrera rank among Tiger greats? (26 - 11:42pm, May 18)Last: Tulo's Fishy Mullet (mrams)Newsblog: OMNICHATTER for MAY 18, 2013 (145 - 11:05pm, May 18)Last:  botemanNewsblog: SoE (Megdal): It's Time to Finally Believe in the Orioles (16 - 10:08pm, May 18)Last: DJ Funky and the Smile Time Variety PlayersNewsblog: Bradford: Could this be the smartest Red Sox team since '07? (8 - 8:57pm, May 18)Last: TVerikNewsblog: Generation K: Baseball’s strikeout trend is growing at record pace (59 - 8:32pm, May 18)Last: Eric J can SABER all he wants toNewsblog: Babcock: Can The 2013 Cubs Channel The Turnaround Artists Of 1967? (10 - 8:14pm, May 18)Last: Walt Davis
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. BDCHamilton certainly has an off-and-on postseason record, like a lot of players, and his overall postseason numbers aren't great. But he was an ALCS MVP a couple of years ago. You're always rolling the dice in the postseason, but it's hardly like Hamilton's number can't come up.
Why would anyone expect this to be a linear relationship? Top pitchers limit their hits and runs against everyone. It's probably true that "bad" pitchers are "bad" because they can't get the top hitters out, not because they can't get backup catchers out.
This brings up a fascinating general point; is there a KIND of hitter who has more trouble with really good (or some particular Type of really good) arm? More generally, are there methods of platooning we have not seen, being content to simply use left-and-right handedness?
Do some guys not hit 95+ fastballs? Do pitchers who throw very hard (A Chapman) have different platoon splits? Or hurlers who toss lots of big curves? If a hitter can't hit "good" pitchers, what is it that he feasts on; is it poor control, lower speed, or less variety?
Lots of good studies there.
Alfonso Soriano and Dave Henderson sympathize with Hamilton.
Just by observation, it always seemed to me that Rickey Henderson had inordinate trouble with the really-fast high fastball. And indeed, some of his lowest career BA-against numbers feature Randy Johnson, Nolan Ryan, Tom Henke, Tom Gordon, Roger Clemens – not like that's anything unusual. By contrast, Henderson was at his best against pitchers like Charlie Leibrandt, Jimmy Key, Dennis Martinez: good pitchers but not blow-it-past you guys. Henderson's style was aided by an extreme crouch: small strikezone, lots of walks, but it made it hard to get around on the higher fastballs.
I don't know if that would help any manager in platooning. Somebody has to go up and bat against Randy Johnson.
Super Joe McEwing, come on down!
This is a pretty meaningless study without context. What do the other LH power hitter's of Hamilton's caliber do against great pitching? I don't really care about the average hitter here. Is this adjusted for park and league context?
Edit: Not terribly surprising, the guy with the best record against RANDY JOHNSON (i.e. between 1993-2004) with 50 PA...Barry Bonds. Drop it to 30 PA and Chipper hit .353/.421/.912 in 38 PA.
It makes sense that certain pitchers would match up better against certain hitters. Obviously there is the platoon advantage but also there are some hitters that can turn on a fastball but aren't good with breaking pitches. Some hitters are trying to work the count in their favor and a pitcher with good control can neutralize them. Lots of older hitters can't turn on the fastball but will destroy a "cripple" pitch.
While managing the Orioles in the 1997 ALDS, Davey Johnson started Jeff Reboulet and Jerome Walton against Randy Johnson instead of Roberto Alomar and Rafael Palmeiro and won both games.
Actually that's about a 124 OPS+. So he's better than a (full season) average corner OF vs. top pitchers and Babe Ruth vs. bottom pitchers. Sounds like a pretty good guy to have around to me.
I suspect this is pretty common for top hitters. I mean 433 points is probably extreme but "feasting on poor pitching" is surely a major component of any top hitter's success. If you broke it down some I bet it comes down to hitting ahead/behind in the count, K-rates, etc. My guess would be that guys like Thome have a "hard" time with elite pitchers -- they'll hit the low,outside corner and not get behind in the count. Thome Ks about once per 4 PA for his career and I wouldn't be surprised if that was more like 1 per 3 PA against the top and 1 per 5 PA against the bottom.
And speaking of Thome, is Hamilton's good/bad split any more troubling than Thome's R/L split of 1034/766? I guarantee you that I don't let Thome face a RHP from the 6th inning on in a close playoff game (except Mo).
Here are some funny numbers, from Thome's vs. pitchers, some of his highest PAs:
Clemens 1293
Verlander 1136 (this is old Thome!)
Radke 784
Wakefield 691
Belcher 685
Erickson 1347 (surprised it's not higher :-)
Baseball is a funny game.
All-time favorite split I know of:
Sosa vs. David Williams
22 PA, 8-13 with 6 HR, 9 BB, only 2 K -- 615/773/2077 for a 2850 OPS
Small sample or not, it didn't take anybody long to realize that Sosa had Williams number and he was walked anytime there were men on base (6 HR, 6 RBI)
You're double counting. It's 12% above the average against those pitchers. If you're going to compare an individual's OPS+ to the OPS+ allowed by Top Pitchers, then you have to figure his OPS relative to what the league hits against everybody. IOW, Top Pitchers turn Hamilton into a slightly below-average hitter, but they turn average hitters into lousy hitters.
Not sure how Walt figured the 124 either.
Not sure how Walt figured the 124 either.
OPS+ = OBP/lgOBP + SLG/lgSLG - 1. A guy who has an OPS 12% better than league average will have a ~124 OPS+ (depending on the actual splits, of course).
Start about 1:20 for this topic
Fair point, I hadn't read that right -- it is 12% above average vs. top pitchers.
So, yeah, that's a roughly 124 OPS+ (#14 explained it) split ... but from 2009-11, he averaged only a 135 OPS+ overall. If there was no Hamilton effect by pitcher, he'd average 135 in each split and 124 is not far enough off 135 in a small sample (guesstimate of 500 PA against the bottom third 09-11) to say very much. Oops, less than that as this seems to include only starting pitchers so we're talking, what, maybe 1000-1100 PAs over 3 years?
Anyway, he was about 17.5% above average overall in this time period. 12% above for top pitchers and 40% above for bottom pitchers so, assuming equal PA, he would have to be league average against middle pitchers? That would seem the bigger issue if it was true so I suspect an unequal distribution of PAs. (The definition of top, middle, bottom seems to take no account of IP) So until I know how many PAs we're talking about, I'm keeping quiet.
"smoke him inside.."
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main