|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Pickover Calculus and Pizza? I can’t decide.
What prompted this post was not a calculus barb directed at sabermetrics, but one of the reactions to such a barb in a Baseball Think Factory thread: a flat out statement that “calculus has no place in baseball statistics”. On one hand, I really should just ignore this. The statement itself is so outlandish as to be difficult to respond to. It’s akin to saying that “cymbals have no place in music” or that “rice has no place in one’s diet”. Calculus is obviously not used directly by most sabermetricians, and one can certainly be a practice high-level sabermetrics without using any calculus. But to simply write off the possibility of using an entire branch of mathematics in the discipline is absurd.
...I do not wish to give the impression that I think the application of calculus is central to the current practice of sabermetrics. Clearly it is not, given the paucity of work applying it to sabermetric questions. But it is another tool at our disposal, and one that is perfectly suited to assist in the types of sabermetric questions that have always interested me. Calculus certainly has vast applications in understanding the mathematical relationships between sabermetric formulas. Why can you predict team runs scored fairly accurately (at least in a normal team context) using a dynamic equation like Base Runs or a linear weights equation? Why does any variant of the Pythagorean family of win estimators match up so well in practice with linear equations that follow the rule that ten runs = one win? Calculus is also inherent in any sort of exercise involving hypothesis testing, even if it is only implicit. After all, the normal distribution is defined as an integral of a particular function.
I will close with a list of links to articles on this blog that have used calculus in some manner. As you will see, the scope of topics that I have applied calculus to are fairly limited—mostly to understand how events are valued in various offensive measures and to estimate runs per win from non-linear win estimators. Hopefully those of you with more imagination and a broader range of research interests can come up with other applications. Even if what I’ve written about did represent the full extent of possible applications of calculus in sabermetrics, it should be clear that there is a place for it. And if there wasn’t a place for a branch of mathematics which has countless applications in the sciences, statistics, and probability in sabermetrics, I’d suggest it would be time to re-evaluate how we practice sabermetrics.
|
Support BBTF
Thanks to TedBerg for his generous support.
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: JM Catellier: Is Pedro Martinez a First Ballot Hall of Famer? (129 - 4:46am, May 22)Last:  BrianBriansonNewsblog: OT: The Soccer Thread, May 2013 (1050 - 4:31am, May 22)Last:  Swedish ChefNewsblog: White Sox Ace Chris Sale Eats and Eats and Eats Without Gaining Any Weight (82 - 4:27am, May 22)Last: you got a STEAGLES? you're gonna need a STEAGLES.Newsblog: OT: NHL is finally back thread (359 - 4:02am, May 22)Last:  Robert in Manhattan BeachNewsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread - May 2013 (1056 - 3:41am, May 22)Last:  Los Angeles El Hombre of AnaheimNewsblog: LATimes: Microsoft unveils new Xbox One console (5 - 3:33am, May 22)Last: Dr. HouseNewsblog: [OTP-May] Politico: Congressional baseball game, May 1, 1926 (3836 - 2:46am, May 22)Last:  BurlyBuehrleNewsblog: Barry Bonds: Detroit Tigers' Miguel Cabrera 'the best' ... but not better than me (63 - 2:30am, May 22)Last: the Hugh Jorgan returnsNewsblog: Yanks, Manchester City awarded MLS expansion team (24 - 2:12am, May 22)Last: the Hugh Jorgan returnsNewsblog: Dollar Sign on the Glistening Muscle: Scouting Ballplayers in 1980s Playgirl (26 - 2:07am, May 22)Last: base ball chickNewsblog: OMNICHATTER for MAY 21, 2013 (121 - 1:50am, May 22)Last:  botemanNewsblog: Posnanski: Jeff Francoeur and ANT (56 - 1:24am, May 22)Last: Sunday silenceNewsblog: SB Nation: Five lost scouting reports (11 - 12:44am, May 22)Last: PerryNewsblog: BBTF SOFTBALL GAME IN NEW YORK--AUG 17 (311 - 12:07am, May 22)Last:  Rafael Bellylard: Built like a FielderNewsblog: Primer Dugout (and link of the day) 5-21-2013 (22 - 12:01am, May 22)Last: esseff
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. depletion Posted: March 20, 2013 at 08:18 AM (#4392243)The easiest example is finding the area under a curve. You could always do it by calculus, or by approximation, drawing a series of thin rectangles under the curve and adding up the area. With a modern computer, that latter is very, very easy.
See if it matches the theory.
I think you're missing the point of numerical applications on the computer.
It was a good article, though. And shows how the ideas of calculus relate well to looking at functions. Like the derivative of pythagorean record showing why 10 runs is equal to a win. I should probably think about what I say more carefully.
Why set yourself apart from the crowd?
Not even wrong. Just missing the whole point of numerical computing.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main