Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Pickover Calculus and Pizza? I can’t decide.
What prompted this post was not a calculus barb directed at sabermetrics, but one of the reactions to such a barb in a Baseball Think Factory thread: a flat out statement that “calculus has no place in baseball statistics”. On one hand, I really should just ignore this. The statement itself is so outlandish as to be difficult to respond to. It’s akin to saying that “cymbals have no place in music” or that “rice has no place in one’s diet”. Calculus is obviously not used directly by most sabermetricians, and one can certainly be a practice highlevel sabermetrics without using any calculus. But to simply write off the possibility of using an entire branch of mathematics in the discipline is absurd.
...I do not wish to give the impression that I think the application of calculus is central to the current practice of sabermetrics. Clearly it is not, given the paucity of work applying it to sabermetric questions. But it is another tool at our disposal, and one that is perfectly suited to assist in the types of sabermetric questions that have always interested me. Calculus certainly has vast applications in understanding the mathematical relationships between sabermetric formulas. Why can you predict team runs scored fairly accurately (at least in a normal team context) using a dynamic equation like Base Runs or a linear weights equation? Why does any variant of the Pythagorean family of win estimators match up so well in practice with linear equations that follow the rule that ten runs = one win? Calculus is also inherent in any sort of exercise involving hypothesis testing, even if it is only implicit. After all, the normal distribution is defined as an integral of a particular function.
I will close with a list of links to articles on this blog that have used calculus in some manner. As you will see, the scope of topics that I have applied calculus to are fairly limited—mostly to understand how events are valued in various offensive measures and to estimate runs per win from nonlinear win estimators. Hopefully those of you with more imagination and a broader range of research interests can come up with other applications. Even if what I’ve written about did represent the full extent of possible applications of calculus in sabermetrics, it should be clear that there is a place for it. And if there wasn’t a place for a branch of mathematics which has countless applications in the sciences, statistics, and probability in sabermetrics, I’d suggest it would be time to reevaluate how we practice sabermetrics.

Support BBTF
Thanks to Tuque for his generous support.
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: OTP 16 Jan. 2017: The ‘honor’ Trumps politics in scheduling Cubs’ White House visit (1709  8:13am, Jan 21)Last: You Know Nothing JT Snow (YR)Newsblog: Hall of Fame's Rule of 10 should be changed  MLB.com (65  4:52am, Jan 21)Last: QLENewsblog: OT  December 2016 NBA thread (1207  2:34am, Jan 21)Last: BooeyHall of Merit: 2018 Hall of Merit Ballot Discussion (104  12:52am, Jan 21)Last: Dr. ChaleekoNewsblog: ExAstro Luis Valbuena reportedly agrees to deal with Angels  Houston Chronicle (10  11:38pm, Jan 20)Last: Los Angeles El Hombre de AnaheimNewsblog: Josh Hamilton Prepared to Earn Spot on Rangers' Roster (45  11:38pm, Jan 20)Last: Sunday silenceNewsblog: OT  NFL stretch drive/playoffs (December 2016  February 2017) (618  11:28pm, Jan 20)Last: Crispix reaches boiling point with lackluster playNewsblog: Orioles, Mark Trumbo agree to deal  MLB.com (10  11:16pm, Jan 20)Last: Infinite Yost (Voxter)Newsblog: 2017 Top 10 first base prospects  MLB.com (3  8:35pm, Jan 20)Last: Cargo CultistNewsblog: OT Gaming: October 2015 (608  8:33pm, Jan 20)Last: PASTE does not get put on waivers in AugustHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 2000 Discussion (24  6:12pm, Jan 20)Last: DL from MNNewsblog: Jayson Stark: Casting my 2018 Hall of Fame ballot ... today (67  6:07pm, Jan 20)Last: BaldrickNewsblog: What the Hall of Fame elections will look like through 2022 (92  5:31pm, Jan 20)Last: BlastinNewsblog: Marlins Acquire RHP Straily from Reds (22  5:30pm, Jan 20)Last: Edmundo got dem ol' Kozma blues again mamaNewsblog: Primer Dugout (and link of the day) 1202017 (21  5:16pm, Jan 20)Last: Pat Rapper's Delight (as quoted on MLB Network)

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. depletion Posted: March 20, 2013 at 08:18 AM (#4392243)The easiest example is finding the area under a curve. You could always do it by calculus, or by approximation, drawing a series of thin rectangles under the curve and adding up the area. With a modern computer, that latter is very, very easy.
See if it matches the theory.
I think you're missing the point of numerical applications on the computer.
It was a good article, though. And shows how the ideas of calculus relate well to looking at functions. Like the derivative of pythagorean record showing why 10 runs is equal to a win. I should probably think about what I say more carefully.
Why set yourself apart from the crowd?
Not even wrong. Just missing the whole point of numerical computing.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main