Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Pickover Calculus and Pizza? I can’t decide.
What prompted this post was not a calculus barb directed at sabermetrics, but one of the reactions to such a barb in a Baseball Think Factory thread: a flat out statement that “calculus has no place in baseball statistics”. On one hand, I really should just ignore this. The statement itself is so outlandish as to be difficult to respond to. It’s akin to saying that “cymbals have no place in music” or that “rice has no place in one’s diet”. Calculus is obviously not used directly by most sabermetricians, and one can certainly be a practice highlevel sabermetrics without using any calculus. But to simply write off the possibility of using an entire branch of mathematics in the discipline is absurd.
...I do not wish to give the impression that I think the application of calculus is central to the current practice of sabermetrics. Clearly it is not, given the paucity of work applying it to sabermetric questions. But it is another tool at our disposal, and one that is perfectly suited to assist in the types of sabermetric questions that have always interested me. Calculus certainly has vast applications in understanding the mathematical relationships between sabermetric formulas. Why can you predict team runs scored fairly accurately (at least in a normal team context) using a dynamic equation like Base Runs or a linear weights equation? Why does any variant of the Pythagorean family of win estimators match up so well in practice with linear equations that follow the rule that ten runs = one win? Calculus is also inherent in any sort of exercise involving hypothesis testing, even if it is only implicit. After all, the normal distribution is defined as an integral of a particular function.
I will close with a list of links to articles on this blog that have used calculus in some manner. As you will see, the scope of topics that I have applied calculus to are fairly limited—mostly to understand how events are valued in various offensive measures and to estimate runs per win from nonlinear win estimators. Hopefully those of you with more imagination and a broader range of research interests can come up with other applications. Even if what I’ve written about did represent the full extent of possible applications of calculus in sabermetrics, it should be clear that there is a place for it. And if there wasn’t a place for a branch of mathematics which has countless applications in the sciences, statistics, and probability in sabermetrics, I’d suggest it would be time to reevaluate how we practice sabermetrics.

Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: OTP 2016 Sep 26: A single for Donald Trump  He doesn’t have to hit a home run to send Hillary to the showers (662  11:36am, Sep 27)Last: ERRORJolly Old St. NickNewsblog: Mariners catcher Steve Clevenger tweets protesters should be treated 'like animals' (466  11:32am, Sep 27)Last: Ron JNewsblog: Yankees say good riddance to David Ortiz, the best to ever own them  New York Post (5  11:31am, Sep 27)Last: LassusNewsblog: Fans jeer as Cardinals suffer 'embarrassing loss'  St. Louis Cardinals  stltoday.com (3  11:29am, Sep 27)Last: Nasty NateNewsblog: Why 2016 is the Year of the Home Run (7  11:28am, Sep 27)Last: snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster)Newsblog: The impossible happened — so Dee Gordon did the impossible  New York Post (2  11:13am, Sep 27)Last: Infinite Yost (Voxter)Newsblog: The Golden Age of Baseball Writing (1  11:05am, Sep 27)Last: gehrig97Newsblog: Kyle Hendricks extends mastery, Kris Bryant tops 100 RBIs in Cubs' 100th win  Chicago Tribune (7  10:53am, Sep 27)Last: Moses Taylor World Tour: Hong KongNewsblog: OMNICHATTER 92616 (61  10:47am, Sep 27)Last: gef, more dangerous than a monkey w/ a razor bladeGonfalon Cubs: Projected Playoff Roster (62  10:45am, Sep 27)Last: Moses Taylor World Tour: Hong KongHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1997 Ballot (3  10:28am, Sep 27)Last: MrC.Newsblog: OTP 2016 Sep 19  Race for the White House: The Greatest Circus on Earth (1707  10:22am, Sep 27)Last: Chicago JoeNewsblog: What can the Cardinals learn from the Cubs' rise?  St Louis Cardinals ESPN (29  10:21am, Sep 27)Last: bobmNewsblog: Primer Dugout (and link of the day) 9272016 (2  10:12am, Sep 27)Last: BatmanNewsblog: Minor Leagues, Minimal Wages (4  9:42am, Sep 27)Last: DL from MN

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. depletion Posted: March 20, 2013 at 08:18 AM (#4392243)The easiest example is finding the area under a curve. You could always do it by calculus, or by approximation, drawing a series of thin rectangles under the curve and adding up the area. With a modern computer, that latter is very, very easy.
See if it matches the theory.
I think you're missing the point of numerical applications on the computer.
It was a good article, though. And shows how the ideas of calculus relate well to looking at functions. Like the derivative of pythagorean record showing why 10 runs is equal to a win. I should probably think about what I say more carefully.
Why set yourself apart from the crowd?
Not even wrong. Just missing the whole point of numerical computing.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main