|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Thursday, September 06, 2012
Prior to Tuesday, the most home runs the Washington Nationals had ever hit in a single game was five. They have now hit six two days in a row.
Less than an hour into the game, the supremacy was clear to everyone present, including the opposing manager who was ejected before the rout was one-third over. “This is by far the best team that we have played all year,” Cubs Manager Dale Sveum said after the Nationals’ 9-1 win that maintained a 7½-game lead over the Atlanta Braves in the National League East standings. “That’s like an American League lineup, too, with guys that hit the ball a long way, grind at-bats out and take advantage of any mistake that’s thrown.”
Gonzalez was brilliant through seven scoreless innings, striking out nine batters and not allowing a hit until the sixth inning. The offense smashed six home runs, becoming just the third team since 1920 to hit at least that many in consecutive games. Adam LaRoche continued his torrid hitting pace with a 3-for-4 night that included a two-run home run. Rookie Bryce Harper went 2 for 3 and clobbered two home runs for the second time, moving him further into historic company with his parents watching from the stands.
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: Mitchell: Pedroia, Cano and Magical Thinking (14 - 3:23am, May 23)Last: Cooper NielsonNewsblog: [OTP-May] Politico: Congressional baseball game, May 1, 1926 (4084 - 3:20am, May 23)Last:  BurlyBuehrleNewsblog: Jose Canseco to join Ft. Worth Cats as player/coach... or maybe not. (3 - 3:13am, May 23)Last: Jim Wisinski Newsblog: OT: The Soccer Thread, May 2013 (1070 - 2:32am, May 23)Last:  Swedish ChefNewsblog: Chase Utley 'scared' by injury, could be headed to DL (3 - 2:06am, May 23)Last: botemanNewsblog: ESPN: Forging bond with Pete Rose has helped fuel Joey Votto's desire to be great (37 - 1:22am, May 23)Last: Sunday silenceNewsblog: Verducci: Offensive decline leads list of 10 early-season trends to watch (32 - 1:13am, May 23)Last: LionoftheSenate (feels sorry for the Pirates)Newsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread - May 2013 (1187 - 12:54am, May 23)Last:  tshipmanNewsblog: OMNICHATTER for MAY 22, 2013 (171 - 12:50am, May 23)Last:  GutsNewsblog: Seamheads.com Adds 1928 Negro Leagues Data (3 - 12:41am, May 23)Last: OCFNewsblog: Arizona Diamondbacks broadcaster Bob Brenly says it’s time for robo-umps in baseball (32 - 12:33am, May 23)Last: Sunday silenceNewsblog: Posnanski: Jeff Francoeur and ANT (81 - 12:03am, May 23)Last: Steve TrederNewsblog: White Sox Ace Chris Sale Eats and Eats and Eats Without Gaining Any Weight (124 - 12:02am, May 23)Last:  SquashNewsblog: Gonzales: No plans to dismantle White Sox (13 - 11:51pm, May 22)Last: asinwreckNewsblog: Sources: O's calling up Kevin Gausman (6 - 11:51pm, May 22)Last: Crispix Attacks 2: Swag Airlines
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. TerpNats Posted: September 06, 2012 at 11:20 AM (#4228172)It will be a shame though when they get good and the fans jump on. Prices will go up and it will be much much harder to find tickets and good tickets at cheap prices.
But depending on what happens in the last few starts, it could end up being an interesting, and possibly very tight vote indeed.
Having been on both sides of that dichotomy, I'm willing to say that it's a great problem to have.
And then you read joeys posts.
No kidding.
I feel like I've seen a lot of brand-new A's hats around the Bay Area the last couple of months, and I am TOTALLY FINE with that. I don't care about "loyalty" or who is a "real" A's fan, because what other people do or think or feel about my team has nothing to do with me, and seems like a completely stupid thing to worry about. I guess if they were selling out most of their games, and jacking up ticket prices, and kept doing that for a long time, then maybe... but, come on, this is the A's we're talking about.
And then I remember that they're concern trolls and give the proper response, which is to laugh at them.
Remember before the season when some of the know-it-alls were saying that Beane wasn't really that good?
A good friend of mine just started watching professional baseball this year and picked Washington as his team. He said he was going for a team that hadn't won anything, but was on the rise. Good timing, that.
EDIT:
This has only made me a bigger and bigger Nationals fan this year. So much to be positive about.
This.
I assume this is somewhat directed at JoeyB. Joey, I'm not sure what your problem is mate, but you really need to chill out.
Every team that finds itself being successful always has various hangers on and such who drop off when the team returns to tougher times, as mentioned by Greg, just enjoy your team playing really well. The Nationals have been a great story this year and I don't think you'd find anyone on this board with anything negative to post about them.
Is it quasi-irrational? Sure, of course it is: fandom was ever such. But the attitude comes not from some mistaken belief that the Nationals' achievement is "our own," so much as it is a reflection of the vindication fans who stayed with the team through the awful years feel for maintaining their dogged (and at times mocked) devotion. I'm sure Pirates fans and Orioles fans feel the same way right now, except the reason they're not quite so touch is that they already have storied legacies of success to fall back upon -- and a longer track record of recent futility -- hence the reason your "green fans" theory has some real merit to it.
At some point they have to adopt a bit of the COUNT DA RINGZ attitude that fans of all good teams tend to have.
They probably need to win at least one ring first.
Aren't you a Mariners fan?
;)
Also I have no clue what a "concern troll" is but I'm fairly certain I am not one.
I think Washington-Cincinnati is far too close to call. The Reds' bullpen and the front end of the rotation have carried the staff to the best adjusted ERA in the league. Each team has a .746 OPS, so the Nationals get the edge for playing in a neutral park. Neither team is among the leaders in steals.
The Reds have the edge in a short series, imo. They've got a great bullpen with the highest strikeout rate in history. Washington's rotation has been terrific, but its advantage is neutralized in a short series because the last two rotation spots don't matter nearly as much. With Votto returning and having enough time to get ready for the postseason, the Reds will be dangerous next month.
(Still, as Jeff Sullivan says: Felix is ours and you can't have him.)
(This has been a long running joke on Lookout Landing, as it's transparently obvious that the only reason the Padres were assigned as the Mariners' "interleague rival" is because the Giants, the team they actually somewhat overlap with in terms of fanbase -- in Oregon in particular -- already have the A's across the bay, and the Dodgers -- who are at least somewhat closer geographically than the Pirates -- have the Angels. Ah, the stupidity of forced interleague schedules.)
I think you think I'm Austria. I am England. FINALIZED England.
Remember the phrase, "Just close your eyes and think of Fred Lynn."
And I personally find this convenient, as it means the Padres come up to Seattle more than you'd expect. I realize everyone else in the world thinks it's stupid. Not my problem!
since his 0-5 on Aug 15, he's 338/382/746 in 77 PA's
EDIT: whereas, Trout has been 208/263/264 in his last 60
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main