|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Saturday, February 25, 2012
Braun’s argument during his January appeal in New York City was that the courier who collected his urine made a number of against-protocol moves after leaving the testing area. But were mistakes really made?
The courier did not immediately head to a FedEx Office after collecting Braun’s sample following an early-October game because it was late on a Saturday night and he figured the store would be closed. Braun (or, rather, his lawyers) argued in January that the courier’s action was against policy, but the MLB-MLBPA joint drug agreement states that “specimens cannot be placed in a FedEx Drop Box” and the five FedEx Office locations closest to Miller Park are all closed before 9 p.m. on Saturdays. In fact, the location closest to Miller Park — just 3.28 miles away — isn’t open at all on Saturdays.
Also, none of the FedEx Office locations in the Milwaukee area ship items out on Sundays. So instead of giving the sealed cup of urine to a FedEx Office employee at some point Sunday and hoping for proper handling, the courier followed the terms of the MLB-MLBPA joint drug agreement (see pages 37-39) by storing Braun’s urine sample in a secure refrigerator at his residence until Monday morning, when FedEx could finally get the shipment to the appropriate testing lab in Montreal.
The MLB-MLBPA joint drug agreement fully allows for temporary storage by couriers — people who are trained and paid to handle drug test samples, and do so as a profession — as long as the specimen can be “appropriately safeguarded,” kept in a “cool and secure location,” with “chain of custody intact.” A refrigerator in the private residence of a trained doping officer would seem to fit those criteria.
So if the courier is allowed to temporarily store samples on his own, and he did so in his own residence, where exactly is the chain of custody issue? And why did Das rule to have the suspension overturned?
Dan
Posted: February 25, 2012 at 11:50 AM | 35 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags:
brewers
|
Support BBTF
Thanks to Jim Wisinski for his generous support.
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: Posnanski: Albert Pujols doesn't matter anymore (7 - 4:50am, May 21)Last: SnowboyNewsblog: Heyman: Miggy-Trout debate rages on, but Cabrera wins all here (156 - 4:16am, May 21)Last:  FancyPantsHandle glistening with foreign substanceNewsblog: OT: NHL is finally back thread (356 - 4:03am, May 21)Last:  BurlyBuehrleNewsblog: Williams: Discover one of baseball's forgotten streaks (25 - 3:23am, May 21)Last: bobmNewsblog: Rosenthal: Ax to fall soon for LA's Mattingly (89 - 3:23am, May 21)Last: Tom TNewsblog: Slate: The Dreaded C-Word (1 - 2:40am, May 21)Last: The Clarence Thomas of BBTF (scott)Newsblog: [OTP-May] Politico: Congressional baseball game, May 1, 1926 (3590 - 2:39am, May 21)Last:  Joe KehoskieNewsblog: OMNICHATTER for MAY 20, 2013 (142 - 1:38am, May 21)Last:  Phil Coorey. Newsblog: Joe Maddon calls ump's position 'baseball anarchy' (16 - 1:18am, May 21)Last: Robert in Manhattan BeachNewsblog: Hal Steinbrenner calls tickets 'affordable' (29 - 12:46am, May 21)Last: What did Billy Ripken have against Elroy Face?Newsblog: TheZobrists.com (15 - 12:44am, May 21)Last: MontyNewsblog: Rare Feat Not Done Since Pete Rose (2 - 12:25am, May 21)Last: VoodooRNewsblog: OT: The Soccer Thread, May 2013 (977 - 11:53pm, May 20)Last:  JH (in DC)Newsblog: Justice: 3-homer effort puts Miguel Cabrera ahead of pace from MVP 2012 season (2 - 11:32pm, May 20)Last: Cooper NielsonNewsblog: Draft Features Rarest of Prospects: Redheads (107 - 11:09pm, May 20)Last:  Alex meets the threshold for granular review
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Dan SzymborskiExcept, of course, it wasn't late on a Saturday night. The Brewers only played a single game on Saturday in October, NLDS Game 1, which started at 2:00 PM and was over at 4:44 PM
Personally, the whole "steroid concentrations of eleventy bajillion times higher than we've ever found before" makes me a bit suspicious, and that combined with the issues that were reportedly found, is enough to keep me from convicting the doe-eyed player.
Does he have roommates? Does anyone really know anything?
The important thing to note is that MLB had the burden of proof in a disciplinary case. It failed to meet its burden. Rather than cast doubt on Braun they should be looking in the mirror and wondering why they are so bad at proving their case.
Huh? The last time I checked the FedEx office across the street from my job is open past 9 on Saturdays, and it's only about a 10 min ride from Miller Park. And if I'm wrong about the time, I sure as heck aren't wrong about them being open on Saturday, because I've been there on the weekend.
This is the part that is really annoying. The Players were promised confidentiality, and it keeps getting breached, over and over. This is either MLB or their testers, but in either case, I would hope that the next time around, the Union insist on some teeth in the confidentiality provision -- requiring a full scale, serious investigation, conducted jointly by MLB security adn the union, and with serious sanctions if it is found that anyone other than the player or his representatives was responsible for the leak.
They are sports writers - they either make them up or pass along illegally obtained/speculative information for page cli...uh, the people's right to know. I mean, in the comments section of the article, the author claims that his mind is far from made up - not far enough to keep from publishing an article that argues the COC wasn't broken based on unconfirmed reports and tweets apparently - but inside, where it counts.
Nobody knows nuthin'
One guy says there were 18,000 fed ex locations open, another says none were. This guy says Fed Ex doesn't ship out on Saturdays, that guy says there was at least one still shipment available. This guy says it was late Saturday night, but the game ended before 5:00. Someone says the collector is required to get it to the courier immediately, but someone else says he's allowed to hold on to it. Since it's apparent that no one knows what the rules or circumstances really are, it's pointless to argue any more, as anyone can pick any set of "facts" to make their argument and no one can with confidence say they are wrong.
Doesn't that assume that Braun immediately stepped off the field and gave a sample? It's possible that he showered, fielded questions from the media, greeted guests, and then gave a sample. If that happened, maybe the courier didn't get the sample until 7 or 8 pm and he or she doesn't look as much as a lazy ass.
EDIT: Of course, that assumes MLB and the MLBPA managed to come to a reasonable solution to an obvious problem. So I see the flaw in my logic.
From article, "The MLB-MLBPA joint drug agreement fully allows for temporary storage by couriers — people who are trained and paid to handle drug test samples, and do so as a profession." If the courier is indeed a "profession," it stands to reason that he was trained to prevent his buddies from handling the sample in a drunken stupor.
I took a quick scan of the joint drug agreement between Major League Baseball and its Players Association on mlb's site. From Section VIII, "The Club Representative, accompanied by the Chaperone, shall notify each player on the test list immediately after the Club Representative’s review of the test list, or upon the player’s arrival at the ballpark. The Chaperone will note the time of notification on the test list next to the player’s name. The player must check in at the collection facility within 15 minutes of notification. The player shall be monitored by the Chaperone at all times between the time of notification and the time the player checks in at the collection area."
Once the player is notified, he has 15 minutes to give a sample, but who knows when Braun was notified.
Link
The game didn't end until 4:44 pm. Braun gave a sample during the game?
During the gap, the sample was at the collector's home, and he placed it in a cool, dry area on a lower level, the people familiar with the case said. However, the collector didn't document his storage procedures, one of those persons said.
Here is literally the entire language regarding temporary storage from the joint agreement (see page 39).
If the specimen is not immediately prepared for shipment, the Collector shall
ensure that it is appropriately safeguarded during temporary storage.
1. The Collector must keep the chain of custody intact.
2. The Collector must store the samples in a cool and secure location.
There is no requirements for documenting the storage procedure in the joint agreement.
I think most of the comments on most sites are missing the point (although understandable, as we don't have the arbitrator's written reasoning).
This really has nothing to do with whether the sample was tampered with (it apparently wasn't), or if it was left out at room temperature, or WHETHER Braun is guilty. All it has to do with was if the bargained procedures were followed. If for example the procedures said "the sample must be tossed in the air three times", then Braun's lawyers are arguing it was only tossed in the air two times. The abitrator has agreed with Braun's side, and says MLB cannot suspend Braun because the sample was only tossed in the air two times. Doesn't mean tossing the sample in the air impacted the chain of custody, or somehow impacts the science or the results of the testing.
And I can't see the breach at this point? As far as I can tell, there's nothing in the joint agreement even specifying when the sample must arrive at Fed Ex. EDIT: Line 7 (page 37) states that the sample must arrive at Fed Ex the same day as collection. But line E on page 39 allows for temporary storage.
Second--and more importantly--we don't actually know what happened. What we have are a bunch of "sources say" and the like, some of which (like the time of the sample, as you pointed out in #18) don't seem to mesh in a meaningful way with known facts.
His job is strictly to figure out if the procedures outlined in the collective bargaining agreement were followed, as that's what Braun's lawyers were arguing. An his decision was that in this case the procedures weren't followed, so even if the fact that they weren't followed had NO impact on the test results being valid or invalid, he ruled in Braun's favor regarding the setting aside of the suspension.
Actually, the languages says "should be" not must be. Here's the entire language, "Absent unusual circumstances, the specimens should be sent by FedEx to the Laboratory on the same day they are collected." I think that's a subtle but important difference. And I can't seem to find which FedEx offices were open around the ball park on a Saturday afternoon.
The protocol allows for temporary storage by the courier, which is FedEx. It does not allow for temporary storage by the collector, which is the guy who took it home for the weekend. Because the collector knows who's sample it is, there's no confidentiality while he has it, so it's important that he hand off the sample ASAP.
Also, the joint agreement doesn't explicitly require documenting the storage procedure, because that's implicit in: "1. The Collector must keep the chain of custody intact." If the collector doesn't document where the sample was at all times until handed off to the courier, there is no chain of custody. Now, the collector may be able to claim after the fact that he knows where the sample was, but that wouldn't fly with most judges – they'll insist on contemporaneous records. And unless he lives alone in a home he owns (no roommates, relatives, or landlords with keys), he can't document what happened while he slept. Since he apparently brought his son with him to work (real professional while collecting urine samples), that seems unlikely.
The protocol allows for temporary storage by the collector. See the language I quoted in post 20.
Now, the collector may be able to claim after the fact that he knows where the sample was, but that wouldn't fly with most judges – they'll insist on contemporaneous records. And unless he lives alone in a home he owns (no roommates, relatives, or landlords with keys), he can't document what happened while he slept. Since he apparently brought his son with him to work (real professional while collecting urine samples), that seems unlikely.
This is where the language gets interesting from the Hardball Times and ESPN article. The HBT article says the sample was placed in a, "secure refrigerator at his residence until Monday morning," while ESPN writes the sample was placed, "in a cool, dry area on a lower level." Nice spin on both sides.
This is perfectly analogous to the players' strict liability. If a player fails a (properly administered) test, it is not a valid defense to argue that he took the PED unknowingly through an over-the-counter supplement or with a doctor's prescription about which MLB was not given prior notice.
At least those who assume Braun is guilty are having as much fun as those who assume he isn't, it appears.
"Hi, I'm here to collect Ryan Braun's urine."
"We're tired of you e-bay weirdos."
"No, I'm with the drug lab, Braun has been selected for a test. He has 15 minutes to give me his urine."
"C'mon, man, it's the playoffs and the game starts in 30 minutes. Can't this wait until after the game?"
"Sorry sir, those are the rules besides my son is waiting out in the car for me."
"I bet your son would love to see a playoff game."
"Boy would he!!"
"Well, look, I've got this friend, he's got one of those private boxes and I know they're nowhere near full today. I can get you in no problem."
"Gee, I don't know."
"Then you can bring him down to the locker room later, he can hang out with all the players and when Ryan's free, he will come give you a sample."
"Well, I guess that would be OK. Will I still be able to get the sample to FedEx on time?"
(Crossing fingers behind back) "We ship stuff late on a Saturday all the time."
"Gosh, thanks. Say, I didn't catch your name."
"Ummm ... just call me Doug."
We don't really know whether there was an opportunity to investigate tampering. I haven't seen anything indicating the lab preserved the packaging for every sample. If they toss the packaging after giving it a cursory inspection on arrival, you can't fault Braun for not being able to prove tampering, and it provides further support for the proposition that suspicious handling of a sample should be grounds for tossing a test.
IMO there is no way that what allegedly happened in the Braun case is covered (or was intended to be covered) under the language referred to here.
Read a larger portion of the quote from Section XI. (PROCEDURES AFTER COLLECTION / SECURITY AND SHIPMENT OF SPECIMENS) of the JDA, page 39.
The temporary storage by the collector is provided for "if the specimen is not immediately prepared for shipment." Maybe that window of time is to allow for the collection of samples from multiple players on the same day at the same stadium, prior to boxing it all up for shipment.
IMO subsection [F] negates the idea that "temporary storage" in subsection [E] somehow allows for overnight (or, worse, 36-hour) storage of samples by the collector between the completion of collection of the samples and the delivery by the collector of the samples to FedEx. "When...shall" clearly means that the delivery to FedEx is intended to occur directly and immediately on completion of collection and packaging; I do not think one can even argue that this language permits the collector to leave the stadium collection site without first having packaged the specimens for shipment (and therefore store the specimens temporarily for packaging).
That seems consistent with the other language quoted above from page 37 of the JDA:
The delivery to FedEx should occur directly and immediately "absent unusual circumstances."
I do not think one can even argue that this language permits the collector to leave the stadium collection site without first having packaged the specimens for shipment (and therefore store the specimens temporarily for packaging).
I don't think language specifies what is suppose to occur under unusual circumstances. Is temporary storage permissible only in cases when the specimen is not immediately prepared for shipment? In any case, the whole temporary storage clause seems like an unnecessary hazard. If the collector can't deliver the samples to FedEx immediately, the language should specify that the samples are no longer viable and new samples should be collected. Once you allow the collector to take the samples home, it creates too much potential trouble regarding the integrity of the sample.
Maybe Braun gave a sample before the game.
I had always assumed, since it makes the most sense, that the sample collectors would come to the park at the beginning of the day and notify the club of which players are on the list to be tested that day. If they show up in the middle of the game, that would put the players in the position of having to do exactly the thing that you were incerdulous about -- i.e., give a urine sample during a game.
FWIW, NY Times reported yesterday that the collector left Miller Park with the sample(s) at 5 PM.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main