User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.1558 seconds
54 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. ajnrules Posted: January 12, 2012 at 12:09 AM (#4034790)Anyways, excited about this, not necessary because I think he'll do well, but that'll I'll get to cheer on a fellow Taiwanese player. It'll make up for missing seeing Fu-Te Ni.
Do people who think handedness matters for starters ever stop to think that it makes no sense? I can see the need for a lefty reliever (although even there teams can certainly get by without any), but a lefty starter?
Imo, handedness matters for starters for the following reasons:
1. Stadium configuration (Yankee Stadium historically for example).
2. Teams often do not take star lefties out of the lineup, and the platoon split for righties is smaller.
3. Game Theory--without lefty starters, there would be almost exclusively left-handed hitters.
This makes sense, but you still haven't answered the question of whether you ever stop to think that it makes no sense.
"Old School" baseball demands at least one left-hander in the rotation. And I'm remembering that from a year when the Orioles had not one, not two, not three, but four different soft-tossing lefties in the rotation at one point or another. One of the old Baltimore Sun reporters, think it was Steadman, indicated that he knew the Orioles didn't have a prayer in '88, 'cuz they had not a single quality left-hander anymore.
/For some reason, that article stuck with me, but I think even then I knew the Birds had other problems...
Two doors down from me is a home owned by someone connected with the Taiwanese
EmbassyFriendship Center, that usually houses an entire family which has been posted here. The inhabitants were pretty excited when Chien-Ming Wang got called up by the Nats, Chen Wei-Yin might interest them as well--he at least has the potential to throw harder than the other guys Baltimore's been signing lately.I'll add that I think having a lefty starter matters more for playoff caliber teams than others - as:
1) I believe that these teams have, on average, a higher percentage of PA going to guys hitting lefty than non-playoff clubs. (Can anyone verify?)
2) Crispix's second point becomes a bigger deal.
3) Teams pursue more short-run strategies in the playoffs.
4) Each round is "winner take all" - not having a lefty may wash out as an advantage/disadvantage against a given team over the course of a season - but not a single series.
Having said that, I'd be very wiling to forego a lefty starter, if the circumstances seemed to call for it.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main