User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
For wholesale prices on baseball gifts and equipment, check these stores out! |
Page rendered in 0.1534 seconds
51 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. The Artist Posted: October 24, 2012 at 04:48 PM (#4281860)While it's easy to overplay the effect of team unity, it's also crazy to ignore it completely. The Giants were good enough to knock out the Reds and Cardinals without Melky; why run the risk of changing the internal mix at this stage when Melky has chosen to distance himself from the team?
-- MWE
Not only that, immediately upon losing Melky they got red-hot, going 25-10 and making a mockery of the division race when it appeared that the trade-infused Dodgers were about to gain the upper hand.
So: the team knows it can win without him, and the players are unanimously furious at him. His re-introduction into the clubhouse couldn't help but be a media circus and a significant distraction.
Clubhouse chemistry is real. The Giants have a very positive vibe going on, and they don't want to mess with it.
Also dear god, why on earth is Mota in the rotation as a 12th man? Why not at least get the speed / or an extra OF (Christian? Burriss?) of the bench?
That's not what I'm saying, and while I can't speak for Treder I don't think that what he's saying, either.
I don't think having Melky there would affect the team's effort at all. But it's going to affect the atmosphere under which the team prepares for the game. It's going to make it harder in some ways for the players, and the management team, to concentrate on the things that they have to do. Bringing Melky back - especially when he hasn't faced live pitching in 2 1/2 months, when he's done nothing to reach back out to the guys who were his teammates, and when the team has every right to feel that they got here more or less without him and by golly they can finish the job without him - is a risk, and frankly one that I think the Giants are better off passing up.
Christian's not on the 40-man. I suppose there's an argument you could make for Burriss or Peguero, especially with Lincecum in the pen, but realistically that person isn't likely to play much either.
-- MWE
If you had said his initials are JP I would have said Joe Posnanski. You would have said no, guess again and I would reply with is it Joe Posnanski?
It's time for Melky to move on, which I'm sure he'll do as soon as he becomes a free agent.
While I agree with Mike, Steve, and Bruce above, one question remains: Why did the Giants keep Melky on the 40-man rotation if they have little incentive to re-sign him?
I think to do him a solid?
If they take him off the 40 man, doesn't he have to serve out 5-6 games of the suspension next season? So they are doing him a solid, I guess.
Might as well throw Melky on the roster just in case they change their mind for some reason. It doesn't hurt.
To give Melky a spot on the roster, all they had to do was dump Shane Loux and Justin Christian off it. Those guys are generic minor league journeymen who would have been moved off the 40-man and into minor league free agency this off-season anyway, so there is no downside to throwing Melky on the 40-man just in case.
If the Giants win three more games, Schulman will likely become the most insufferable beat reporter in all of MLB. He's quite the Giants fanboy.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main